DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, GREAT LAKES, AND ENERGY  
AIR QUALITY DIVISION  
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL  
(By authority conferred on the director of the department of environment, Great Lakes,  
and energy by sections 5503 and 5512 of the natural resource and environmental  
protection act, 1994 PA 451, MCL 324.5503 and 324.5512, and Executive  
Reorganization Order Nos. 1995-16, 2009-31, 2011-1, 2019-1, MCL 324.99903,  
324.99919, 324.99921, and 324.99923)  
PART 10. INTERMITTENT TESTING AND SAMPLING  
R 336.2001 Performance tests by owner.  
Rule 1001. (1) The department may require the owner or operator of a source of air  
contaminant to conduct acceptable performance tests, at the owner's or operator's  
expense, in accordance with R 336.2003 under any of the following conditions:  
(a) Reserved.  
(b) The source is determined to be in violation of R 336.1301 and the potential  
emissions exceed 100 tons per year.  
(c) The owner or operator of the source has not submitted an acceptable  
performance test, in accordance with R 336.2003, that demonstrates the source complies  
with either the department's rules or the conditions specified in the permit to install, or  
both.  
(d) The source of air contaminant is located in an area designated as nonattainment  
for 1 or more air pollutants, and more than 12 months have expired since the date of the  
last performance test for such designated nonattainment pollutants.  
(e) The source of air contaminant has potential emissions in excess of 100 tons per  
year, is located in an area designated as attainment for 1 or more air pollutants, and more  
than 36 months have expired since the date of the last performance test for the designated  
attainment pollutants.  
(f) After completion of a compliance program.  
(2) Performance tests required by subrule (1) of this rule must be conducted within  
60 days following receipt of written notification from the department, unless otherwise  
authorized by the department.  
(3) Not less than 30 days before a performance test, as required by subrule (1) of this  
rule, the owner or operator, or an authorized agent, shall do both of the following:  
(a) Submit a site-specific test plan for approval by the department. The plan must  
include a test program summary, test schedule, and the quality assurance measures to be  
applied.  
(b) Notify the department, in writing, of the time and place of the performance tests  
and who shall conduct them as provided in the site-specific test plan required under  
Page 1  
subdivision (a) of this subrule. A representative of the department shall have the  
opportunity to witness these tests.  
(4) Results of performance tests must be submitted to the department in the format  
prescribed by the applicable reference test method within 60 days after the last date of the  
test.  
History: 1980 AACS; 2002 AACS; 2009 AACS; 2025 MR 17, Eff. Sept. 10, 2025.  
R 336.2002 Performance tests by department.  
Rule 1002. (1) The department may conduct performance  
tests  
in  
accordance with R 336.2003 at any source of air contaminant, on behalf of the state, at  
a reasonable time and at the state's expense. During the conduct of such tests, the  
department may obtain samples of any air contaminant and samples of any material  
entering or exiting the source or aircleaning device for the purpose of evaluating  
pollutant emissions with respect to process operating conditions.  
(2) The department shall provide written notification to the owner or operator  
of a source of the department's intent to conduct performance tests pursuant to  
subrule (1). Within 30 days of receipt of such notification, the owner or operator  
shall provide, and bear the expense of, performance test facilities as specified by the  
department, including the following:  
(a) Sampling ports adequate for reference test methods applicable to the source.  
(b) Safe sampling platforms as required.  
(c) Safe access to sampling platforms.  
(d) A suitable power source within 50 feet of any sampling location  
designated by the department. Upon request, additional time for installing the required  
performance test facilities may be authorized by the department for special situations.  
(3) The owner shall not be responsible for providing sampling instruments  
and sensing devices.  
(4) Results of performance tests shall be furnished to the owner or operator, or  
both, in the format prescribed by the applicable reference test method within 60 days  
following the last date of the test.  
History: 1980 AACS; 2002 AACS.  
R 336.2003 Performance test criteria.  
Rule 1003. (1) Performance tests must be conducted and data reduced according to  
the reference test methods listed in R 336.2004, unless the department does any of the  
following:  
(a) Specifies or approves, in specific cases, the use of a reference test method with  
minor changes in procedures or equipment.  
(b) Approves the use of an equivalent method.  
(c) Specifies or approves the use of an alternative method if an applicable reference  
test method does not exist for a specific air contaminant or source of air contaminant.  
(2) Unless otherwise approved by the department, a performance test must consist of  
a minimum of 3 separate samples of a specific air contaminant conducted within a 36-  
Page 2  
hour period that starts once the probe enters the stack. Any data measured within the 36-  
hour period must be recorded and provided to the department. Each of the 3 separate  
samples must be obtained while the source is operating at a similar production level, as  
described under subrule (3) of this rule. For the purpose of determining compliance with  
an applicable emission limit, rule, or permit condition, the arithmetic mean of results of  
the 3 samples must apply. If a sample is accidentally lost or conditions occur in which 1  
of the 3 samples must be discontinued because of forced shutdown, failure of an  
irreplaceable portion of the sampling train, extreme meteorological conditions, or other  
circumstances beyond the owner's or operator's control, then compliance may, upon the  
approval of the department, be determined using the arithmetic mean of the results of 2  
samples.  
(3) All performance tests must be conducted while the source of air contaminant is  
operating at maximum routine operating conditions, or under other conditions, within the  
capacity of the equipment, as may be requested by the department. Other conditions may  
include source operating periods of startup, shutdown, or other operations, excluding  
malfunction, specific to certain sources. Routine operating conditions must also include  
those specified within a permit to install or a permit to operate. The owner or operator  
shall make available to the department the records that may be necessary to determine the  
conditions of source operation that occurred during the period of time of the performance  
test.  
(4) For sources that are subject to an emission limitation calculated to 50% excess  
air, the multipoint, integrated sampling at every traverse point must be used with method  
3, 3A, or 3Bfor gas analysis. For all other sources that require a determination of the  
molecular weight of the exhaust, an optional sampling procedure of method 3, 3A, or 3B  
may be used. Alternatives or modifications to procedures are subject to the approval of  
the department.  
(5) For reference test method 5B, which is described in R 336.2011, reference test  
method 5C, which is described in R 336.2012, and reference test method 5E, which is  
described in R 336.1014, the minimum volume per sample must be 30 cubic feet of dry  
gas corrected to standard conditions, 68 degrees Fahrenheit, 29.92 inches mercury.  
Minimum sample time must be 60 minutes, which may be continuous or a combination  
of shorter sampling periods for sources that operate in a cyclic manner. Smaller sampling  
times or sample volumes, when necessitated by process variables or other factors, may be  
approved by the department.  
History: 1980 AACS; 2002 AACS; 2025 MR 17, Eff. Sept. 10, 2025.  
R 336.2004 Reference test methods; adoption of federal reference test methods.  
Rule 1004. (1) The federal test methods described in the provisions of 40 CFR part  
60, appendix A, adopted by reference in R 336.1902, are test methods for performance  
tests required pursuant to the provisions of this part and include, but are not limited to,  
the following:  
(a) Method 1 - Sample and velocity traverse for stationary sources.  
(b) Method 1A - Sample and velocity traverses for stationary sources with small  
stacks or ducts.  
Page 3  
(c) Method 2 - Determination of stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate (type-S  
pitot tube).  
(d) Method 2A - Direct measurement of gas volume through pipes and small ducts.  
(e) Method 2C - Determination of stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate in  
small stacks and ducts (standard pitot tube).  
(f) Method 2D - Measurement of gas volumetric flow rates in small pipes and ducts.  
(g) Method 3 - Gas analysis for the determination of dry molecular weight.  
(h) Method 4 - Determination of moisture content in stack gases.  
(i) Method 5 - Determination of particulate matter emissions from stationary  
sources.  
(j) Method 6 - Determination of sulfur dioxide emissions from stationary sources.  
(k) Method 7 - Determination of nitrogen oxide emissions from stationary sources.  
(l) Method 8 - Determination of sulfuric acid mist and sulfur dioxide emissions  
from stationary sources.  
(m) Method 9 - Visual determination of the opacity of emissions from stationary  
sources.  
(n) Method 10 - Determination of carbon monoxide emissions from stationary  
sources.  
(o) Method 10B - Determination of carbon monoxide emissions from stationary  
sources.  
(p) Method 18 - Measurement of gaseous organic compound emissions by gas  
chromatography.  
(q) Method 21 - Determination of volatile organic compound leaks.  
(r) Method 24 - Determination of volatile matter content, water content, density,  
volume solids, and weight solids of surface coatings.  
(s) Method 24A - Determination of volatile matter content and density of printing  
inks and related coatings.  
(t) Method 25 - Determination of total gaseous nonmethane organic emissions as  
carbon.  
(u) Method 25A - Determination of total gaseous organic concentration using a  
flame ionization analyzer.  
(v) Method 27 - Determination of vapor tightness of gasoline delivery tank using  
pressure-vacuum test.  
(w) Method 29 - Determination of metals emissions from stationary sources.  
(x) Method 30A - Determination of total vapor phase mercury emissions from  
stationary sources (instrumental analyzer procedure).  
(y) Method 30B - Determination of total vapor phase mercury emissions from coal-  
fired combustion sources using carbon sorbent traps.  
(2) The federal test methods in the following provisions, adopted by reference in  
R 336.1902, are test methods for performance tests required pursuant to the provisions of  
this part:  
(a) 40 CFR part 51, appendix M.  
(b) 40 CFR part 61, appendix B.  
(c) 40 CFR part 63, appendix A.  
(3) All alternatives that are subject to the approval of the administrator in the  
adopted federal reference methods are subject to the approval of the department.  
Page 4  
() Determinations of compliance with visible emission standards for stationary  
sources must be conducted as specified in 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, test method 9 or  
another alternative method approved by the department, with the following exceptions:  
(a) Visible emissions from a scarfing operation at a steel manufacturing facility  
must be determined as specified in reference test method 9A, which is described in  
R 336.2030.  
(b) Visible emissions from a coke oven pushing operation and fugitive coke oven  
visible emissions must be determined as specified in reference test method 9B, which is  
described in R 336.2031.  
(c) Visible emissions, fugitive and nonfugitive, from basic oxygen furnace  
operations, hot metal transfer operations, and hot metal desulfurization operations must  
be determined as specified in reference method 9C, which is described in R 336.2032.  
(5) Determinations of particulate emission rates for stationary sources must be  
conducted as specified in 1 or more of the following reference test methods:  
(a) Reference test method 5B, which is described in R 336.2011.  
(b) Reference test method 5C, which is described in R 336.2012.  
(c) Reference test method 5D, which is described in R 336.2013.  
(d) Reference test method 5E, which is described in R 336.2014.  
(e) "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater," (23rd  
edition), as described and modified in R 336.2033.  
(6) Determinations of total gaseous nonmethane organic emissions as carbon, using  
the alternate version of federal test method 25 under 40 CFR part 60, appendix A,  
incorporating the Byron analysis, must be conducted as specified in R 336.2006.  
History: 1980 AACS; 1985 AACS; 1989 AACS; 1993 AACS; 1998-2000 AACS; 2002 AACS; 2006  
AACS; 2009 AACS; 2025 MR 17, Eff. Sept. 10, 2025.  
R 336.2005 Reference test methods for staterequested tests of delivery  
vessels.  
Rule 1005. The following reference test method shall be used to detect  
gasoline vapor leaks by a combustible gas detector:  
(a) Principle. A combustible gas detector is used to indicate any incidence  
of leakage from gasoline delivery vessel tanks  
and  
vapor control systems. This  
qualitative monitoring procedure is an enforcement tool to confirm the continuing  
existence of leak-tight conditions.  
(b) Applicability. This method is applicable to determining leak-tightness  
of gasoline delivery vessel tanks during loading without taking the delivery vessel  
tank out of service. The method is applicable only if the vapor control system does  
not create back pressure in excess of the pressure limits of the delivery vessel tank  
compliance leak test. For vapor control systems, this method is applicable to  
determining leak-tightness at any time.  
(c) Apparatus and specifications. The following apparatus shall be used:  
(i) Manometer. Liquid manometer, or equivalent, capable of measuring up to 0.9  
pounds per square inch (24.9 inches of water) gauge pressure within 0.003 pounds per  
square inch (0.1 inches of water) precision.  
Page 5  
(ii) Combustible gas detector. A portable hydrocarbon  
associated sampling line and probe which complies with all of  
provisions:  
gas  
analyzer with  
the following  
(A) Safety. The device is certified as safe for operation in explosive  
atmospheres.  
(B) Range. The device shall have a minimum range of 0 to 100% of the lower  
explosive limit (LEL) as propane.  
(C) Probe diameter. The sampling probe shall have an internal diameter of 0.625  
centimeters (1/4 inch).  
(D) Probe length. The probe sampling line shall be of sufficient length for  
easy maneuverability during testing.  
(E) Response time. The response time for full-scale deflection shall be less than  
8 seconds for a detector with a sampling line and probe attached.  
(d) Test procedure. The following test procedure shall be complied with:  
(i) Pressure. Place a pressure tap in the terminal, plant, or service station  
vapor control system as close as possible to the connection with the delivery vessel  
tank. Record the pressure periodically during testing.  
(ii) Calibration. Calibrate the combustible gas detector with 2.2% propane,  
by volume, in air for 100% lower explosive limit response.  
(iii) Monitoring procedure. During loading or  
unloading,  
check the  
periphery of all potential sources of leakage of the delivery vessel tank and of the  
terminal, plant, or service station vapor collection system with a combustible gas  
detector. The check shall comply with the following procedure:  
(A) Probe distance. The probe inlet shall be 2.5 centimeters from the potential  
leak source.  
(B) Probe movement. Move the probe slowly (2.0 centimeters per second).If there  
is any meter deflection at a potential leak source, move the probe to locate the point of  
highest meter response.  
(C) Probe position. As much as possible, the probe inlet shall be positioned  
in the path of (parallel to) the vapor flow from a leak.  
(D) Wind. Attempt, as much as possible, to block the wind from the area being  
monitored.  
(iv) Recording. Record the highest detector reading and location for each  
incidence of leakage.  
History: 1981 AACS; 1989 AACS; 2002 AACS; 2006 AACS.  
R 336.2006 Reference test method serving as alternate version of federal  
reference test method 25 by incorporating Byron analysis.  
Rule 1006. When using the alternate version of federal reference test method 25  
incorporating the Byron analysis, the procedures in method 25, which are described in  
R 336.2004, shall be followed, except that all of the following parts in method 25 are  
amended to read as follows:  
1.2 Principle. An emission sample is withdrawn from a stack at a constant  
rate through a stainless steel absorber tube packed with porasil; the gaseous portion of  
the sample is pulled past a battery-operated sampling pump into a tedlar bag. After  
Page 6  
sampling is complete, the contents of the tedlar bag are analyzed on an automated gas  
chromatograph (GC), and the sample in the porasil packed tube is heated to remove all  
components for analysis on the GC. The GC separates CO, CO2, and CH4 from  
the nonmethane organics (NMO), then converts the NMOs to methane for analysis.  
2. Apparatus. The sampling system consists of a nonmethane organic (NMO)  
absorber tube, a sampling pump, and a sample bag (figure 25-1). The analytical  
system has 2 parts the oven for removing the sample from the absorber tube and an  
automated gas chromatograph (GC).  
2.1 Sampling. All of the following equipment is required, as shown in figure 25-  
1:  
2.1.1 Heated probe. 6.4-millimeter (mm) (1/4-inch (in.)) outside diameter  
(o.d.) stainless steel tubing with a heating system that is capable of maintaining a  
gas temperature at the exit end of not less than 129 degrees Centigrade (265 degrees  
Fahrenheit). The probe shall be equipped with a thermocouple at the exit end to  
monitor the gas temperature. The nozzle is an elbow fitting that is attached to the  
front end of the probe while the thermocouple is inserted in the side arm of a tee  
fitting that is attached to the rear of the probe. The probe is wrapped with a suitable  
length of high-temperature heating tape and then covered with 2 layers of glass cloth  
insulation and 1 layer of aluminum foil.  
2.1.2 Heated prefilter-only for stacks with possible particulate matter interference.  
A stainless steel filter holder with a 47-mm type A/E fiberglass filter without  
organic binder. The entire prefilter shall be maintained at 110 degrees Celsius. Note -  
if it is not possible to use a heating system for safety reasons, an unheated system  
with an instack filter is a suitable alternative.  
2.1.3 NMO absorber tube. 1/2-inch inside diameter (i.d.) stainless steel tube  
packed with porasil (thermally stable silica gel).  
2.1.4 1/4-inch o.d. teflon line that is 2 to 4 feet long.  
2.1.5 Battery-operated diaphragm sampling pump with kurz digital mass flow  
meter. Total flow is integrated electronically to measure flow with an accuracy of 1% at  
any flow rate. (Byron instruments model 90).  
2.1.6 Sample bag. 0.3-mil tedlar, 1/2-cubic foot capacity. The sample bag  
undergoes nitrogen purge cycle until analysis exhibits zero carbon content in the  
sample bag.  
2.2 Analysis. The following equipment is required:  
2.2.1 Sample recovery on the adsorber tube is done in a Byron model 75 oven in  
2 stages, each stage requiring a 0.3-mil tedlar bag that has a 1/2-cubic foot capacity.  
2.2.2 Analysis is done on a Byron model 401 gas chromatograph (GC) that meets  
all criteria specified in method 25, section 2.2.2.  
2.3 NMO analyzer. The NMO analyzer is a Byron model  
chromatograph (GC). (Remainder of 2.3 as stated in method 25)  
401  
gas  
2.3.5.2 Range. A full scale range of 1 to 10,000 parts per million (ppm) CH4.  
Signal attenuators shall be available to produce a minimum signal response of 10%  
of full scale.  
3.1.1 Delete (dry ice is not required).  
4.1.1 Model 90 and model 75 flow meter calibration. The model 90 sample pump  
inlet is attached to the outlet of the model 75 oven. Air is passed through the system at  
Page 7  
the rate that will be used in sampling and for the total volume anticipated to be  
sampled. If the flow meters on the 2 instruments do not agree within 0.01 liters,  
then adjust the meter on the model 90 until agreement is within 0.01 liters. After  
making any correction, run a full calibration again.  
4.1.2 Sample train assembly. Assemble the probe (prefilter if needed), adsorber  
tube, and teflon line to the inlet of the model 90. Attach a short (8 to 10 inches)  
flexible line to the outlet of model 90. Have a completely clean evacuated tedlar  
sample bag nearby for collection of sample to be analyzed.  
4.1.3 Pretest leak check. Stopper the inlet of the probe and place the flexible tube  
on the outlet of the model 90 in a small open container of water. Turn on the sampling  
pump. For a satisfactory leak check, bubbling should cease within 1 minute. If the leak  
check is unsatisfactory, tighten the fittings or change parts until a satisfactory leak  
check is obtained. 4.1.4 Sampling train operation. Place the probe and the front portion  
of the adsorption tube in the stack. If the stack has a temperature higher than ambient,  
allow time for the probe to heat before starting the sample pump. Start the model 90  
pump and adjust to the desired flow, usually about 90 ml/min. After about 0.1 liter  
of sampling, or equivalent to the volume of air that is displaced in the sample system  
before the flowmeter, remove the flexible tube from the outlet of the model 90 and  
install the evacuated tedlar bag. This assures that gaseous components are undiluted by  
the air originally in the sampling system. Record requested data on the data form during  
the sample time. The sampling is usually done for 1 hour with a total of 5 to 6 liters  
sampled. When sampling is complete, record the precise volume sampled. The  
process may require different sample times or sample volumes. (Sampling form is  
figure 25-8.)  
4.1.5 Post test leak check. Remove the tedlar bag and replace it with the flexible  
tube. Stopper the probe and operate the same as the pretest leak check specified in  
section 4.1.3. If the leak test is not acceptable, invalidate the sample.  
4.2 Sample recovery. The tedlar bag is ready for direct analysis on the GC. The  
adsorber tube shall undergo the following 2-stage preparation:  
4.2.1 Sample purge. The absorber tube is placed in the Byron model 75 oven  
with a clean tedlar bag attached directly to the tube.  
A
volume of clean dry air is  
passed through the adsorber tube while holding the oven temperature at about 130  
degrees Celsius. The volume of air should be precisely the same as that sampled.  
This purge is necessary to remove any CO2 on the sample tube, and the elevated  
temperature is needed to assure CO2 removal from any absorbed water. The tedlar  
bag is now ready for direct analysis on the GC.  
4.2.2 Sample digest. The absorber tube, now free of CO2 and the lighter NMOs,  
is now attached to an oxidation catalyst, and another tedlar bag is attached to the outlet  
of the oxidation catalyst. A volume of clean dry air equal to that sampled is passed  
through this system while the temperature on the sample tube is brought up to 600  
degrees Celsius. If the sampled volume was less than 3 liters, a larger volume shall be  
used in the digestion to assure completion. Usually a multiple of precisely 1.5 or 2.0 of  
the sampled volume is sufficient. This third tedlar bag is now ready for direct analysis  
on the GC. If anything other than CO2 is found in this bag, the model 75 oxidation  
catalyst is probably in need of replacement. In this case the test would be invalid  
and would have to be redone.  
Page 8  
4.3 Analysis. Each of the 3 bags is analyzed on the GC. Each bag should be  
analyzed as soon as possible after being filled. At the completion of analysis, the  
bags shall be cleaned by repeated fillings with either clean air or nitrogen. Before being  
used again, the bags shall be checked by filling with clean air and then analyzed  
on the GC to assure zero concentrations of all analyzed substances. All pertinent  
calibration, performance, and operational checks in sections 4.4 and 5 of method 25  
apply to the Byron system.  
6. Calculations.  
6.1 Nomenclature.  
C1 = Concentration of sample bag, ppm C, (NMO converted to methane).  
C2 = Concentration of purge bag, ppm C, (NMO converted to methane).  
C3 = Concentration of digest bag, ppm C, (CO2 converted to methane).  
C = Ppm C (NMO).  
6.2-6.4 (Delete).  
6.5 C1, C2, C3 calculated directly as: ppm C calibration gas x GC reading unknown  
= ppm C GC reading calibration gas  
unknown 6.6 C = C1 + C2 + C3 Delete  
figures 25.3, 25.4, 25.9, and 25.10 from method 25. Amend figures 25.1 and 25.8 from  
method 25 to read as follows:  
FIGURE 25.1  
SAMPLING TRAIN  
Page 9  
FIGURE 25.1  
History: 1993 AACS.  
R 336.2007 Alternate version of procedure L, referenced  
336.2040(10).  
in R  
Rule 1007. The alternate version of procedure L is as follows:  
1. Introduction.  
1.1 Applicability. This procedure is applicable for determining the input of  
volatile organic compounds (voc), measured as equivalent propane as measured by a  
flame ionization instrument. It is intended to be used as a segment in the development  
of liquid/gas protocols for determining voc capture efficiency (ce) for surface coating  
and printing operations.  
1.2 Principle. The amount of voc introduced to the process (l) is the sum of  
products of the weight (w) of each voc containing liquid (ink, paint, solvent, or  
similar material) used and its voc content (v), corrected for a response factor (rf) to  
allow the input to be calculated in terms of propane, the same calibration gas used in  
the gaseous voc measurements. A sample of each coating used is distilled to separate  
the voc fraction. The distillate is used to prepare a known standard for analysis by a  
flame ionization analyzer (fia), calibrated against propane, to determine its rf.  
2. Apparatus and reagents.  
2.1 Liquid weight.  
Page 10  
2.1.1 Balances/digital scales. To weigh drums of voc containing liquids to within  
0.2 lb.  
2.1.2 Volume measurement apparatus (alternative). Volume meters, flow meters,  
density measurement equipment, or similar material, as needed to achieve the same  
accuracy as direct weight measurements.  
2.2 Response factor (rf) determination (fia technique). The voc distillation  
and tedlar gas bag generation systems apparatus are shown in figures 1 and 2. The  
following equipment is required:  
2.2.1 Sample collection can. An appropriately sized metal can to collect voc-  
containing materials. The can shall be constructed in such a way that it can be grounded  
to the coating container.  
2.2.2 Needle valves. To control gas flow.  
2.2.3 Regulators. For fia, calibration, dilution, and sweep gas cylinders.  
2.2.4 Tubing and fittings. Teflon and stainless steel tubing and fittings with  
diameters and lengths and sizes determined by connection requirements of the  
equipment.  
2.2.5 Thermometer. Capable of measuring the temperature of the hot water and oil  
baths to within 1 degree Celsius.  
2.2.6 Analytical balance. To measure plus or minus 0.01 mg.  
2.2.7 Microliter syringe. 10-microliter size.  
2.2.8 Vacuum and pressure manometers. 0 to 760 mm (0 to 30 in.) hg.U-tube  
manometer, vacuum or pressure.  
2.2.9 Hot oil bath, with stirring hot plate. Capable of heating and maintaining a  
distillation vessel at 110 plus or minus 3 degrees Celsius.  
2.2.10 Vacuum/water aspirator. A device capable of drawing a vacuum to within  
20 mm hg from absolute.  
2.2.11 Rotary evaporator system. Complete with folded inner coil, vertical  
style condenser, rotary speed control, and teflon sweep gas delivery tube with  
valved inlet. Buchi rotavapor or equivalent.  
2.2.12 Ethylene glycol cooling/circulating bath. Capable of maintaining the  
condenser coil fluid at minus 10 degrees Celsius.  
2.2.13 Dry gas meter. For the precise measurement of dilution gas volume. It  
shall be calibrated to a primary standard, either spirometer or bubble meter.  
2.2.14 Activated charcoal/mole sieve trap. To remove any trace level of organics  
picked up from the dry gas meter.  
2.2.15 Gas coil heater. Sufficient length of 0.125-inch stainless steel tubing to  
allow heating of the dilution gas to near the water bath temperature before entering  
the volatilization vessel.  
2.2.16 Water bath, with stirring hot plate. Capable of heating and maintaining  
a volatilization vessel and coil heater at a temperature of 100 plus or minus 5 degrees  
Celsius.  
2.2.17 Volatilization vessel. 50-milliliter midget impinger fitted with a septum top  
and loosely filled with glass wool to increase volatilization surface.  
2.2.18 Tedlar gas bag. Capable of holding 30 liters of gas, flushed clean with  
zero air, leak tested and evacuated.  
Page 11  
2.2.19 Cylinder of compressed zero air. Used to supply dilution air for making the  
tedlar bag gas samples.  
2.2.20 Cylinder of compressed thc free N2. Used as sweep gas in the rotary  
evaporator system.  
2.2.21 Organic concentration analyzer. An fia with a span value of 1.5 times the  
expected concentration as propane; however, other span values may be used if it can  
be demonstrated that they would provide more accurate measurements. The fia  
instrument shall be the same instrument used in the gaseous analyses adjusted with  
the same fuel, combustion air, and sample backpressure (flowrate) settings. The system  
shall be capable of meeting or exceeding the following specifications:  
2.2.21.1 Zero drift. Less than plus or minus 3.0% of the span value.  
2.2.21.2 Calibration drift. Less than plus or minus 3.0% of span value.  
2.2.21.3 Calibration error. Less than plus or minus 5.0% of the calibration  
gas value.  
2.2.22 Integrator/data acquisition system. An analog or digital device or  
computerized data acquisition system used to integrate the fia response or compute the  
average response and record measurement data. The minimum data sampling frequency  
for computing average or integrated values is 1 measurement value every 5  
seconds. The device shall be capable of recording average values at least once per  
minute.  
2.2.23 Chart recorder (optional). A chart recorder or similar device  
is  
recommended to provide a continuous analog display of the measurement results  
during the liquid sample analysis.  
2.2.24 Calibration and other gases. For calibration, fuel, and combustion air,  
if required, contained in compressed gas cylinders. All calibration gases shall be  
traceable to NIST standards and shall be certified by the manufacturer to plus or  
minus 1% of the tag value.Additionally, the manufacturer of the cylinder should  
provide a recommended shelf life for each calibration gas cylinder over which the  
concentration does not change more than plus or minus 2% from the certified  
value. For calibration gas values that are not generally available, alternative  
methods for preparing calibration gas mixtures, such as dilution systems, may be  
used with prior approval.  
2.2.24.1 Fuel. 99.995% hydrogen, 40% hydrogen/60% helium, or 40%  
hydrogen/60% nitrogen. The fia manufacturer's recommended fuel shall be used. An  
attempt shall be made to avoid fuels with oxygen to avoid an oxygen synergism  
effect that reportedly occurs when oxygen concentration varies significantly from a  
mean value.  
2.2.24.2 Carrier gas. High purity air with less than 1 ppm of organic material (as  
propane) or less than 0.1% of the span value, whichever is greater.  
2.2.24.3 Fia linearity calibration gases. Low-, mid-, and high-range gas mixture  
standards with a nominal propane concentration of 20 to 30, 45 to 55, and 70 to 80%  
of the span value in air, respectively. Other calibration values and other span values  
may be used if it can be shown that more accurate measurements would be achieved.  
2.2.24.4 System calibration gas. Gas mixture standard which contains propane  
in air and which approximates the voc concentration expected for the tedlar gas bag  
samples.  
Page 12  
3. Determination of liquid input weight. A capture efficiency test shall consist of  
not less than 3 sampling runs. Each run shall cover at least 1 complete production or  
processing cycle or shall be at least  
1
hour in duration. For automotive surface  
coating operations, the sampling time per run shall be based on coating a minimum of 3  
representative vehicles.  
3.1 Weight difference. Determine the amount of material introduced to the  
process as the weight difference of the feed material before and after each sampling  
run. In determining the total voc-containing liquid usage, account for all of the  
following:  
(a) The initial (beginning) voc-containing liquid mixture.  
(b) Any solvent added during the test run.  
(c) Any coating added during the test run.  
(d) Any residual voc-containing liquid mixture remaining at the end of the  
sample run.  
3.1.1 Identify all points where voc-containing liquids are introduced to the  
process. To obtain an accurate measurement of voc-containing liquids, start with an  
empty fountain, if applicable. After completing the run, drain the liquid in the  
fountain back into the liquid drum, if possible, and weigh the drum again. Weigh the  
voc-containing liquids to plus or minus 0.5% of the total weight (full) or plus or  
minus 0.1% of the total weight of voc-containing liquid used during the sample run,  
whichever is less. If the residual liquid cannot be returned to the drum, drain the  
fountain into a preweighed empty drum to determine the final weight of the liquid.  
3.1.2 If it is not possible to measure a single representative mixture, then weigh  
the various components separately, for example, if solvent is added during the  
sampling run, weigh the solvent before it is added to the mixture. If a fresh drum of  
voc-containing liquid is needed during the run, then weigh both the empty drum and  
the fresh drum.  
