DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, GREAT LAKES, AND ENERGY  
AIR QUALITY DIVISION  
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL  
(By authority conferred on the director of the department of environment, Great Lakes, and  
energy by sections 5503 and 5512 of the natural resource and environmental protection act,  
1994 PA 451, MCL 324.5503 and 324.5512, and Executive Reorganization Order Nos.  
1995-16, 2009-31, 2011-1, 2019-1, MCL 324.99903, 324.99919, 324.99921, and  
324.99923)  
PART 10. INTERMITTENT TESTING AND SAMPLING  
R 336.2001 Performance tests by owner.  
Rule 1001. (1) The department may require the owner or operator of a source of air  
contaminant to conduct acceptable performance tests, at the owner's or operator's expense,  
in accordance with R 336.2003 under any of the following conditions:  
(a) Reserved.  
(b) The source is determined to be in violation of R 336.1301 and the potential emissions  
exceed 100 tons per year.  
(c) The owner or operator of the source has not submitted an acceptable performance test,  
in accordance with R 336.2003, that demonstrates the source complies with either the  
department's rules or the conditions specified in the permit to install, or both.  
(d) The source of air contaminant is located in an area designated as nonattainment for 1  
or more air pollutants, and more than 12 months have expired since the date of the last  
performance test for such designated nonattainment pollutants.  
(e) The source of air contaminant has potential emissions in excess of 100 tons per year,  
is located in an area designated as attainment for 1 or more air pollutants, and more than  
36 months have expired since the date of the last performance test for the designated  
attainment pollutants.  
(f) After completion of a compliance program.  
(2) Performance tests required by subrule (1) of this rule must be conducted within 60  
days following receipt of written notification from the department, unless otherwise  
authorized by the department.  
(3) Not less than 30 days before a performance test, as required by subrule (1) of this rule,  
the owner or operator, or an authorized agent, shall do both of the following:  
(a) Submit a site-specific test plan for approval by the department. The plan must include  
a test program summary, test schedule, and the quality assurance measures to be applied.  
(b) Notify the department, in writing, of the time and place of the performance tests and  
who shall conduct them as provided in the site-specific test plan required under subdivision  
(a) of this subrule. A representative of the department shall have the opportunity to witness  
these tests.  
Page 1  
(4) Results of performance tests must be submitted to the department in the format  
prescribed by the applicable reference test method within 60 days after the last date of the  
test.  
History: 1980 AACS; 2002 AACS; 2009 AACS; 2025 AACS.  
R 336.2002 Performance tests by department.  
Rule 1002. (1) The department may conduct performance tests in accordance with R  
336.2003 at any source of air contaminant, on behalf of the state, at a reasonable time and  
at the state's expense. During the conduct of such tests, the department may obtain samples  
of any air contaminant and samples of any material entering or exiting the source or  
aircleaning device for the purpose of evaluating pollutant emissions with respect to process  
operating conditions.  
(2) The department shall provide written notification to the owner or operator of a source  
of the department's intent to conduct performance tests pursuant to subrule (1). Within 30  
days of receipt of such notification, the owner or operator shall provide, and bear the  
expense of, performance test facilities as specified by the department, including the  
following:  
(a) Sampling ports adequate for reference test methods applicable to the source.  
(b) Safe sampling platforms as required.  
(c) Safe access to sampling platforms.  
(d) A suitable power source within 50 feet of any sampling location designated by the  
department. Upon request, additional time for installing the required performance test  
facilities may be authorized by the department for special situations.  
(3) The owner shall not be responsible for providing sampling instruments and sensing  
devices.  
(4) Results of performance tests shall be furnished to the owner or operator, or both, in  
the format prescribed by the applicable reference test method within 60 days following the  
last date of the test.  
History: 1980 AACS; 2002 AACS.  
R 336.2003 Performance test criteria.  
Rule 1003. (1) Performance tests must be conducted and data reduced according to the  
reference test methods listed in R 336.2004, unless the department does any of the  
following:  
(a) Specifies or approves, in specific cases, the use of a reference test method with minor  
changes in procedures or equipment.  
(b) Approves the use of an equivalent method.  
(c) Specifies or approves the use of an alternative method if an applicable reference test  
method does not exist for a specific air contaminant or source of air contaminant.  
(2) Unless otherwise approved by the department, a performance test must consist of a  
minimum of 3 separate samples of a specific air contaminant conducted within a 36-hour  
period that starts once the probe enters the stack. Any data measured within the 36-hour  
period must be recorded and provided to the department. Each of the 3 separate samples  
Page 2  
must be obtained while the source is operating at a similar production level, as described  
under subrule (3) of this rule. For the purpose of determining compliance with an applicable  
emission limit, rule, or permit condition, the arithmetic mean of results of the 3 samples  
must apply. If a sample is accidentally lost or conditions occur in which 1 of the 3 samples  
must be discontinued because of forced shutdown, failure of an irreplaceable portion of the  
sampling train, extreme meteorological conditions, or other circumstances beyond the  
owner's or operator's control, then compliance may, upon the approval of the department,  
be determined using the arithmetic mean of the results of 2 samples.  
