DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, GREAT LAKES, AND ENERGY  
REMEDIATION AND REDEVELOPMENT DIVISION  
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION RESPONSE ACTIVITY  
(By authority conferred on the director of the department of environment, Great Lakes,  
and energy by sections 20104, and 20120a of the natural resources and environmental  
protection act, 1994 PA 451, MCL 324.20104 and 324.20120a)  
CLEANUP CRITERIA REQUIREMENTS FOR RESPONSE ACTIVITY  
R 299.1 Definitions; A to I.  
Rule 1. As used in this part:  
(a) “Act” means 1994 PA 451, MCL 324.101 to 324.90106, known as the Natural  
Resources and Environmental Protection Act.  
(b) "Acute toxicity" means the ability of a hazardous substance to cause a debilitating or  
injurious effect in an organism as a result of a single or short-term exposure.  
(c) “Ambient air” means the atmosphere outside of buildings.  
(d) “Applicable criterion” means a cleanup criterion for a relevant pathway. A criterion  
is not an applicable criterion if the exposure pathway is not a relevant pathway at the  
facility or if the exposure it addresses is reliably restricted by a restrictive covenant or  
institutional control or other mechanism allowed for under part 201 of the act and these  
rules.  
(e) “Aquifer” means a geological formation, group of formations, or part of a formation  
capable of yielding a significant amount of groundwater to wells or springs.  
(f) "Best available information" means, when used in relation to a risk assessment or the  
development of cleanup criteria, the most scientifically credible and relevant data  
available about a particular hazardous substance. Such information may include, but is  
not limited to, any of the following:  
(i) The peer reviewed scientific literature.  
(ii) Information sources recognized by the risk assessment community, such as the  
integrated risk information system database maintained by the United States  
environmental protection agency or other scientifically reliable databases.  
(iii) Other scientific studies that are acceptable to the department.  
(g) “Cancer slope factor” means a plausible upper-bound estimate of the probability of a  
response per unit dose of a hazardous substance over a lifetime. The cancer slope factor  
is used to estimate an upper bound probability of an individual developing cancer as a  
result of a lifetime exposure to a particular level of a potential carcinogen.  
(h) "Carcinogen" means a hazardous substance which, based on the weight of evidence,  
causes an increased incidence of benign or malignant neoplasms in animals or humans or  
that substantially decreases the time in which neoplasms develop in animals or humans.  
(i) "Chronic toxicity" means the ability of a hazardous substance to cause an injurious or  
debilitating effect in an organism that results from repeated exposure to the hazardous  
Page 1  
substance for a time period representing a substantial portion of the natural life  
expectancy of the organism.  
(j) “Csat” means the concentration in soil at which the solubility limits of the soil pore  
water, the vapor phase limits of the soil pore air, and the absorptive limits of the soil  
particles have been reached. As used in these rules, Csat is a theoretical threshold above  
which a free-phase liquid (non-aqueous phase liquid) hazardous substance may exist.  
(k) “Direct contact” means exposure to hazardous substances through ingestion or  
dermal contact.  
(l) “Generic residential” means the cleanup criteria established by the department under  
section 20120a(1)(a) of the act and these rules.  
(m) “Groundwater” means water below the land surface in a zone of saturation.  
(n) "Increased cancer risk of 1 in 100,000" means the 95% upper bound on the  
calculated risk of 1 additional cancer above the background cancer rate per 100,000  
individuals continuously exposed to a carcinogen at a given average daily dose for a 70-  
year lifetime.  
(o) “Inhalation unit risk factor” means the additional lifetime cancer risk occurring in a  
population in which all individuals are exposed continuously for life to a concentration of  
1 microgram per cubic meter of the hazardous substance in the air they breathe. The  
inhalation unit risk factor shall be calculated under the provisions of part 55 of the act and  
the rules promulgated under that part.  
(p) “Initial threshold screening level” means a concentration in air of a toxic air  
contaminant which is used to evaluate noncarcinogenic health effects and is calculated  
under part 55 of the act and the rules promulgated under that part.  
(q) “Institutional control” means a measure which is approved by the department, which  
takes a form other than a restrictive covenant, and which limits or prohibits certain  
activities that may interfere with the integrity or effectiveness of a remedial action or  
result in exposure to hazardous substances at a facility, or which provides notice about  
the presence of a hazardous substance at a facility in concentrations that exceed only an  
aesthetic-based cleanup criterion.  