3.2 Volume measurement (alternative). If direct weight measurements are not  
feasible, the tester may use volume meters, flow  
rate  
meters,  
and density  
measurements to determine the weight of liquids that are used if it can be demonstrated  
that the technique produces results equivalent to the direct weight measurements. If a  
single representative mixture cannot be measured, measure the components separately.  
4. Determination of voc content in input liquids.  
4.1 Collection of liquid samples.  
4.1.1 Collect a 1-pint or larger sample of the voc-containing liquid mixture at  
each application location at the beginning and end of each test run. A separate sample  
shall be taken of each voc-containing liquid that is added to the application mixture  
during the test run. If a fresh drum is needed during the sampling run, then obtain a  
sample from the fresh drum.  
4.1.2 When collecting the sample, ground the sample container to the coating  
drum. Fill the sample container as close to the rim as possible to minimize the amount  
of headspace.  
4.1.3 After the sample is collected, seal the container so the sample cannot leak  
out or evaporate.  
4.1.4 Label the container to identify clearly the contents.  
4.2 Distillation of voc.  
Page 13  
4.2.1 Assemble the rotary evaporator as shown in figure 1.  
4.2.2 Leak check the rotary evaporation system by aspirating a vacuum of  
approximately 20 mm hg from absolute. Close up the system and monitor the vacuum  
for approximately 1 minute. If the vacuum falls more than 125 mm hg in 1 minute, repair  
leaks and repeat.  
4.2.3 Deposit approximately 20 mls of the sample (inks, paints, or similar  
material) into the rotary evaporation distillation vessel.  
4.2.4 Turn off the aspirator and gradually apply a vacuum to the evaporator of  
within 20 mm hg.  
4.2.5 Begin heating the vessel at a rate of 2 to 3 degrees Centigrade per minute,  
maintaining the vacuum specified in 4.2.3. Care shall be taken to prevent material  
bumping from the distillation flask.  
4.2.6 Continue heating until a temperature of 110 degrees Centigrade is achieved  
and maintain this temperature for not less than 10 minutes or until the sample has  
dried in the distillation flask.  
4.2.7 Slowly introduce the N2 sweep gas through the purge tube and into the  
distillation flask, taking care to maintain not less than 125 mm hg vacuum at all  
times.  
4.2.8 Continue sweeping the remaining solvent voc from the distillation flask and  
condenser assembly for 10 minutes or until all traces of condensed solvent are  
gone from the vessel and the still head.  
4.2.9 Disassemble the apparatus and transfer the distillate to a labeled sealed vial.  
4.3 Preparation of voc standard bag sample.  
4.3.1 Assemble the bag sample generation system as shown in figure 2 and bring  
the water bath up to a near-boiling temperature.  
4.3.2 Inflate the tedlar bag and perform a leak check on the bag.  
4.3.3 Evacuate the bag and close the bag inlet valve.  
4.3.4 Record the current barometric pressure.  
4.3.5 Record the starting reading on the dry gas meter, open the bag inlet valve,  
and start the dilution zero air flowing into the tedlar bag at approximately 2 liters per  
minute.  
4.3.6 The bag sample voc concentration shall be similar to the gaseous voc  
concentration measured in the exhaust gas ducts. The amount of liquid voc required  
can be approximated using the equations in section 6, the gaseous voc measurement  
results in terms of propane, and an assumed response factor of 1.0. Let Cc3 equal  
the exhaust gas concentration in terms of propane and rf=1.0. Calculate Cvoc. Let  
bv = 20 liters and calculate ml, the approximate quantity of liquid to be used to  
prepare the bag gas sample.  
4.3.7 Quickly withdraw an aliquot (approximately  
5
microliters) of sample  
from the distillate vial with the microliter syringe and record its weight from the  
analytical balance to the nearest 0.01 mg.  
4.3.8 Inject the contents of the syringe through the septum of the volatilization  
vessel into the glass wool inside the vessel.  
4.3.9 Reweigh and record the tare weight of the now empty syringe.  
4.3.10 Record the pressure and temperature of the dilution gas as it is passed  
through the dry gas meter, as shown in the figure 2 diagram.  
Page 14  
4.3.11 After approximately 20 liters of dilution gas have passed into the tedlar  
bag, close the valve to the dilution air source and record the exact final reading on the  
dry gas meter.  
4.3.12 The gas bag is then analyzed by fia within 1 hour of bag preparation  
in accordance with the procedures contained in section 4.4. 4.4 Determination of voc  
response factor.  
4.4.1 Start up the fia instrument using the same settings as used for the gaseous  
voc measurements.  
4.4.2 Perform the fia analyzer calibration and linearity checks according to  
the procedure in section 5.1. Record the responses to each of the calibration gases and  
the back-pressure setting of the fia.  
4.4.3 Connect the tedlar bag sample to the fia sample inlet and record the bag  
concentration in terms of propane. Continue the analysis until a steady reading is  
obtained for not less than 30 seconds. Record the final reading and proceed with the  
calculation of the response factor.  
4.5 Determination of coating voc content as voc (vu).  
4.5.1 Determine the voc content of the coatings used in the process using EPA  
method 24 or 24a as applicable.  
5. Calibration and quality assurance.  
5.1 Fia calibration and linearity check. Make necessary adjustments to the air and  
fuel supplies for the fia and ignite the burner. Allow the fia to warm up for the period  
recommended by the manufacturer. Inject a calibration gas into the measurement  
system and adjust the back-pressure regulator to the value required to achieve the flow  
rates specified by the manufacturer. Inject the zero- and the high-range calibration  
gases and adjust the analyzer calibration to provide the proper responses. Inject the  
low and mid-range gases and record the responses of the measurement system. The  
calibration and linearity of the system are acceptable if the responses for all 4 gases are  
within 5% of the respective gas values. If the performance of the system is not  
acceptable, repair or adjust the system and repeat the linearity check. Conduct a  
calibration and linearity check after assembling the analysis system and after a major  
change is made to the system. A calibration curve consisting of zero gas and 2  
calibration levelsshall be performed at the beginning and end of each batch of  
samples.  
5.2 Systems drift checks. After each sample, repeat the system calibration  
checks in section 5.1 before any adjustments to the fia or measurement system are  
made. If the zero or calibration drift is more than plus or minus 3% of the span value,  
discard the result and repeat the analysis.  
5.3 Quality control. A minimum of 1 sample in each batch shall be distilled  
and analyzed in duplicate as a precision control. If the results of the 2 analyzed differ by  
more than plus or minus 10% of the mean, then the system shall be reevaluated and the  
entire batch shall be redistilled and analyzed.  
6. Calculations.  
6.1 Bag sample volume, Bv.  
(
) ( )  
) (  
MV TSTD PM  
(
=
BV  
) ( )  
T M PSTD  
Page 15  
Where:  
Bv  
Mv  
= Bag sample volume in standard liters.  
= Indicated dry gas meter volume, in liters.  
TSTD = 2930K.  
TM  
PM  
= Meter gas temperature, in 0K.  
= Meter gas pressure, in mm Hg absolute.  
PSTD = 760 mm Hg.  
6.2  
6.3  
Bag sample voc concentration, as voc, Cvoc.  
Cvoc = Ml/Bv  
Where:  
Cvoc = Bag sample voc concentration, as voc, mg/std. liters.  
Ml  
= Weight of voc liquid injected, mg.  
Bag sample voc concentration, as propane, Cc3.  
Cc3 = Rc3*K  
Where:  
Cc3  
Rc3  
= Bag sample voc concentration, as propane, mg C3/std. liter.  
= FIA reading for bag gas sample, ppm propane.  
mg propane / std. liter  
K = Conversion factor, 0.00183  
Response factor, RF.  
ppm propane  
6.4  
6.5  
RF = Cvoc/Cc3  
Where:  
RF  
= Response factor, weight voc/weight propane.  
Total voc content of the input voc containing liquid, as propane, L.  
n
n
n
V IJ WIJ  
RF J  
V FJ WFJ  
RFJ  
V AJ W AJ  
RF J  
L =  
-
+
J=1  
J=1  
J=1  
Where:  
L =  
Total voc content of liquid input, calculate as propane, kg.  
VIJ = Initial voc weight fraction of voc liquid J.  
VFJ = Final voc weight fraction of voc liquid J.  
VAJ = Voc weight fraction of voc liquid J added during the test.  
WIJ = Weight of voc containing liquid J at beginning of test, kg.  
WFG = Weight of voc containing liquid J at end of test, kg.  
Page 16  
WAJ = Weight of voc containing liquid J added during the test, kg.  
RFJ = Response factor for voc in liquid J, weight voc/weight propane.  
Page 17  
History: 1993 AACS; 2002 AACS.  
R 336.2010 Rescinded.  
History: 1985 AACS; 1992 AACS; 1997 AACS.  
R 336.2011 Reference test method 5B.  
Rule 1011. Reference test method 5B, in-stack filtration method, reads as follows:  
(a) The principle, applicability, and performance test criteria are as follows:  
(i) Principle. Particulate matter is withdrawn isokinetically from the source and  
collected on solid filtering media maintained at stack temperature. The particulate matter  
mass is determined gravimetrically after removal of uncombined water.  
(ii) Applicability. This method is applicable for the determination of particulate  
emissions from stationary sources as identified in table 31 of R 336.1331. The method is  
also applicable when specifically provided for in the department’s rules, orders, a permit  
to install, or a permit to operate.  
(iii) Performance test criteria as follows:  
(A) A performance test must meet the requirements under R 336.2003(2).  
(B) For sources that are subject to an emission limitation calculated to 50% excess  
air, the multipoint, integrated sampling procedure of R 336.2004(1)(c) must be used for  
gas analysis. For all other sources that require a determination of the molecular weight of  
Page 18  
the exhaust, an optional sampling procedure of R 336.2004(1)(c) may be used.  
Alternatives or modifications to procedures are subject to the approval of the department.  
(C) The minimum volume per sample must be 30 cubic feet of dry gas corrected to  
standard conditions, 68 degrees Fahrenheit and 29.92 inches mercury. Minimum sample  
time must be 60 minutes, which may be continuous or a combination of shorter sampling  
periods for sources that operate in a cyclic manner. Smaller sampling times or sample  
volumes, if necessitated by process variables or other factors, may be approved by the  
department.  
(D) For a source whose emission control device alters the moisture content of the  
exhaust gas, a moisture determination must be performed in a location upstream from the  
emission control device and in accordance with R 336.2004(1)(d) or an alternative  
method approved by the department.  
(b) The following provisions apply to apparatus:  
(i) Sampling train. A schematic of the sampling train used in this method is shown  
in figure 102 under R 336.2021. Construction details for many, but not all, of the train  
components are given in APTD-0581, adopted by reference in R 336.1902. See  
subdivision (g)(ii) of this rule. For changes from the APTD-0581 document and for  
allowable modifications to figure 102, the user shall consult with the department. The  
operating and maintenance procedures for many, but not all, of the sampling train are  
described in APTD-0576, adopted by reference in R 336.1902. See subdivision (g)(iii) of  
this rule. Since correct usage is important in obtaining valid results, all users shall read  
APTD-0576 and adopt the applicable operating and maintenance procedures outlined in  
it, unless otherwise specified. The sampling train must consist of the following  
components:  
(A) Probe nozzle. Stainless steel 316 or glass with sharp, tapered leading edge.  
The angle of taper must be less than 30 degrees and the taper must be on the outside to  
preserve a constant internal diameter. The probe nozzle must be of the button-hook  
design, unless otherwise specified by the department. If made of stainless steel, the  
nozzle must be constructed from seamless tubing. Other materials of construction may be  
used, subject to the approval of the department. A range of nozzle sizes suitable for  
isokinetic sampling must be available, for example, 0.32 to 1.27 centimeters, 1/8 to 1/2  
inch, or larger if higher volume sampling trains are used inside diameter nozzles in  
increments of 0.16 centimeters, 1/16 inches. Each nozzle must be calibrated according to  
the procedures outlined in subdivision (e) of this rule.  
(B) Probe liner. Interior surface may be constructed of stainless steel, no specific  
grade, glass, Teflon, or other material that maintains proper flow at the stack conditions  
experienced.  
(C) Pitot tube. Type S, as described in method 2, or other device approved by the  
department. The pitot tube must be attached to the probe, as shown in figure 102 under R  
336.2021, to allow constant monitoring of the stack gas velocity. The impact, high  
pressure, opening plane of the pitot tube must be even with or above the nozzle entry  
plane, see method 2, figure 2-6b, during sampling. The type S pitot tube assembly must  
have a known coefficient, determined as outlined in method 2.  
(D) Differential pressure gauge. Two incline manometer or equivalent devices as  
described in method 2. One manometer must be used for velocity head (p) readings and  
the other must be used for orifice differential pressure readings.  
Page 19  
(E) Filter holders. Two separate filter holders in series or 1 filter holder with  
separate filter supports and seals for 2 filters. One filter holder with 2 filters held in  
contact with each other is not acceptable. Materials of construction may be stainless steel  
316, glass, Teflon, or other material approved by the department.  
(F) Filter heating system. Auxiliary heating of the filter media is not acceptable.  
For saturated stack gases, the operator may opt to use filters that do not blind when wet  
and that do not require heating, see subdivision (c)(i)(A) of this rule.  
(G) Condenser. The following system must be used to determine the stack gas  
moisture content: Three impingers connected in series with leak-free ground glass fittings  
or similar leak-free noncontaminating fittings. All impingers must be of the Greenburg-  
Smith design and must be modified by replacing the tip with a 1.3 centimeters, 1/2 inch,  
inside diameter glass tube extending to about 1.3 centimeters, 1/2 inch, from the bottom  
of the flask. Modifications, such as using flexible connections between the impingers or  
using materials other than glass, are allowed, subject to the approval of the department.  
The first impinger must contain a known quantity of water, as described in subdivision  
(d)(i)(C) of this rule. The second impinger must be empty, and the third must contain a  
known weight of silica gel or equivalent desiccant. Alternatively, a system that cools the  
sample gas stream and allows measurement of the water condensed and moisture leaving  
the condenser, each to within 1 milliliter or 1 gram, may be used, subject to the approval  
of the department. In any case, the means for measuring the moisture leaving the  
condenser must be by passing the sample gas stream through a tared silica gel, or  
equivalent desiccant, trap with exit gases kept below 20 degrees Centigrade, 68 degrees  
Fahrenheit, and determining the weight gain. If a determination of the particulate matter  
collected in the impingers is required by the department’s rules, a permit to install, or a  
permit to operate, then the impinger system described above must be used without  
modification. Contact the department as to the sample recovery and analysis of the  
impinger contents.  
(H) Metering system. Vacuum gauge, leak-free pump, thermometers capable of  
measuring temperature to within 3 degrees Centigrade, 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit, dry-gas  
meter capable of measuring volume to within 2%, and related equipment as shown in  
figure 102 under R 336.2021. Other metering systems capable of maintaining sampling  
rates within 10% of isokinetic and capable of determining sample volumes to within 2%  
may be used, subject to the approval of the department. When the metering system is  
used in conjunction with a pitot tube, the system must enable checks of isokinetic rates.  
Sampling trains utilizing metering systems designed for higher flow rates than those  
described in APTD-0581 or APTD-0576, both adopted by reference in R 336.1902, may  
be used if the specifications of this method are met.  
(I) Barometer. Mercury, aneroid, or other barometer capable of measuring  
atmospheric pressure to within 2.5 millimeters mercury, 0.1 inch mercury. In many cases,  
the barometric reading may be obtained from a nearby national weather service station. In  
this case, the station value, which is the absolute barometric pressure, must be requested  
and an adjustment for elevation differences between the weather station and sampling  
point must be applied at a rate of minus 2.5 millimeters mercury, 0.1 inch mercury, per  
30 meters, 100 feet, elevation increase or vice versa for elevation decrease.  
(J) Gas density determination equipment. Temperature sensor and pressure gauge,  
as described in method 2, and gas analyzer, if necessary, as described in method 3. The  
Page 20  
temperature sensor must, preferably, be permanently attached to the pitot tube or  
sampling probe in a fixed configuration so that the tip of the sensor extends beyond the  
leading edge of the probe sheath and does not touch any metal. Alternatively, the sensor  
may be attached just before use in the field. If the temperature sensor is attached in the  
field, then the sensor must be placed in an interference-free arrangement with respect to  
the type S pitot tube openings, see method 2, figure 2-6 Velocity Traverse Data. As a  
second alternative, if a difference of not more than 1% in the average velocity  
measurement is to be introduced, then the temperature gauge need not be attached to the  
probe or pitot tube. This alternative is subject to the approval of the department.  
“Construction Details of Isokinetic Source Sampling Equipment,” APTD-0581, April  
1971, PB203-060-LL, and “Maintenance, Calibration, and Operation of Isokinetic Source  
Sampling Equipment,” APTD-0576, March 1972, PB209-022-LL, are adopted by  
reference in R 336.1902.  
(ii) Sample recovery. The following items are required:  
(A) Probe-liner and probe-nozzle brushes. Nylon bristle brushes with stainless  
steel wire handles. The probe brush must have extensions, at least as long as the probe,  
made of stainless steel, nylon, Teflon, or similarly inert material. The brushes must be  
properly sized and shaped to brush out the probe liner and nozzle.  
(B) Wash bottles. Two glass wash bottles are recommended. The tester may use  
polyethylene wash bottles, but the acetone should not be stored in polyethylene bottles  
for longer than 1 month.  
(C) Glass sample storage containers. Chemically resistant, borosilicate glass  
bottles for acetone washes. Screw cap liners must either be rubber-backed Teflon or must  
be constructed to be leak-free and resistant to chemical attack by acetone. Narrow-mouth  
glass bottles are less prone to leakage. Alternatively, polyethylene bottles may be used.  
(D) Filter containers. Glass, polyethylene, or aluminum tube containers, unless  
otherwise specified by the department.  
(E) Graduated cylinder or balance. To measure condensed water to within 1  
milliliter or 1 gram, graduated cylinders must have subdivisions of not more than 2  
milliliters. Most laboratory balances are capable of weighing to the nearest 0.5 gram or  
less. Any of these balances may be used here and in paragraph (iii)(D) of this  
subdivision.  
(F) Plastic storage containers. Airtight containers to store silica gel.  
(G) Funnel and rubber policeman. To aid in the transfer of silica gel to container,  
but not necessary if silica gel is weighed in the field.  
(H) Funnel. Glass or polyethylene, to aid in sample recovery.  
(iii) Analysis. The following equipment is required for analysis:  
(A) Glass weighing dishes.  
(B) Desiccator.  
(C) Analytical balance. To measure to within 0.1 milligram.  
(D) Balance. To measure to within 0.5 milligram.  
(E) Beakers. 250 milliliters.  
(F) Hygrometer. To measure the relative humidity of the laboratory environment.  
(G) Temperature gauge. To measure the temperature of the laboratory  
environment.  
(c) The following provisions must apply to reagents:  
Page 21  
(i) Sampling. The reagents used in sampling are as follows:  
(A) Filters. Two in-stack filters may be any combination of alundum ceramic  
thimble filters, type RA-98, or glass fiber filters, type A without organic binder. The size  
of the filters must allow proper sampling rates to maintain iso-kinetics using the nozzle  
sizes specified in subdivision (b)(i)(A) of this rule. Alternatively, other types of filters  
may be used, subject to the approval of the department.  
(B) Silica gel. Indicating type, 6 to 16 mesh. If previously used, dry at 175 degrees  
Centigrade, 350 degrees Fahrenheit, for 2 hours. New silica gel may be used as received.  
Alternatively, other types of desiccants that are equivalent or better may be used, subject  
to the approval of the department.  
(C) Water. When analysis of the material caught in the impingers is required,  
distilled water must be used. Run blanks before field use to eliminate a high blank of test  
samples.  
(D) Crushed ice.  
(E) Stopcock grease. Acetone-insoluble, heat-stable silicone grease. This is not  
necessary if screw-on connectors with Teflon sleeves, or equivalent, are used.  
Alternatively, other types of stopcock grease may be used, subject to the approval of the  
department.  
(ii) Sample recovery. Washing solvent. Either acetone or distilled water may be  
used for sample recovery. If acetone is used for washing solvent, then reagent grade, less  
than 0.001% residue, in glass bottles is required. Acetone from metal containers generally  
has a high residue blank and must not be used. If suppliers transfer acetone to glass  
bottles from metal containers, then acetone blanks must be run before field use and only  
acetone with low blank values, less than 0.001%, must be used. In no case must a blank  
value of more than 0.001% of the weight of acetone used be subtracted from the sample  
weight. If distilled water is used for washing solvent, use distilled water with less than  
0.001% residue. Run blanks before field use to eliminate a high blank on test samples.  
(iii) Analysis. Two reagents are required for the analysis:  
(A) Solvent. Same as paragraph (ii) of this subdivision for quantitative transfer.  
(B) Desiccant. Anhydrous calcium sulfate, indicating type. Alternatively, other  
types of desiccants may be used, subject to the approval of the department.  
(d) The following provisions must apply to procedure:  
(i) Sampling. The complexity of this method is such that, in order to obtain reliable  
results, testers shall be trained and experienced with the test procedures. Sampling must  
comply with the following provisions:  
(A) Pretest preparation provisions are as follows:  
(I). All the components must be maintained and calibrated according to the  
applicable procedures described in APTD-0576, adopted by reference in R 336.1902,  
unless otherwise specified in this rule.  
(II) Weigh several 200 to 300 gram portions of silica gel in airtight containers to  
the nearest 0.5 gram. Record the total weight of the silica gel plus container on each  
container. As an alternative, the silica gel need not be preweighed, but may be weighed  
directly in its impinger or sampling holder just before train assembly.  
(III) Check filters visually against light for irregularities, flaws, pinhole leaks, or  
cracks. Label filters of the proper size on the back side using numbering machine ink. As  
an alternative, label the shipping containers, as described under subdivision (b)(ii)(D) of  
Page 22  
this rule, and keep the filters in these containers at all times, except during sampling and  
weighing.  
(IV) Dry the filters in an oven at 105 degrees Centigrade, 220 degrees Fahrenheit,  
for a minimum of 2 hours, cool for at least 1 hour in a desiccator containing anhydrous  
calcium sulfate, and individually weigh and record each weight to the nearest 0.1  
milligram. During the weighing, the filter must not be exposed to the laboratory  
atmosphere for a period of more than 2 minutes and a relative humidity above 50%.  
(V) Procedures, other than those specified, that account for relative humidity  
effects may be used, subject to the approval of the department.  
(B) Preliminary determinations provisions are as follows:  
(I) Select the sampling site and the minimum number by the department.  
(II) Determine the stack pressure, temperature, and the range of velocity heads  
using method 2. It is recommended that a leak check of the pitot lines, see method 2, be  
performed.  
(III) Determine the moisture content using approximation method 4, or its  
alternatives, for the purpose of making isokinetic sampling rate settings.  
(IV) Determine the stack gas dry molecular weight, as described in method 2, if  
integrated method 3 sampling is used for molecular weight determination, the integrated  
bag sample must be taken simultaneously with, and for the same total length of time as,  
the particulate sample run.  
(V) Select a nozzle size based on the range of velocity heads so that it is not  
necessary to change the nozzle size to maintain isokinetic sampling rates. During the run,  
do not change the nozzle size. Ensure that the proper differential pressure gauge is chosen  
for the range of velocity heads encountered, see method 2.  
(VI) Select a suitable probe liner and probe length so that all traverse points may  
be sampled. For large stacks, sampling from opposite sides of the stack may reduce the  
length of probes.  
(VII) Select a total sampling time greater than or equal to the minimum total  
sampling time specified in the department’s rules so that the sampling time per point is  
not less than 5 minutes, unless approved by the department, or some greater time interval  
as specified by the department, and so that the sample volume taken, corrected to  
standard conditions, exceeds the required minimum total gas sample volume. The latter is  
based on an approximate average sampling rate. The number of minutes sampled at each  
point may be an integer or an integer plus 1/2 minute to avoid timekeeping errors. In  
some circumstances, such as in batch cycles, it may be necessary to sample for shorter  
times at the traverse points and to obtain smaller gas sample volumes. In these cases, the  
department’s approval must first be obtained.  
(C) Preparation of collection train provisions are as follows:  
(I) During preparation and assembly of the sampling train, keep all openings  
where contamination can occur covered until just before assembly or until sampling is  
about to begin.  
(II) Place 100 milliliters of water in the first impinger, leave the second impinger  
empty, and transfer approximately 200 to 300 grams of preweighed silica gel from its  
container to the third impinger. More silica gel may be used, but care must be taken to  
ensure that it is not entrained and carried out from the impinger during sampling. Place  
the container in a clean place for later use in the sample recovery. Alternatively, the  
Page 23  
weight of the silica gel plus impinger may be determined to the nearest 0.5 gram and  
recorded.  
(III) Using tweezers or clean disposable surgical gloves, place a labeled,  
identified, and weighed filter in each filter holder. Be sure that the filter is properly  
centered and the gasket properly placed so as to prevent the sample gas stream from  
circumventing the filter.  
(IV) Install the selected nozzle using a Viton A 0-ring when stack temperatures  
are less than 260 degrees Centigrade, 500 degrees Fahrenheit, and a heat-resistant  
fiberglass, graphite, or other material string gasket when temperatures are higher. See  
APTD-0576, adopted by reference in R 336.1902, for requirements. Other connecting  
systems using either 310 stainless steel or Teflon ferrules may be used to form a leak-free  
direct mechanical connection.  
(V) Mark the probe with heat-resistant tape or by some other method to denote the  
proper distance into the stack or duct for each sampling point.  
(VI) Set up the train as in figure 102 under R 336.2021.  
(VII) If necessary, use a very light coat of silicone grease on all ground glass  
joints. Grease only the outer portion, see APTD-0576, to avoid the possibility of  
contamination by the silicone grease.  
(VIII) Place crushed ice around the impingers.  
(D) Leak check procedures:  
(I) Pretest leak check. A pretest leak check is strongly recommended, but not  
required, to prevent invalid sampling and wasted time. If the tester opts to conduct the  
pretest leak check, the following procedure must be used: Perform the leak check on the  
entire system, including filter housings and nozzle, by plugging the nozzle and pulling a  
380 millimeter mercury, 15 inch mercury, vacuum. Alternatively, a lower vacuum may  
be used if it is not exceeded during the test. Leakage rates in excess of 4% of the average  
sampling rate or 0.00057 cubic meters per minute, 0.02 cubic feet per minute, whichever  
is less, are unacceptable. The following leak check instructions for the sampling train  
described in APTD-0576 and APTD-0581, adopted by reference in R 336.1902, may be  
helpful. Start the pump with the bypass valve fully open and the coarse adjust valve  
completely closed. Partially open the coarse adjust valve and slowly close the bypass  
valve until the desired vacuum is reached. Do not reverse the direction of the bypass  
valve, as this will cause water to back up into the flexible sample tube and the probe. If  
the desired vacuum is exceeded, either leak-check at this higher vacuum or end the leak  
check and start over. When the leak check is completed, first slowly remove the plug  
from the inlet to the nozzle and immediately turn off the vacuum pump. This prevents the  
water in the first impinger from being forced backward into the sample tube and prevents  
silica gel from being entrained backward into the second impinger.  
(II) Leak checks during sample run. If, during the sampling run, a component,  
such as a filter assembly or impinger, change becomes necessary, a leak check must be  
conducted immediately before the change is made. The leak check must be done  
according to the procedure outlined in paragraph (i)(D)(I) of this subdivision, except that  
it must be done at a vacuum equal to or greater than the maximum value recorded up to  
that point in the test. If the leakage rate is not more than 0.00057 cubic meters per minute,  
0.02 cubic feet per minute, or 4% of the average sampling rate, whichever is less, then the  
results are acceptable and no correction need be applied to the total volume of dry gas  
Page 24  
metered. If a higher leakage rate is obtained, then the tester shall either record the leakage  
rate and plan to correct the sample volume, as shown in subdivision (f)(iii) of this rule, or  
void the sampling run. Immediately after component changes, leak checks may be  
performed. If leak checks are done, then the procedure outlined in paragraph (i)(D)(I) of  
this subdivision must be used.  
(III) Post-test leak check. A leak check is required at the conclusion of each  
sampling run. The leak check must be performed in accordance with the procedures in  
paragraph (i)(D)(I) of this subdivision, except that it must be conducted at a vacuum  
equal to or greater than the maximum value reached during the sampling run. If the  
leakage rate is not more than 0.00057 cubic meters per minute, 0.02 cubic feet per  
minute, or 4% of the average sampling rate, whichever is less, then the results are  
acceptable and no correction need be applied to the total volume of dry gas metered. If a  
higher leakage rate is obtained, then the tester shall either record the leakage rate and  
correct the sample volume, as shown in subdivision (f)(iii) of this rule, or void the  
sampling run.  
(E) Particulate train operation. During the sampling run, maintain an isokinetic  
sampling rate that is within 10% of true isokinetic, unless otherwise specified by the  
department. For each run, record the data required on a data sheet such as the data sheet  
in figure 104 under R 336.2021. Record the initial dry-gas meter reading. Record the dry-  
gas meter readings at the beginning and end of each sampling time increment, when  
changes in flow rates are made, before and after each leak check, and when sampling is  
halted. Take other readings required by figure 104 under R 336.2021 at least once at each  
sample point during each time increment, and take additional readings when significant  
changes, 20% variation in velocity head readings, necessitate additional adjustments in  
flow rate. Level and zero the manometer. Because the manometer level and zero may  
drift due to vibrations and temperature changes, make periodic checks during the  
traverse. Clean the portholes before the test run to minimize the chance of sampling  
deposited material. To begin sampling, remove the nozzle cap and verify that the pitot  
tube and probe are properly positioned. Position the nozzle at the first traverse point with  
the tip pointing directly into the gas stream. Immediately start the pump and adjust the  
flow to isokinetic conditions. Nomographs that aid in the rapid adjustment of the  
isokinetic sampling rate without excessive computations are available. These nomographs  
are designed for use when the type S pitot tube coefficient is 0.85 ±0.02 and the stack gas  
equivalent density, dry molecular weight, is equal to 29 ±4. APTD-0576, adopted by  
reference in R 336.1902, details the procedure for using the nomographs. If Cp and Md  
are outside the above stated ranges, do not use the nomographs unless appropriate steps,  
see subdivision (g)(iv) of this rule, are taken to compensate for the deviations. When the  
stack is under significant negative pressure, height of impinger stem, take care to pull  
low-flow when inserting the probe into the stack to prevent water from backing into the  
sample tubing and to avoid pulsation through the filter and possible loss of materials.  