(3) All performance tests must be conducted while the source of air contaminant is  
operating at maximum routine operating conditions, or under other conditions, within the  
capacity of the equipment, as may be requested by the department. Other conditions may  
include source operating periods of startup, shutdown, or other operations, excluding  
malfunction, specific to certain sources. Routine operating conditions must also include  
those specified within a permit to install or a permit to operate. The owner or operator shall  
make available to the department the records that may be necessary to determine the  
conditions of source operation that occurred during the period of time of the performance  
test.  
(4) For sources that are subject to an emission limitation calculated to 50% excess air, the  
multipoint, integrated sampling at every traverse point must be used with method 3, 3A, or  
3Bfor gas analysis. For all other sources that require a determination of the molecular  
weight of the exhaust, an optional sampling procedure of method 3, 3A, or 3B may be used.  
Alternatives or modifications to procedures are subject to the approval of the department.  
(5) For reference test method 5B, which is described in R 336.2011, reference test method  
5C, which is described in R 336.2012, and reference test method 5E, which is described in  
R 336.1014, the minimum volume per sample must be 30 cubic feet of dry gas corrected  
to standard conditions, 68 degrees Fahrenheit, 29.92 inches mercury. Minimum sample  
time must be 60 minutes, which may be continuous or a combination of shorter sampling  
periods for sources that operate in a cyclic manner. Smaller sampling times or sample  
volumes, when necessitated by process variables or other factors, may be approved by the  
department.  
History: 1980 AACS; 2002 AACS; 2025 AACS.  
R 336.2004 Reference test methods; adoption of federal reference test methods.  
Rule 1004. (1) The federal test methods described in the provisions of 40 CFR part 60,  
appendix A, adopted by reference in R 336.1902, are test methods for performance tests  
required pursuant to the provisions of this part and include, but are not limited to, the  
following:  
(a) Method 1 - Sample and velocity traverse for stationary sources.  
(b) Method 1A - Sample and velocity traverses for stationary sources with small stacks  
or ducts.  
(c) Method 2 - Determination of stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate (type-S pitot  
tube).  
(d) Method 2A - Direct measurement of gas volume through pipes and small ducts.  
(e) Method 2C - Determination of stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate in small  
stacks and ducts (standard pitot tube).  
Page 3  
(f) Method 2D - Measurement of gas volumetric flow rates in small pipes and ducts.  
(g) Method 3 - Gas analysis for the determination of dry molecular weight.  
(h) Method 4 - Determination of moisture content in stack gases.  
(i) Method 5 - Determination of particulate matter emissions from stationary sources.  
(j) Method 6 - Determination of sulfur dioxide emissions from stationary sources.  
(k) Method 7 - Determination of nitrogen oxide emissions from stationary sources.  
(l) Method 8 - Determination of sulfuric acid mist and sulfur dioxide emissions from  
stationary sources.  
(m) Method 9 - Visual determination of the opacity of emissions from stationary sources.  
(n) Method 10 - Determination of carbon monoxide emissions from stationary sources.  
(o) Method 10B - Determination of carbon monoxide emissions from stationary sources.  
(p) Method 18 - Measurement of gaseous organic compound emissions by gas  
chromatography.  
(q) Method 21 - Determination of volatile organic compound leaks.  
(r) Method 24 - Determination of volatile matter content, water content, density, volume  
solids, and weight solids of surface coatings.  
(s) Method 24A - Determination of volatile matter content and density of printing inks  
and related coatings.  
(t) Method 25 - Determination of total gaseous nonmethane organic emissions as carbon.  
(u) Method 25A - Determination of total gaseous organic concentration using a flame  
ionization analyzer.  
(v) Method 27 - Determination of vapor tightness of gasoline delivery tank using  
pressure-vacuum test.  
(w) Method 29 - Determination of metals emissions from stationary sources.  
(x) Method 30A - Determination of total vapor phase mercury emissions from stationary  
sources (instrumental analyzer procedure).  
(y) Method 30B - Determination of total vapor phase mercury emissions from coal-fired  
combustion sources using carbon sorbent traps.  
(2) The federal test methods in the following provisions, adopted by reference in  
R 336.1902, are test methods for performance tests required pursuant to the provisions of  
this part:  
(a) 40 CFR part 51, appendix M.  
(b) 40 CFR part 61, appendix B.  
(c) 40 CFR part 63, appendix A.  
(3) All alternatives that are subject to the approval of the administrator in the adopted  
federal reference methods are subject to the approval of the department.  
(4) Determinations of compliance with visible emission standards for stationary sources  
must be conducted as specified in 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, test method 9 or another  
alternative method approved by the department, with the following exceptions:  
(a) Visible emissions from a scarfing operation at a steel manufacturing facility must be  
determined as specified in reference test method 9A, which is described in R 336.2030.  
(b) Visible emissions from a coke oven pushing operation and fugitive coke oven visible  
emissions must be determined as specified in reference test method 9B, which is described  
in R 336.2031.  
Page 4  
(c) Visible emissions, fugitive and nonfugitive, from basic oxygen furnace operations,  
hot metal transfer operations, and hot metal desulfurization operations must be determined  
as specified in reference method 9C, which is described in R 336.2032.  