(r) "Ionizing organic hazardous substance" means an organic hazardous substance that  
has functional chemical groups that become ions when exposed to varying pH conditions.  
History: 2013 AACS.  
R 299.2 Definitions; L to V.  
Rule 2. As used in this part:  
(a) “Land or resource use restrictions” means the provisions of any of the following  
measures that are used to limit or prohibit activities that may interfere with the integrity  
or effectiveness of a response activity, or to limit or prohibit activities that may result in  
exposure to hazardous substances at a facility, or to provide notice about the presence of  
a hazardous substance at a facility in concentrations that exceed only an aesthetic-based  
cleanup criterion:  
(i) A restrictive covenant.  
(ii) A notice of approved environmental remediation.  
(iii) An institutional control, which may be a local ordinance or any form of  
preapproved institutional control, such as a notice of aesthetic impact.  
Page 2  
(b) "Leachate" means liquid, including any suspended components in the liquid, that has  
percolated through or drained from a hazardous substance or soil contaminated with a  
hazardous substance.  
(c) "Linearized multistage model" means a dose-response model which assumes that  
there are a number of distinct biological stages or changes that must occur for a normal  
cell to be transformed into a tumor and which assumes the dose-response relationship to  
be linear at low doses.  
(d) “Notice of aesthetic impact” means a document that describes conditions at a facility  
that result from the presence of hazardous substances at concentrations which exceed  
only cleanup criteria that are based on aesthetic impacts.  
(e) "Reference dose" or "RfD" means a conservative estimate of the daily intake of the  
human population, including sensitive subgroups, that is likely to be without appreciable  
risk of deleterious effect during a lifetime. The reference dose is expressed in units of  
milligrams per kilogram body weight per day.  
(f) “Relative source contribution factor” or “RSC” means that portion of a person’s total  
daily intake of a noncarcinogenic hazardous substance that comes from the medium being  
addressed by the cleanup criterion.  
(g) “Relevant pathway” means an exposure pathway that is reasonable and relevant  
because there is a reasonable potential for exposure to a hazardous substance to occur to a  
human or nonhuman receptor. The components of an exposure pathway are a source or  
release of a hazardous substance, an exposure point, and, if the exposure point is not the  
source or point of release, a transport medium. The existence of a municipal water  
supply, exposure barrier, or other similar feature does not automatically make an  
exposure pathway irrelevant.  
(h) "Risk assessment" means the analytical process used to determine the risk to the  
public health, safety, or welfare or to the environment associated with a release or threat  
of release of a hazardous substance at a facility.  
(i) "Secondary maximum contaminant level" means the United States environmental  
protection agency's secondary maximum contaminant level for protection of the public  
welfare for substances that may adversely affect the taste, odor, color, appearance, or any  
aesthetic quality of drinking water, as set forth in 40 C.F.R. part 143 (revised as of July 1,  
2012), which is adopted by reference in these rules and which is available for inspection  
at the Lansing office of the department, 525 West Allegan Street, Lansing, Michigan.  
Copies of the provisions may be purchased, at a cost as of the time of adoption of these  
rules of $55.00, from the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office,  
Washington, DC 20401 (Stock Number 869-044-00152-7), or from the Department of  
Environmental Quality, Remediation and Redevelopment Division, 525 West Allegan  
Street, Lansing, Michigan 48933, at cost.  
(j) "Toxicological interaction" means simultaneous exposure to 2 or more hazardous  
substances which will produce a toxicological response that is greater or less than their  
individual responses.  
(k) "Weight of evidence," a term of art used in risk assessment, means an evaluation of  
the relevant scientific data conducted to determine the likelihood that a hazardous  
substance is a human carcinogen or causes noncancer adverse health effects, or both. The  
evaluation may include any of the following information in addition to toxicological  
bioassays:  
Page 3  
(i) Structure-activity relationships.  
(ii) chemical-physical properties.  
(iii) Short-term test findings.  
(iv) Results of appropriate physiological, biological, and toxicological observations.  
(v) Comparative metabolism and pharmacokinetic studies.  
(l) “Volatile” means any compound that exhibits a Henry’s law constant equal to or  
greater than 0.00001 atmosphere-cubic meter per mole at standard temperature and  
pressure.  
History: 2013 AACS.  
R 299.3  
Response activities; protection of public health, safety, welfare, and  
environment required; rules applicable to interim response actions designed to  
meet cleanup criteria; degree of cleanup; modification of cleanup category;  
aquifers; unacceptability of response activity plan.  