When the probe is in position, block off the openings around the probe and porthole to  
prevent unrepresentative dilution of the gas stream. Traverse the stack cross section, as  
required by method 1 or as specified by the department, being careful not to bump the  
probe nozzle into the stack walls when sampling near the walls or when removing or  
inserting the probe through the portholes; this minimizes the chance of extracting  
deposited material. During the test run, add more ice and, if necessary, salt to maintain a  
Page 25  
temperature of less than 20 degrees Centigrade, 68 degrees Fahrenheit, at the  
condenser/silica gel outlet. Also, periodically check the level and zero of the manometer.  
If the pressure drop across the filter becomes too high and makes isokinetic sampling  
difficult to maintain, the filter may be replaced in the midst of a sample run. It is  
recommended that another complete filter assembly be used rather than attempting to  
change the filter itself. Before a new filter assembly is installed, conduct a leak check, as  
described under paragraph (i)(D)(II) of this subdivision. The total particulate weight must  
include the summation of all filter assembly catches. A single train must be used for the  
entire sample run, except in cases where simultaneous sampling is required in 2 or more  
separate ducts, at 2 or more different locations within the same duct, or where equipment  
failure necessitates a change of trains. In all other situations, the use of 2 or more trains  
must be subject to the approval of the department. When 2 or more trains are used,  
separate analyses of the front-half and, if applicable, impinger catches from each train  
must be performed, unless identical nozzle sizes were used on all trains. If identical  
nozzle sizes were used, the front-half catches from the individual trains may be  
combined, as may the impinger catches, and 1 analysis of front-half catch and 1 analysis  
of impinger catch may be performed. Consult with the department for details concerning  
the calculation of results when 2 or more trains are used. At the end of the sample run,  
turn off the coarse adjust valve, remove the probe and nozzle from the stack, turn off the  
pump, record the final dry-gas meter reading, and conduct a post-test leak check, as  
outlined in paragraph (i)(D)(III) of this subdivision. Leak-check the pitot lines as  
described in method 2. The lines must pass this leak check to validate the velocity head  
data.  
(F) Calculation of percent isokinetic. Calculate percent isokinetic, see subdivision  
(f) of this rule, to determine if the run was valid or if another test run should be made. If  
there was difficulty in maintaining isokinetic rates due to source conditions, consult with  
the department for possible variance on the isokinetic rates.  
(ii) Sample recovery. Proper cleanup procedure begins as soon as the probe is  
removed from the stack at the end of the sampling period. Allow the probe to cool. When  
the probe can be safely handled, wipe off all external particulate matter near the tip of the  
probe nozzle and place a cap over it to prevent losing or gaining particulate matter. Do  
not cap off the probe tip tightly while the sampling train is cooling down as this creates a  
vacuum in the filter holder and draws water from the impingers into the sample tube.  
Before moving the sampling train to the cleanup site, make sure all condensed water in  
the probe and flexible sample lines are drained into the first impinger. Disconnect all  
sample lines and remove the nozzle-filter set assembly from the probe. Cap all openings  
to prevent contamination or accidental loss of sample. Remove all excess particulate from  
the exterior of the nozzle-filter assembly to prevent contamination during disassembly.  
Transfer the nozzle-filter set assembly and impinger set to the cleanup area. The cleanup  
area must be clean and protected from the wind so that the chances of contaminating or  
losing the sample are minimized. Save a portion of the solvent used for cleanup as a  
blank. Take 200 milliliters of this solvent directly from the wash bottle being used and  
place it in a glass sample container labeled "solvent blank". Inspect the train before and  
during disassembly and note any abnormal conditions. Treat the samples in the following  
manner: Container numbers. 1, 1A. Carefully remove the filters from the filter holders  
and place each filter in its identified container. Use a pair of tweezers or clean disposable  
Page 26  
surgical gloves, or both, to handle the filters. Carefully transfer to the container any  
particulate matter or filter fibers, or both, that adhere to the filter holder gasket by using a  
dry nylon bristle brush or sharp-edged blade, or both. Seal the containers. Container  
number 2. Taking care to see that particulate on the outside of the nozzle and filter  
holders does not get into the sample, the tester shall carefully remove the nozzle and  
clean the inside surface by rinsing with solvent from a wash bottle and brushing with a  
nylon bristle brush. Brush until the solvent rinse shows no visible particles and then make  
a final rinse of the inside surface with solvent. After ensuring that all joints have been  
cleaned of all extraneous material, the tester shall quantitatively remove particulate from  
the filter holders by rubbing the surfaces with a nylon bristle brush and rinsing with  
solvent. Rinse each surface 3 times, or more if needed, to remove visible particulate.  
Make a final rinse of the brush and filter holder set. After all solvent washings and  
particulate matter have been collected in the sample container, tighten the lid on the  
sample container so that solvent will not leak out when it is shipped to the laboratory.  
Mark the height of the fluid level to determine if leakage occurred during transport. Label  
the container to clearly identify its contents. Container number 3. Note the color of the  
indicating silica gel to determine if it has been completely spent and make a notation of  
its condition. Transfer the silica gel from the third impinger to its original container and  
seal. A funnel may make it easier to pour the silica gel without spilling it. A rubber  
policeman may be used as an aid in removing the silica gel from the impinger. It is not  
necessary to remove the small amount of dust particles that adhere to the impinger wall  
and are difficult to remove. Since the gain in weight will be used for moisture  
calculations, do not use any water or other liquids to transfer the silica gel. If a balance is  
available in the field, follow the procedure for container number 3 in paragraph (iii) of  
this subdivision. Impinger water. Treat the impingers in the following manner: Make a  
notation of any color or film in the liquid catch. Measure the liquid that is in the first 2  
impingers to within ±1 milliliter by using a graduated cylinder or by weighing it to within  
±1.0 gram by using a balance if one is available. Record the volume or weight of liquid  
present. This information is required to calculate the moisture content of the effluent gas.  
Discard the liquid after measuring and recording the volume or weight, unless analysis of  
the impinger catch is required, see subdivision (b)(i)(G) of this rule. If a different type of  
condenser is used, measure the amount of moisture condensed either volumetrically or  
gravimetrically. If possible, containers must be shipped in a manner that keeps them  
upright at all times.  
(iii) Analysis. Record the data required on a sheet such as the sheet in figure 106  
under R 336.2021. Handle each sample container in the following manner: Container  
numbers 1, 1A. Analyze and report each filter separately. Transfer the filter and any loose  
particulate from the sample container to a tared-glass weighing dish. Dry the filter in an  
oven at 105 degrees Centigrade, 220 degrees Fahrenheit, for a minimum of 2 hours, cool  
for at least 1 hour in a desiccator containing anhydrous calcium sulfate, and weigh and  
record its weight to the nearest 0.1 milligram. During the weighing the filter must not be  
exposed to the laboratory atmosphere for a period greater than 2 minutes or a relative  
humidity above 50%. Procedures, other than those specified, that account for relative  
humidity effects may be used, subject to the approval of the department. The method  
used for drying and weighing of filters must be consistent before and after the test.  
Container number 2. Note the level of liquid in the container and confirm on the analysis  
Page 27  
sheet if leakage occurred during transport. If a noticeable amount of leakage has  
occurred, then either void the sample or use methods, subject to the approval of the  
department, to correct the final results. Measure the liquid in this container either  
volumetrically to ±1 milliliter or gravimetrically to ±1.0 gram. Transfer the contents to a  
tared 250-milliliter beaker and evaporate to dryness either at ambient temperature and  
pressure for acetone or at 95 degrees Centigrade, 203 degrees Fahrenheit, in an oven for  
distilled water. Then subject the sample to 250 degrees Centigrade, 482 degrees  
Fahrenheit, in an oven for 2 to 3 hours. Desiccate 24 hours and weigh to a constant  
weight. Report the results to the nearest 0.1 milligram. Container number 3. Weigh the  
spent silica gel, or silica gel plus impinger, to the nearest 0.5 gram using a balance. This  
step may be conducted in the field. "Solvent blank" container. Measure solvent in this  
container either volumetrically or gravimetrically. Transfer the contents to a tared 250-  
milliliters beaker and evaporate to dryness either at ambient temperature and pressure for  
acetone or at 95 degrees Centigrade, 203 degrees Fahrenheit, in an oven for distilled  
water. Then subject the sample to 250 degrees Centigrade, 482 degrees Fahrenheit, in an  
oven for 2 to 3 hours. Desiccate for 24 hours and weigh to a constant weight. Report the  
results to the nearest 0.1 milligram. If acetone is used, the contents of Container number  
2, as well as the acetone blank container, may be evaporated at temperatures higher than  
ambient. If evaporation is done at an elevated temperature, then the temperature must be  
closely supervised, and the contents of the beaker must be swirled occasionally to  
maintain an even temperature. Use extreme care, as acetone is highly flammable and has  
a low flash point.  
(e) Calibration. Maintain a laboratory log of all calibrations. Calibrations must  
comply with the following provisions:  
(i) Probe nozzle. A probe nozzle must be calibrated before its initial use in the  
field. Using a micrometer, measure the inside diameter of the nozzle to the nearest 0.025  
millimeter, 0.001 inch. Make 3 separate measurements using different diameters each  
time and obtain the average of the measurements. The difference between the high and  
low numbers must not exceed 0.1 millimeter, 0.004 inch. When nozzles become nicked,  
dented, or corroded, the nozzles must be reshaped, sharpened, and recalibrated before  
use. Each nozzle must be permanently and uniquely identified.  
(ii) Pitot tube. The type S pitot tube assembly must be calibrated according to the  
procedures in method 2.  
(iii) Metering system. Before its initial use in the field, the metering system must  
be calibrated according to the procedure in APTD-0576, adopted by reference in R  
336.1902. Instead of physically adjusting the dry-gas meter dial readings to correspond to  
the wet-test meter readings, calibration factors may be used to mathematically correct the  
gas meter dial readings to the proper values. Before calibrating the metering system, a  
leak check may be conducted. For metering systems having diaphragm or rotary pumps,  
the normal leak check procedure will not detect leakages within the pump. For these  
cases, the following leak check procedure may be used: Make a 10-minute calibration run  
at 0.00057 cubic meters per minute, 0.02 cubic feet per minute. At the end of the run,  
take the difference of the measured wet-test meter and dry-gas meter volumes and divide  
the difference by 10 to get the leak rate. The leak rate must not exceed 0.00057 cubic  
meters per minute (0.02 cubic feet per minute). After each field use, the calibration of the  
metering system must be checked by performing 3 calibration runs at a single,  
Page 28  
intermediate orifice setting, based on the previous field test, with the vacuum set at the  
maximum value reached during the test series. To adjust the vacuum, insert a valve  
between the wet-test meter and the inlet of the metering system. Calculate the average  
value of the calibration factor. If the calibration has changed by more than 5%, then  
recalibrate the meter over the full range of orifice settings, as outlined in APTD-0576.  
Alternatively, a spirometer may be substituted for a wet-test meter in the above  
calibration procedures. Alternative procedures, such as using the orifice meter  
coefficients, may be used, subject to the approval of the department. If the dry-gas meter  
coefficient values obtained before and after a test series differ by more than 5%, then the  
test series must be performed using whichever meter coefficient value, before or after,  
gives the lower value of total sample volume.  
(iv) Temperature gauges. Use the procedure in method 2 to calibrate in-stack  
temperature gauges. Dial thermometers, such as those used for the dry-gas meter and  
condenser outlet, must be calibrated against mercury-in-glass thermometers or other  
thermometers that are calibrated using a National Institute of Standards and Technology  
calibrated reference thermometer.  
(v) Leak check of metering system shown in figure 102 under R 336.2021. That  
portion of the sampling train from the pump to the orifice meter must be leak-checked  
before initial use and after each shipment. Leakage after the pump will result in less  
volume being recorded than is actually sampled. The following procedure is suggested,  
also see figure 107 under R 336.2021: Close the main valve on the meter box. Insert a 1-  
hole rubber stopper with rubber tubing attached into the orifice exhaust pipe. Disconnect  
and vent the low side of the orifice manometer. Close off the low side orifice tap.  
Pressurize the system to 13 to 18 centimeters, 5 to 7 inches, water column by blowing  
into the rubber tubing. Pinch off the tubing and observe the manometer for 1 minute. A  
loss of pressure on the manometer indicates a leak in the meter box. Leaks, if present,  
must be corrected.  
(vi) Barometer. Calibrate against a mercury barometer.  
(f) Calculations. When carrying out calculations, retain at least 1 extra decimal  
figure beyond that of the acquired data. Round off figures after the final calculation.  
Other forms of the equations may be used if the other forms of the equations give  
equivalent results. The following provisions apply to calculations:  
(i) Nomenclature:  
An = Cross-sectional area of nozzle, meters² or the equivalent feet².  
A = Cross-sectional area of stack or flue at the point of sampling, feet².  
B
fraction.  
B
= Water vapor in the gas stream, proportion by volume, expressed as a  
ws  
= Percent water vapor in gas entering source particulate control device  
wi  
determined by method 4.  
B wo = Percent water vapor in gas exiting source particulate control device.  
Ca = Wash blank residue concentration, milligrams per gram.  
Cs = Concentration of particulate matter in stack gas, pounds per 1,000 pounds of  
actual stack gas.  
C
= Concentration of particulate matter in stack gas, moisture excluded,  
sD  
pounds per 1000 pounds of dry stack gas.  
Page 29  
Cs50 = Concentration of particulate matter corrected to 50% excess air, pounds per  
1000 pounds of stack gas.  
Cs50D = Concentration of particulate matter corrected to 50% excess air, excluding  
any water addition from a collector, pounds per 1000 pounds of stack gas.  
E = Mass emission rate of particulate, pounds/hour.  
F50 = Concentration conversion factor to 50% excess air with no moisture  
alterations in exhaust.  
F50D = Concentration conversion factor to 50% excess air, excluding any moisture  
added to exhaust gas by pollution collection system.  
FD = Concentration conversion factor to dry basis, excluding any water in the  
stack gas.  
I = Percent of isokinetic sampling.  
L a = Maximum acceptable leakage rate for either a pretest leak check or for a leak  
check following a component change; equal to 0.00057 meters³/minute (0.02 cubic feet  
per minute) or 4% of the average sampling rate, whichever is less.  
Li = Individual leakage rate observed during the leak check conducted  
before the "ith" component change (i = 1, 2, 3 . . . . n), meters³/minute (cubic feet per  
minute).  
Lp = Leakage rate observed during the post-test leak check, meters³/minute (cubic  
feet per minute).  
Md = Molecular weight of dry stack gas, gram/gram mole (pound/pound-mole),  
calculated  
by method 3, equation 3-1, using data from integrated method 3.  
mn = Total amount of particulate matter collected, milligram.  
Mw = Molecular weight of water, 18.0 gram/gram-mole (18.0 pound/pound-  
mole).  
ma = Mass of residue of solvent after evaporation, milligram.  
mg = Total weight of gas samples through nozzle, pound.  
P
= Barometric pressure at the sampling site, millimeter mercury (inches  
bar  
mercury).  
Ps = Absolute stack gas pressure.  
Pstd  
=
Standard absolute pressure, 760 millimeters mercury (29.92 inches  
mercury).  
R = Ideal gas constant, 0.06236 millimeters of mercury-cubic meters per kelvin-  
gram-mole, (21.85 inches of mercury-cubic feet per Rankine-pound-mole).  
T
= Absolute average dry-gas meter temperature, see figure 104 under R  
m
336.2021, °Kelvin, (°Rankine).  
Ts = Absolute average stack gas temperature, see figure 104 under R 336.2021,  
°Kelvin, (°Rankine).  
Tstd = Standard absolute temperature, 294.I°Kelvin, (530°Rankine).  
V a = Volume of solvent blank, milliliters.  
V aw = Volume of solvent used in wash, milliliters.  
V lc = Total volume of liquid collected in impingers and silica gel (see figure 106  
under R 336.2021), milliliters.  
Vm = Volume of gas sample as measured by the dry-gas meter, deci-centimeter,  
(deci-cubic-foot).  
Page 30  
V
= Volume of gas sample measured by the dry-gas meter, corrected to  
standard conditions, deci-standard cubic meter, (deci-standard cubic foot).  
= Volume of water vapor in the gas sample, corrected to standard  
conditions, standard cubic meter, (standard cubic foot).  
= Stack gas velocity, calculated by method 2, using data obtained from  
m(std)  
V
w(std)  
V
s
method 5, meters/second (feet/second).  
Wa = Weight of residue in solvent wash, milligram.  
Y = Dry-gas meter calibration factor.  
ΔH = Average pressure differential across the orifice meter (see figure 104 under  
R 336.2021), millimeter water (inches water).  
%02 = Percent oxygen in stack gas by volume (dry basis).  
%N2 = Percent nitrogen in stack gas by volume (dry basis).  
p a = Density of solvent, milligrams/milliliter.  
p s(std) = Density of all sampled gas at standard conditions, pounds/feet.³  
pw = Density of water, 0.9982 grams/milliliter (0.002201 pounds/milliliter).  
θ = Total sample time, minute.  
θ1 = Sample time, interval, from the beginning of a run until the first component  
change, minute.  
θi = Sampling time interval, between 2 successive component changes, beginning  
with the interval between the first and second changes, minute.  
θp = Sampling time interval, from the final (nth) component change until the end  
of the sampling run, minute.  
13.6 = Specific gravity of mercury.  
60 = Seconds/minute.  
100 = Conversion to percent.  
386.9 = Cubic feet per pound-mole of ideal gas at standard conditions.  
453.6 = Conversion of pounds to grams.  
3600 = Conversion of hours to seconds.  
1000 = Conversion of 1000 pound units to pound units.  
(ii) Average the dry-gas meter temperature and average the orifice pressure drop.  
See data sheet, figure 104 under R 336.2021.  
(iii) Dry gas volume. Correct the sample volume measured by the dry-gas meter to  
standard conditions, 21.11 degrees Centigrade, 760 millimeters mercury or 68 degrees  
Fahrenheit, 29.92 inches mercury, by using equation 5-1.  
Equation 5-1:  
Y
(
+ H / 13.6)  
(
+ H / 13.6)  
Pbar  
Vm Tstd Pbar  
=
=
Y
K1 Vm  
Vm(std)  
Tm Pstd  
Tm  
Where:  
K1 = 0.3869 °K/mm Hg for metric units.  
= 17.71 °R/in. Hg for English units.  
Page 31  
Equation 5-1 may be used as written. However, if the leakage rate observed during  
any of the mandatory leak checks, for example, the post-test leak check or leak checks  
conducted before component changes, exceeds La, equation 5-1 must be modified as  
follows:  
(A) Case I. No component changes made during sampling run. In this case, replace  
Vm in equation 5-1 with the following expression:  
Vm  
-(L  
p
-L)  
a
(B) Case II. One or more component changes made during the sampling run. In  
this case, replace V in equation 5-1 by the following expression:  
m
n
Vm  
-(L  
1
- L  
a
)  
1
(L  
i
- L  
a
)  
i
(L  
p
- L  
a
)  
p
i2  
and substitute only for those leakage rates (Li or Lp) that exceed La.  
(iv) Volume of water vapor.  
Equation 5-2  
=
( pw /  
) (R  
/
) =  
Vw(std)  
V1c  
Mw  
Tstd Pstd K2 V1c  
Where:  
K2 = 0.001338 m³/ml for metric units.  
= 0.04733 ft.3/ml for English units.  
(v) Moisture content.  
Equation 5-3  
=
/ (  
Vw(std) Vm(std)  
+
)
vw(std)  
Bws  
In saturated or water droplet-laden gas streams, 2 calculations of the moisture content  
of the stack gas must be made: 1 from the impinger analysis, equation 5-3, and a second  
from the assumption of saturated conditions. The lower of the 2 values of Bws must be  
considered correct. The procedure for determining the moisture content based on the  
assumption of saturated conditions as described in 40 CFR part 60 appendix A method 4.  
For the purpose of this method, the average stack gas temperature from figure 104 under  
R 336.2021 may be used to make the determination, if the accuracy of the in-stack  
temperature sensor is ±1 degree Centigrade, 2 degrees Fahrenheit.  
(vi) Solvent blank concentration.  
Equation 5-4  
Page 32  
=
/ ( )  
Va Pa  
Ca  
m
a
(vii) Solvent wash blank.  
Equation 5-5  
=
W a  
C a  
V
P a  
aw  
(viii) Total particulate weight. Determine the total particulate catch from the sum  
of the weights obtained from containers 1, 1A, and 2 less the wash solvent blank, see  
figure 106 under R 336.2021. Refer to subdivision (d)(i)(E) of this rule to assist in the  
calculation of results involving 2 or more pairs of filters or 2 or more sampling trains.  
(ix) Sampled gas density. Determine the density of the gas sampled from the stack,  
at standard conditions in pounds per cubic foot, lb/ft.³.  
Equation 5-6  
= (  
(1-  
) +  
) / 386.9  
Mw Bws  
Ps(std)  
Md  
Bws  
(x) Total weight of gas sampled, lbs.  
Equation 5-7  
= (  
+
) p  
V w(std)  
s(std)  
mg  
Vm(std)  
(xi) Particulate concentration, lbs/1000 lbs.  
Equation 5-8  
=
/ (453.6  
)
mg  
Cs  
mn  
(xii) Excess air and moisture correction factors:  
(A) Correction factor to 50% excess air for those sources with or without a  
particulate collector where no increase in moisture content of the exhaust gas occurs after  
the process and before the point of sampling.  
Equation 5-9  
+ 18  
/ (100 -  
)
Md  
- 2.0592 %  
Bwo  
+
Bwo  
+ 18  
=
F50  
0.1826 %  
/ (100 -  
)
Bwo  
N2  
02  
Md  
Bwo  
(B) Correction factor to 50% excess air for those sources with a wet collection  
device, scrubber, that increases the moisture content of the exhaust gas after the process  
and before the point of sampling.  
Page 33  
Equation 5-10  
+ 18  
/ (100 -  
)
Md  
- 2.0592 %  
Bwo  
+
Bwo  
+ 18  
=
F50D  
0.1826 %  
/ (100 -  
)
Bwi  
N2  
02  
Md  
Bwi  
(C) Correction factor to convert the actual concentration, Cs, to dry conditions.  
Equation 5-11  
+ 18  
/ (100 -  
)
Bwo  
Md  
Bwo  
=
FD  
Md  
(xiii) Converted particulate concentrations, where applicable under the  
department’s rules or permit.  
Equation 5-12  
=
C s50  
C s F 50  
Cs F 50D  
Cs F D  
Equation 5-13  
=
C s50D  
Equation 5-14  
=
CsD  
(xiv) Mass emission rate in pounds per hour, lb/hr.  
Equation 5-15  
3600 A  
Vs Cs Ps Tstd Ps(std)  
E =  
=
A
/
K3 Vs Cs Ps Ps(std) Ts  
1000  
Ts Pstd  
Where:  
K3 = 63.77 for English units.  
(xv) Isokinetic variation using 1 of the following methods:  
(A) Calculation from raw data.  
Equation 5-16  
Page 34  
100  
(
+ ( + H / 13.6))  
/
)(  
Ts K4 Vlc  
Vm Tm Pbar  
I =  
60  
Vs Ps An  
Where:  
K4 = 0.003458 mm Hg - m³ml - °K for metric units.  
= 0.002672 in. Hg - ft.³/ml - °R for English units.  
(B) Calculation from intermediate values.  
Equation 5-17  
100  
Ts Vm(std) Pstd  
Ts Vm(std)  
(1-  
I =  
=
K5  
60(1-  
)
)
Bws  
Tstd Vs An Ps  
Bws  
Ps Vs An  
Where:  
K5 = 4.307 for metric units.  
= 0.09409 for English units.  
(xvi) Acceptable results. If 90%=I=110%, then the results are acceptable. If the  
results are low in comparison to the standard and I is beyond the acceptable range, or if I  
is less than 90%, then the department may opt to accept the results. Otherwise, reject the  
results and repeat the test.  
(g) Bibliography:  
(i) Federal Register, Volume 42, No. 160, Part 160, Chapter 1, Title 40, Appendix  
A, Method 5, August 18, 1977.  
(ii) Martin, Robert M. Construction Details of Isokinetic Source Sampling  
Equipment. Environmental Protection Agency. Research Triangle Park, N.C. APTD-  
0581. April, 1971.  
(iii) Rom, Jerome J. Maintenance, Calibration, and Operation of Isokinetic Source  
Sampling Equipment. Environmental Protection Agency. Research Triangle Park, N.C.  
APTD-0576. March, 1972.  
(iv) Shigehara, R. T. "Adjustments in the EPA Nomograph for Different Pitot Tube  
Coefficients and Dry Molecular Weights." Stack Sampling News, 2:4 - 11. October,  
1974.  
(v) Guidelines for Source Testing of Particulate. Michigan Department of Natural  
Resources, Air Quality Division. June 1, 1977.  
History: 1985 AACS; 1992 AACS; 2002 AACS; 2005 AACS; 2025 MR 17, Eff. Sept. 10, 2025.  
R 336.2012 Reference test method 5C.  
Rule 1012. Reference test method 5C, out-stack filtration method, reads as follows:  
(a) The principle, applicability, and performance test criteria are as follows:  
(i) Principle. Particulate matter is withdrawn iso-kinetically from the source and  
collected on solid filtering media maintained at a temperature in the range of 120 ±14  
Page 35  
degrees Centigrade, 248 ±25 degrees Fahrenheit, or another temperature as specified by  
the department's rules or a permit condition, or as approved by the department for a  
particular application. The particulate mass, which includes any material that condenses  
at or above the filtration temperature, is determined gravimetrically after removal of  
uncombined water.  
(ii) Applicability. This method is applicable for the determination of particulate  
emissions from stationary sources as identified in table 31 of R 336.1331. The method is  
also applicable when specifically provided for in the department’s rules, orders, a permit  
to install, or a permit to operate.  
(iii) Performance test criteria as follows:  
(A) A performance test must meet the requirements under R 336.2003(2).  
(B) For sources that are subject to an emission limitation calculated to 50% excess  
air, the multipoint, integrated sampling procedure of R 336.2004(1)(c) must be used for  
gas analysis. For all other sources that require a determination of the molecular weight of  
the exhaust, an optional sampling procedure of R 336.2004(1)(c) may be used.  
Alternatives or modifications to procedures are subject to the approval of the department.  
(C) The minimum volume per sample must be 30 cubic feet of dry gas corrected to  
standard conditions, 68 degrees Fahrenheit, 29.92 inches mercury. Minimum sample time  
must be 60 minutes, which may be continuous or a combination of shorter sampling  
periods for sources that operate in a cyclic manner. Smaller sampling times or sample  
volumes, when necessitated by process variables or other factors, may be approved by the  
department.  
(D) For a source whose emission control device alters the moisture content of the  
exhaust gas, a moisture determination must be performed in a location upstream from the  
emission control device and in accordance with R 336.2004(1)(d) or an alternative  
method approved by the department.  
(b) The following provisions apply to apparatus:  
(i) Sampling train. A schematic of the sampling train used in this method is shown  
in figure 103 under R 336.2021. Construction details for many, but not all, of the train  
components are given in APTD-0581, subdivision (g)(ii) of this rule. For changes from  
the APTD-0581 document and for allowable modifications to figure 103 under R  
336.2021, consult with the department. The operating and maintenance procedures for  
many, but not all, of the sampling train are described in APTD-0576, adopted by  
reference in R 336.1902, and referenced under subdivision (g)(iii) of this rule. Since  
correct usage is important in obtaining valid results, all users shall read APTD-0576 and  
adopt the applicable operating and maintenance procedures outlined in it, unless  
otherwise specified. The sampling train consists of the following components:  
(A) Probe nozzle. Stainless steel 316 or glass with sharp, tapered leading edge.  
The angle of taper must be less than 30 degrees and the taper must be on the outside to  
preserve a constant internal diameter. The probe nozzle must be of the buttonhook  
design, unless otherwise specified by the department. If made of stainless steel, the  
nozzle must be constructed from seamless tubing. Other materials of construction may be  
used, subject to the approval of the department. A range of nozzle sizes suitable for  
isokinetic sampling must be available, for example, 0.32 to 1.27 centimeters, 1/8 to 1/2  
inch, or larger if higher volume sampling trains are used inside diameter nozzles in  
Page 36  
increments of 0.16 centimeters, 1/16 inches. Each nozzle must be calibrated according to  
the procedures outlined in subdivision (e) of this rule.  
(B) Probe liner. Borosilicate or quartz glass tubing with a heating system capable  
of maintaining a gas temperature at the exit end during sampling of 120 ±14 degrees  
Centigrade, 248 ±25 degrees Fahrenheit, another temperature as specified by the  
department's rules, or a temperature approved by the department for a particular  
application. The tester may opt to operate the equipment at a temperature lower than that  
specified. Since the actual temperature at the outlet of the probe is not usually monitored  
during sampling, probes constructed according to APTD-0581, adopted by reference in R  
336.1902, which utilize the calibration curves of APTD-0576, or calibrated according to  
the procedure outlined in APTD-0576, adopted by reference in R 336.1902, are  
acceptable. Either borosilicate or quartz glass probe liners may be used for stack  
temperatures up to about 480 degrees Centigrade, 900 degrees Fahrenheit; quartz liners  
must be used for temperatures between 480 and 900 degrees Centigrade, 900 and 1,650  
degrees Fahrenheit. Both types of liners may be used at higher temperatures than  
specified for short periods of time, subject to the approval of the department. The  
softening temperature for borosilicate is 820 degrees Centigrade, 1,508 degrees  
Fahrenheit, and for quartz it is 1,500 degrees Centigrade, 2,732 degrees Fahrenheit.  
When practical, every effort must be made to use borosilicate or quartz glass probe liners.  
Alternatively, metal liners, such as 316 stainless steel, Incoloy 825, or other corrosion  
resistant materials made of seamless tubing, may be used, subject to the approval of the  
department.  
(C) Pitot tube. Type S, as described in method 2, or another device approved by  
the department. The pitot tube must be attached to the probe, as shown in figure 103  
under R 336.2021, to allow constant monitoring of the stack gas velocity. The impact,  
high pressure, opening plane of the pitot tube must be even with or above the nozzle  
entry plane, see method 2, figure 2-6 Velocity Traverse Data, during sampling. The type  
S pitot tube assembly must have a known coefficient, determined as outlined in method 2.  
(D) Differential pressure gauge. Incline manometer or equivalent devices (2), as  
described in method 2. One manometer must be used for velocity head (p) readings, and  
the other must be used for orifice differential pressure readings.  
(E) Filter holders. Two separate filter holders in series or 1 filter holder with  
separate filter supports and seals for 2 filters. One filter holder with 2 filters held in  
contact with each other is not acceptable. Materials of construction may be stainless steel  
316, glass, Teflon, or another material approved by the department.  