(5) Determinations of particulate emission rates for stationary sources must be conducted  
as specified in 1 or more of the following reference test methods:  
(a) Reference test method 5B, which is described in R 336.2011.  
(b) Reference test method 5C, which is described in R 336.2012.  
(c) Reference test method 5D, which is described in R 336.2013.  
(d) Reference test method 5E, which is described in R 336.2014.  
(e) "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater," (23rd edition), as  
described and modified in R 336.2033.  
(6) Determinations of total gaseous nonmethane organic emissions as carbon, using the  
alternate version of federal test method 25 under 40 CFR part 60, appendix A,  
incorporating the Byron analysis, must be conducted as specified in R 336.2006.  
History: 1980 AACS; 1985 AACS; 1989 AACS; 1993 AACS; 1998-2000 AACS; 2002 AACS; 2006  
AACS; 2009 AACS; 2025 AACS.  
Editor's Note: An obvious error in R 336.2004 was corrected at the request of the promulgating agency,  
pursuant to Section 56 of 1969 PA 306, as amended by 2000 PA 262, MCL 24.256. The rule containing the  
error was published in Annual Administrative Code Supplement 2025. The memorandum requesting the  
correction was published in Michigan Register, 2026 MR 16.  
R 336.2005 Reference test methods for state-requested tests of delivery vessels.  
Rule 1005. The following reference test method shall be used to detect gasoline vapor  
leaks by a combustible gas detector:  
(a) Principle. A combustible gas detector is used to indicate any incidence of leakage from  
gasoline delivery vessel tanks and vapor control systems. This qualitative monitoring  
procedure is an enforcement tool to confirm the continuing existence of leak-tight  
conditions.  
(b) Applicability. This method is applicable to determining leak-tightness of gasoline  
delivery vessel tanks during loading without taking the delivery vessel tank out of service.  
The method is applicable only if the vapor control system does not create back pressure in  
excess of the pressure limits of the delivery vessel tank compliance leak test. For vapor  
control systems, this method is applicable to determining leak-tightness at any time.  
(c) Apparatus and specifications. The following apparatus shall be used:  
(i) Manometer. Liquid manometer, or equivalent, capable of measuring up to 0.9 pounds  
per square inch (24.9 inches of water) gauge pressure within 0.003 pounds per square inch  
(0.1 inches of water) precision.  
(ii) Combustible gas detector. A portable hydrocarbon gas analyzer with associated  
sampling line and probe which complies with all of the following provisions:  
(A) Safety. The device is certified as safe for operation in explosive atmospheres.  
(B) Range. The device shall have a minimum range of 0 to 100% of the lower explosive  
limit (LEL) as propane.  
(C) Probe diameter. The sampling probe shall have an internal diameter of 0.625  
centimeters (1/4 inch).  
Page 5  
(D) Probe length. The probe sampling line shall be of sufficient length for easy  
maneuverability during testing.  
(E) Response time. The response time for full-scale deflection shall be less than 8 seconds  
for a detector with a sampling line and probe attached.  
(d) Test procedure. The following test procedure shall be complied with:  
(i) Pressure. Place a pressure tap in the terminal, plant, or service station vapor control  
system as close as possible to the connection with the delivery vessel tank. Record the  
pressure periodically during testing.  
(ii) Calibration. Calibrate the combustible gas detector with 2.2% propane, by volume, in  
air for 100% lower explosive limit response.  
(iii) Monitoring procedure. During loading or unloading, check the periphery of all  
potential sources of leakage of the delivery vessel tank and of the terminal, plant, or service  
station vapor collection system with a combustible gas detector. The check shall comply  
with the following procedure:  
(A) Probe distance. The probe inlet shall be 2.5 centimeters from the potential leak source.  
(B) Probe movement. Move the probe slowly (2.0 centimeters per second).If there is any  
meter deflection at a potential leak source, move the probe to locate the point of highest  
meter response.  
(C) Probe position. As much as possible, the probe inlet shall be positioned in the path of  
(parallel to) the vapor flow from a leak.  
(D) Wind. Attempt, as much as possible, to block the wind from the area being monitored.  
(iv) Recording. Record the highest detector reading and location for each incidence of  
leakage.  
History: 1981 AACS; 1989 AACS; 2002 AACS; 2006 AACS.  
Editor's Note: An obvious error in R 336.2005 was corrected at the request of the promulgating agency,  
pursuant to Section 56 of 1969 PA 306, as amended by 2000 PA 262, MCL 24.256. The rule containing the  
error was published in Annual Administrative Code Supplement 2006. The memorandum requesting the  
correction was published in Michigan Register, 2026 MR 16.  
R 336.2006 Reference test method serving as alternate version of federal reference  
test method 25 by incorporating Byron analysis.  
Rule 1006. When using the alternate version of federal reference test method 25  
incorporating the Byron analysis, the procedures in method 25, which are described in R  
336.2004, shall be followed, except that all of the following parts in method 25 are  
amended to read as follows:  
1.2 Principle. An emission sample is withdrawn from a stack at a constant rate through a  
stainless steel absorber tube packed with porasil; the gaseous portion of the sample is pulled  
past a battery-operated sampling pump into a tedlar bag. After sampling is complete, the  
contents of the tedlar bag are analyzed on an automated gas chromatograph (GC), and the  
sample in the porasil packed tube is heated to remove all components for analysis on the  
GC. The GC separates CO, CO2, and CH4 from the nonmethane organics (NMO), then  
converts the NMOs to methane for analysis.  