Rule 3. (1) All response activities shall be protective of the public health, safety, and  
welfare and the environment. Applicable generic cleanup criteria established by the  
department pursuant to section 20120a(1) and site specific cleanup criteria approved by  
the department under section 20120a(2) and 20120b of the act and these rules reflect the  
department’s judgment, at the time the criteria are established or approved by the  
department, about the numerical criteria required to meet this protectiveness requirement,  
subject to the provisions of R 299.4(3), R 299.28, and R 299.34(2).  
(2) The rules in this part apply to interim response activities that are designed to meet  
cleanup criteria. References in this part to response activity also include those interim  
response activities.  
(3) The category of land use-based remedial action under section 20120a(1) of the act or  
the site-specific cleanup criteria identified under sections 20120a(2) and 20120b of the  
act may be modified by the person proposing to conduct the response activity that will  
result in modification during implementation or after completion of a remedial action, if  
appropriate to the facility and if that modification is accomplished in a manner that is  
consistent with the act and these rules.  
(4) If a revised land use-based remedial action includes characteristics that are required  
to be approved by the department, then the person implementing the change shall seek  
department approval as required by part 201 of the act and these rules.  
(5) The horizontal and vertical extent of hazardous substance concentrations in an  
aquifer above the higher of either the concentration allowed by section 20120a(1)(a) or  
(10) of the act, as applicable, shall not increase after the initiation of remedial actions to  
address an aquifer, except as approved by the director as provided in section 20118(5)  
and (6) of the act.  
(6) All remedial actions that address the remediation of an aquifer shall provide for  
removal of the hazardous substance or substances from the aquifer, either through active  
remediation or as a result of naturally occurring biological or chemical processes which  
can be documented to occur at the facility, except as provided in section 20118(5) and (6)  
of the act.  
History: 2013 AACS.  
Page 4  
R 299.4 General requirements for application of cleanup criteria.  
Rule 4. (1) All cleanup criteria used in response activity undertaken under part 201 of  
the act and these rules shall be based on best available information.  
(2) The generic cleanup criteria developed by the department using the algorithms  
presented in these rules are derived primarily from data that reflect chronic toxicity  
endpoints. If a hazardous substance has a more sensitive toxic effect than those  
associated with the chronic toxicity data used to calculate a generic criterion, then a  
criterion shall be developed to address the most sensitive effect. The generic cleanup  
criteria established by the department shall be accepted as protective of the most sensitive  
toxic effect in a given exposure pathway for the hazardous substance in question.  
(3) If the department has not calculated a criterion for a hazardous substance for a given  
exposure pathway, then the person proposing or implementing the response activity shall  
supply the necessary data for the department to calculate a criterion or establish a  
criterion under subrule (4) of this rule, unless the department determines that a numerical  
criterion is not required to assure that a given response activity will be protective.  
(4) A generic or site-specific cleanup criterion may be established by the department  
based on best professional judgment instead of a calculation based on minimum toxicity  
data for a specific hazardous substance when the minimum toxicity data are not available  
for that hazardous substance, but data of sufficient quality are available to show that the  
hazardous substance in question can be adequately assessed by comparison to the toxicity  
of another hazardous substance for which sufficient data are available. A criterion may  
be established by the department in this manner when the hazardous substances are  
expected by the department to have similar fate and toxicity.  
History: 2013 AACS.  
R 299.6 Generic cleanup criteria; toxicological and chemical-physical properties;  
use of generic cleanup criteria as risk based screening levels; procedure for  
developing additional generic criteria.  
Rule 6. (1) Except as provided in subrules (9), (10) and (11) of this rule, generic  
groundwater cleanup criteria for the residential and nonresidential categories shall be the  
values shown in table 1 of R 299.44. If a generic groundwater cleanup criterion is higher  
than the flammability and explosivity screening level shown in table 1 of R 299.44, then  
the person proposing or implementing response activity shall document whether  
additional response activity is required to protect against the acute hazard.  
(2) Except as provided in subrules (9), (10), and (11) of this rule, generic soil cleanup  
criteria for the residential category shall be the values shown in table 2 of R 299.46. If  
soil concentrations are greater than Csat, then the person proposing or implementing  
response activity shall evaluate whether additional response activity is required to control  
free-phase liquids or to protect against risks associated with free-phase liquids that are  
not accounted for in development of the generic criteria.  
(3) Except as provided in subrules (9), (10), and (11) of this rule, generic soil cleanup  
criteria for the nonresidential category shall be the values shown in table 3 of R 299.48.  