(F) Filter heating system. Any heating system capable of maintaining a  
temperature around the filter holder during sampling of 120 ±14 degrees Centigrade, 248  
±25 degrees Fahrenheit, another temperature as specified by the department's rules or a  
permit condition, or a temperature approved by the department for a particular  
application. Alternatively, the tester may opt to operate the equipment at a temperature  
lower than that specified. A temperature gauge capable of measuring temperature to  
within 3 degrees Centigrade, 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit, must be installed so that the  
temperature around the filter holders can be regulated and monitored during sampling.  
Heating systems other than the one shown in APTD-0581 may be used.  
(G) Condenser. The following system must be used to determine the stack gas  
moisture content: Three impingers connected in series with leak-free ground glass fittings  
Page 37  
or any similar leak-free non-contaminating fittings. All impingers must be of the  
Greenburg-Smith design and must be modified by replacing the tip with a 1.3  
centimeters, 1/2 inch, inside diameter glass tube extending to about 1.3 centimeters, 1/2  
inch, from the bottom of the flask. Modifications, such as using flexible connections  
between the impingers or using materials other than glass, are allowed subject to the  
approval of the department’s staff. The first impinger must contain a known quantity of  
water, as described in subdivision (d)(i)(C) of this rule, the second must be empty, and  
the third must contain a known weight of silica gel or equivalent desiccant. Alternatively,  
a system that cools the sample gas stream and allows measurement of the water  
condensed and moisture leaving the condenser, to within 1 milliliter or 1 gram, may be  
used subject to the approval of the department. In any case, the means for measuring the  
moisture leaving the condenser must be by passing the sample gas stream through a tared  
silica gel, or equivalent desiccant, trap with exit gases kept below 20 degrees Centigrade,  
68 degrees Fahrenheit, and determining the weight gain. If a determination of the  
particulate matter collected in the impingers is required by the department's rules, a  
permit to install, or a permit to operate, the impinger system described in this  
subparagraph must be used, without modification. Contact the department as to the  
sample recovery and analysis of the impinger contents.  
(H) Metering system. Vacuum gauge, leak-free pump, thermometers capable of  
measuring temperature to within 3 degrees Centigrade, 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit, drygas  
meter capable of measuring volume to within 2%, and related equipment as shown in  
figure 103 under R 336.2021. Other metering systems capable of maintaining sampling  
rates within 10% of isokinetic and capable of determining sample volumes to within 2%  
may be used, subject to the approval of the department. When the metering system is  
used in conjunction with a pitot tube, the system must enable checks of isokinetic rates.  
Sampling trains utilizing metering systems designed for higher flow rates than those  
described in APTD-0581 or APTD-0576, both adopted by reference in R 336.1902, may  
be used if the specifications of this method are met.  
(I) Barometer. Mercury, aneroid, or other barometer capable of measuring  
atmospheric pressure to within 2.5 millimeters mercury, 0.1 inch mercury. In many cases,  
the barometric reading may be obtained from a nearby national weather service station.  
When obtained from this source, the station value, which is the absolute barometric  
pressure, must be requested and an adjustment for elevation differences between the  
weather station and sampling point must be applied at a rate of minus 2.5 millimeters  
mercury per 30 meters, 0.1 inch mercury, per 100 foot, elevation increase or vice versa  
for elevation decrease.  
(J) Gas density determination equipment. Temperature sensor and pressure gauge,  
as described in method 2, and gas analyzer, if necessary, as described in method 3. The  
temperature sensor must, preferably, be permanently attached to the pitot tube or  
sampling probe in a fixed configuration so that the tip of the sensor extends beyond the  
leading edge of the probe sheath and does not touch any metal. Alternatively, the sensor  
may be attached just before use in the field. Note, however, that if the temperature sensor  
is attached in the field, the sensor must be placed in an interference-free arrangement  
with respect to the type S pitot tube openings, see method 2, figure 2.7. As a second  
alternative, if a difference of not more than 1% in the average velocity measurement is to  
Page 38  
be introduced, the temperature gauge need not be attached to the probe or pitot tube. This  
alternative is subject to the approval of the department.  
(ii) Sample recovery. The following items :  
(A) Probe-liner and probe-nozzle brushes. Nylon bristle brushes with stainless  
steel wire handles. The probe brush must have extensions, at least as long as the probe,  
made of stainless steel, nylon, Teflon, or similarly inert material. The brushes must be  
properly sized and shaped to brush out the probe liner and nozzle.  
(B) Wash bottles - 2. Glass wash bottles are recommended; polyethylene wash  
bottles may be used at the option of the tester. It is recommended that acetone not be  
stored in polyethylene bottles for longer than a month.  
(C) Glass sample storage containers. Chemically resistant, borosilicate glass  
bottles, for acetone washes. Screw cap liners must either be rubber-backed Teflon or  
must be constructed so as to be leak-free and resistant to chemical attack by acetone.  
Narrow-mouth glass bottles have been found to be less prone to leakage. Alternatively,  
polyethylene bottles may be used.  
(D) Filter containers. Glass, polyethylene, or aluminum tube containers, unless  
otherwise specified by the department.  
(E) Graduated cylinder or balance. To measure condensed water to within 1  
milliliter or 1 gram. Graduated cylinders must have subdivisions of not more than 2  
milliliters. Most laboratory balances are capable of weighing to the nearest 0.5 gram or  
less. Any of these balances are suitable for use here and in paragraph (iii)(D) of this  
subdivision.  
(F) Plastic storage containers. Airtight containers to store silica gel.  
(G) Funnel and rubber policeman, to aid in the transfer of silica gel to container;  
not necessary if silica gel is weighed in the field.  
(H) Funnel made from glass or polyethylene, to aid in sample recovery.  
(iii) Analysis must include the following equipment:  
(A) Glass weighing dishes.  
(B) Desiccator.  
(C) Analytical balance, to measure to within 0.1 milligrams.  
(D) Balance, to measure to within 0.5 milligrams.  
(E) Beakers, 250 milliliters.  
(F) Hygrometer, to measure the relative humidity of the laboratory environment.  
(G) Temperature gauge, to measure the temperature of the laboratory environment.  
(c) The following provisions apply to reagents:  
(i) The reagents used in sampling are as follows:  
(A) Filters. Two outstack filters may be any combination of alundum ceramic  
thimble filters, type RA-98 or glass fiber filters, type A without organic binder. The size  
of the filters must allow proper sampling rates to maintain isokinetics using the nozzle  
sizes specified in subdivision (b)(i)(A) of this rule. Alternatively, other types of filters  
may be used, subject to the approval of the department.  
(B) Silica gel. Indicating type, 6 to 16 mesh. If previously used, dry at 175 degrees  
Centigrade, 350 degrees Fahrenheit, for 2 hours. New silica gel may be used as received.  
Alternatively, other types of desiccants, equivalent or better, may be used, subject to the  
approval of the department.  
Page 39  
(C) Water. When analysis of the material caught in the impingers is required,  
distilled water must be used. Run blanks prior to field use to eliminate a high blank on  
test samples.  
(D) Crushed ice.  
(E) Stopcock grease. Acetone-insoluble, heatstable silicone grease. This is not  
necessary if screw on connectors with Teflon sleeves, or equivalent, are used.  
Alternatively, other types of stopcock grease may be used, subject to the approval of the  
department.  
(ii) Sample recovery, washing solvent. Either acetone or distilled water may be  
used for sample recovery. If acetone is used for washing solvent, then reagent grade, less  
than 0.001% residue, in glass bottles is required. Acetone from metal containers generally  
has a high residue blank and must not be used. Suppliers sometimes transfer acetone to  
glass bottles from metal containers, so acetone blanks must be run before field use and  
only acetone with low blank values, less than 0.001%, must be used. A blank value of  
more than 0.001% of the weight of acetone used must not be subtracted from the sample  
weight. If distilled water is used for washing solvent, use distilled water with less than  
0.001% residue. Run blanks before field use to eliminate a high blank on test samples.  
(iii) Two reagents are required for the analysis:  
(A) Solvent. Same as paragraph (ii) of this subdivision for quantitative transfer.  
(B) Desiccant. Anhydrous calcium sulfate, indicating type. Alternatively, other  
types of desiccants may be used, subject to the approval of the department.  
(d) The following provisions apply to procedure:  
(i) Sampling. The complexity of this method is such that, in order to obtain reliable  
results, testers shall be trained and experienced with the test procedures. Sampling must  
comply with the following provisions:  
(A) Pretest preparation. All the components must be maintained and calibrated  
according to the applicable procedures described in APTD-0576, adopted by reference in  
R 336.1902, unless otherwise specified in this rule. Weigh several 200 to 300 gram  
portions of silica gel in airtight containers to the nearest 0.5 gram. Record the total weight  
of the silica gel plus container on each container. As an alternative, the silica gel need not  
be pre-weighed, but may be weighed directly in its impinger or sampling holder just  
before train assembly. Check filters visually against light for irregularities, flaws, pinhole  
leaks, or cracks. Label filters of the proper size on the back side using numbering  
machine ink. As an alternative, label the shipping containers, described in subdivision  
(b)(ii)(D) of this rule, and keep the filters in these containers at all times, except during  
sampling and weighing. Dry the filters in an oven at 105 degrees Centigrade, 220 degrees  
Fahrenheit, for a minimum of 2 hours, cool for at least 1 hour in a desiccator containing  
anhydrous calcium sulfate, and individually weigh and record each weight to the nearest  
0.1 milligram. During the weighing, the filters must not be exposed to the laboratory  
atmosphere for a period of more than 2 minutes and a relative humidity above 50%.  
Procedures, other than those specified, that account for relative humidity effects may be  
used, subject to the approval of the department.  
(B) Preliminary determinations. Select the sampling site and the minimum number  
of sampling points according to method 1 or as specified by the department. Determine  
the stack pressure, temperature, and the range of velocity heads using method 2. It is  
recommended that a leak check of the pitot lines, see method 2, be performed. Determine  
Page 40  
the moisture content using approximation method 4, or its alternatives, for the purpose of  
making isokinetic sampling rate settings. Determine the stack gas dry molecular weight,  
as described in method 2. If integrated method 3 sampling is used for molecular weight  
determination, the integrated bag sample must be taken simultaneously with, and for the  
same total length of time as, the particulate sample run. Select a nozzle size based on the  
range of velocity heads so that it is not necessary to change the nozzle size in order to  
maintain isokinetic sampling rates. During the run, do not change the nozzle size. Ensure  
that the proper differential pressure gauge is chosen for the range of velocity heads  
encountered, see method 2. Select a suitable probe liner and probe length so that all  
traverse points can be sampled. For large stacks, consider sampling from opposite sides  
of the stack to reduce the length of probes. Select a total sampling time greater than or  
equal to the minimum total sampling time specified in the test procedures for the specific  
industry so that the sampling time per point is not less than 5 minutes, unless approved by  
the department, or some greater time interval as specified by the department, and so that  
the sample volume taken, corrected to standard conditions, exceeds the required  
minimum total gas sample volume. The latter is based on an approximate average  
sampling rate. It is recommended that the number of minutes sampled at each point be an  
integer or an integer plus 1/2 minute to avoid timekeeping errors. In some circumstances,  
such as in batch cycles, it may be necessary to sample for shorter times at the traverse  
points and to obtain smaller gas sample volumes. In these cases, the department's  
approval must first be obtained.  
(C) Preparation of collection train. During preparation and assembly of the  
sampling train, keep all openings where contamination can occur covered until just  
before assembly or until sampling is about to begin. Place 100 milliliters of water in the  
first impinger, leave the second impinger empty, and transfer approximately 200 to 300  
grams of pre-weighed silica gel from its container to the third impinger. More silica gel  
may be used, but care should be taken to ensure that it is not entrained and carried out  
from the impinger during sampling. Place the container in a clean place for later use in  
the sample recovery. Alternatively, the weight of the silica gel plus impinger may be  
determined to the nearest 0.5 gram and recorded. Using tweezers or clean disposable  
surgical gloves, place a labeled, identified, and weighed filter in the filter holder. Be sure  
that the filter is properly centered and the gasket properly placed so as to prevent the  
sample gas stream from circumventing the filter. Check the filter for tears after assembly  
is completed. When glass liners are used, install the selected nozzle using a Viton A O-  
ring when stack temperatures are less than 260 degrees Centigrade, 500 degrees  
Fahrenheit, and a heat-resistant fiberglass, graphite, or other material string gasket when  
temperatures are higher. See APTD-0576, adopted by reference in R 336.1902, for  
details. Other connecting systems using either 310 stainless steel or Teflon ferrules may  
be used. When metal liners are used, install the nozzle in the same manner as for glass  
liners or by a leak-free direct mechanical connection. Mark the probe with heat-resistant  
tape or by some other method to denote the proper distance into the stack or duct for each  
sampling point. Set up the train as in figure 103 under R 336.2021. If necessary, use a  
very light coat of silicone grease on all ground glass joints. Grease only the outer portion,  
see APTD-0576, adopted by reference in R 336.1902, to avoid the possibility of  
contamination by the silicone grease. Place crushed ice around the impingers.  
(D) Leak check procedures as follows:  
Page 41  
(I) Pretest leak check. A pretest leak check is strongly recommended, but not  
required, to prevent invalid sampling and wasted time. If the tester opts to conduct the  
pretest leak check, the following procedure must be used: After the sampling train has  
been assembled, turn it on and set the filter and probe heating systems at the desired  
operating temperatures. Allow time for the temperatures to stabilize. If a Viton A O-ring  
or other leak-free connection is used in assembling the probe nozzle to the probe liner,  
leak check the train at the sampling site by plugging the nozzle and pulling a 380  
millimeter mercury, 15 inch mercury, vacuum. A lower vacuum may be used, if it is not  
exceeded during the test. If a heat-resistant fiberglass, graphite, or other material string is  
used, do not connect the probe to the train during the leak check. Instead, leak check the  
train by first plugging the inlet to the filter holder, and cyclone, if applicable, and pulling  
a 380 millimeter mercury, 15 inch mercury, vacuum. A lower vacuum may be used if it is  
not exceeded during the test. Then connect the probe to the train and leak check at about  
a 25 millimeter mercury, 1 inch mercury, vacuum. Alternatively, the probe may be leak  
checked with the rest of the sampling train, in 1 step, at a 380 millimeter mercury, 15  
inch mercury, vacuum. Leakage rates in excess of 4% of the average sampling rate or  
0.00057 cubic meters per minute (0.02 cubic feet per minute), whichever is less, are  
unacceptable. The following leak check instructions for the sampling train described in  
APTD-0576 and APTD-0581 may be helpful. Start the pump with the bypass valve fully  
open and the coarse adjust valve completely closed. Partially open the coarse adjust valve  
and slowly close the bypass valve until the desired vacuum is reached. Do not reverse the  
direction of the bypass valve, as this will cause water to back up into the filter holder. If  
the desired vacuum is exceeded, either leak check at this higher vacuum or end the leak  
check and start over. When the leak check is completed, first slowly remove the plug  
from the inlet to the probe, filter holder, or cyclone, if applicable, and immediately turn  
off the vacuum pump. This prevents the water in the impingers from being forced  
backward into the filter holder and prevents silica gel from being entrained backward into  
the third impinger.  
(II) Leak checks during sample run. If, during the sampling run, a component,  
such as a filter assembly or impinger, change becomes necessary, a leak check must be  
conducted immediately before the change is made. The leak check must be done  
according to the procedure outlined in subparagraph (D) (I) of this paragraph, except that  
it must be done at a vacuum equal to or greater than the maximum value recorded up to  
that point in the test. If the leakage rate is found to be not more than 0.00057 cubic meters  
per minute, 0.02 cubic feet per minute, or 4% of the average sampling rate, whichever is  
less, the results are acceptable and no correction need be applied to the total volume of  
dry gas metered. If, however, a higher leakage rate is obtained, the tester shall either  
record the leakage rate and plan to correct the sample volume, as shown in subdivision  
(f)(iii)  
of  
R 336.2011, or shall void the sampling run. Immediately after component changes, leak  
checks are optional. If the leak checks are done, the procedure outlined in paragraph  
(i)(D)(I) of this subdivision must be used.  
(III) Post-test leak check. A leak check is mandatory at the conclusion of each  
sampling run. The leak check must be done in accordance with the procedures outlined in  
paragraph (i)(D)(I) of this subdivision, except that it must be conducted at a vacuum  
equal to or greater than the maximum value reached during the sampling run. If the  
Page 42  
leakage rate is found to be not more than 0.00057 cubic meters per minute, 0.02 cubic  
feet per minute, or 4% of the average sampling rate, whichever is less, the results are  
acceptable and no correction need be applied to the total volume of dry gas metered. If,  
however, a higher leakage rate is obtained, the tester shall either record the leakage rate  
and correct the sample volume, as shown in subdivision (f)(iii) of R 336.2011, or shall  
void the sampling run.  
(E) Particulate train operation. During the sampling run, maintain an isokinetic  
sampling rate that is within 10% of true isokinetic, unless otherwise specified by the  
department. For each run, record the data required on a data sheet such as the one shown  
in figure 104 under R 336.2021. Be sure to record the initial dry-gas meter reading.  
Record the dry-gas meter readings at the beginning and end of each sampling time  
increment, when changes in flow rates are made, before and after each leak check, and  
when sampling is halted. Take other readings required by figure 104 under R 336.2021 at  
least once at each sample point during each time increment, and take additional readings  
when significant changes, 20% variation in velocity head readings, necessitate additional  
adjustments in flow rate. Level and zero the manometer. Because the manometer level  
and zero may drift due to vibrations and temperature changes, make periodic checks  
during the traverse. Clean the portholes before the test run to minimize the chance of  
sampling deposited material. To begin sampling, remove the nozzle cap and verify that  
the pitot tube and probe are properly positioned. Position the nozzle at the first traverse  
point with the tip pointing directly into the gas stream. Immediately start the pump and  
adjust the flow to isokinetic conditions. Nomographs that aid in the rapid adjustment of  
the isokinetic sampling rate without excessive computations are available. These  
nomographs are designed for use when the type S pitot tube coefficient is 0.85 ±0.02 and  
the stack gas equivalent density, dry molecular weight, is equal to 29 ±4. APTD-0576,  
adopted by reference in R 336.1902, details the procedure for using the nomographs. If  
Cp and Md are outside the above stated ranges, do not use the nomographs unless  
appropriate steps, see subdivision (g)(iv) of this rule, are taken to compensate for the  
deviations. When the stack is under significant negative pressure, height of impinger  
stem, take care to pull low flow when inserting the probe into the stack to prevent water  
from backing into the sample tubing and to avoid pulsation through the filter and possible  
loss of materials. When the probe is in position, block off the openings around the probe  
and porthole to prevent unrepresentative dilution of the gas stream. Traverse the stack  
cross section, as required by method 1 or as specified by the department, being careful  
not to bump the probe nozzle into the stack walls when sampling near the walls or when  
removing or inserting the probe through the portholes. This minimizes the chance of  
extracting deposited material. During the test run, add more ice and, if necessary, salt to  
maintain a temperature of less than 20 degrees Centigrade,68 degrees Fahrenheit, at the  
condenser/silica gel outlet. Also, periodically check the level and zero of the manometer.  
If the pressure drop across the filter becomes too high and makes isokinetic sampling  
difficult to maintain, the filter may be replaced in the midst of a sample run. It is  
recommended that another complete filter assembly be used rather than attempting to  
change the filter itself. Before a new filter assembly is installed, conduct a leak check, see  
subparagraph (D)(II) of this paragraph . The total particulate weight must include the  
summation of all filter assembly catches. A single train must be used for the entire  
sample run, except in cases where simultaneous sampling is required in 2 or more  
Page 43  
separate ducts, at 2 or more different locations within the same duct, or where equipment  
failure necessitates a change of trains. In all other situations, the use of 2 or more trains  
must be subject to the approval of the department. Note that when 2 or more trains are  
used, separate analyses of the front half catches from the individual trains may be  
combined, as may the impinger catches, and 1 analysis of the front half catch and 1  
analysis of impinger catch may be performed. Consult with the department for details  
concerning the calculation of results when 2 or more trains are used. At the end of the  
sample run, turn off the coarse adjust valve, remove the probe and nozzle from the stack,  
turn off the pump, record the final dry gas meter reading, and conduct a post-test leak  
check, as outlined in subparagraph (D)(III) of this paragraph. Also, leak check the pitot  
lines as described in method 2. The lines must pass this leak check to validate the  
velocity head data.  
(F) Calculation of percent isokinetic. Calculate percent isokinetic, see subdivision  
(f) of this rule, to determine whether the run was valid or whether another test run should  
be made. If there was difficulty in maintaining isokinetic rates due to source conditions,  
consult with the department for possible variance on the isokinetic rates.  
(ii) Sample recovery. Proper cleanup procedure begins as soon as the probe is  
removed from the stack at the end of the sampling period. Allow the probe to cool. When  
the probe can be safely handled, wipe off all external particulate matter near the tip of the  
probe nozzle and place a cap over it to prevent losing or gaining particulate matter. Do  
not cap off the probe tip tightly while the sampling train is cooling down as this creates a  
vacuum in the filter holder and draws water from the impingers into the filter holder.  
Before moving the sample train to the cleanup site, remove the probe from the sample  
train, wipe off the silicone grease, and cap the open outlet of the probe. Be careful not to  
lose any condensate that might be present. Wipe off the silicone grease from the filter  
inlet where the probe was fastened and cap it. Remove the umbilical cord from the last  
impinger and cap the impinger. If a flexible line is used between the first impinger or  
condenser and the filter holder, disconnect the line at the filter holder and let any  
condensed water or liquid drain into the impingers or condenser. After wiping off the  
silicone grease, cap off the filter holder outlet and impinger inlet. Ground-glass stoppers,  
plastic caps, or serum caps may be used to close these openings. Transfer the probe and  
filter-impinger assembly to the cleanup area. This area must be clean and protected from  
the wind so that the chances of contaminating or losing the sample are minimized. Save a  
portion of the solvent used for cleanup as a blank. Take 200 milliliters of this solvent  
directly from the wash bottle being used and place it in a glass sample container labeled  
"solvent blank." Inspect the train prior to and during disassembly and note abnormal  
conditions. Treat the samples as follows:  
(A) Container numbers 1, 1A. Carefully remove the filters from the filter holders  
and place each filter in its identified container. Use a pair of tweezers or clean disposable  
surgical gloves, or both, to handle the filters. Carefully transfer to the container any  
particulate matter or filter fibers, or both, that adhere to the filter holder gasket by using a  
dry nylon bristle brush or sharp-edged blade, or both. Seal the container.  
(B) Container number 2. Taking care to see that dust on the outside of the probe or  
other exterior surfaces does not get into the sample, the tester shall quantitatively recover  
from particulate matter or any condensate from the nozzle, probe fitting, probe liner, and  
from both filter holders by washing these components with solvent and placing the wash  
Page 44  
in a glass container. Perform the solvent rinses as follows: Carefully remove the probe  
nozzle and clean the inside surface by rinsing with solvent from a wash bottle and  
brushing with a nylon bristle brush. Brush until the solvent rinse shows no visible  
particles and then make a final rinse of the inside surface with solvent. Brush and rinse  
the inside parts of the Swagelok fitting with solvent in a similar way until no visible  
particles remain. Rinse the probe liner with solvent by tilting and rotating the probe while  
squirting solvent into its upper end so that all inside surfaces are wetted with acetone. Let  
the solvent drain from the lower end into the sample container. A glass or polyethylene  
funnel may be used to aid in transferring liquid washes to the container. Follow the  
solvent rinse with a probe brush. Hold the probe in an inclined position and squirt solvent  
into the upper end as the probe brush is being pushed with a twisting action through the  
probe. Hold a sample container underneath the lower end of the probe and catch any  
solvent and particulate matter that is brushed from the probe. Run the brush through the  
probe 3 or more times until no visible particulate matter is carried out with the solvent or  
until none remains in the probe liner on visual inspection. With stainless steel or other  
metal probes, run the brush through, in the above prescribed manner, not less than 6  
times, since metal probes have small crevices in which particulate matter can be  
entrapped. Rinse the brush with solvent and quantitatively collect these washings in the  
sample container. After the brushing, make a final solvent rinse of the probe as described  
above. It is recommended that 2 people clean the probe to minimize sample losses.  
Between sampling runs, keep brushes clean and protected from contamination. After  
ensuring that all joints have been wiped clean of silicone grease, clean the inside of both  
filter holders by rubbing the surfaces with a nylon bristle brush and rinsing with solvent.  
Rinse each surface 3 times, or more if needed, to remove visible particulate. Make a final  
rinse of the brush and filter holder. After all solvent washings and particulate matter have  
been collected in the sample container, tighten the lid on the sample container so that  
solvent will not leak out when it is shipped to the laboratory. Mark the height of the fluid  
level to determine whether or not leakage occurred during transport. Label the container  
to clearly identify its contents.  
(C) Container number 3. Note the color of the indicating silica gel to determine if  
it has been completely spent and make a notation of its condition. Transfer the silica gel  
from the third impinger to its original container and seal. A funnel may make it easier to  
pour the silica gel without spilling it. A rubber policeman may be used as an aid in  
removing the silica gel from the impinger. It is not necessary to remove the small amount  
of dust particles that adhere to the impinger wall and are difficult to remove. Since the  
gain in weight is to be used for moisture calculations, do not use any water or other  
liquids to transfer the silica gel. If a balance is available in the field, follow the procedure  
for container number 3 in paragraph (iii)(C) of this subdivision. Impinger water. Treat the  
impingers as follows: Make a notation of any color or film in the liquid catch. Measure  
the liquid that is in the first 2 impingers to within ±1 milliliter by using a graduated  
cylinder or by weighing it to within ±1.0 gram by using a balance if none is available.  
Record the volume or weight of liquid present. This information is required to calculate  
the moisture content of the effluent gas. Discard the liquid after measuring and recording  
the volume or weight, unless analysis of the impinger catch is required, see subdivision  
(b)(i)(G) of this rule. If a different type of condenser is used, measure the amount of  
Page 45  
moisture condensed either volumetrically or gravimetrically. Whenever possible,  
containers must be shipped in a manner that keeps them upright at all times.  
(iii) Analysis. Record the data required on a sheet such as the one shown in figure  
106 under R 336.2021. Handle each sample container as follows:  
(A) Container numbers 1, 1A. Analyze and report each filter separately. Transfer  
the filter and any loose particulate from the sample container to a tared-glass weighing  
dish. Dry the filter in an oven at 105 degrees Centigrade, 220 degrees Fahrenheit, for a  
minimum of 2 hours, cool for at least 1 hour in a desiccator containing anhydrous  
calcium sulfate, and weigh and record its weight to the nearest 0.1 milligram. During the  
weighing, the filter must not be exposed to the laboratory atmosphere for a period of  
more than 2 minutes or a relative humidity above 50%. Procedures, other than those  
specified, that account for relative humidity effects may be used, subject to the approval  
of the department. The method used for the drying and weighing of filters must be  
consistent before and after the test.  
(B) Container number 2. Note the level of liquid in the container and confirm on  
the analysis sheet whether or not leakage occurred during transport. If a noticeable  
amount of leakage has occurred, either void the sample or use methods, subject to the  
approval of the department, to correct the final results. Measure the liquid in this  
container either volumetrically to ±1 milliliter or gravimetrically to ±1.0 gram. Transfer  
the contents to a tared 250 milliliter beaker and evaporate to dryness either at ambient  
temperature and pressure for acetone or at 95 degrees Centigrade, 203 degrees  
Fahrenheit, in an oven for distilled water. Then subject the sample to 250 degrees  
Centigrade, 482 degrees Fahrenheit, in an oven for 2 to 3 hours. Desiccate for 24 hours  
and weigh to a constant weight. Report the results to the nearest 0.1 milligram.  
(C) Container number 3. Weigh the spent silica gel, or silica gel plus impinger, to  
the nearest 0.5 gram using a balance. This step may be conducted in the field. "Solvent  
blank" container. Measure solvent in this container either volumetrically or  
gravimetrically. Transfer the contents to a tared 250 milliliter beaker and evaporate to  
dryness either at ambient temperature and pressure for acetone or at 95 degrees  
Centigrade, 203 degrees Fahrenheit, in an oven for distilled water. Then subject the  
sample to 250 degrees Centigrade, 482 degrees Fahrenheit, in an oven for 2 to 3 hours.  
Desiccate for 24-hours and weigh to a constant weight. Report the results to the nearest  
0.1 milligram. If acetone is used, the contents of container number 2, as well as the  
acetone blank container, may be evaporated at temperatures higher than ambient. If  
evaporation is done at an elevated temperature, the temperature must be closely  
supervised, and the contents of the beaker must be swirled occasionally to maintain an  
even temperature. Use extreme care, as acetone is highly flammable and has a low flash  
point.  
(e) Calibration. Maintain a laboratory log of all calibrations. Calibrations must  
comply with all of the following provisions:  
(i) Probe nozzle. A probe nozzle must be calibrated before its initial use in the  
field. Using a micrometer, measure the inside diameter of the nozzle to the nearest 0.025  
millimeter, 0.001 inch. Make 3 separate measurements using different diameters each  
time and obtain the average of the measurements. The difference between the high and  
low numbers must not exceed 0.1 millimeter, 0.004 inch. When nozzles become nicked,  
Page 46  
dented, or corroded, the nozzles must be reshaped, sharpened, and recalibrated before  
use. Each nozzle must be permanently and uniquely identified.  
(ii) Pitot tube. The type S pitot tube assembly must be calibrated according to the  
procedure outlined in method 2.  
(iii) Metering system. Before its initial use in the field, the metering system must  
be calibrated according to the procedure outlined in APTD -0576, adopted by reference in  
R 336.1902. Instead of physically adjusting the dry gas meter dial readings to correspond  
to the wet test meter readings, calibration factors may be used to mathematically correct  
the gas meter dial readings to the proper values. Before calibrating the metering system, it  
is suggested that a leak check be conducted. For metering systems having diaphragm or  
rotary pumps, the normal leak check procedure will not detect leakages within the pump.  
For these cases, the following leak check procedure is suggested: Make a 10-minute  
calibration run at 0.00057 cubic meters per minute, 0.02 cubic feet per minute. At the end  
of the run, take the difference of the measured wet test meter and dry gas meter volumes,  
and divide the difference by 10 to get the leak rate. The leak rate must not exceed  
0.00057 cubic meters per minute, 0.02 cubic feet per minute. After each field use, the  
calibration of the metering system must be checked by performing 3 calibration runs at a  
single, intermediate orifice setting, based on the previous field test, with the vacuum set  
at the maximum value reached during the test series. To adjust the vacuum, insert a valve  
between the wet test meter and the inlet of the metering system. Calculate the average  
value of the calibration factor. If the calibration has changed by more than 5%, recalibrate  
the meter over the full range of orifice settings, as outlined in APTD-0576. Alternatively,  
a spirometer may be substituted for a wettest meter in the above mentioned calibration  
procedures. Alternative procedures, such as using the orifice meter coefficients, may be  
used, subject to the approval of the department. If the dry gas meter coefficient values  
obtained before and after a test series differ by more than 5%, the test series must be  
performed using whichever meter coefficient value, before or after, gives the lower value  
of total sample volume.  