2. Apparatus. The sampling system consists of a nonmethane organic (NMO) absorber  
tube, a sampling pump, and a sample bag (figure 25-1). The analytical system has 2 parts  
Page 6  
the oven for removing the sample from the absorber tube and an automated gas  
chromatograph (GC).  
2.1 Sampling. All of the following equipment is required, as shown in figure 25-1:  
2.1.1 Heated probe. 6.4-millimeter (mm) (1/4-inch (in.)) outside diameter (o.d.) stainless  
steel tubing with a heating system that is capable of maintaining a gas temperature at the  
exit end of not less than 129 degrees Centigrade (265 degrees Fahrenheit). The probe shall  
be equipped with a thermocouple at the exit end to monitor the gas temperature. The nozzle  
is an elbow fitting that is attached to the front end of the probe while the thermocouple is  
inserted in the side arm of a tee fitting that is attached to the rear of the probe. The probe  
is wrapped with a suitable length of high-temperature heating tape and then covered with  
2 layers of glass cloth insulation and 1 layer of aluminum foil.  
2.1.2 Heated prefilter-only for stacks with possible particulate matter interference. A  
stainless steel filter holder with a 47-mm type A/E fiberglass filter without organic binder.  
The entire prefilter shall be maintained at 110 degrees Celsius. Note - if it is not possible  
to use a heating system for safety reasons, an unheated system with an instack filter is a  
suitable alternative.  
2.1.3 NMO absorber tube. 1/2-inch inside diameter (i.d.) stainless steel tube packed with  
porasil (thermally stable silica gel).  
2.1.4 1/4-inch o.d. teflon line that is 2 to 4 feet long.  
2.1.5 Battery-operated diaphragm sampling pump with kurz digital mass flow meter.  
Total flow is integrated electronically to measure flow with an accuracy of 1% at any flow  
rate. (Byron instruments model 90).  
2.1.6 Sample bag. 0.3-mil tedlar, 1/2-cubic foot capacity. The sample bag undergoes  
nitrogen purge cycle until analysis exhibits zero carbon content in the sample bag.  
2.2 Analysis. The following equipment is required:  
2.2.1 Sample recovery on the adsorber tube is done in a Byron model 75 oven in 2 stages,  
each stage requiring a 0.3-mil tedlar bag that has a 1/2-cubic foot capacity.  
2.2.2 Analysis is done on a Byron model 401 gas chromatograph (GC) that meets all  
criteria specified in method 25, section 2.2.2.  
2.3 NMO analyzer. The NMO analyzer is a Byron model 401 gas chromatograph (GC).  
(Remainder of 2.3 as stated in method 25)  
2.3.5.2 Range. A full scale range of 1 to 10,000 parts per million (ppm) CH4. Signal  
attenuators shall be available to produce a minimum signal response of 10% of full scale.  
3.1.1 Delete (dry ice is not required).  
4.1.1 Model 90 and model 75 flow meter calibration. The model 90 sample pump inlet is  
attached to the outlet of the model 75 oven. Air is passed through the system at the rate that  
will be used in sampling and for the total volume anticipated to be sampled. If the flow  
meters on the 2 instruments do not agree within 0.01 liters, then adjust the meter on the  
model 90 until agreement is within 0.01 liters. After making any correction, run a full  
calibration again.  
4.1.2 Sample train assembly. Assemble the probe (prefilter if needed), adsorber tube, and  
teflon line to the inlet of the model 90. Attach a short (8 to 10 inches) flexible line to the  
outlet of model 90. Have a completely clean evacuated tedlar sample bag nearby for  
collection of sample to be analyzed.  
4.1.3 Pretest leak check. Stopper the inlet of the probe and place the flexible tube on the  
outlet of the model 90 in a small open container of water. Turn on the sampling pump. For  
Page 7  
a satisfactory leak check, bubbling should cease within 1 minute. If the leak check is  
unsatisfactory, tighten the fittings or change parts until a satisfactory leak check is obtained.  
4.1.4 Sampling train operation. Place the probe and the front portion of the adsorption tube  
in the stack. If the stack has a temperature higher than ambient, allow time for the probe to  
heat before starting the sample pump. Start the model 90 pump and adjust to the desired  
flow, usually about 90 ml/min. After about 0.1 liter of sampling, or equivalent to the  
volume of air that is displaced in the sample system before the flowmeter, remove the  
flexible tube from the outlet of the model 90 and install the evacuated tedlar bag. This  
assures that gaseous components are undiluted by the air originally in the sampling system.  
Record requested data on the data form during the sample time. The sampling is usually  
done for 1 hour with a total of 5 to 6 liters sampled. When sampling is complete, record  
the precise volume sampled. The process may require different sample times or sample  
volumes. (Sampling form is figure 25-8.)  
4.1.5 Post test leak check. Remove the tedlar bag and replace it with the flexible tube.  
Stopper the probe and operate the same as the pretest leak check specified in section 4.1.3.  