Page 5  
(4) The generic cleanup criteria shown in R 299.44, R 299.46, and R 299.48 and  
identified under subrule (12) of this rule may be used and known as risk-based screening  
levels for corrective actions required under part 213 of the act.  
(5) Generic cleanup criteria under R 299.44, R 299.46, and R 299.48 are based on the  
target detection limit or background concentration in the following cases:  
(a) If a calculated cleanup criterion is less than the target detection limit for that  
hazardous substance in a given medium, then the target detection limit is the cleanup  
criterion. Criteria to which this subdivision applies are designated with a footnote in the  
criteria tables.  
(b) A background concentration may be substituted for a generic cleanup criterion when  
the background concentration is higher than a criterion shown in R 299.44, R 299.46, or  
R 299.48.  
(6) If a hazardous substance imparts adverse aesthetic characteristics to groundwater at a  
concentration less than the health-based criterion for that hazardous substance, then the  
aesthetic-based criterion derived under R 299.9 is shown as the drinking water criterion  
in the table of generic cleanup criteria in R 299.44 and designated with a footnote.  
(7) Except as provided in section 20120a(9) of the act, R 299.49(1)(l), and  
R 299.49(1)(o), the toxicological and physical-chemical input values used by the  
department to derive generic cleanup criteria with the equations and default assumptions  
provided in R 299.10, R 299.14, R 299.20, R 299.22, R 299.24, and R 299.26 are shown  
in table 4 of R 299.50.  
(8) Toxicological and chemical-physical data in table 4 of R 299.50, if available, shall  
be used in conjunction with the equations and default assumptions that appear in these  
rules for the development of generic cleanup criteria under subrules (9) or (10) of this  
rule, except as provided in section 20120a(9) of the act, R 299.49(1)(l), and R  
299.49(1)(o).  
(9) For a substance that is not listed in the cleanup criteria tables in R 299.44, R 299.46,  
or R 299.48, the department may determine if the substance is a hazardous substance  
using best available information about the toxicological and physical-chemical properties  
of that substance and use that information to develop a generic or site-specific cleanup  
criterion.  
(10) For a substance that is listed in the cleanup criteria tables in R 299.44, R 299.46, or  
R 299.48, if the department obtains sufficient information to support calculation of a  
cleanup criterion which is designated in the cleanup criteria tables or table 4 of R 299.50  
with a footnote “ID” or “NA,” the department shall use best available information to  
calculate a cleanup criterion for the hazardous substance.  
(11) If a new state drinking water standard is established or a state drinking water  
standard is changed after the effective date of this rule, the drinking water standard in  
effect under section 5 of 1976 PA 399, MCL 325.1005, shall become the generic  
residential cleanup criterion under R 299.44, as provided in section 20120a(5) of the act.  
(12) If a generic cleanup criterion is developed under subrule (9) or (10) of this rule, or  
modified under subrule (11) of this rule, the department shall make the new toxicological  
and physical-chemical data and criterion available by announcing it on the department’s  
internet web site, and by publishing notice of the change in the department calendar, or  
by such other means that effectively notifies interested persons. The new criterion shall  
take effect when published and announced by the department as required in this rule. The  
Page 6  
new data and resulting cleanup criterion shall remain effective and be used as required  
under these rules until the department promulgates revised data and criteria pursuant to  
administrative procedures act, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.201 to 24.328.  
History: 2013 AACS.  
R 299.8 Groundwater cleanup criteria generally.  
Rule 8. (1) Except as provided in subrule (2) of this rule, the generic groundwater  
cleanup criteria applicable at a given facility shall be the most restrictive of the criteria  
developed under R 299.9, R 299.10, or R 299.14, considering those pathways that are  
reasonable and relevant to the facility and the category of cleanup criteria being proposed  
or implemented.  
(2) If a generic groundwater cleanup criterion developed under R 299.9, R 299.10, or R  
299.14 is greater than the solubility limit of that hazardous substance in water at 25o  
Celsius, then the solubility limit shall be the generic criteria for that pathway.  
History: 2013 AACS.  
R 299.9 Calculation of generic cleanup criteria for groundwater in aquifer based  
on adverse aesthetic impacts.  
Rule 9. (1) If a hazardous substance, singly or in combination with other hazardous  
substances present at the facility, imparts adverse aesthetic characteristics to groundwater  
in an aquifer, then the cleanup criterion shall be the secondary maximum contaminant