(iv) Probe heater calibration. The probe heating system must be calibrated before  
its initial use in the field according to the procedures outlined in APTD-0576, adopted by  
reference in R 336.1902. Probes constructed according to APTD-0581 need not be  
calibrated if the calibration curves in APTD-0576 are used.  
(v) Temperature gauges. Use the procedure in method 2 to calibrate in stack  
temperature gauges. Dial thermometers, such as those used for the dry gas meter and  
condenser outlet, must be calibrated against mercury in glass thermometers or other  
thermometers that are calibrated using a National Institute of Standards and Technology  
calibrated reference thermometer.  
(vi) Leak check of metering system shown in figure 103 under R 336.2021. That  
portion of the sampling train from the pump to the orifice meter must be leak checked  
before initial use and after each shipment. Leakage after the pump results in less volume  
being recorded than is actually sampled. The following procedure is suggested, also see  
figure 107 under R 336.2021: Close the main valve on the meter box. Insert a 1-hole  
rubber stopper with rubber tubing attached into the orifice exhaust pipe. Disconnect and  
vent the low side of the orifice manometer. Close off the low side orifice tap. Pressurize  
the system to 13 to 18 centimeters, 5 to 7 inches, water column by blowing into the  
rubber tubing. Pinch off the tubing and observe the manometer for 1 minute. A loss of  
Page 47  
pressure on the manometer indicates a leak in the meter box. Leaks, if present, must be  
corrected.  
(vii) Barometer. Calibrate against a mercury barometer.  
(f) Calculations. When carrying out calculations, retain at least 1 extra decimal  
figure beyond that of the acquired data. Round off figures after the final calculation.  
Other forms of the equations may be used if the other forms of the equations give  
equivalent results. All of the provisions under R 336.2011 (f) apply to calculations for  
this rule.  
(g) Bibliography:  
(i) Federal Register, Volume 42, No. 160, Part 60, Chapter 1, Title 40, Appendix  
A, Method 5. August 18, 1977.  
(ii) Martin, Robert M. Construction Details of Isokinetic Source Sampling  
Equipment. Environmental Protection Agency. Research Triangle Park, N.C.APTD-  
0581. April, 1971.  
(iii) Rom, Jerome J. Maintenance, Calibration, and Operation of Isokinetic Source  
Sampling Equipment. Environmental Protection Agency. Research Triangle Park, N.C.  
APTD-0576. March, 1972.  
(iv) Shigehara, R. T. "Adjustments in the EPA Nomograph for Different Pitot Tube  
Coefficients and Dry Molecular Weights." Stack Sampling News 2:4-11.October, 1974.  
(v) Guidelines for Source Testing of Particulate. Michigan Department of Natural  
Resources, Air Quality Division. June 1, 1977.  
History: 1985 AACS; 1992 AACS; 2002 AACS; 2025 MR 17, Eff. Sept. 10, 2025.  
R 336.2013 Reference test method 5D.  
Rule 1013. Reference test method 5D, testing of steel manufacturing sources,  
reads as follows:  
(a) General description. Emission testing procedures shall  
follow the  
methodology specified in R 336.2004(1)(c) and (d) and  
otherwise provided in this rule.  
R
336.2012, unless  
(b) Coke battery pushing emission control equipment outlet test procedure for  
scrubbers. Outlet emission tests for any scrubber emission control equipment  
controlling coke battery emissions shall be conducted as follows:  
(i) The pushing emission control system is operated on a batch type process and  
shall be tested as such using the reference test methods specified in subdivision (a)  
of this rule.  
(ii) Each sampling point shall be sampled for 1 cycle operation, which is defined  
as beginning when the coke guide and snorkels are engaged and continuing until the  
quench car leaves the hood.  
(iii) For a shed, the sampling period shall begin with the first movement of coke  
and shall end when the car enters the quench tower.  
(iv) Integrated gas samples shall be taken over the entire test period. The samples  
shall be analyzed for carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, oxygen, and nitrogen by means  
of an Orsat analyzer. The sampling and sample analysis shall be performed in  
accordance with R 336.2004(1)(c). The average values from the 3 samples shall be  
Page 48  
used in determining the dry molecular weight of the exhaust gas. If a complete test is  
not performed during the day, at least 1 sample shall be taken.  
(v) Based on design and previous data, saturated conditions shall be assumed.  
The moisture content shall be calculated as per R 336.2004(1)(d), based on stack  
conditions during the preliminary and sampling traverses.  
(vi) The stack sampling equipment and procedures as described in method 5C  
shall be used in performing a particulate emission test, with the following variations:  
(A) Due to the varying time required for pushing operations, an integer  
sampling time increment shall not be required.  
(B) Because of the shorter sampling periods at each sampling point, a specific  
gas volume cannot be guaranteed. Therefore, an average sampling rate of not less than  
0.90 dry standard cubic feet per minute shall be used during each sampling run.  
(C) A stainless steel probe liner after the nozzle may be used.  
(D) Glass or glass-lined stainless steel tubing and a glass cyclone between the  
probe and filter holder may be used.  
(E) The probe and filter heating system may be heated at 248 ±25 degrees  
Fahrenheit.  
(c) Basic oxygen furnace primary emissions control  
equipment  
outlet test  
procedure. Outlet emission tests for any emission control equipment controlling  
only the primary emissions from a basic oxygen furnace shall be conducted as follows:  
(i) The testing program shall consist of 3 valid sampling runs. A sampling run  
is the composite of those portions of 4 heats starting with oxygen blowing and  
ending not more than 180 seconds following the last oxygen blow or the beginning of  
the tap, whichever occurs first. Each process cycle shall be used to obtain the sample  
for 1 quadrant of the traverse.  
(ii) When testing a wet scrubber outlet, saturated conditions shall be assumed  
and moisture content shall be calculated based on stack conditions during the  
preliminary and sampling traverses.  
(iii) The particulate emission rate shall be determined as specified in reference  
test method 5C, with the following variations:  
(A) A stainless steel probe liner after the nozzle may be used.  
(B) Glass or glass-lined stainless steel tubing and a glass cyclone between the  
probe and filter holder may be used.  
(C) The probe and filter heating system may be heated to 248 ±25 degrees  
Fahrenheit.  
(d) Basic oxygen furnace secondary emissions control  
equipment  
outlet test  
procedure. Outlet emission tests for any emission control equipment controlling  
only the secondary emissions from a basic oxygen furnace shall be conducted as  
follows:  
(i) The testing program shall consist of 3 valid sampling runs. A sampling run  
shall be defined as the composite of the following portions of 4 heats:  
(A) Charging.  
(B) Tapping.  
(C) Turndown.  
(D) Slagging.  
Page 49  
(E) The first 5 minutes of oxygen blowing for those systems with a separate  
secondary collector.  
(ii) When testing a wet scrubber outlet, saturated conditions shall be assumed  
and moisture content shall be calculated based on stack conditions during the  
preliminary and sampling traverses.  
(iii) The particulate emission rate shall be determined as specified in reference  
test method 5C, with the following variations:  
(A) A stainless steel probe liner after the nozzle may be used.  
(B) Glass or glass-lined stainless steel tubing and a glass cyclone between the  
probe and filter holder may be used.  
(C) The probe and filter heating system may be heated to 248 ±25 degrees  
Fahrenheit.  
(e) Basic oxygen furnace primary and secondary emissions control equip-  
ment outlet test procedures. Outlet emission tests for any emission control  
equipment controlling both the primary and secondary emissions from a basic  
oxygen furnace shall be conducted as follows:  
(i) One vessel:  
(A) For testing of primary control equipment that captures secondary  
emissions from a single vessel, the testing program shall consist of 3 valid sampling  
runs. A sampling run is the composite of the following portions of 8 heats:  
(1) Charging.  
(2) Oxygen blowing.  
(3) Tapping.  
(4) Turndown.  
(5) Slagging.  
Four heats are to be sampled only during oxygen blowing, with each heat used to  
obtain the sample from 1 quadrant. The remaining 4 heats are to be sampled only during  
the portions of the heat other than oxygen blowing, with each heat used to obtain the  
sample from 1 quadrant.  
(B) When testing a wet scrubber outlet, saturated conditions shall be assumed  
and moisture content shall be calculated based on stack conditions during the  
preliminary and sampling traverses.  
(C) The particulate emission rate shall be determined as specified in reference  
test method 5C, with the following variations:  
(1) A stainless steel probe liner after the nozzle may be used.  
(2) Glass or glass-lined stainless steel tubing and a glass cyclone between the  
probe and filter holder may be used.  
(3) The probe and filter heating system may be heated to 248 ±25 degrees  
Fahrenheit.  
(ii) More than one vessel:  
(A) For testing of control equipment that captures both primary and secondary  
emissions from more than 1 vessel, the testing program shall consist of 3 valid  
sampling runs. A sampling run is the composite of the following portions of 4 heats  
for 1 or more vessels:  
(1) Charging.  
(2) Oxygen blowing.  
Page 50  
(3) Tapping.  
(4) Turndown.  
(5) Slagging.  
At least 1 heat shall be used to obtain the sample from each quadrant of the traverse.  
(B) When testing a wet scrubber outlet, saturated conditions shall be assumed  
and moisture content shall be calculated based on stack conditions during the  
preliminary and sampling traverses.  
(C) The particulate emission rate shall be determined as specified in reference  
test method 5C, with the following variations:  
(1) A stainless steel probe liner after the nozzle may be used.  
(2) Glass or glass-lined stainless steel tubing and a glass cyclone between the  
probe and filter holder may be used.  
(3) The probe and filter heating system may be heated to 248 ±25 degrees  
Fahrenheit.  
(f) Blast furnace casthouse air-cleaning device outlet test procedure. Outlet  
emission tests for any air-cleaning device controlling fugitive emissions from a blast  
furnace casthouse shall be conducted as follows:  
(i) The testing program shall consist of 3 sampling runs. A sampling run shall be  
performed during a 2-hour period, sampling only when casting takes place. If 50 dry  
standard cubic feet are not sampled during this period, the sampling run shall be  
extended so as to fulfill this condition.  
(ii) The particulate emission rate shall be determined as specified in reference  
test method 5C, with the following variations:  
(A) A stainless steel probe liner after the nozzle may be used.  
(B) Glass or glass-lined stainless steel tubing and a glass cyclone between the  
probe and filter holder may be used.  
(C) The probe and filter heating system may be heated to 248 ±25 degrees  
Fahrenheit.  
(g) Coke oven combustion stack test procedures. Emissions from any coke oven  
combustion stack shall be tested as follows:  
(i) The testing program shall consist of 3 valid sampling runs.  
(ii) Saturated conditions shall be assumed for stacks controlled  
by wet  
scrubbers. The moisture content shall be calculated as per R 336.2004(1)(d) based  
on stack conditions during the preliminary and sampling traverses.  
(iii) The stack sampling equipment and procedures described in method 5C shall  
be used in performing a particulate emission test with the following variations:  
(A) A stainless steel probe liner after the nozzle may be used.  
(B) Heated flexible teflon tubing and a glass cyclone between the probe and filter  
holder may be used.  
(C) The probe and filter heating system may be heated at 248 ±25 degrees  
Fahrenheit.  
(D) All filters shall be cooled and stored in a dessicator previous to weighing.  
Exposure to the ambient air shall be minimized to the extent that it is practical. This  
same procedure shall be used if any subsequent weighing is necessary.  
(iv) The sampling time shall correspond to a minimum of 5 coke oven pushes per  
battery.  
Page 51  
(h) Coke oven coal preheater scrubber outlet test procedures. Outlet emission  
tests for any scrubber emission control equipment controlling emissions from a coke  
oven coal preheater shall be conducted as follows:  
(i) The testing program shall consist of 3 valid sampling runs.  
(ii) Based on design and previous data, saturated conditions shall be assumed.  
The moisture content shall be calculated as per R 336.2004(1)(d) based on stack  
conditions during the preliminary and sampling traverses.  
(iii) The stack sampling equipment and procedures described in method 5C shall  
be used in performing a particulate emission test with the following variations:  
(A) A stainless steel probe liner after the nozzle may be used.  
(B) Glass or glass-lined stainless steel tubing and a glass cyclone between the  
probe and filter holder may be used.  
(C) The probe and filter heating system may be heated at 248 ±25 degrees  
Fahrenheit.  
(i) Electric arc furnace stack test procedures. Emissions from any electric arc  
furnace stack shall be tested as follows:  
(i) The testing program shall consist of 3 valid sampling runs. A sampling run  
is the time beginning when the roof is placed on the furnace, after the first charge, and  
ending with the time when the roof is removed, just prior to tapping.  
(ii) The particulate emission rate shall be determined as specified in reference  
test method 5C, with the following exceptions:  
(A) A stainless steel probe liner after the nozzle may be used.  
(B) Glass or glass-lined stainless steel tubing and a glass cyclone between the  
probe and filter holder may be used.  
(C) The probe and filter heating system may be heated to 248 ±25 degrees  
Fahrenheit.  
(D) The emission rate for any furnace controlled by  
a
positive pressure  
baghouse, or by a baghouse exhausted by more than 5 stacks, shall be determined  
as specified in R 336.2014.  
(j) Sinter plant gravel bed filter test procedures. Emissions from any gravel bed  
filter emission control equipment controlling emissions from a sinter plant shall be  
tested as follows:  
(i) The testing program shall consist of 3 valid sampling runs.  
(ii) The stack sampling equipment and procedures described in method 5C shall  
be used in performing a particulate emission test with the following variations:  
(A) A stainless steel probe liner after the nozzle may be used.  
(B) Glass or glass-lined stainless steel tubing and a glass cyclone between the  
probe and filter holder may be used.  
(C) The probe and filter heating system may be heated at 248 ±25 degrees  
Fahrenheit.  
(k) Miscellaneous. During each stack test performed, the owner or operator  
shall provide a representative of the department access to production data and  
other parameters that are necessary for determining compliance.  
(l) Sample volume. The minimum volume per sample shall be 50 cubic feet of dry  
gas corrected to standard conditions, 70 degrees Fahrenheit, 29.92 inches of mercury,  
unless specified otherwise in the provisions of this rule.  
Page 52  
(m) Opacity tests. During each stack test performed,  
simultaneous visible  
emission evaluations shall be conducted according to the reference test method  
specified in R 336.1303 for the process being tested.  
(n) Operating conditions. During each run of a stack test, the facility to be tested  
shall be operated at a batch or other similar production level which is representative of  
the actual level during the preceding 3 months before the first day of the test, unless  
the department approves or specifies alternate acceptable operating conditions.  
(o) Compliance. Compliance with any mass emission standard shall be  
determined by averaging 3 test runs using all test procedures specified for the tested  
process in this rule.  
History: 1985 AACS; 2002 AACS.  
R 336.2014 Reference test method 5E.  
Rule 1014. Reference method 5E, determination of particulate matter emissions  
from positive pressure fabric filters, reads as follows:  
(a) The principle, applicability, and performance test criteria are as follows:  
(i) Principle. Particulate matter is withdrawn isokinetically from the source and  
collected on a glass fiber filter maintained at a temperature at or above the exhaust gas  
temperature up to a nominal 248 ±25 degrees Fahrenheit. The particulate mass, which  
includes any material that condenses at or above the filtration temperature, is determined  
gravimetrically after the removal of uncombined water.  
(ii) Applicability. This method is applicable for the determination of particulate  
emissions from the stationary sources as identified in table 31 of R 336.1331. The method  
is also applicable when specifically provided for in the department's rules, orders, a  
permit to install, or a permit to operate.  
(iii) Performance test criteria as follows:  
(A) A performance test must meet the requirements under R 336.2003(2).  
(B) For sources that are subject to an emission limitation calculated to 50% excess  
air, the multipoint, integrated sampling procedure of R 336.2004(1)(c) must be used for  
gas analysis. For all other sources that require a determination of the molecular weight of  
the exhaust, an optional sampling procedure of R 336.2004(1)(c) may be used.  
Alternatives or modifications to procedures are subject to the approval of the department.  
(C) The minimum volume per sample must be 30 cubic feet actual gas. Minimum  
sample time must be 60 minutes, which may be continuous or a combination of shorter  
sampling periods for sources that operate in a cyclic manner. Smaller sampling times or  
sample volumes, when necessitated by process variables or other factors, may be  
approved by the department.  
(D) For a source whose emission control device alters the moisture content of the  
exhaust gas, a moisture determination must be performed in a location upstream from the  
emission control device and in accordance with R 336.2004(1)(d) or an alternative  
method approved by the department.  
(b) The following provisions apply to apparatus:  
(i) Sampling train. A schematic of the sampling train used in this method is shown  
in figure 103 under R 336.2021. Construction details for many, but not all, of the train  
components are given in APTD-0581, subdivision (g)(ii) of this rule. For changes from  
Page 53  
the APTD-0581 document and for allowable modifications to figure 103 under  
R 336.2021, consult with the department. The operating and maintenance procedures for  
many, but not all, of the sampling train are described in APTD-0576, adopted by  
reference in R 336.1902 and as referenced under subdivision (g)(iii) of this rule. Since  
correct usage is important in obtaining valid results, all users shall read APTD-0576 and  
adopt the applicable operating and maintenance procedures outlined in it, unless  
otherwise specified in these rules. The sampling train consists of the following  
components:  
(A) Probe nozzle. Stainless steel 316 or glass with sharp, tapered leading edge.  
The angle of taper must be less than 30 degrees and the taper must be on the outside to  
preserve a constant internal diameter. The probe nozzle must be of the button-hook  
design, unless otherwise specified by the department. If made of stainless steel, the  
nozzle must be constructed from seamless tubing. Other materials of construction may be  
used, subject to the approval of the department. A range of nozzle sizes suitable for  
isokinetic sampling must be available, for example, 0.32 to 1.27 centimeters, 1/8 to 1/2  
inch, or larger if higher volume sampling trains are used inside diameter nozzles in  
increments of 0.16 centimeter, 1/16 inch. Each nozzle must be calibrated according to the  
procedures outlined in subdivision (e) of this rule.  
(B) Probe liner. Borosilicate or quartz glass tubing with a heating system capable  
of maintaining a gas temperature at the exit end during sampling of 120 ±14 degrees  
Centigrade, 248 ±25 degrees Fahrenheit, another temperature as specified by the  
department's rules, or a temperature approved by the department for a particular  
application. The tester may opt to operate the equipment at a temperature lower than that  
specified. Since the actual temperature at the outlet of the probe is not usually monitored  
during sampling, probes constructed according to APTD-0581 that utilize the calibration  
curves of APTD-0576, or calibrated according to the procedure outlined in APTD-0576,  
are acceptable. Either borosilicate or quartz glass probe liners may be used for stack  
temperatures up to about 480 degrees Centigrade, 900 degrees Fahrenheit. Quartz liners  
must be used for temperatures between 480 and 900 degrees Centigrade, 900 and 1,650  
degrees Fahrenheit. Both types of liners may be used at higher temperatures than  
specified for short periods of time, subject to the approval of the department. The  
softening temperature for borosilicate is 820 degrees Centigrade, 1,508 degrees  
Fahrenheit, and for quartz it is 1,500 degrees Centigrade, 2,732 degrees Fahrenheit.  
When practical, every effort must be made to use borosilicate or quartz glass probe liners.  
Alternatively, metal liners, such as 316 stainless steel, Incoloy 825, or other corrosion-  
resistant materials made of seamless tubing, may be used, subject to the approval of the  
department.  
(C) Pitot tube. Type S, as described in method 2, or other device approved by the  
department. The pitot tube must be attached to the probe, as shown in figure 103 under R  
336.2021, to allow constant monitoring of the stack gas velocity. The impact, high  
pressure, opening plane of the pitot tube must be even with or above the nozzle entry  
plane, see method 2, figure 2-6 Velocity Traverse Data during sampling. The type S pitot  
tube assembly must have a known coefficient, determined as outlined in method 2.  
(D) Differential pressure gauge. Incline manometer or equivalent devices, quantity  
2, as described in method 2. One manometer must be used for velocity head (p) readings,  
and the other must be used for orifice differential pressure readings.  
Page 54  
(E) Filter holders. Two separate filter holders in series or 1 filter holder with  
separate filter supports and seals for 2 filters. One filter holder with 2 filters held in  
contact with each other is not acceptable. Materials of construction may be stainless steel  
316, glass, Teflon, or other material approved by the department.  
(F) Filter heating system. Any heating system capable of maintaining a  
temperature around the filter holder during sampling of 120 ±14 degrees Centigrade, 248  
±25 degrees Fahrenheit, another temperature as specified by the department's rules or a  
permit condition, or a temperature approved by the department for a particular  
application. Alternatively, the tester may opt to operate the equipment at a temperature  
lower than that specified. A temperature gauge capable of measuring temperature to  
within 3 degrees Centigrade, 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit, must be installed so that the  
temperature around the filter holders can be regulated and monitored during sampling.  
Heating systems other than the one shown in APTD-0581 may be used.  
(G) Condenser. The following system must be used to determine the stack gas  
moisture content: Three impingers connected in series with leak-free ground glass fittings  
or any similar leak-free noncontaminating fittings. All impingers must be of the  
Greenburg-Smith design and must be modified by replacing the tip with a 1.3  
centimeters, 1/2 inch, inside diameter glass tube extending to about 1.3 centimeters, 1/2  
inch, from the bottom of the flask. Modifications, such as using flexible connections  
between the impingers or using materials other than glass, are allowed subject to the  
approval of the department. The first impinger must contain a known quantity of water,  
as described in subdivision (d)(i)(C) of this rule, the second must be empty, and the third  
must contain a known weight of silica gel or equivalent desiccant. Alternatively, any  
system that cools the sample gas stream and allows measurement of the water condensed  
and moisture leaving the condenser, each to within 1 milliliter or 1 gram, may be used  
subject to the approval of the department. In any case, the means for measuring the  
moisture leaving the condenser must be by passing the sample gas stream through a tared  
silica gel, or equivalent desiccant, trap with exit gases kept below 20 degrees Centigrade,  
68 degrees Fahrenheit, and determining the weight gain. If a determination of the  
particulate matter collected in the impingers is required by the department's rules, a  
permit to install, or a permit to operate, the impinger system described in this subdivision  
must be used, without modification. Contact the department as to the sample recovery  
and analysis of the impinger contents.  
(H) Metering system. Vacuum gauge, leak-free pump, thermometers capable of  
measuring temperature to within 3 degrees Centigrade, 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit, dry-gas  
meter capable of measuring volume to within 2%, and related equipment as shown in  
figure 103 under R 336.2021. Other metering systems capable of maintaining sampling  
rates within 10% of isokinetic and capable of determining sample volumes to within 2%  
may be used, subject to the approval of the department. When the metering system is  
used in conjunction with a pitot tube, the system must enable checks of isokinetic rates.  
Sampling trains utilizing metering systems designed for higher flow rates than those  
described in APTD-0581 or APTD-0576, adopted by reference in R 336.1902, may be  
used if the specifications of this rule are met.  
(I) Barometer. Mercury, aneroid, or other barometer capable of measuring  
atmospheric pressure to within 2.5 millimeters mercury, 0.1-inch mercury. In many cases,  
the barometric reading may be obtained from a nearby national weather service station.  
Page 55  
When obtained from this source, the station value, which is the absolute barometric  
pressure, must be requested and an adjustment for elevation differences between the  
weather station and sampling point must be applied at a rate of minus 2.5 millimeters  
mercury, 0.1-inch mercury, per 30 meters, 100 foot, elevation increase or vice versa for  
elevation decrease.  
(J) Gas density determination equipment. Temperature sensor and pressure gauge,  
as described in method 2, and gas analyzer, if necessary, as described in method 3. The  
temperature sensor must, preferably, be permanently attached to the pitot tube or  
sampling probe in a fixed configuration so that the tip of the sensor extends beyond the  
leading edge of the probe sheath and does not touch metal. Alternatively, the sensor may  
be attached just before use in the field. Note, however, that if the temperature sensor is  
attached in the field, the sensor must be placed in an interference-free arrangement with  
respect to the type S pitot tube openings, see method 2, figure 2.6 Velocity Traverse  
Data. As a second alternative, if a difference of not more than 1% in the average velocity  
measurement is to be introduced, the temperature gauge need not be attached to the probe  
or pitot tube. This alternative is subject to the approval of the department.  
(ii) Sample recovery. The following items are needed:  
(A) Probe-liner and probe-nozzle brushes. Nylon bristle brushes with stainless  
steel wire handles. The probe brush must have extensions, at least as long as the probe,  
made of stainless steel, nylon, Teflon, or similarly inert material. The brushes must be  
properly sized and shaped to brush out the probe liner and nozzle.  
(B) Wash bottles - 2. Glass wash bottles are recommended. Polyethylene wash  
bottles may be used at the option of the tester. It is recommended that acetone not be  
stored in polyethylene bottles for longer than a month.  
(C) Glass sample storage containers. Chemically resistant, borosilicate glass  
bottles, for acetone washes, 500 milliliters or 1000 milliliters. Screw cap liners must  
either be rubber-backed Teflon or must be constructed so as to be leak-free and resistant  
to chemical attack by acetone. Narrow-mouth glass bottles have been found to be less  
prone to leakage. Alternatively, polyethylene bottles may be used.  
(D) Filter containers. Glass, polyethylene, or aluminum tube containers, unless  
otherwise specified by the department.  
(E) Graduated cylinder or balance. To measure condensed water to within 1  
milliliter or 1 gram. Graduated cylinders must have subdivisions of not more than 2  
milliliters. Most laboratory balances are capable of weighing to the nearest 0.5 gram or  
less. Any of these balances are suitable for use here and in paragraph (iii)(D) of this  
subdivision.  
(F) Plastic storage containers. Airtight containers to store silica gel.  
(G) Funnel and rubber policeman, to aid in the transfer of silica gel to container,  
but not necessary if silica gel is weighed in the field.  
(H) Funnel. Glass or polyethylene, to aid in sample recovery.  
(iii) Analysis. The following equipment is needed for analysis:  
(A) Glass weighing dishes.  
(B) Desiccator.  
(C) Analytical balance. To measure to within 0.1 milligrams.  
(D) Balance. To measure to within 0.5 milligrams.  
(E) Beakers. 250 milliliters.  
Page 56  
(F) Hygrometer, to measure the relative humidity of the laboratory environment.  
(G) Temperature gauge, to measure the temperature of the laboratory environment.  
(c) The following provisions apply to reagents:  
(i) Sampling. The reagents used in sampling are as follows:  
(A) Filters. Two outstack filters may be any combination of alundum ceramic  
thimble filters, type RA-98 or glass fiber filters, type A without organic binder. The size  
of such filters must allow proper sampling rates to maintain isokinetics using the nozzle  
sizes specified in subdivision (b)(i)(A) of this rule. Alternatively, other types of filters  
may be used, subject to the approval of the department.  
(B) Silica gel. Indicating type, 6 to 16 mesh. If previously used, dry at 175 degrees  
Centigrade, 350 degrees Fahrenheit, for 2 hours. New silica gel may be used as received.  
Alternatively, other types of desiccants, the equivalent or better of silica gel, may be  
used, subject to the approval of the department.  
(C) Water. When analysis of the material caught in the impingers is required,  
distilled water must be used. Run blanks before field use to eliminate a high blank on test  
samples.  
(D) Crushed ice.  
(E) Stopcock grease. Acetone-insoluble, heat-stable silicone grease. This is not  
necessary if screw-on connectors with Teflon sleeves, or equivalent, are used.  
Alternatively, other types of stopcock grease may be used, subject to the approval of the  
department.  
(ii) Sample recovery. Washing solvent. Either acetone or distilled water may be  
used for sample recovery. If acetone is used for washing solvent, then reagent grade, less  
than 0.001% residue, in glass bottles is required. Acetone from metal containers generally  
has a high residue blank and must not be used. Suppliers sometimes transfer acetone to  
glass bottles from metal containers. Thus, acetone blanks must be run before field use,  
and only acetone with low blank values, less than 0.001%, must be used. In no case must  
a blank value of more than 0.001% of the weight of acetone used be subtracted from the  
sample weight. If distilled water is used for washing solvent, use distilled water with less  
than 0.001% residue. Run blanks before field use to eliminate a high blank on test  
samples.  
(iii) Analysis. Two reagents are required for the analysis:  
(A) Solvent. Same as paragraph (ii) of this subdivision for quantitative transfer.  
(B) Desiccant. Anhydrous calcium sulfate, indicating type. Alternatively, other  
types of desiccants may be used, subject to the approval of the department.  
(d) The following provisions apply to procedures:  
(i) Determination of single measurement sites. The measurement site for a positive  
pressure fabric filter with an exhaust stack meeting method 1 criteria must be in  
accordance with method 1. The measurement site for positive pressure fabric filters with  
short stacks or physical configuration not amenable to the requirements of method 1 must  
be determined from the following alternatives, or as approved by the department:  
(A) Short stacks not meeting method 1 criteria: Short stacks may be extended in  
accordance with the procedures set forth in method 1 or by the use of flow straightening  
vanes. The flow straightening vanes must be of the egg crate design, see figure 109 under  
R 336.2021. The measurement site, when using straightening vanes, must be at a distance  
Page 57  
not less than 2 times the average equivalent diameter of the vane opening and not less  
than half of the overall stack diameter upstream of the stack outlet.  
(B) Roof monitor or monovent exhaust outlets: For positive pressure fabric filters  
equipped with peaked roof monitors, ridge vents, or other types of monovents, use a  
measurement site at the base of the monovent. Examples of the locations are shown in  
figure 108 under R 336.2021. The measurement site must be upstream of any exhaust  
point.  
(C) Measurement site in fabric filter compartment housing. Sample immediately  
downstream of the filter bags directly as shown in the examples in figure 108 under R  
336.2021. Depending on the housing design, use sampling ports in the housing walls or  
locate the sampling equipment within the compartment housing.  
(ii) Determination of number and location of traverse points. The number and  
location of traverse points for single exhaust stacks on positive pressure fabric filters  
meeting method 1 criteria must be in accordance with method 1. The number of traverse  
points for other single measurement sites not meeting method 1 criteria must not be less  
than 24. For example, a rectangular measurement site, such as a monovent, would require  
the use of a balanced 5-by-5 traverse point matrix. All traverse points must be sampled  
for each test run.  
(iii) Multiple measurement sites. Sampling from 2 or more stacks or measurement  
sites may be combined for a test run, if all of the following requirements are met:  
(A) All measurement sites up to 12 must be sampled. For more than 12  
measurement sites, conduct sampling on not less than 12 sites or 50% of the sites,  
whichever is greater. The measurement sites sampled must be evenly, or nearly evenly,  
distributed among the available sites, if not all of the sites are to be sampled.  