If the leak test is not acceptable, invalidate the sample.  
4.2 Sample recovery. The tedlar bag is ready for direct analysis on the GC. The adsorber  
tube shall undergo the following 2-stage preparation:  
4.2.1 Sample purge. The absorber tube is placed in the Byron model 75 oven with a clean  
tedlar bag attached directly to the tube. A volume of clean dry air is passed through the  
adsorber tube while holding the oven temperature at about 130 degrees Celsius. The  
volume of air should be precisely the same as that sampled. This purge is necessary to  
remove any CO2 on the sample tube, and the elevated temperature is needed to assure CO2  
removal from any absorbed water. The tedlar bag is now ready for direct analysis on the  
GC.  
4.2.2 Sample digest. The absorber tube, now free of CO2 and the lighter NMOs, is now  
attached to an oxidation catalyst, and another tedlar bag is attached to the outlet of the  
oxidation catalyst. A volume of clean dry air equal to that sampled is passed through this  
system while the temperature on the sample tube is brought up to 600 degrees Celsius. If  
the sampled volume was less than 3 liters, a larger volume shall be used in the digestion to  
assure completion. Usually a multiple of precisely 1.5 or 2.0 of the sampled volume is  
sufficient. This third tedlar bag is now ready for direct analysis on the GC. If anything other  
than CO2 is found in this bag, the model 75 oxidation catalyst is probably in need of  
replacement. In this case the test would be invalid and would have to be redone.  
4.3 Analysis. Each of the 3 bags is analyzed on the GC. Each bag should be analyzed as  
soon as possible after being filled. At the completion of analysis, the bags shall be cleaned  
by repeated fillings with either clean air or nitrogen. Before being used again, the bags shall  
be checked by filling with clean air and then analyzed on the GC to assure zero  
concentrations of all analyzed substances. All pertinent calibration, performance, and  
operational checks in sections 4.4 and 5 of method 25 apply to the Byron system.  
6. Calculations.  
6.1 Nomenclature.  
C1 = Concentration of sample bag, ppm C, (NMO converted to methane).  
C2 = Concentration of purge bag, ppm C, (NMO converted to methane).  
C3 = Concentration of digest bag, ppm C, (CO2 converted to methane).  
C = Ppm C (NMO).  
Page 8  
6.2-6.4 (Delete).  
6.5 C1, C2, C3 calculated directly as: ppm C calibration gas x GC reading unknown =  
ppm C GC reading calibration gas unknown 6.6 C = C1 + C2 + C3 Delete figures 25.3,  
25.4, 25.9, and 25.10 from method 25. Amend figures 25.1 and 25.8 from method 25 to  
read as follows:  
FIGURE 25.1  
SAMPLING TRAIN  
FIGURE 25.1  
Page 9  
History: 1993 AACS.  
R 336.2007 Alternate version of procedure L, referenced in R 336.2040(10).  
Rule 1007. The alternate version of procedure L is as follows:  
1. Introduction.  
1.1 Applicability. This procedure is applicable for determining the input of volatile  
organic compounds (voc), measured as equivalent propane as measured by a flame  
ionization instrument. It is intended to be used as a segment in the development of  
liquid/gas protocols for determining voc capture efficiency (ce) for surface coating and  
printing operations.  
1.2 Principle. The amount of voc introduced to the process (l) is the sum of products of  
the weight (w) of each voc containing liquid (ink, paint, solvent, or similar material) used  
and its voc content (v), corrected for a response factor (rf) to allow the input to be calculated  
in terms of propane, the same calibration gas used in the gaseous voc measurements. A  
sample of each coating used is distilled to separate the voc fraction. The distillate is used  
to prepare a known standard for analysis by a flame ionization analyzer (fia), calibrated  
against propane, to determine its rf.  
2. Apparatus and reagents.  
2.1 Liquid weight.  
2.1.1 Balances/digital scales. To weigh drums of voc containing liquids to within 0.2 lb.  
Page 10  
2.1.2 Volume measurement apparatus (alternative). Volume meters, flow meters, density  
measurement equipment, or similar material, as needed to achieve the same accuracy as  
direct weight measurements.  
2.2 Response factor (rf) determination (fia technique). The voc distillation and tedlar gas  
bag generation systems apparatus are shown in figures 1 and 2. The following equipment  
is required:  
2.2.1 Sample collection can. An appropriately sized metal can to collect voc-containing  
materials. The can shall be constructed in such a way that it can be grounded to the coating  
container.  
2.2.2 Needle valves. To control gas flow.  
2.2.3 Regulators. For fia, calibration, dilution, and sweep gas cylinders.  
2.2.4 Tubing and fittings. Teflon and stainless steel tubing and fittings with diameters and  
lengths and sizes determined by connection requirements of the equipment.  
2.2.5 Thermometer. Capable of measuring the temperature of the hot water and oil baths  
to within 1 degree Celsius.  
2.2.6 Analytical balance. To measure plus or minus 0.01 mg.  
2.2.7 Microliter syringe. 10-microliter size.  
2.2.8 Vacuum and pressure manometers. 0 to 760 mm (0 to 30 in.) hg.U-tube manometer,  
vacuum or pressure.  
2.2.9 Hot oil bath, with stirring hot plate. Capable of heating and maintaining a distillation  
vessel at 110 plus or minus 3 degrees Celsius.  
2.2.10 Vacuum/water aspirator. A device capable of drawing a vacuum to within 20 mm  
hg from absolute.  
2.2.11 Rotary evaporator system. Complete with folded inner coil, vertical style  
condenser, rotary speed control, and teflon sweep gas delivery tube with valved inlet. Buchi  
rotavapor or equivalent.  
2.2.12 Ethylene glycol cooling/circulating bath. Capable of maintaining the condenser  
coil fluid at minus 10 degrees Celsius.  
2.2.13 Dry gas meter. For the precise measurement of dilution gas volume. It shall be  
calibrated to a primary standard, either spirometer or bubble meter.  
2.2.14 Activated charcoal/mole sieve trap. To remove any trace level of organics picked  
up from the dry gas meter.  
2.2.15 Gas coil heater. Sufficient length of 0.125-inch stainless steel tubing to allow  
heating of the dilution gas to near the water bath temperature before entering the  
volatilization vessel.  
2.2.16 Water bath, with stirring hot plate. Capable of heating and maintaining a  
volatilization vessel and coil heater at a temperature of 100 plus or minus 5 degrees Celsius.  
2.2.17 Volatilization vessel. 50-milliliter midget impinger fitted with a septum top and  
loosely filled with glass wool to increase volatilization surface.  
2.2.18 Tedlar gas bag. Capable of holding 30 liters of gas, flushed clean with zero air,  
leak tested and evacuated.  
2.2.19 Cylinder of compressed zero air. Used to supply dilution air for making the tedlar  
bag gas samples.  
2.2.20 Cylinder of compressed thc free N2. Used as sweep gas in the rotary evaporator  
system.  
Page 11  
2.2.21 Organic concentration analyzer. An fia with a span value of 1.5 times the expected  
concentration as propane; however, other span values may be used if it can be demonstrated  
that they would provide more accurate measurements. The fia instrument shall be the same  
instrument used in the gaseous analyses adjusted with the same fuel, combustion air, and  
sample backpressure (flowrate) settings. The system shall be capable of meeting or  
exceeding the following specifications:  
2.2.21.1 Zero drift. Less than plus or minus 3.0% of the span value.  
2.2.21.2 Calibration drift. Less than plus or minus 3.0% of span value.  
2.2.21.3 Calibration error. Less than plus or minus 5.0% of the calibration gas value.  
2.2.22 Integrator/data acquisition system. An analog or digital device or computerized  
data acquisition system used to integrate the fia response or compute the average response  
and record measurement data. The minimum data sampling frequency for computing  
average or integrated values is 1 measurement value every 5 seconds. The device shall be  
capable of recording average values at least once per minute.  
2.2.23 Chart recorder (optional). A chart recorder or similar device is recommended to  
provide a continuous analog display of the measurement results during the liquid sample  
analysis.  
2.2.24 Calibration and other gases. For calibration, fuel, and combustion air, if required,  
contained in compressed gas cylinders. All calibration gases shall be traceable to NIST  
standards and shall be certified by the manufacturer to plus or minus 1% of the tag  
value.Additionally, the manufacturer of the cylinder should provide a recommended shelf  
life for each calibration gas cylinder over which the concentration does not change more  
than plus or minus 2% from the certified value. For calibration gas values that are not  
generally available, alternative methods for preparing calibration gas mixtures, such as  
dilution systems, may be used with prior approval.  
2.2.24.1 Fuel. 99.995% hydrogen, 40% hydrogen/60% helium, or 40% hydrogen/60%  
nitrogen. The fia manufacturer's recommended fuel shall be used. An attempt shall be made  
to avoid fuels with oxygen to avoid an oxygen synergism effect that reportedly occurs when  
oxygen concentration varies significantly from a mean value.  
2.2.24.2 Carrier gas. High purity air with less than 1 ppm of organic material (as propane)  
or less than 0.1% of the span value, whichever is greater.  
2.2.24.3 Fia linearity calibration gases. Low-, mid-, and high-range gas mixture standards  
with a nominal propane concentration of 20 to 30, 45 to 55, and 70 to 80% of the span  
value in air, respectively. Other calibration values and other span values may be used if it  
can be shown that more accurate measurements would be achieved.  
2.2.24.4 System calibration gas. Gas mixture standard which contains propane in air and  
which approximates the voc concentration expected for the tedlar gas bag samples.  
3. Determination of liquid input weight. A capture efficiency test shall consist of not less  
than 3 sampling runs. Each run shall cover at least 1 complete production or processing  
cycle or shall be at least 1 hour in duration. For automotive surface coating operations, the  
sampling time per run shall be based on coating a minimum of 3 representative vehicles.  
3.1 Weight difference. Determine the amount of material introduced to the process as the  
weight difference of the feed material before and after each sampling run. In determining  
the total voc-containing liquid usage, account for all of the following:  
(a) The initial (beginning) voc-containing liquid mixture.  
(b) Any solvent added during the test run.  