(B) The same number of measurement sites must be sampled for each test run.  
(C) The minimum number of traverse points per test run is 24. An exception to the  
24-point minimum would be a test combining the sampling from 2 stacks meeting  
method 1 criteria for acceptable stack length, and method 1 specifies fewer than 12 points  
per site.  
(D) As long as the 24 traverse points per test run criterion is met, the number of  
traverse points per measurement site may be reduced to 8. Alternatively, conduct a test  
run for each measurement site individually using the criteria in this paragraph and  
paragraph (ii) of this subdivision for the number of traverse points. Each test must count  
toward the total of 3 required for a performance test. If more than 3 measurement sites  
are sampled, the number of traverse points per measurement site may be reduced to 8 if  
not less than 72 traverse points are sampled for all 3 tests.  
(iv) Sampling. The complexity of this method is such that, in order to obtain  
reliable results, testers must be trained and experienced with the test procedures.  
Sampling must comply with the following provisions:  
(A) Pretest preparation. All the components must be maintained and calibrated  
according to the applicable procedures described in APTD-0576, adopted by reference in  
R 336.1902, unless otherwise specified in this rule. Weigh several 200 to 300 gram  
portions of silica gel in airtight containers to the nearest 0.5 gram. Record the total weight  
of the silica gel plus container on each container. As an alternative, the silica gel need not  
be preweighed, but may be weighed directly in its impinger or sampling holder just  
before train assembly. Check filters visually against light for irregularities, flaws, pinhole  
Page 58  
leaks, or cracks. Label filters of the proper size on the back side using numbering  
machine ink. As an alternative, label the shipping containers, subdivision (b)(ii)(D) of  
this rule, and keep the filters in these containers at all times, except during sampling and  
weighing. Dry the filters in an oven at 105 degrees Centigrade, 220 degrees Fahrenheit,  
for a minimum of 2 hours, cool for at least 1 hour in a desiccator containing anhydrous  
calciumsulfate, and individually weigh and record each weight to the nearest 0.1  
milligram. During the weighing, the filters must not be exposed to the laboratory  
atmosphere for a period of more than 2 minutes and a relative humidity above 50%.  
Procedures, other than those specified, that account for relative humidity effects may be  
used, subject to the approval of the department.  
(B) Preliminary determinations. Select the sampling site and the minimum number  
of sampling points according to method 1 or as specified by the department. Determine  
the stack pressure, temperature, and the range of velocity heads using method 2. It is  
recommended that a leak check of the pitot lines, see method 2, be performed. Determine  
the moisture content using approximation method 4, or its alternatives, for the purpose of  
making isokinetic sampling rate settings. Determine the stack gas dry molecular weight,  
as described in method 2. If integrated method 3 sampling is used for molecular weight  
determination, the integrated bag sample must be taken simultaneously with, and for the  
same total length of time as, the particulate sample run. Select a nozzle size based on the  
range of velocity heads so that it is not necessary to change the nozzle size in order to  
maintain isokinetic sampling rates. During the run, do not change the nozzle size. Ensure  
that the proper differential pressure gauge is chosen for the range of velocity heads  
encountered, see method 2. Select a suitable probe liner and probe length so that all  
traverse points can be sampled. For large stacks, consider sampling from opposite sides  
of the stack to reduce the length of probes. Select a total sampling time greater than or  
equal to the minimum total sampling time specified in the test procedures for the specific  
industry so that the sampling time per point is not less than 5 minutes, unless approved by  
the department, or some greater time interval as specified by the department, and so that  
the sample volume taken, corrected to standard conditions, exceeds the required  
minimum total gas sample volume. The latter is based on an approximate average  
sampling rate. It is recommended that the number of minutes sampled at each point be an  
integer or an integer plus 1/2 minute to avoid timekeeping errors. In some circumstances,  
such as in batch cycles, it may be necessary to sample for shorter times at the traverse  
points and to obtain smaller gas sample volumes. In these cases, the department's  
approval must first be obtained.  
(C) Preparation of collection train. During preparation and assembly of the  
sampling train, keep all openings where contamination can occur covered until just  
before assembly or until sampling is about to begin. Place 100 milliliters of water in the  
first impinger, leave the second impinger empty, and transfer approximately 200 to 300  
grams of preweighed silica gel from its container to the third impinger. More silica gel  
may be used, but care should be taken to ensure that it is not entrained and carried out  
from the impinger during sampling. Place the container in a clean place for later use in  
the sample recovery. Alternatively, the weight of the silica gel plus impinger may be  
determined to the nearest 0.5 gram and recorded. Using tweezers or clean disposable  
surgical gloves, place a labeled, identified, and weighed filter in the filter holder. Be sure  
that the filter is properly centered and the gasket properly placed so as to prevent the  
Page 59  
sample gas stream from circumventing the filter. Check the filter for tears after assembly  
is completed. When glass liners are used, install the selected nozzle using a Viton A O-  
ring when stack temperatures are less than 260 degrees Centigrade, 500 degrees  
Fahrenheit, and a heat-resistant fiberglass, graphite, or other material string gasket when  
temperatures are higher. See APTD-0576, adopted by reference in R 336.1902, for  
details. Other connecting systems using either 310 stainless steel or Teflon ferrules may  
be used. When metal liners are used, install the nozzle in the same manner as for glass  
liners or by a leak-free direct mechanical connection. Mark the probe with heat-resistant  
tape or by some other method to denote the proper distance into the stack or duct for each  
sampling point. Set up the train as in figure 103 under R 336.2021. If necessary, use a  
very light coat of silicone grease on all ground glass joints. Grease only the outer portion,  
see APTD-0576, to avoid the possibility of contamination by the silicone grease. Place  
crushed ice around the impingers.  
(D) Leak check procedures:  
(I) Pretest leak check. A pretest leak check is strongly recommended, but not  
required, to prevent invalid sampling and wasted time. If the tester opts to conduct the  
pretest leak check, the following procedure must be used: After the sampling train has  
been assembled, turn it on and set the filter and probe heating systems at the desired  
operating temperatures. Allow time for the temperatures to stabilize. If a Viton A O-ring  
or other leak-free connection is used in assembling the probe nozzle to the probe liner,  
leak check the train at the sampling site by plugging the nozzle and pulling a 380  
millimeter mercury, 15 inch mercury, vacuum. A lower vacuum may be used if it is not  
exceeded during the test. If a heat-resistant fiberglass, graphite, or other material string is  
used, do not connect the probe to the train during the leak check. Instead, leak check the  
train by first plugging the inlet to the filter holder, cyclone, if applicable, and pulling a  
380 millimeter mercury, 15 inch mercury, vacuum. A lower vacuum may be used if it is  
not exceeded during the test. Then connect the probe to the train and leak check at about  
a 25 millimeter mercury, 1 inch mercury, vacuum. Alternatively, the probe may be leak  
checked with the rest of the sampling train, in 1 step, at a 380 millimeter mercury, 15  
inch mercury, vacuum. Leakage rates in excess of 4% of the average sampling rate or  
0.00057 cubic meters per minute, 0.02 cubic feet per minute,, whichever is less, are  
unacceptable. The following leak check instructions for the sampling train described in  
APTD-0576 and APTD-058 may be helpful. Start the pump with the bypass valve fully  
open and the coarse adjust valve completely closed. Partially open the coarse adjust valve  
and slowly close the bypass valve until the desired vacuum is reached. Do not reverse the  
direction of the bypass valve, as this will cause water to back up into the filter holder. If  
the desired vacuum is exceeded, either leak check at this higher vacuum or end the leak  
check and start over. When the leak check is completed, first slowly remove the plug  
from the inlet to the probe, filter holder, or cyclone, if applicable, and immediately turn  
off the vacuum pump. This prevents the water in the impingers from being forced  
backward into the filter holder and prevents silica gel from being entrained backward into  
the third impinger.  
(II) Leak checks during sample run. If, during the sampling run, a component,  
such as a filter assembly or impinger, change becomes necessary, a leak check must be  
conducted immediately before the change is made. The leak check must be done  
according to the procedure outlined in paragraph (iv)(D)(I) of this subdivision, except  
Page 60  
that it must be done at a vacuum equal to or greater than the maximum value recorded up  
to that point in the test. If the leakage rate is found to be not more than 0.00057 cubic  
meters per minute, 0.02 cubic feet per minute, or 4% of the average sampling rate,  
whichever is less, the results are acceptable and no correction need be applied to the total  
volume of dry gas metered. If, however, a higher leakage rate is obtained, the tester shall  
either record the leakage rate and plan to correct the sample volume, as shown in  
subdivision (f)(iii) of R 336.2011, or shall void the sampling run. Immediately after  
component changes, leak checks are optional. If the leak checks are done, the procedure  
outlined in paragraph (iv)(D)(I) of this subdivision must be used.  
(III) Post-test leak check. A leak check is mandatory at the conclusion of each  
sampling run. The leak check must be done in accordance with the procedures outlined in  
paragraph (iv)(D)(I) of this subdivision, except that it must be conducted at a vacuum  
equal to or greater than the maximum value reached during the sampling run. If the  
leakage rate is found to be not more than 0.00057 cubic meters per minute, 0.02 cubic  
feet per minute, or 4% of the average sampling rate, whichever is less, the results are  
acceptable and no correction need be applied to the total volume of dry gas metered. If,  
however, a higher leakage rate is obtained, the tester shall either record the leakage rate  
and correct the sample volume, as shown in subdivision (f)(iii) of R 336.2011, or shall  
void the sampling run.  
(E) Particulate train operation. During the sampling run, maintain an isokinetic  
sampling rate that is within 10% of true isokinetic, unless otherwise specified by the  
department. For each run, record the data required on a data sheet such as the one shown  
in figure 104 under R 336.2021. Be sure to record the initial dry-gas meter reading.  
Record the dry-gas meter readings at the beginning and end of each sampling time  
increment, when changes in flow rates are made, before and after each leak check, and  
when sampling is halted. Take other readings required by figure 104 under R 336.2021 at  
least once at each sample point during each time increment, and take additional readings  
when significant changes, 20% variation in velocity head readings, necessitate additional  
adjustments in flow rate. Level and zero the manometer. Because the manometer level  
and zero may drift due to vibrations and temperature changes, make periodic checks  
during the traverse. Clean the portholes before the test run to minimize the chance of  
sampling deposited material. To begin sampling, remove the nozzle cap and verify that  
the pitot tube and probe are properly positioned. Position the nozzle at the first traverse  
point with the tip pointing directly into the gas stream. Immediately start the pump and  
adjust the flow to isokinetic conditions. Nomographs that aid in the rapid adjustment of  
the isokinetic sampling rate without excessive computations are available. These  
nomographs are designed for use when the type S pitot tube coefficient is 0.85 ±0.02 and  
the stack gas equivalent density, dry molecular weight, is equal to 29 ±4. APTD-0576,  
adopted by reference in R 336.1902, details the procedure for using the nomographs. If  
Cp and Md are outside the above stated ranges, do not use the nomographs unless  
appropriate steps, see subdivision (g)(iv) of this rule, are taken to compensate for the  
deviations. When the stack is under significant negative pressure, height of impinger  
stem, take care to pull low flow when inserting the probe into the stack to prevent water  
from backing into the sample tubing and to avoid pulsation through the filter and possible  
loss of materials. When the probe is in position, block off the openings around the probe  
and porthole to prevent unrepresentative dilution of the gas stream. Traverse the stack  
Page 61  
cross section, as required by method 1 or as specified by the department, being careful  
not to bump the probe nozzle into the stack walls when sampling near the walls or when  
removing or inserting the probe through the portholes. This minimizes the chance of  
extracting deposited material. During the test run, add more ice and, if necessary, salt to  
maintain a temperature of less than 20 degrees Centigrade, 68 degrees Fahrenheit, at the  
condenser/silica gel outlet. Also, periodically check the level and zero of the manometer.  
If the pressure drop across the filter becomes too high and makes isokinetic sampling  
difficult to maintain, the filter may be replaced in the midst of a sample run. It is  
recommended that another complete filter assembly be used rather than attempting to  
change the filter itself. Before a new filter assembly is installed, conduct a leak check, see  
paragraph (iv)(D)(II) of this subdivision. The total particulate weight must include the  
summation of all filter assembly catches. A single train must be used for the entire  
sample run, except in cases where simultaneous sampling is required in 2 or more  
separate ducts, at 2 or more different locations within the same duct, or where equipment  
failure necessitates a change of trains. In all other situations, the use of 2 or more trains  
must be subject to the approval of the department. Note that when 2 or more trains are  
used, separate analyses of the front-half catches from the individual trains may be  
combined, as may the impinger catches, and 1 analysis of the front-half catch and 1  
analysis of impinger catch may be performed. Consult with the department for details  
concerning the calculation of results when 2 or more trains are used. At the end of the  
sample run, turn off the coarse adjust valve, remove the probe and nozzle from the stack,  
turn off the pump, record the final dry-gas meter reading, and conduct a post-test leak  
check, as outlined in paragraph (iv)(D)(III) of this subdivision. Also, leak-check the pitot  
lines as described in method 2 The lines must pass this leak check to validate the velocity  
head data.  
(F) Calculation of percent isokinetic. Calculate percent isokinetic, see subdivision  
(f) of this rule, to determine whether the run was valid or whether another test run should  
be made. If there was difficulty in maintaining isokinetic rates due to source conditions,  
consult with the department for possible variance on the isokinetic rates.  
(v) Sample recovery. Proper cleanup procedure begins as soon as the probe is  
removed from the stack at the end of the sampling period. Allow the probe to cool. When  
the probe can be safely handled, wipe off all external particulate matter near the tip of the  
probe nozzle and place a cap over it to prevent losing or gaining particulate matter. Do  
not cap off the probe tip tightly while the sampling train is cooling down as this creates a  
vacuum in the filter holder and draws water from the impingers into the filter holder.  
Before moving the sample train to the cleanup site, remove the probe from the sample  
train, wipe off the silicone grease, and cap the open outlet of the probe. Be careful not to  
lose any condensate that might be present. Wipe off the silicone grease from the filter  
inlet where the probe was fastened and cap it. Remove the umbilical cord from the last  
impinger and cap the impinger. If a flexible line is used between the first impinger or  
condenser and the filter holder, disconnect the line at the filter holder and let any  
condensed water or liquid drain into the impingers or condenser. After wiping off the  
silicone grease, cap off the filter holder outlet and impinger inlet. Ground-glass stoppers,  
plastic caps, or serum caps may be used to close these openings. Transfer the probe and  
filter-impinger assembly to the cleanup area. This area must be clean and protected from  
the wind so that the chances of contaminating or losing the sample are minimized. Save a  
Page 62  
portion of the solvent used for cleanup as a blank. Take 200 milliliters of this solvent  
directly from the wash bottle being used and place it in a glass sample container labeled  
"solvent blank." Inspect the train before and during disassembly and note any abnormal  
conditions. Treat the samples as follows: Container numbers 1, 1A. Carefully remove the  
filters from the filter holders and place each filter in its identified container. Use a pair of  
tweezers or clean disposable surgical gloves, or both, to handle the filters. Carefully  
transfer to the container any particulate matter or filter fibers, or both, that adhere to the  
filter holder gasket by using a dry nylon bristle brush or sharp-edged blade, or both. Seal  
the container. Container number 2. Taking care to see that dust on the outside of the  
probe or other exterior surfaces does not get into the sample, the tester shall  
quantitatively recover from particulate matter or condensate from the nozzle, probe  
fitting, probe liner, and from both filter holders by washing these components with  
solvent and placing the wash in a glass container. Perform the solvent rinses as follows:  
Carefully remove the probe nozzle and clean the inside surface by rinsing with solvent  
from a wash bottle and brushing with a nylon bristle brush. Brush until the solvent rinse  
shows no visible particles and then make a final rinse of the inside surface with solvent.  
Brush and rinse the inside parts of the Swagelok fitting with solvent in a similar way until  
no visible particles remain. Rinse the probe liner with solvent by tilting and rotating the  
probe while squirting solvent into its upper end so that all inside surfaces are wetted with  
acetone. Let the solvent drain from the lower end into the sample container. A glass or  
polyethylene funnel may be used to aid in transferring liquid washes to the container.  
Follow the solvent rinse with a probe brush. Hold the probe in an inclined position and  
squirt solvent into the upper end as the probe brush is being pushed with a twisting action  
through the probe. Hold a sample container underneath the lower end of the probe and  
catch any solvent and particulate matter that is brushed from the probe. Run the brush  
through the probe 3 or more times until no visible particulate matter is carried out with  
the solvent or until none remains in the probe liner on visual inspection. With stainless  
steel or other metal probes, run the brush through, in the manner set forth in this  
paragraph, not less than 6 times, since metal probes have small crevices in which  
particulate matter can be entrapped. Rinse the brush with solvent and quantitatively  
collect these washings in the sample container. After the brushing, make a final solvent  
rinse of the probe as described above. It is recommended that 2 people be used to clean  
the probe to minimize sample losses. Between sampling runs, keep brushes clean and  
protected from contamination. After ensuring that all joints have been wiped clean of  
silicone grease, clean the inside of both filter holders by rubbing the surfaces with a nylon  
bristle brush and rinsing with solvent. Rinse each surface 3 times, or more if needed, to  
remove visible particulate. Make a final rinse of the brush and filter holder. After all  
solvent washings and particulate matter have been collected in the sample container,  
tighten the lid on the sample container so that solvent will not leak out when it is shipped  
to the laboratory. Mark the height of the fluid level to determine whether or not leakage  
occurred during transport. Label the container to clearly identify its contents. Container  
number 3. Note the color of the indicating silica gel to determine if it has been  
completely spent and make a notation of its condition. Transfer the silica gel from the  
third impinger to its original container and seal. A funnel may make it easier to pour the  
silica gel without spilling it. A rubber policeman may be used as an aid in removing the  
silica gel from the impinger. It is not necessary to remove the small amount of dust  
Page 63  
particles that adhere to the impinger wall and are difficult to remove. Since the gain in  
weight is to be used for moisture calculations, do not use any water or other liquids to  
transfer the silica gel. If a balance is available in the field, follow the procedure for  
container number 3 in paragraph (vi) of this subdivision. Impinger water. Treat the  
impingers as follows: Make a notation of any color or film in the liquid catch. Measure  
the liquid that is in the first 2 impingers to within ±1 milliliter by using a graduated  
cylinder or by weighing it to within ±1.0 gram by using a balance if none is available.  
Record the volume or weight of liquid present. This information is required to calculate  
the moisture content of the effluent gas. Discard the liquid after measuring and recording  
the volume or weight, unless analysis of the impinger catch is required, see subdivision  
(b)(i)(G) of this rule. If a different type of condenser is used, measure the amount of  
moisture condensed either volumetrically or gravimetrically. When possible, containers  
must be shipped in a manner that keeps them upright at all times.  
(vi) Analysis. Record the data required on a sheet such as the one shown in figure  
106 under R 336.2021. Handle each sample container as follows: Container numbers 1,  
1A. Analyze and report each filter separately. Transfer the filter and any loose particulate  
from the sample container to a tared-glass weighing dish. Dry the filter in an oven at 105  
degrees Centigrade, 220 degrees Fahrenheit, for a minimum of 2 hours, cool for at least 1  
hour in a desiccator containing anhydrous calcium sulfate, and weigh and record its  
weight to the nearest 0.1 milligram. During the weighing, the filter must not be exposed  
to the laboratory atmosphere for a period of more than 2 minutes or a relative humidity  
above 50%. Procedures, other than those specified, that account for relative humidity  
effects may be used, subject to the approval of the department. The method used for the  
drying and weighing of filters must be consistent before and after the test. Container  
number 2. Note the level of liquid in the container and confirm on the analysis sheet  
whether or not leakage occurred during transport. If a noticeable amount of leakage has  
occurred, either void the sample or use methods, subject to the approval of the  
department, to correct the final results. Measure the liquid in this container either  
volumetrically to ±1 milliliters or gravimetrically to ±1.0 grams. Transfer the contents to  
a tared 250 milliliter beaker and evaporate to dryness either at ambient temperature and  
pressure for acetone or at 95 degrees Centigrade, 203 degrees Fahrenheit, in an oven for  
distilled water. Then subject the sample to 250 degrees Centigrade, 482 degrees  
Fahrenheit, in an oven for 2 to 3 hours. Desiccate for 24 hours and weigh to a constant  
weight. Report the results to the nearest 0.1 milligram. Container number 3. Weigh the  
spent silica gel, or silica gel plus impinger, to the nearest 0.5 gram using a balance. This  
step may be conducted in the field. "Solvent blank" container. Measure solvent in this  
container either volumetrically or gravimetrically. Transfer the contents to a tared 250  
milliliter beaker and evaporate to dryness either at ambient temperature and pressure for  
acetone or at 95 degrees Centigrade, 203 degrees Fahrenheit, in an oven for distilled  
water. Then subject the sample to 250 degrees Centigrade, 482 degrees Fahrenheit, in an  
oven for 2 to 3 hours. Desiccate for 24 hours and weigh to a constant weight. Report the  
results to the nearest 0.1 milligram. If acetone is used, the contents of container number  
2, as well as the acetone blank container, may be evaporated at temperatures higher than  
ambient. If evaporation is done at an elevated temperature, the temperature must be  
closely supervised, and the contents of the beaker must be swirled occasionally to  
Page 64  
maintain an even temperature. Use extreme care, as acetone is highly flammable and has  
a low flash point.  
(e) Calibration. Maintain a laboratory log of all calibrations. The following  
provisions apply to calibrations:  
(i) Probe nozzle. A probe nozzle must be calibrated before its initial use in the  
field. Using a micrometer, measure the inside diameter of the nozzle to the nearest 0.025  
millimeter, 0.001 inch. Make 3 separate measurements using different diameters each  
time and obtain the average of the measurements. The difference between the high and  
low numbers must not exceed 0.1 millimeter, 0.004 inch. When nozzles become nicked,  
dented, or corroded, the nozzles must be reshaped, sharpened, and recalibrated before  
use. Each nozzle must be permanently and uniquely identified.  
(ii) Pitot tube. The type S pitot tube assembly must be calibrated according to the  
procedure outlined in method 2.  
(iii) Metering system. Before its initial use in the field, the metering system must  
be calibrated according to the procedure outlined in APTD-0576, adopted by reference in  
R 336.1902. Instead of physically adjusting the dry-gas meter dial readings to correspond  
to the wet-test meter readings, calibration factors may be used to mathematically correct  
the gas meter dial readings to the proper values. Before calibrating the metering system, it  
is suggested that a leak check be conducted. For metering systems having diaphragm or  
rotary pumps, the normal leak check procedure will not detect leakages within the pump.  
For these cases, the following leak check procedure is suggested: Make a 10-minute  
calibration run at 0.00057 cubic meters per minute, 0.02 cubic feet per minute, at the end  
of the run, take the difference of the measured wet-test meter and dry-gas meter volumes,  
and divide the difference by 10 to get the leak rate. The leak rate must not exceed  
0.00057 cubic meters per minute, 0.02 cubic feet per minute. After each field use, the  
calibration of the metering system must be checked by performing 3 calibration runs at a  
single, intermediate orifice setting, based on the previous field test, with the vacuum set  
at the maximum value reached during the test series. To adjust the vacuum, insert a valve  
between the wet-test meter and the inlet of the metering system. Calculate the average  
value of the calibration factor. If the calibration has changed by more than 5%, recalibrate  
the meter over the full range of orifice settings, as outlined in APTD-0576. Alternatively,  
a spirometer may be substituted for a wet-test meter in the above mentioned calibration  
procedures. Alternative procedures, such as using the orifice meter coefficients, may be  
used, subject to the approval of the department. If the dry-gas meter coefficient values  
obtained before and after a test series differ by more than 5%, the test series must be  
performed using whichever meter coefficient value, before or after, gives the lower value  
of total sample volume.  
(iv) Probe heater calibration. The probe heating system must be calibrated before  
its initial use in the field according to the procedures outlined in APTD-0576, adopted by  
reference in R 336.1902. Probes constructed according to APTD-0581 need not be  
calibrated if the calibration curves in APTD-0576 are used.  
(v) Temperature gauges. Use the procedure in method 2 to calibrate instack  
temperature gauges. Dial thermometers, such as those used for the dry-gas meter and  
condenser outlet, must be calibrated against mercury-in-glass thermometers or other  
thermometers that are calibrated using a National Institute of Standards and Technology  
calibrated reference thermometer.  
Page 65  
(vi) Leak check of metering system shown in figure 103 under R 336.2021. That  
portion of the sampling train from the pump to the orifice meter must be leak checked  
before initial use and after each shipment. Leakage after the pump will result in less  
volume being recorded than is actually sampled. The following procedure is suggested,  
also see figure 107 under R 336.2021: Close the main valve on the meter box. Insert a 1-  
hole rubber stopper with rubber tubing attached into the orifice exhaust pipe. Disconnect  
and vent the low side of the orifice manometer. Close off the low side orifice tap.  
Pressurize the system to 13 to 18 centimeters, 5 to 7 inches, water column by blowing  
into the rubber tubing. Pinch off the tubing and observe the manometer for 1 minute. A  
loss of pressure on the manometer indicates a leak in the meter box. Leaks, if present,  
must be corrected.  
(vii) Barometer. Calibrate against a mercury barometer.  
(f) Calculations. When carrying out calculations, retain at least 1 extra decimal  
figure beyond that of the acquired data. Round off figures after the final calculation.  
Other forms of the equations may be used if the other forms of the equations give  
equivalent results. All of the provisions under R 336.2011(f) apply to calculations for this  
rule.  
(g) Bibliography:  
(i) Federal Register, Volume 42, No. 160, Part 60, Chapter 1, Title 40, Appendix A  
Method 5, August 18, 1977.  
(ii) Martin, Robert M. Construction Details of Isokinetic Source Sampling  
Equipment. Environmental Protection Agency. Research Triangle Park, N.C.APTD-  
0581. April, 1971.  
(iii) Rom, Jerome J. Maintenance, Calibration, and Operation of Isokinetic Source  
Sampling Equipment. Environmental Protection Agency.Research Triangle Park, N.C.  
APTD-0576. March, 1972.  
(iv) Shigehara, R. T. "Adjustments in the EPA Nomograph for Different Pitot Tube  
Coefficients and Dry Molecular Weights." Stack Sampling News 2:4-11.October, 1974.  
(v) Guidelines for Source Testing of Particulate. Michigan Department of Natural  
Resources, Air Quality Division. June 1, 1977.  
History: 1985 AACS; 2002 AACS; 2025 MR 17, Eff. Sept. 10, 2025.  
R 336.2021 Figures.  
Rule 1021. Figures 102 to 104 and 106 to 109 read as follows:  
Page 66  
Page 67  
Page 68  
Page 69  
Page 70  
Page 71  
Page 72  
History: 1985 AACS; 2002 AACS.  
R 336.2030 Reference test method 9A.  
Rule 1030. Reference test method 9A, opacity measurement for scarfer  
operations at steel manufacturing facilities, reads as follows: Visible emission  
evaluations for scarfer operations  
at  
steel manufacturing facilities shall be  
conducted as specified in reference test method 9, with the exception that the data  
reduction provisions of section 2.5 of method 9 shall be based on an average of  
consecutive readings, recorded at 15-second intervals.  
6
History: 1985 AACS.  
R 336.2031 Reference test method 9B.  
Rule 1031. Reference test method 9B, coke oven inspection procedures for visible  
emissions, reads as follows:  
(a) Charging. For the purposes of determining compliance with the coke oven  
standards for charging, the following inspection procedure shall be utilized:  
(i) Observations for the purpose of determining compliance with the coke oven  
standards for charging emissions shall be made from any point or points on the topside of  
a coke oven battery from which an observer can obtain an unobstructed view of the  
charging operation. The observer shall determine and record the total number of seconds  
Page 73  
that charging emissions are visible during the charging of coal to the coke oven. The  
observer shall time the visible charging emissions with a stopwatch while observing the  
charging period. The observer shall stop the watch when visible emissions stop or are  
obscured from view and shall restart the stopwatch only when visible emissions are  
observed again. Simultaneous emissions from more than 1 emission point shall be timed  
and recorded as 1 emission and shall not be added individually to the total time.  
(ii) Charging emissions shall not include any emissions observed after all the  
charging port covers have been firmly seated following the removal of the larry car, such  
as emissions occurring when a cover is temporarily removed to permit the sweep-in of  
spilled coal.  
(iii) The total number of seconds of visible emissions observed, clock time for the  
initiation and completion of the charging period, battery identification, and oven number  
of each charge shall be recorded by the observer. If observations of emissions from a  
charge are interrupted due to events beyond the control of the observer, the data from that  
charge shall be invalidated unless a violation has already been noted. The reason for  
invalidating the data shall be noted on the observer's observation sheet. The observer  
shall then resume observation of the next consecutive charge or charges, and continue  
until a set of consecutive charges has been obtained for comparison with the emission  
standard. The charge immediately preceding the interrupted charge and the charge  
immediately following the interrupted charge shall constitute consecutive charges.  
Compliance shall be determined by summing the seconds of charging emissions observed  
during any set of 4 consecutive charges on the same battery. Observations can be  
terminated once a violation has been identified, even though 4 complete charges have not  
been observed. Any 1 charge may be included in only 1 set of consecutive charges.  
(b) Doors. Compliance with the percent door leakage standard shall be determined  
as follows:  
(i) The area to which the door leakage standard applies is the door and any location  
on the perimeter of a coke oven door, including the door jamb, or, with respect to chuck  
doors, the door and any location on the perimeter of a chuck door, but not when  
emissions are seen to come from the area between a buck stay and adjacent jamb.  
(ii) Observations of door emissions shall be made from a minimum distance of 25  
feet from each door. Each door shall be observed in sequence for only that period  
necessary to determine whether or not, at the time, there are visible emissions from any  
point on the door while the observer walks along the side of the battery. If the observer's  
view of a door is more than momentarily obstructed, as, for example, by door machinery,  
pushing machinery, coke guide, luter truck, or opaque steam plumes, the observer shall  
record the door obstructed and the nature of the obstruction and continue the observations  
with the next door in sequence which is not obstructed. The observer shall continue this  
procedure along the entire length of the battery for both sides and shall record the battery  
identification, battery side, and oven door identification number of each door exhibiting  
visible emissions. Before completing the traverse, or immediately thereafter, the  
observer shall attempt to again observe the obstructed doors. A row of 2 or more  
continuous batteries may be inspected by observing all of the doors on one side of the  
row of batteries and then all of the doors on the other side.  