Page 12  
(c) Any coating added during the test run.  
(d) Any residual voc-containing liquid mixture remaining at the end of the sample run.  
3.1.1 Identify all points where voc-containing liquids are introduced to the process. To  
obtain an accurate measurement of voc-containing liquids, start with an empty fountain, if  
applicable. After completing the run, drain the liquid in the fountain back into the liquid  
drum, if possible, and weigh the drum again. Weigh the voc-containing liquids to plus or  
minus 0.5% of the total weight (full) or plus or minus 0.1% of the total weight of voc-  
containing liquid used during the sample run, whichever is less. If the residual liquid cannot  
be returned to the drum, drain the fountain into a preweighed empty drum to determine the  
final weight of the liquid.  
3.1.2 If it is not possible to measure a single representative mixture, then weigh the various  
components separately, for example, if solvent is added during the sampling run, weigh the  
solvent before it is added to the mixture. If a fresh drum of voc-containing liquid is needed  
during the run, then weigh both the empty drum and the fresh drum.  
3.2 Volume measurement (alternative). If direct weight measurements are not feasible,  
the tester may use volume meters, flow rate meters, and density measurements to determine  
the weight of liquids that are used if it can be demonstrated that the technique produces  
results equivalent to the direct weight measurements. If a single representative mixture  
cannot be measured, measure the components separately.  
4. Determination of voc content in input liquids.  
4.1 Collection of liquid samples.  
4.1.1 Collect a 1-pint or larger sample of the voc-containing liquid mixture at each  
application location at the beginning and end of each test run. A separate sample shall be  
taken of each voc-containing liquid that is added to the application mixture during the test  
run. If a fresh drum is needed during the sampling run, then obtain a sample from the fresh  
drum.  
4.1.2 When collecting the sample, ground the sample container to the coating drum. Fill  
the sample container as close to the rim as possible to minimize the amount of headspace.  
4.1.3 After the sample is collected, seal the container so the sample cannot leak out or  
evaporate.  
4.1.4 Label the container to identify clearly the contents.  
4.2 Distillation of voc.  
4.2.1 Assemble the rotary evaporator as shown in figure 1.  
4.2.2 Leak check the rotary evaporation system by aspirating a vacuum of approximately  
20 mm hg from absolute. Close up the system and monitor the vacuum for approximately  
1 minute. If the vacuum falls more than 125 mm hg in 1 minute, repair leaks and repeat.  
4.2.3 Deposit approximately 20 mls of the sample (inks, paints, or similar material) into  
the rotary evaporation distillation vessel.  
4.2.4 Turn off the aspirator and gradually apply a vacuum to the evaporator of within 20  
mm hg.  
4.2.5 Begin heating the vessel at a rate of 2 to 3 degrees Centigrade per minute,  
maintaining the vacuum specified in 4.2.3. Care shall be taken to prevent material bumping  
from the distillation flask.  
4.2.6 Continue heating until a temperature of 110 degrees Centigrade is achieved and  
maintain this temperature for not less than 10 minutes or until the sample has dried in the  
distillation flask.  
Page 13  
4.2.7 Slowly introduce the N2 sweep gas through the purge tube and into the distillation  
flask, taking care to maintain not less than 125 mm hg vacuum at all times.  
4.2.8 Continue sweeping the remaining solvent voc from the distillation flask and  
condenser assembly for 10 minutes or until all traces of condensed solvent are gone from  
the vessel and the still head.  
4.2.9 Disassemble the apparatus and transfer the distillate to a labeled sealed vial.  
4.3 Preparation of voc standard bag sample.  
4.3.1 Assemble the bag sample generation system as shown in figure 2 and bring the water  
bath up to a near-boiling temperature.  
4.3.2 Inflate the tedlar bag and perform a leak check on the bag.  
4.3.3 Evacuate the bag and close the bag inlet valve.  
4.3.4 Record the current barometric pressure.  
4.3.5 Record the starting reading on the dry gas meter, open the bag inlet valve, and start  
the dilution zero air flowing into the tedlar bag at approximately 2 liters per minute.  
4.3.6 The bag sample voc concentration shall be similar to the gaseous voc concentration  
measured in the exhaust gas ducts. The amount of liquid voc required can be approximated  
using the equations in section 6, the gaseous voc measurement results in terms of propane,  
and an assumed response factor of 1.0. Let Cc3 equal the exhaust gas concentration in  
terms of propane and rf=1.0. Calculate Cvoc. Let bv = 20 liters and calculate ml, the  
approximate quantity of liquid to be used to prepare the bag gas sample.  
4.3.7 Quickly withdraw an aliquot (approximately 5 microliters) of sample from the  
distillate vial with the microliter syringe and record its weight from the analytical balance  
to the nearest 0.01 mg.  
4.3.8 Inject the contents of the syringe through the septum of the volatilization vessel into  
the glass wool inside the vessel.  
4.3.9 Reweigh and record the tare weight of the now empty syringe.  
4.3.10 Record the pressure and temperature of the dilution gas as it is passed through the  
dry gas meter, as shown in the figure 2 diagram.  
4.3.11 After approximately 20 liters of dilution gas have passed into the tedlar bag, close  
the valve to the dilution air source and record the exact final reading on the dry gas meter.  