(iii) Compliance with this section shall be calculated by applying the following  
formula separately for coke side doors, pusher side doors, and chuck doors:  
Page 74  
(number of doors with visible emissions  
on operating ovens in the battery) x 100  
actual percentage of doors  
with visible emissions  
=
[(number of doors on total ovens in the battery) -  
(number of doors obstructed from view on operating ovens)]  
(c) Ports. Compliance with the limits on visible emissions from charging ports shall  
be determined as follows:  
(i) Observations of any visible emissions shall be made and recorded during the  
time an observer walks the topside of a battery from one end to the other. Each oven  
shall be observed in sequence.  
(ii) The observer shall record the battery identification, the points of emissions from  
each oven, and the oven number.  
(iii) The observer shall not record the following:  
(A) Visible emissions from charging ports on ovens that are opened during a  
decarbonization period, if not more than 3 ovens are undergoing decarbonization.  
(B) Visible emissions caused by maintenance work in progress at an oven.  
(C) Steam emissions, including steam caused by the vaporization of wet luting  
materials.  
(iv) Compliance shall be determined by applying the following formula:  
(number of charging ports with visible  
actual  
percentage  
of  
emissions on operating ovens in the battery) x 100  
(number of charging ports on operating ovens in the battery)  
=
charging ports with visible  
emissions  
(d) Standpipe assembly emission points. Compliance with the limits on visible  
emissions from standpipe assembly emission points shall be determined as follows:  
(i) Observations of any visible emissions from the standpipe assembly shall be  
made by traversing the topside of the battery. During the traverse, the observer shall  
walk as near to the center of the battery as safety considerations permit, but may walk as  
close as necessary to the offtake piping to determine whether an observed emission is  
emanating from the standpipe assembly. If the battery has 2 collector mains, the  
observer may take 2 traverses to observe emissions from standpipe assembly emission  
points.  
(ii) Each oven shall be observed in sequence.  
(iii) The observer shall record the battery identification; the number of the standpipe  
assembly emission points with visible emissions, which shall not exceed the number of  
emission points on the oven; and the oven number.  
(iv) The observer shall not record the following:  
(A) Visible emissions from standpipe assemblies on ovens that are opened during  
the decarbonization period, if not more than 3 ovens are undergoing decarbonization.  
(B) Visible emissions caused by maintenance work in progress at an oven.  
(C) Steam emissions, including steam caused by the vaporization of wet luting  
material.  
(v) Compliance shall be determined by applying the following formula:  
Page 75  
(number of standpipe assembly emission points with =  
visible emissions on operating ovens) x 100  
(number of standpipe assembly emission points on  
the operating ovens of the coke battery)  
actual percentage of  
emission points with  
visible emissions  
(e) Pushing. Compliance with the visible emission standards during pushing  
operations shall be determined in accordance with the following inspection technique:  
(i) Visible emission observers shall be certified in accordance with the procedures  
specified in reference test method 9.  
(ii) Visible emissions from any pushing emission control device outlet shall be  
determined in accordance with the provisions of reference test method 9, except as  
follows:  
(A) The observer shall be positioned in accordance with the provisions of section  
2.1 of method 9 to the extent practicable.  
(B) The data reduction provisions of section 2.5 of method 9 shall be based on an  
average of 6 consecutive readings taken at 15-second intervals.  
(C) The readings shall commence when the coke begins to fall into the coke  
receiving car and shall end with the sixth reading.  
(iii) In viewing fugitive push and travel emissions, the observer shall stand on the  
coke side of the battery where a clear view of the push can be obtained. This generally  
should be a location on the ground in the coke side yard outside the hot car tracks. The  
observer shall not be restricted to the ground level, but may make the observation from  
some elevated level. The observer's line of sight should be approximately perpendicular  
to the line of travel of the quench car. If observations of emissions from a pushing  
operation are interrupted due to events beyond the control of the observer, the data from  
that pushing operation shall be invalidated unless a violation has already been noted.  
(iv) During the pushing operation, the reader shall observe all the pushing  
emissions, including, but not limited to, fugitive emissions from the pushing emission  
control device and from open quench cars during travel. All fugitive push emissions  
shall be read above the battery top. Fugitive emissions during travel may be read against  
any contrasting background.  
(v) Fugitive visible emissions during the pushing of coke into the coke receiving car  
shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of reference test method 9, except  
as follows:  
(A) The data reduction provisions of section 2.5 of method 9 shall be based on an  
average of 6 consecutive readings taken at 15-second intervals.  
(B) The readings shall commence when coke begins to fall into the coke receiving  
car and shall end with the sixth reading.  
(vi) Fugitive visible emissions during transit of the coke receiving car to the quench  
tower shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of reference test method 9,  
except as follows:  
(A) The data reduction provisions of section 2.5 of method 9 shall be based on an  
average of as many consecutive readings as are possible during transit of the coke  
receiving car.  
(B) The readings used to determine compliance shall be those readings taken after  
the car leaves the hood and until the car enters the quench tower.  
Page 76  
(f) Definition of "operating ovens." For the purposes of subrules (2)(c), (3)(d), and  
(4)(e) of this rule, an "operating oven" means an oven which is not out of service for a  
rebuild or for maintenance that is extensive enough to require the oven to be left out of  
the charging sequence.  
History: 1985 AACS.  
R 336.2032 Reference test method 9C.  
Rule 1032. Reference test method 9C, opacity measurement for basic oxygen  
furnace operations and hot metal transfer and desulfurization operations at steel  
manufacturing facilities, reads as follows:  
Fugitive and nonfugitive visible emission evaluation for basic oxygen furnace  
operations, hot metal desulfurization, and hot metal transfer operations shall be  
conducted as specified in reference test method 9, with the exception that the data  
reduction provisions of section 2.5 of method 9 shall be based on an average of 12  
consecutive readings recorded at 15-second intervals.  
History: 1985 AACS.  
R 336.2033 Test methods for coke oven quench towers.  
Rule 1033. (1) Test methods as applicable to coke oven quench towers. The  
publication entitled "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,"  
23rd edition, must apply to the measurement of total dissolved solids in coke oven  
quench tower water.  
(2) In addition to the provisions in “Standard Methods for the Examination of Water  
and Wastewater” under subrule (1), all of the following provisions must apply to the  
measurement of total dissolved solids in coke oven quench tower water:  
(a) The quench tower makeup water must be sampled at locations downstream of  
any makeup water additions.  
(b) The quench tower water must be sampled between the quench tower sump and  
the quench tower spray nozzles.  
(c) One sample of quench tower water for all operating quench towers must be  
collected once per day, 5 days per week.  
(d) Compliance with the applicable quench tower limits must be determined on a  
weekly basis.  
(e) For purposes of determining compliance, either individual analysis of the  
collected samples may be averaged or a weekly composite analysis may be performed.  
History: 1985 AACS; 2025 MR 17, Eff. Sept. 10, 2025.  
R 336.2040 Method for determination of volatile organic compound emissions  
from coating lines and graphic arts lines.  
Rule 1040. (1) The methods described in this rule must be used for the  
determination of volatile organic compound emissions from coating lines and graphic arts  
Page 77  
lines for the purpose of determining compliance, during the specified averaging period,  
with an emission limit. For emission limits expressed as pounds of volatile organic  
compounds per gallon of coating, minus water, as applied. Concentrations of volatile  
organic compounds in coatings and inks must be determined by excluding water and  
compounds that are used as organic solvents and are excluded from the definition of  
volatile organic compound from both the volume of volatiles in the coatings and inks and  
the volume of the coatings and inks as applied. The emission limits can be contained in  
any of the following:  
(a) These rules.  
(b) A permit to install.  
(c) A permit to operate.  
(d) A voluntary agreement.  
(e) A performance contract.  
(f) A stipulation.  
(g) An order of the department.  
(2) Unless otherwise specified in these rules or in a legally enforceable permit,  
order, or contract as described in subrule (1) of this rule, for a particular coating line or  
graphic arts line, the applicable method for the determination of volatile organic  
emissions from coating lines and graphic arts lines is based on the form of the specified  
emission limit as follows:  
(a) For coating lines that do not have an add-on emissions control device for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
coating, minus water, as applied, use the method described in subrule (12)(a) of this rule.  
(b) For coating lines that have 1 or more add-on emissions control devices for  
which emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon  
of coating, minus water, as applied, use the method described in subrule (12)(b) of this  
rule.  
(c) For coating lines that do not have an add-on emissions control device for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
coating solids, as applied, use the method described in subrule (12)(c) of this rule.  
(d) For coating lines with 1 or more add-on emissions control devices for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
coating solids, as applied, use the method described in subrule (12)(d) of this rule.  
(e) For coating lines that do not have an add-on emissions control device for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
applied coating solids, use the method described in subrule (12)(e) of this rule.  
(f) For coating lines that have 1 or more add-on emissions control devices for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
applied coating solids, use the method described in subrule (12)(f) of this rule.  
(g) For graphic arts lines that do not have an add-on emissions control device for  
which emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per pound  
of solids, as applied, use the method described in subrule (12)(g) of this rule.  
(h) For graphic arts lines that have 1 or more add-on emissions control devices for  
which emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per pound  
of solids, as applied, use the method described in subrule (12)(h) of this rule.  
Page 78  
(i) For flatwood paneling coating lines that do not have an add-on emissions control  
device for which emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds  
per 1,000 square feet of coated finished product, use the method described in subrule  
(12)(i) of this rule.  
(j) For flatwood paneling coating lines that have 1 or more add-on emissions control  
devices for which emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds  
per 1,000 square feet of coated finished product, use the method described in subrule  
(12)(j) of this rule.  
(3) The following nomenclature applies to the equations described in this rule:  
(a) a = An individual duct through which gases containing volatile organic  
compounds are ducted to an add-on emissions control device.  
(b) B = Modified emission limit, converted from pounds of volatile organic  
compounds per gallon of coating, minus water, as applied, to pounds of volatile organic  
compounds per gallon of coating solids as applied.  
(c) Cim = Concentration of volatile organic compounds, as measured by the  
applicable method, in the effluent gas flowing through stack "m" leaving the add-on  
emissions control device, parts per million by volume.  
(d) Cza = Concentration of volatile organic compounds, as measured by the  
applicable method, in the influent gas flowing through duct "a" entering the add-on  
emissions control device, parts per million by volume.  
(e) Dci = Density of each ink or coating "i" as received from the ink or coating  
supplier, pounds per gallon of ink or coating.  
(f) Dsj = Density of each volatile organic compound dilution solvent "j" added to the  
coating, pounds per gallon of solvent, minus water.  
(g) DE = Volatile organic compound destruction efficiency of the add-on emissions  
control device.  
(h) E = Emission limit expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per  
gallon of coating, minus water, as applied.  
(i) GT = Total volume of all coatings "z" used during the averaging period, gallons  
of coating, minus water, as applied.  
(j) i = An individual coating used during the averaging period that belongs to the  
coating category for which a compliance determination is being made pursuant to the  
provisions of this rule. For a graphic arts line, "i" is an individual ink or coating used  
during the averaging period.  
(k) j = An individual dilution solvent used during the averaging period that is used  
in conjunction with a coating "i".  
(l) k = An individual method of application of coating solids.  
(m) Lci = Volume of each coating "i" used during the averaging period, gallons of  
coating, minus water, as applied.  
(n) Ldi = Volume of each ink or coating "i" as received from the ink or coating  
supplier and used during the averaging period, gallons of ink or coating.  
(o) Lik = Volume of each coating "i" used by each application method "k" during  
the averaging period, gallons of coating, minus water, as applied.  
(p) Lsj = Volume of each volatile organic compound dilution solvent "j" added to  
the coating during the averaging period, gallons of solvent, minus water.  
Page 79  
(q) M = Total weight of volatile organic compounds in all coatings "z" used during  
the averaging period for a coating line or a graphic arts line, pounds.  
(r) m = An individual stack through which gases containing volatile organic  
compounds are ducted to the ambient air from an add-on emissions control device.  
(s) Mr = Total weight of volatile organic compounds recovered from a recovery-  
type add-on emissions control device during the averaging period, pounds.  
(t) N = Fraction, by weight, of the total volatile organic compounds emitted from an  
operation which is captured and enters the add-on emissions control device, pound per  
pound.  
(u) NTr = Fraction, by weight, of the total volatile organic compounds in all  
coatings "z" used during the averaging period for a coating line or a graphic arts line  
which is controlled by an add-on emissions control device "r," pound per pound.  
(v) P = For an individual coating "i," pounds of volatile organic compounds per  
gallon of coating, minus water, as applied.  
(w) Ps = For an individual coating "i," pounds of volatile organic compounds,  
minus water, as received from the ink or coating supplier.  
(x) Pa = As used in subrule (12)(a) of this rule for coating lines that do not have an  
add-on emissions control device, volume-weighted average pounds of volatile organic  
compounds per gallon of coating, minus water, as applied, for a single coating category  
during the averaging period.  
(y) Pb = As used in subrule (12)(b) of this rule for coating lines that have 1 or more  
add-on emissions control devices, volume-weighted average pounds of volatile organic  
compounds per gallon of coating, minus water, as applied, for a single coating category  
during the averaging period.  
(z) Pc = As used in subrule (12)(c) of this rule for coating lines that do not have an  
add-on emissions control device, volume-weighted average pounds of volatile organic  
compounds per gallon of coating solids, as applied, for a single coating category during  
the averaging period.  
(aa) Pd = As used in subrule (12)(d) of this rule for coating lines that have 1 or more  
add-on emissions control devices, volume-weighted average pounds of volatile organic  
compounds per gallon of coating solids, as applied, for a single coating category during  
the averaging period.  
(bb) Pe = As used in subrule (12)(e) of this rule for coating lines that do not have an  
add-on emissions control device, volume- weighted average pounds of volatile organic  
compounds per gallon of applied coating solids for a single coating category during the  
averaging period.  
(cc) Pf = As used in subrule (12)(f) of this rule for coating lines that have 1 or more  
add-on emissions control devices, volume-weighted average pounds of volatile organic  
compounds per gallon of applied coating solids for a single coating category during the  
averaging period.  
(dd) Pg = As used in subrule (12)(g) of this rule for graphic arts lines that do not  
have an add-on emissions control device, average pounds of volatile organic compounds  
per pound of solids, as applied, for all inks and coatings used during the averaging period.  
(ee) Ph = As used in subrule (12)(h) of this rule for graphic arts lines that have 1 or  
more add-on emissions control devices, average pounds of volatile organic compounds  
per pound of solids, as applied, for all inks and coatings used during the averaging period.  
Page 80  
(ff) Pi = As used in subrule (12)(i) of this rule for flatwood paneling coating lines  
that do not have an add-on emissions control devices, volume-weighted average pounds  
of volatile organic compounds per 1,000 square feet of coated finished product for a  
single-coating category during the averaging period.  
(gg) Pj = As used in subrule (12)(j) of this rule for flatwood paneling coating lines  
that have 1 or more add-on emissions control devices, volume-weighted average pounds  
of volatile organic compounds per 1,000 square feet of coated finished product for a  
single-coating category during the averaging period.  
(hh) Qim = Volumetric flow rate of the effluent gas flowing through stack "m"  
leaving the add-on emissions control device, dry standard cubic feet per hour.  
(ii) Qza = Volumetric flow rate of the influent gas flowing through duct "a" entering  
the add-on emissions control device, dry standard cubic feet per hour.  
(jj) Q3n = Volumetric flow rate of the effluent gas leaving an uncontrolled stack "n,"  
dry standard cubic feet per hour.  
(kk) r = An individual add-on emissions control device.  
(ll) Rr = Reduction efficiency of a single add-on emissions control device.  
(mm) Rt = Overall reduction efficiency of all add-on emissions control devices used  
for a coating line or a graphic arts line.  
(nn) s =The total number of different add-on control devices "r" on a coating line or  
graphic arts line.  
(oo) sq = The total surface area of coated finished product for a single-coating  
category for a flatwood paneling coating line during the averaging period, square feet.  
(pp) T = Overall transfer efficiency for all coatings "i" for a single-coating category  
on a coating line for the averaging period.  
(qq) t = The total number of stacks "m" leaving an add-on emissions control device  
"r".  
(rr) Ti = Transfer efficiency for application of coating "i," %.  
(ss) u = Total number of ducts "a" entering an add-on emissions control device "r".  
(tt) Uci = For representative colors and parts that are tested for transfer efficiency,  
"Uci" is the volume of each representative color of coating that is applied to each  
representative part on a coating line during the averaging period.  
(uu) V = For a coating line, the volume of solids in all coatings used "zc" during the  
averaging period, gallons.  
(vv) Vci = Proportion of solids by volume in each coating "i," gallon of solids per  
gallon of coating, minus water, as applied.  
(ww) W = For a graphic arts line, the weight of solids in all inks and coatings used  
"zg" during the averaging period, pounds.  
(xx) Wci = Proportion of volatiles, volatile organic compounds, water, and exempt  
compounds, by weight in each ink or coating "i" as received from the ink or coating  
supplier, pound of volatiles per pound of coating.  
(yy) x = The total number of different application methods "k."  
(zz) y = The total number of different dilution solvents "j."  
(aaa) z = The total number of different coatings "i" used on a coating line or  
different number of inks and coatings "i" used on a graphic arts line during the averaging  
period. "z" is used generically in the equations specified in this rule for "zc" when the  
Page 81  
calculation is made for a coating line and for "zg" when the calculation is made for a  
graphic arts line.  
(bbb) zc = The total number of different coatings "i" in the same coating category  
used during the averaging period.  
(ccc) zg = The total number of different inks and coatings "i" used during the  
averaging period.  
(4) The following provisions apply to the calculations for a coating line or graphic  
arts line made pursuant to the methods described in this rule:  
(a) When carrying out calculations, carry not less than 5 significant digits in  
intermediate calculations. Round off figures after the final calculation, rounding off  
calculated emission numbers to not less than 2, but not more than 3, significant figures.  
(b) The calculations for a coating line must include all of the coatings which are in  
the same coating category and which are used during the averaging period as specified in  
the applicable emission limit.  
(c) Except as specified in R 336.1624(5)(d), the calculations for a graphic arts line  
must include all of the inks and coatings that are used during the averaging period as  
specified in the applicable emission limit.  
(5) The volatile organic compound content of an ink or coating, minus water, as  
applied, "P," must be determined using any of the following methods:  
(a) The volatile organic compound content of an ink or coating, minus water, as  
applied, "P," must be determined according to all of the following provisions:  
(i) The volatile organic compound content, minus water, as applied, must be  
determined as follows:  
(A) For a coating used on a coating line or a coating used on a graphic arts line,  
the volatile organic compound content, minus water, as applied, must be determined  
using federal reference method 24 or federal reference method 24A, as applicable to the  
coating, as described in R 336.2004, or an alternate method approved by the department.  
(B) For an ink that is used on a graphic arts line, the volatile organic compound  
content, minus water, as applied, must be determined using federal reference method 24  
or federal reference method 24A, as applicable, as described in R 336.2004.  
(ii) The ink or coating sample must be taken at a point where the sample will be  
representative of the ink or coating material as applied.  
(iii) The sample must be stored in an enclosed container that is not less than 1 pint  
in volume.  
(iv) By using a procedure that is acceptable to the department, the amount of any  
compound in the sample that is excluded from the definition of volatile organic  
compound may be quantified and subtracted from the total amount of volatiles in the  
sample as determined by federal reference method 24, federal reference method 24A, or  
an alternate method that is approved by the department. In this case, the volume of any  
excluded compound in the sample must also be subtracted from the volume of the ink or  
coating sample.  
(b) Upon written approval by the department, the volatile organic compound  
content of an ink or coating may be determined from formulation data, which includes  
batch composition information from the ink or coating manufacturer and the amount of  
volatile organic compound dilution solvent added to the ink or coating before application.  
In this case, "P" must be calculated using the following equation:  
Page 82  
Ps+  
Ldi  
Lsj Dsj  
P=  
+
Ldi Lsj  
(c) If a coating or ink is tested by a federal reference method 24 or 24A analysis or  
by an alternate method approved by the department and the results are different than  
calculated through formulation data review, then the test method results must be used for  
determining compliance with the emission limit.  
(6) The weight of volatile organic compounds that are used during the averaging  
period must be calculated using the following equation, where "z" is the total number of  
coatings used:  
z
M =  
P
Lci  
i=1  
(7) The total volume of coating solids that are used during the averaging period must  
be calculated using the following equation, where "z" is the total number of coatings  
used:  
z
V =  
Lci Vci  
i=1  
(8) The total weight of ink and coating solids that are used during the averaging  
period must be calculated using the following equation, where "zg" is the total number of  
inks and coatings used during the averaging period:  
zg  
W =  
(1- )  
Ldi Dci W ci  
i=1  
(9) The transfer efficiency must be determined by the following method, if approved  
by the department, or by an alternate method approved by the department:  
(a) A person that is responsible for the transfer efficiency test shall identify all of  
the following in a coating operation transfer efficiency test proposal and submit the  
proposal to the department for approval not less than 30 days before the transfer  
efficiency test:  
(i) All processing sequences. A processing sequence is the combination and order  
of paint booths, flash-off areas, ovens, and application equipment necessary to apply a  
coating.  
(ii) The coating categories used on each processing sequence.  
(iii) The representative coating color in each coating category. A representative  
color must be determined based on the volume of coating used in relation to the total  
volume of coating category coatings used and any other parameters acceptable to the  
department. If it is believed by the department that the transfer efficiency of the various  
coatings within the same coating category would be different as a result of different  
coating technologies, such as for metallic topcoat coatings and nonmetallic topcoat  
coatings, 2 or more representative coating colors may be required by the department to be  
tested.  
(iv) At a minimum, 2 different representative parts coated in each processing  
sequence. A representative part must be determined based on the numbers of the part  
coated in relation to the total number of parts coated, the configuration of the part, and  
any other parameters acceptable to the department.  
Page 83  
(b) For the initial transfer efficiency tests, a person shall test, at a minimum, the  
representative color or colors in each coating category used on each representative part in  
each processing sequence. To more closely represent actual process conditions, coatings  
applied wet-on-wet, such as basecoat and clearcoat, may be tested together. Also,  
identical colors or clear coats on identical parts in identical processing sequences need  
not be tested.  
(c) A person that is responsible for the transfer efficiency test shall review the  
operating conditions annually after the initial transfer efficiency tests and demonstrate, to  
the satisfaction of the department, that significant changes have not occurred in coating  
technology, the parts coated, or the processing sequence. The most recent test results  
remain valid for 5 years if the person demonstrates that significant change has not  
occurred. Significant product, processing, material, or application equipment changes  
necessitate retesting of the transfer efficiency of the operations that have been modified.  
The retesting must be done as soon as practicable, but not more than 180 days after the  
start-up and stabilization of the new product, process, material, or application equipment.  
New transfer efficiency values determined by the retest must be used retroactively to the  
start-up of the new product, process, material, or application equipment.  
(d) Retests on a coating line may be limited to a representative coating on not less  
than 2 representative parts in a representative processing sequence, as approved by the  
department. A representative processing sequence must be determined based on coating  
usage, application equipment, and any other parameters acceptable to the department.  
(e) The area in the facility to be used for part weighing must be selected so as to  
provide for an area that has relatively constant temperature and minimal air movement.  
(f) Except as allowed pursuant to the provisions of subdivision (b) of this subrule,  
the coating being tested must be the only coating applied during the transfer efficiency  
test. If the part is weighed, weight loss from all other materials must be accounted for in  
the initial test weight.  
(g) A minimum of 10 parts per transfer efficiency test must be weighed to  
determine the weight of the solids applied. The average weight gain for the 10 parts  
tested must be used as the part weight gain for that transfer efficiency test. All transfer  
efficiency tests for a processing sequence must be completed within a 36-hour period.  
(h) Each part to be painted must be identified and preweighed to the nearest  
0.05 pound.  
(i) The selected paint material at each paint system or paint pot dedicated for the  
transfer efficiency test must be isolated.  
(j) The amount of material used during the transfer efficiency test must be  
determined by either of the following measurement procedures:  
(i) The weight measurement procedure as follows:  
(A) Weigh the tank of reduced paint, to the nearest 0.01 pound, after all supply  
and return lines have been filled.  
(B) Connect the paint tank to the system and paint the test parts.  
(C) Reweigh the tank to the nearest 0.01 pound.  
(D) Determine the weight of paint material used by subtracting the final weight of  
the tank from the initial weight of the tank.  
(E) Obtain paint samples for weight solids determination.  
Page 84  
(F) Do both the initial and final weighings of the paint tank with the tank  
pressurized or with the tank not pressurized.  
(ii) A volume measurement procedure that is acceptable to the department.  
(k) Each painted test part must be reweighed to the nearest 0.01 pound after paint  
has cured and cooled.  
(l) The weight of the solids in the paint samples must be determined using  
ASTM-D2369, adopted by reference in R 336.1902.  
(m) The coating density in pounds per gallon must be determined using  
ASTM-D1475, adopted by reference in R 336.1902.  
(n) The following equation must be used to calculate the transfer efficiency for the  
application of coating "i":  
Ti =  
(o) Where more than 1 part type or coating are tested on a coating line for a single  
coating category, the overall transfer efficiency "T" for the coating category must be  
determined by averaging the individual transfer efficiency values based on a volume-  
weighted average of coatings applied during the averaging period for each different color  
and part type tested. This overall transfer efficiency must be calculated by using the  
following equation, where "aa" is the number of coatings tested and "bb" is the number of  
part types tested:  
aa bb  
T ci U ci  
  
i=1 c=1  
T =  
aa bb  
U ci  
  
i-1 c=1  
(p) Baseline operating parameters of the paint application equipment and the paint  
booths must be established for each transfer efficiency test and must serve as a basis for  
determining compliance. These parameters must be included in a transfer efficiency test  
report and must include all of the following information:  
(i) Type of spray equipment.  
(ii) Electrostatic voltage.  
(iii) Size and geometry of the part coated.  
(iv) Gun-to-target distance, nonmanual.  
(v) Number of parts per conveyor hook.  
(vi) Air velocity in spray booth, linear feet per minute.  
(vii) Fluid flow settings, by color.  
(viii) Bell revolutions per minute for minibells.  
(ix) Atomizing air pressure.  
(10) The capture efficiency "N" must be determined as follows:  
(a) The capture efficiency "N" must be determined by using the methods specified  
in 40 CFR 52.741(a)(4)(iii) entitled "Capture system efficiency test protocols" and in  
appendix B entitled "VOM Measurement Techniques for Capture Efficiency," with the  
following modifications:  
(i) The general modifications are as follows:  
(A) Replace the requirements under 40 CFR 52.741(a)(4)(iii)(A) (2) with the  
following requirements: If a source owner or operator uses a control device designed to  
Page 85  
collect and recover volatile organic compounds, for example, carbon adsorber, an explicit  
measurement of capture efficiency is not necessary if the conditions described in 40 CFR  
52.741(a)(4)(iii) are met. The overall emission reduction efficiency of the control system  
must be determined each day by directly comparing the input liquid volatile organic  
compounds to the recovered liquidvolatile organic compounds. The procedure for use in  
this situation is given in 40 CFR 60.433, with the modification to 40 CFR  
52.741(a)(4)(iii)(A)(2)(i) under paragraph (B) of this rule.  
(B) Replace the requirements under 40 CFR 52.741(a)(4)(iii)(A)(2)(i) with the  
following requirements: The source owner or operator shall obtain data each day for the  
solvent usage and solvent recovery and determine the solvent recovery efficiency of the  
system each day using a 7-day rolling period. The recovery efficiency for each day is  
computed as the ratio of the total recovered solvent for that day and the prior 6  
consecutive operating days to the total solvent usage for the same 7-day period weighted  
average as given in 40 CFR §60.433. This ratio must be expressed as a percentage. The  
ratio must be computed within 72 hours after each 24-hour period. With the approval of  
the administrator, a source that believes that the 7-day rolling period is not appropriate  
may use an alternative multi-day rolling period of not more than 30 days.  
(C) Requirements in 40 CFR 52.741 appendix Bfor procedures G.1, G.2, F.2, F.1,  
and L, sections titled “1.4 Sampling requirements” must be replaced with the following:  
A capture efficiency test must consist of not less than 3 sampling runs. Each run must  
cover at least 1 complete production cycle, but must be not less than 3 hours long. The  
sampling time for each run need not be more than 8 hours, even if the production cycle  
has not been completed. Alternative sampling times may be used if approved by the  
administrator.  
(ii) Owners or operators of coating lines that have multiple stacks may choose to  
apply 1 of the 4 protocols under 40 CFR 52.741(a)(4)(iii)(B) or the protocol described  
under subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, in addition to the modifications listed in  
paragraph (i) of this subdivision except for the modification to 1.4 listed in paragraph  
(i)(C)(1) of this subdivision, which is replaced with the following language as described  
under subparagraph (B) of this paragraph:  
(A) Liquid/gas method measuring the captured emission, Gw, and liquid input, L.  
This procedure may only be used when the capture efficiency for a coating line is  
expected to be less than 50%. The capture efficiency equation to be used for this protocol  
is:  
CE = Gw/L  
Where:  
CE = Coating line capture efficiency, decimal fraction.  
Gw = Mass of vom captured and delivered to a control device.  
L = Mass of liquid vom input to coating line.  
Procedure G.1 contained in appendix B of this section is used to obtain Gw. Procedure  
L contained in appendix B or the alternate method in R 336.2007 must be used to  
determine L.  
Page 86  
(B) Requirements in 40 CFR 52.741 appendix B for procedures G.1, G.2, F.2, F.1,  
and L, under the procedure section titled “1.4 Sampling requirements” must be replaced  
with the following requirements: A capture efficiency test must consist of not less than 3  
sampling runs. Each run must cover at least 1 complete production or processing cycle or  
must be at least 1 hour in duration. For automotive surface coating operations, the  
sampling time per test must be based on coating a minimum of 3 representative vehicles.  
(b) The test protocols and 40 CFR 52.741(a)(4)(iii) appendix B are adopted by  
reference under R 336.1902.  
(c) Where multiple capture systems are used on a coating line or a graphic arts line,  
the appropriate capture efficiency for each application method must be determined and  
the overall capture efficiency for the coating line must be based on a mass-weighted  
average of all volatile organic compounds used on the coating line or the graphic arts line  
during the averaging period.  
(11) The overall reduction efficiency of add-on emissions control devices must be  
determined using 1 or more of the following methods, as applicable:  
(a) When a destructive-type add-on emissions control device is used, the reduction  
efficiency for the add-on emissions control device must be determined by using the  
following method:  
(i) The destruction efficiency of the add-on emissions control device is calculated  
by using the following equation, where "u" is the total number of ducts entering the  
control device and "t" is the total number of stacks leaving the control device:  
u
t
-
Q
Q
im Cim  
za C za  
a=1  
m=1  
DE =  
u
Q
za C za  
a=1  
(ii) Using the destruction efficiency as determined in paragraph (i) of this  
subdivision, the reduction efficiency of the add-on emissions control device is calculated  
by using the following equation:  
=(DE)N  
Rr  
(iii) If there is only 1 add-on emissions control device used on a coating line or  
graphic arts line, use the value calculated for "Rr" pursuant to paragraph (ii) of this  
subdivision as the value for RT in subsequent calculations.  
(iv) The concentration of volatile organic compound emissions entering and exiting  
the add-on emissions control device must be determined by using federal reference  
methods 25 or 25A, federal reference method 18 if approved by the department, the  
alternate version of federal reference method 25 incorporating the Byron analysis, as  
described in R 336.2004, or an alternate method that is acceptable to the department.  
federal reference methods as described in R 336.2004, must be used as applicable for the  
determination of the volumetric flow rate in the effluent gas.  
(b) When an add-on emissions control device is used that recovers volatile organic  
compounds, the reduction efficiency of the device must be determined by using 1 of the  
following methods:  
(i) A mass balance of the products used and the products recovered, using the  
following equation:  
Page 87  
M
M
r
=
R r  
(ii) An alternate method that is acceptable to the department.  
(iii) If there is only 1 add-on emissions control device used on a coating line or a  
graphic arts line, use the value calculated for "R " pursuant to paragraph (i) or (ii) of this  
r
subdivision as the value for R in subsequent calculations.  
T
(c) If there is more than 1 add-on emissions control device used on a coating line or  
a graphic arts line, calculate the overall reduction efficiency by using the following  
equation:  
s
=
(
)
RT  
Rr NTr  
r=1  
(12) Compliance with the specified emission limit must be determined using 1 of the  
following methods, as applicable, based on the form of the emission limit:  
(a) For coating lines that do not have an add-on emissions control device for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
coating, minus water, as applied, use either of the following methods:  
(i) If only 1 coating is used on the coating line during the averaging time, use the  
following method:  
(A) Determine the volatile organic compound content of the coating, minus water,  
as applied, "P," by using the method described in subrule (5) of this rule.  
(B) If "P" is less than or equal to the specified emission limit, the coating line  
meets the emission limit.  
(ii) If more than 1 coating of the same coating category is used on the coating line  
during the averaging period, use the following method:  
(A) Determine the volatile organic compound content of each coating, minus  
water, as applied, that belongs to the same coating category "P" used during the  
averaging period by using the method described in subrule (5) of this rule.  
(B) Determine the weight of volatile organic compounds used during the  
averaging period "M" by using the method described in subrule (6) of this rule.  
(C) Determine the total volume of coatings used on the coating line during the  
averaging period "GT" using the following equation:  
z
=
GT  
Lci  
i=1  
(D) Determine the volume-weighted average weight of volatile organic  
compounds per gallon, minus water, as applied, by using the following equation:  
M
=
Pa  
GT  
(E) If "Pa" is less than or equal to the specified emission limit, the coating line  
meets the emission limit.  
(b) For coating lines that have 1 or more add-on emissions control devices for  
which emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon  
of coating, minus water, as applied, use the following method:  
Page 88  
(i) Convert the specified emission limit to a modified emission limit "B" expressed  
in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of coating solids, as applied, by using  
the following equation:  
E
E
B=  
1-  
7.36  
(ii) Determine the volatile organic compound content of each coating, minus water,  
as applied, that belongs to the same coating category "P" used during the averaging  
period by using the method described in subrule (5) of this rule.  
(iii) Determine the weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging  
period "M" by using the method described in subrule (6) of this rule.  
(iv) Determine the total volume of coating solids used during the averaging period  
"V" by using the method described in subrule (7) of this rule.  
(v) Determine the overall capture efficiency "N" by using the method described in  
subrule (10) of this rule.  
(vi) Determine the overall reduction efficiency "RT" by using the method described  
in subrule (11) of this rule.  
(vii) Determine the volume-weighted average weight of volatile organic  
compounds per gallon of coating solids, as applied, "Pb," by using the following equation:  
M
=
(1-  
)
RT  
Pb  
V
(viii) If "Pb" is less than or equal to the modified limit "B," the coating line meets  
the emission limit.  
(c) For coating lines that do not have an add-on emissions control device for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
coating solids, as applied, use the following method:  
(i) Determine the volatile organic compound content of each coating, minus water,  
as applied, that belongs to the same coating category "P" used during the averaging  
period by using the method described in subrule (5) of this rule.  
(ii) Determine the weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging  
period "M" by using the method described in subrule (6) of this rule.  
(iii) Determine the total volume of coating solids used during the averaging period  
"V" by using the method described in subrule (7) of this rule.  
(iv) Determine the volume-weighted average weight of volatile organic compounds  
per gallon of coating solids, as applied, "Pc," by using the following equation:  
M
=
Pc  
V
(v) If "Pc" is less than or equal to the specified limit, the coating line meets the  
emission limit.  
(d) For coating lines that have 1 or more add-on emissions control devices for  
which emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon  
of coating solids, as applied, use the following method:  
(i) Determine the volatile organic compound content of each coating, minus water,  
as applied, that belongs to the same coating category "P" used during the averaging  
period by using the method described in subrule (5) of this rule.  
Page 89  
(ii) Determine the weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging  
period "M" by using the method described in subrule (6) of this rule.  
(iii) Determine the total volume of coating solids used during the averaging period  
"V" by using the method described in subrule (7) of this rule.  
(iv) Determine the overall capture efficiency "N" by using the method described in  
subrule (10) of this rule.  
(v) Determine the overall reduction efficiency "RT" by using the method described  
in subrule (11) of this rule.  
(vi) Determine the volume-weighted average weight of volatile organic compounds  
per gallon of coating solids, as applied, "Pd," by using the following equation:  
M
=
(1-  
)
RT  
Pd  
V
(vii) If "Pd" is less than or equal to the specified limit, the coating line meets the  
emission limit.  
(e) For coating lines that do not have an add-on emissions control device for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
applied coating solids, use the following method:  
(i) Determine the volatile organic compound content of each coating, minus water,  
as applied, that belongs to the same coating category "P" used during the averaging  
period by using the method described in subrule (5) of this rule.  
(ii) Determine the weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging  
period "M" by using the method described in subrule (6) of this rule.  
(iii) Determine the total volume of coating solids used during the averaging period  
"V" by using the method described in subrule (7) of this rule.  
(iv) Determine the overall transfer efficiency "T" by using the method described in  
subrule (9) of this rule.  
(v) Determine the volume-weighted average weight of volatile organic compounds  
per gallon of applied coating solids "Pe" by using the following equation:  
M
=
Pe  
(T)  
V
100  
(vi) If "Pe" is less than or equal to the specified limit, the coating line meets the  
emission limit.  
(f) For coating lines that have 1 or more add-on emissions control devices for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
applied coating solids, use the following method:  
(i) Determine the volatile organic compound content of each coating, minus water,  
as applied, that belongs to the same coating category "P" used during the averaging  
period by using the method described in subrule (5) of this rule.  
(ii) Determine the weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging  
period "M" by using the method described in subrule (6) of this rule.  
(iii) Determine the total volume of coating solids used during the averaging period  
"V" by using the method described in subrule (7) of this rule.  
(iv) Determine the overall transfer efficiency "T" by using the method described in  
subrule (9) of this rule.  
Page 90  
(v) Determine the overall capture efficiency "N" by using the method described in  
subrule (10) of this rule.  
(vi) Determine the overall reduction efficiency "RT" by using the method described  
in subrule (11) of this rule.  
(vii) Determine the volume-weighted average weight of volatile organic  
compounds per gallon of applied coating solids "Pf" by using the following equation:  
M
=
(1-  
)
RT  
Pf  
(T)  
V
100  
(viii) If "Pf" is less than or equal to the specified limit, the coating line meets the  
emission limit.  
(g) For graphic arts lines that do not have an add-on emissions control device for  
which emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per pound  
of solids, as applied, use the following method:  
(i) Determine the volatile organic compound content of each ink and coating,  
minus water, as applied, "P," used during the averaging period by using the method  
described in subrule (5) of this rule.  
(ii) Determine the weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging  
period "M" by using the method described in subrule (6) of this rule.  
(iii) Determine the weight of ink and coating solids used during the averaging  
period "W" by using the method described in subrule (8) of this rule.  
(iv) Determine the average pounds of volatile organic compound per pound of  
solids, as applied, "Pg," by using the following equation:  
M
=
Pg  
W
(v) If "Pg" is less than or equal to the specified limit, the graphic arts line meets the  
emission limit.  
(h) For graphic arts lines that have 1 or more add-on emissions control devices for  
which emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per pound  
of solids, as applied, use the following method:  
(i) Determine the volatile organic compound content of each ink and coating,  
minus water, as applied, "P," used during the averaging period by using the method  
described in subrule (5) of this rule.  
(ii) Determine the weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging  
period "M" by using the method described in subrule (6) of this rule.  
(iii) Determine the weight of ink and coating solids used during the averaging  
period "W" by using the method described in subrule (8) of this rule.  
(iv) Determine the overall capture efficiency "N" by using the method described in  
subrule (10) of this rule.  
(v) Determine the overall reduction efficiency "Rt" by using the method described  
in subrule (11) of this rule.  
(vi) Determine the average pounds of volatile organic compound per pound of  
solids, as applied, "Ph," by using the following equation:  
M
=
(1-  
)
RT  
Ph  
W
Page 91  
(vii) If "Ph" is less than or equal to the specified limit, the graphic arts line meets  
the emission limit.  
(i) For flatwood paneling coating lines that do not have an add-on emissions control  
device for which emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compound  
per 1,000 square feet of coated finished product, use the following method:  
(i) Determine the volatile organic compound content of each coating, minus water,  
as applied that belongs to the same coating category "P" used during the averaging period  
by using the method described in subrule (5) of this rule.  
(ii) Determine the weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging  
period "M" by using the method described in subrule (6) of this rule.  
(iii) Determine the total surface area of coated finished product for the coating  
category during the averaging period "sq".  
(iv) Determine the volume-weighted average pounds of volatile organic  
compounds per 1,000 square feet of coated finished product "Pi" by using the following  
equation:  
M
sq  
=
Pi  
1,000  
Where the units for the term 1,000 are square feet.  
(v) If "Pi" is less than or equal to the specified limit, the coating line meets the  
emission limit.  
(j) For flatwood paneling coating lines that have 1 or more add-on emissions control  
devices for which emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds  
per 1,000 square feet of coated finished product, use the following method:  
(i) Determine the volatile organic compound content of each coating, minus water,  
as applied, that belongs to the same coating category "P" used during the averaging  
period by using the method described in subrule (5) of this rule.  
(ii) Determine the weight of volatile organic compounds used during the specified  
averaging period "M" by using the method described in subrule (6) of this rule.  
(iii) Determine the total surface area of coated finished product for the coating  
category during the averaging period "sq".  
(iv) Determine the overall capture efficiency "N" by using the method described in  
subrule (10) of this rule.  
(v) Determine the overall reduction efficiency "RT" by using the method described  
in subrule (11) of this rule.  
(vi) Determine the volume-weighted average pounds of volatile organic  
compounds per 1,000 square feet of coated finished product "Pj" by using the following  
equation:  
M
sq  
=
(1-  
)
RT  
P j  
1,000  
Where the units for the term 1,000 are square feet.  
(vii) If "Pj" is less than or equal to the specified limit, the coating line meets the  
emission limit.  
Page 92  
History: 1993 AACS; 2002 AACS; 2025 MR 17, Eff. Sept. 10, 2025.  
R 336.2041 Recordkeeping requirements for coating lines and graphic arts lines.  
Rule 1041. (1) Unless otherwise specified in any of the following, the  
recordkeeping requirements specified in this rule must apply to coating lines and graphic  
arts lines subject to emission limits contained in any of the following:  
(a) These rules.  
(b) A permit to install.  
(c) A permit to operate.  
(d) A voluntary agreement.  
(e) A performance contract.  
(f) A stipulation.  
(g) An order of the department.  
(h) A renewable operating permit.  
(2) If a coating line does not have an add-on emissions control device for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
coating, minus water, as applied, and if only 1 coating is used on the coating line during  
the averaging time, then a person shall keep records of the name, identification number,  
volume "Lci," and volatile organic compound content of the coating, minus water, as  
applied, "P," used during the averaging period, as described in R 336.2040(5). If this  
single coating used during an averaging period is in compliance with all of the emission  
limits specified in subrule (1) of this rule, then the volume "Lci" for the averaging period  
may be calculated, based on coating usage records during a time period of not more than  
1 month, with the coating usage prorated to the specified averaging period using a  
method approved by the department for that coating line.  
(3) If a coating line does not have an add-on emissions control device for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
coating, minus water, as applied, and if more than 1 coating of the same coating category  
is used on the coating line during the averaging period, then a person shall keep all of the  
following records:  
(a) The name, identification number, volume "Lci," and volatile organic compound  
content of each coating, minus water, as applied, that belongs to the same coating  
category "P" used during the averaging period, as described in R 336.2040(5). If all  
coatings used on the coating line during an averaging period are in compliance with all of  
the emission limits specified in subrule (1) of this rule, then the volume "Lci" for the  
averaging period may be calculated, based upon coating usage records during a time  
period of not more than 1 month, with the coating usage prorated to the specified  
averaging period using a method approved by the department for that coating line.  
(b) The weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging period  
"M," as described in R 336.2040(6).  
(c) The total volume of coatings used on the coating line during the averaging  
period "GT," as described in R 336.2040(12).  
(d) The volume-weighted average weight of volatile organic compounds per gallon,  
minus water, as applied, "Pa," as described in R 336.2040(12).  
Page 93  
(4) If a coating line has 1 or more add-on emissions control devices for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
coating, minus water, as applied, then a person shall keep all of the following records:  
(a) The name, identification number, volume "Lci," and volatile organic compound  
content of each coating, minus water, as applied, that belongs to the same coating  
category "P" used during the averaging period, as described in R 336.2040(5).  
(b) The weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging period  
"M," as described in R 336.2040(6).  
(c) The total volume of coating solids and volume of ink or coating "Ldi" used  
during the averaging period "V," as described in R 336.2040(7).  
(d) The overall capture efficiency "N," as described in R 336.2040(10).  
(e) The overall reduction efficiency "Rt, " as described in R 336.2040(11),  
including the parameters "Qza," "Cza," "Qim," "Cim," and "Mr."  
(f) The volume-weighted average weight of volatile organic compounds per gallon  
of coating solids, as applied, "Pb," as described in R 336.2040(12).  
(5) If a coating line does not have an add-on emissions control device for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
coating solids, as applied, then a person shall keep all of the following records:  
(a) The name, identification number, volume "Lci," and volatile organic compound  
content of each coating, minus water, as applied, that belongs to the same coating  
category "P" used during the averaging period, as described in R 336.2040(5).  
(b) The weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging period  
"M," as described in R 336.2040(6).  
(c) The total volume of coating solids and volume of ink or coating "Ldi" used  
during the averaging period "V," as described in R 336.2040(7).  
(d) The volume-weighted average weight of volatile organic compounds per gallon  
of coating solids, as applied, "Pc," as described in R 336.2040(12).  
(6) If a coating line has 1 or more add-on emissions control devices for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
coating solids, as applied, then a person shall keep all of the following records:  
(a) The name, identification number, volume "Lci," and volatile organic compound  
content of each coating, minus water, as applied, that belongs to the same coating  
category "P" used during the averaging period, as described in R 336.2040(5).  
(b) The weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging period  
"M," as described in R 336.2040(6).  
(c) The total volume of coating solids and volume of ink or coating "Ldi" used  
during the averaging period "V," as described in R 336.2040(7).  
(d) The overall capture efficiency "N," as described in R 336.2040(10).  
(e) The overall reduction efficiency "Rt," as described in R 336.2040(11), including  
the parameters "Qza," "Cza," "Qim," "Cim," and "Mr."  
(f) The volume-weighted average weight of volatile organic compounds per gallon  
of coating solids, as applied, "Pd," as described in R 336.2040(12).  
(7) If a coating line does not have an add-on emissions control device for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
applied coating solids, then a person shall keep all of the following records:  
Page 94  
(a) The name, identification number, volume "Lci," and volatile organic compound  
content of each coating, minus water, as applied, that belongs to the same coating  
category "P" used during the averaging period, as described in R 336.2040(5).  
(b) The weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging period  
"M," as described in R 336.2040(6).  
(c) The total volume of coating solids and volume of ink or coating "Ldi" used  
during the averaging period "V," as described in R 336.2040(7).  
(d) The overall transfer efficiency "T," as described in R 336.2040(9), including  
"Ti" and "Uci".  
(e) The volume-weighted average weight of volatile organic compounds per gallon  
of applied coating solids "Pe," as described in R 336.2040(12).  
(8) If a coating line has 1 or more add-on emissions control devices for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
applied coating solids, then a person shall keep all of the following records:  
(a) The name, identification number, volume "Lci," and volatile organic compound  
content of each coating, minus water, as applied, that belongs to the same coating  
category "P" used during the averaging period, as described in R 336.2040(5).  
(b) The weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging period  
"M," as described in R 336.2040(6).  
(c) The total volume of coating solids and volume of ink or coating "Ldi" used  
during the averaging period "V," as described in R 336.2040(7).  
(d) The overall transfer efficiency "T," as described in R 336.2040(9), including  
"Ti" and "Uci".  
(e) The overall capture efficiency "N," as described in R 336.2040(10).  
(f) The overall reduction efficiency "Rt," as described in R 336.2040(11), including  
the parameters "Qza," "Cza," "Qim," "Vim," and "Mr."  
(g) The volume-weighted average weight of volatile organic compounds per gallon  
of applied coating solids "Pf," as described in R 336.2040(12).  
(9) If a graphic arts line does not have an add-on emissions control device for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per pound of  
solids, then a person shall keep all of the following records:  
(a) The name, identification number, volume "Lci," and volatile organic compound  
content of each ink and coating, minus water, as applied, "P," used during the averaging  
period, as described in R 336.2040(5).  
(b) The weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging period  
"M," as described in R 336.2040(6).  
(c) The weight of ink and coating solids used during the averaging period "W," as  
described in R 336.2040(8), including "Wci" and "Ldi."  
(d) The average pounds of volatile organic compound per pound of solids, as  
applied, "Pg," as described in R 336.2040(12).  
(10) If a graphic arts line has 1 or more add-on emissions control devices for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per pound of  
solids, as applied, then a person shall keep all of the following records:  
(a) The name, identification number, volume "Lci," and volatile organic compound  
content of each ink and coating, minus water, as applied, "P," used during the averaging  
period, as described in R 336.2040(5).  
Page 95  
(b) The weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging period  
"M," as described in R 336.2040(6).  
(c) The weight of ink and coating solids used during the averaging period "W," as  
described in R 336.2040(8), including "Wci" and "Ldi."  
(d) The overall capture efficiency "N," as described in R 336.2040(10).  
(e) The overall reduction efficiency "Rt," as described in R 336.2040(11), including  
the parameters "Qza," "Cza," "Qim," "Cim," and "Mr."  
(f) The average pounds of volatile organic compound per pound of solids, as  
applied, "Ph," as described in R 336.2040(12).  
(11) If a flatwood paneling coating line does not have an add-on emissions control  
device for which emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compound  
per 1,000 square feet of coated finished product, then a person shall keep all of the  
following records:  
(a) The name, identification number, volume "Lci," and volatile organic compound  
content of each coating, minus water, as applied, "P," used during the averaging period,  
as described in R 336.2040(5).  
(b) The weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging period  
"M," as described in R 336.2040(6).  
(c) The total surface area of coated finished product for the coating category during  
the averaging period "sq," as described in R 336.2040(3).  
(d) The volume-weighted average pounds of volatile organic compounds per 1,000  
square feet of coated finished product "Pi," as described in R 336.2040(12).  
(12) If a flatwood paneling coating line has 1 or more add-on emissions control  
devices for which emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds  
per 1,000 square feet of coated finished product, then a person shall keep all of the  
following records:  
(a) The name, identification number, volume "Lci," and volatile organic compound  
content of each coating, minus water, as applied, "P," used during the averaging period,  
as described in R 336.2040(5).  
(b) The weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging period  
"M," as described in R 336.2040(6).  
(c) The total surface area of coated finished product for the coating category during  
the averaging period "sq," as described in R 336.2040(3).  
(d) The overall capture efficiency "N," as described in R 336.2040(10).  
(e) The overall reduction efficiency "Rt," as described in R 336.2040(11), including  
the parameters "Qza," "Cza," "Qim," "Cim," and "Mr."  
(f) The volume-weighted average pounds of volatile organic compounds per 1,000  
square feet of coated finished product "Pj," as described in R 336.2040(12).  
(13) An owner or operator of primer surfacer or topcoat operations subject to  
emission limits in R 336.1610(11), table 62 or R 336.1610a(4), table 64-a, shall keep  
records as required in the publication entitled "Protocol for Determining the Daily  
Volatile Organic Compound Emission Rate of Automobile and Light-duty Truck Topcoat  
Operations," EPA-453/R-08/002adopted by reference in R 336.1902.  
(14) The records that are required in this rule must be retained for a period of not  
less than 2 complete years after the date of collection and, on request by the department,  
must be submitted to the department in an acceptable format.  
Page 96  
History: 1993 AACS; 1998-2000 AACS; 2002 AACS; 2025 MR 17, Eff. Sept. 10, 2025.  
R 336.2060 Procedures for determination of compliance with R 336.1631.  
Rule 1060. The following procedures shall be used for the determination of  
compliance with R 336.1631:  
(a) The following procedure shall be used for the determination of compliance with  
R 336.1631 emission limitations expressed as pounds of volatile organic compound per  
1,000 pounds of polystyrene resin, dry organic resin, or completed organic resin  
produced:  
(i) Principle. Compliance with R 336.1631 is determined after determining all of  
the following:  
(A) The concentration of volatile organic compounds in the effluent gas vented to  
the atmosphere.  
(B) The flow rate of effluent gas vented to the atmosphere.  
(C) The pounds of polystyrene resin, completed organic resin, or dry organic resin  
produced over a period of time or per batch.  
(D) The length of time for each stage of the resin manufacturing operation.  
(ii) Applicability. This procedure is applicable for the determination of compliance  
with R 336.1631 emission limits expressed as pounds of volatile organic compound per  
1,000 pounds of polystyrene, completed organic, or dry organic resin produced.  
(iii) All of the following provisions apply to procedure:  
(A) The concentration of volatile organic compounds in the effluent gas vented to  
the atmosphere shall be determined using federal reference method 25, as described in  
R 336.2004, or an equivalent method approved by the department. A sample shall be  
taken from each vent emitting volatile organic compounds on all material recovery  
equipment and on all reactors, thinning tanks, and blending tanks. The samples shall be  
taken at a point between the last piece of control equipment on the vent and the vent  
opening to the atmosphere. Two samples shall be taken during each time period or stage  
in the manufacturing process represented by a process change. The results of the 2  
samples shall be averaged.  
(B) The flow rate of effluent gas vented to the atmosphere shall be determined  
using federal reference methods 1 and 2, as described in R 336.2004, or an equivalent  
method approved by the department. The flow rate shall be measured in conjunction  
with the sampling as required in subparagraph (A) of this paragraph. The flow chart shall  
be measured at a point between the last piece of control equipment on the vent and the  
vent opening to the atmosphere. The flow rates shall be measured on each vent stack of  
each piece of equipment affected by the emission limits referred to in this subdivision.  
Flow rates shall be measured on each piece of equipment from which the samples  
referred to in subparagraph (A) of this paragraph are taken.  
(C) The pounds of polystyrene resin, completed organic resin, or dry organic resin  
produced shall be determined from plant production data.  
(D) The length of time for each stage of a resin manufacturing operation shall be  
determined from plant records.  
(iv) All of the following provisions apply to carrying out calculations:  
(A) Nomenclature.  
Page 97  
Csv = Concentration of volatile organic compound in the effluent gas flowing  
through stack v during stage s before venting to the atmosphere (pounds per cubic feet).  
M = Total mass of volatile organic compound emitted through all stacks for every  
stage of the resin manufacturing operation per batch, or per calendar day for continuous  
processes (pounds of volatile organic compound).  
K = Total mass of polystyrene resin, completed organic resin, or dry organic resin  
produced per batch or per calendar day for continuous processes (pounds of resin).  
Qsv = Volumetric flow rate of the effluent gas flowing through stack v during stage  
s (cubic feet per minute).  
R = Actual emission rate from a resin manufacturing process (pounds of volatile  
organic compound per 1,000 pounds of polystyrene resin, completed organic resin, or dry  
organic resin produced).  
Ts = Time period for each stage of the resin manufacturing process (minutes).  
(B) The following equations shall be used:  
(1) Calculate the total mass of volatile organic compound emitted from affected  
stacks for every stage of the resin manufacturing process using the following equation,  
where "a" is the total number of stages of the resin manufacturing process and "b" is the  
total number of stacks emitting volatile organic compound and involved in the  
manufacture of a resin affected by R 336.1631:  
a
b
M =  
QSV  
C
SV  
T
S
   
s1 v1  
(2) Calculate the actual emission rate from material recovery equipment used in the  
manufacture of polystyrene resin, and from reactors, thinning tanks, and blending tanks  
used in the manufacture of completed organic resin and dry organic resin, using the  
following equation:  
(1000) M  
R =  
K
If "R" is less than or equal to the required emission limit expressed as pounds of  
volatile organic compound per 1,000 pounds of polystyrene resin, completed organic  
resin, or dry organic resin produced for the affected resin operation, the resin operation  
meets the emission limit.  
(b) The following procedure shall be used for the determination of compliance with  
the R 336.1631 emission limit requiring control equipment to reduce the total volatile  
organic compound emissions from reactors, thinning tanks, and blending tanks by 95  
weight percent:  
(i) Principle. Compliance with R 336.1631 is determined after determining all of  
the following:  
(A) The concentration of volatile organic compounds in the effluent gas vented to  
the atmosphere.  
Page 98  
(B) The concentration of volatile organic compounds in the effluent gas vented to  
the first piece of control equipment following the reactors, thinning tanks, or blending  
tanks.  
(C) The flow rate of the effluent gas vented to the atmosphere and vented to the first  
piece of control equipment following the reactors, thinning tanks, or blending tanks.  
(ii) Applicability. This procedure is applicable for the determination of compliance  
with the R 336.1631 emission limit requiring control equipment to reduce the total  
volatile organic compound emissions from reactors, thinning tanks, and blending tanks  
by 95 weight percent.  
(iii) All of the following provisions apply to procedure:  
(A) The concentration of volatile organic compounds in the effluent gas vented to  
the atmosphere shall be determined using federal reference method 25, as described in  
R 336.2004, or an equivalent method approved by the department. A sample shall be  
taken from each vent emitting volatile organic compounds on all reactors, thinning tanks,  
and blending tanks. The samples shall be taken at a point between the last piece of  
control equipment on the vent and the vent opening to the atmosphere. Two samples  
shall be taken during each time period or stage in the manufacturing process represented  
by a process change. The results of the 2 samples shall be averaged.  
(B) The concentration of volatile organic compounds in the effluent gas vented  
from reactors, thinning tanks, and blending tanks shall be determined using federal  
reference method 25, as described in R 336.2004, or an equivalent method approved by  
the department. A sample shall be taken from each vent containing volatile organic  
compounds on all reactors, thinning tanks, and blending tanks. The samples shall be  
taken at a point on the vent immediately before entering the first piece of control  
equipment from the reactor, thinning tank, or blending tank. Two samples shall be taken  
at each time period or stage in the manufacturing process represented by a process  
change. The results of the 2 samples shall be averaged.  
(C) The flow rate of the effluent gas vented to the atmosphere and vented from  
reactors, thinning tanks, and blending tanks shall be determined using federal reference  
methods 1 and 2, as described in R 336.2004, or an equivalent method approved by the  
department. The flow rate shall be measured in conjunction with the sampling as  
required in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of this paragraph. The flow rate shall be measured  
at a point between the last piece of control equipment on the vent and the vent opening to  
the atmosphere and also at a point between the reactor, thinning tank, or blending tank  
and the piece of control equipment nearest the reactor, thinning tank, or blending tank.  
The flow rates shall be measured on each piece of equipment from which the samples  
referred to in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of this paragraph are taken.  
(iv) All of the following provisions apply to carrying out calculations:  
(A) Nomenclature.  
Csv = Concentration of volatile organic compound in the effluent gas flowing  
through stack v during stage s before venting to the atmosphere (pounds per cubic feet).  
C1 = Concentration of volatile organic compound in the effluent gas leaving the  
sv  
reactor, thinning tank, or blending tank and flowing through stack v during stage s  
(pounds per cubic feet).  
Page 99  
M = Total mass of volatile organic compound emitted to the atmosphere through  
the stacks of all reactors, thinning tanks, and blending tanks for every stage of the resin  
manufacturing operation (pounds of volatile organic compounds per minute).  
M1 = Total mass of volatile organic compound leaving all the reactors, thinning  
tanks, and blending tanks through the stacks for every stage of the resin manufacturing  
process (pounds of volatile organic compound per minute).  
P = Actual weight percent of volatile organic compound emissions reduced by  
control equipment from all reactors, thinning tanks, and blending tanks (percent).  
Qsv = Volumetric flow rate of the effluent gas flowing through stack v during stage  
s (cubic feet per minute).  
Q1 = Volumetric flow rate of the effluent gas leaving the reactor, thinning tank,  
sv  
and blending tank and flowing through stack v during stage s (cubic feet per minute).  
(B) The following equations shall be used:  
(1) Calculate the total mass of volatile organic compound emitted from affected  
stacks for every stage of the resin manufacturing process using the following equation,  
where "a" is the total number of stages of the resin manufacturing process and "b" is the  
total number of stacks emitting volatile organic compound and involved in the  
manufacture of a resin affected by R 336.1631:  
a
b
M =  
Q
SV  
C
SV  
   
s1 v1  
(2) Calculate the total mass of volatile organic compound leaving reactors, thinning  
tanks, and blending tanks through affected stacks for every stage of the resin  
manufacturing process using the following equation, where "a" is the total number of  
stages of the resin manufacturing process and "b" is the total number of stacks emitting  
volatile organic compound and involved in the manufacture of a resin affected by  
R 336.1631:  
Aa  
b
M1 =  
Q1SV C1SV  
   
s=1 v1  
(3) Calculate the actual weight percent of volatile organic compound emissions  
reduced by control equipment from all reactors, thinning tanks, and blending tanks using  
the following equation:  
M
M1  
P = 1 -  
100  
If "P" is equal to or greater than 95, the resin operation meets the emission limit.  
History: 1989 AACS; 2002 AACS.  
Page 100  
;