4.3.12 The gas bag is then analyzed by fia within 1 hour of bag preparation in accordance  
with the procedures contained in section 4.4. 4.4 Determination of voc response factor.  
4.4.1 Start up the fia instrument using the same settings as used for the gaseous voc  
measurements.  
4.4.2 Perform the fia analyzer calibration and linearity checks according to the procedure  
in section 5.1. Record the responses to each of the calibration gases and the back-pressure  
setting of the fia.  
4.4.3 Connect the tedlar bag sample to the fia sample inlet and record the bag  
concentration in terms of propane. Continue the analysis until a steady reading is obtained  
for not less than 30 seconds. Record the final reading and proceed with the calculation of  
the response factor.  
4.5 Determination of coating voc content as voc (vu).  
4.5.1 Determine the voc content of the coatings used in the process using EPA method 24  
or 24a as applicable.  
5. Calibration and quality assurance.  
Page 14  
5.1 Fia calibration and linearity check. Make necessary adjustments to the air and fuel  
supplies for the fia and ignite the burner. Allow the fia to warm up for the period  
recommended by the manufacturer. Inject a calibration gas into the measurement system  
and adjust the back-pressure regulator to the value required to achieve the flow rates  
specified by the manufacturer. Inject the zero- and the high-range calibration gases and  
adjust the analyzer calibration to provide the proper responses. Inject the low and mid-  
range gases and record the responses of the measurement system. The calibration and  
linearity of the system are acceptable if the responses for all 4 gases are within 5% of the  
respective gas values. If the performance of the system is not acceptable, repair or adjust  
the system and repeat the linearity check. Conduct a calibration and linearity check after  
assembling the analysis system and after a major change is made to the system. A  
calibration curve consisting of zero gas and 2 calibration levelsshall be performed at the  
beginning and end of each batch of samples.  
5.2 Systems drift checks. After each sample, repeat the system calibration checks in  
section 5.1 before any adjustments to the fia or measurement system are made. If the zero  
or calibration drift is more than plus or minus 3% of the span value, discard the result and  
repeat the analysis.  
5.3 Quality control. A minimum of 1 sample in each batch shall be distilled and analyzed  
in duplicate as a precision control. If the results of the 2 analyzed differ by more than plus  
or minus 10% of the mean, then the system shall be reevaluated and the entire batch shall  
be redistilled and analyzed.  
6.  
Calculations.  
6.1 Bag sample volume, Bv.  
(
) (  
) (  
)
MV TSTD PM  
) (  
=
BV  
Where:  
(
)
T M PSTD  
Bv  
= Bag sample volume in  
= Indicated dry gas meter  
standard liters.  
Mv  
volume, in liters.  
TSTD = 2930K.  
TM  
= Meter gas temperature, in  
0K.  
PM  
= Meter gas pressure, in mm  
Hg absolute.  
PSTD = 760 mm Hg.  
Bag sample voc concentration, as voc, Cvoc.  
Cvoc = Ml/Bv  
6.2  
Where:  
Cvoc  
=
Bag  
sample  
voc  
concentration, as voc, mg/std. liters.  
Page 15  
Ml  
= Weight of voc liquid  
injected, mg.  
6.3  
Bag sample voc concentration, as propane, Cc3.  
Cc3 = Rc3*K  
Where:  
Cc3  
=
Bag  
sample  
voc  
concentration, as propane, mg C3/std. liter.  
Rc3  
= FIA reading for bag gas  
sample, ppm propane.  
mg propane / std. liter  
K = Conversion factor, 0.00183  
Response factor, RF.  
ppm propane  
6.4  
6.5  
RF = Cvoc/Cc3  
Where:  
RF  
= Response factor, weight  
voc/weight propane.  
Total voc content of the input voc containing liquid, as propane, L.  
n
n
n
V IJ WIJ  
RFJ  
V FJ WFJ  
RFJ  
V AJ WAJ  
RFJ  
L =  
-
+
J=1  
J=1  
J=1  
Where:  
L =  
Total voc content of liquid  
input, calculate as propane, kg.  
voc liquid J.  
VIJ = Initial voc weight fraction of  
VFJ = Final voc weight fraction of  
VAJ = Voc weight fraction of voc  
WIJ = Weight of voc containing  
WFG = Weight of voc containing  
WAJ = Weight of voc containing  
RFJ = Response factor for voc in  
voc liquid J.  
liquid J added during the test.  
liquid J at beginning of test, kg.  
liquid J at end of test, kg.  
liquid J added during the test, kg.  
liquid J, weight voc/weight propane.  
Page 16  
Page 17  
History: 1993 AACS; 2002 AACS.  
R 336.2010 Rescinded.  
History: 1985 AACS; 1992 AACS; 1997 AACS.  
R 336.2011 Reference test method 5B.  
Rule 1011. Reference test method 5B, in-stack filtration method, reads as follows:  
(a) The principle, applicability, and performance test criteria are as follows:  
(i) Principle. Particulate matter is withdrawn isokinetically from the source and collected  
on solid filtering media maintained at stack temperature. The particulate matter mass is  
determined gravimetrically after removal of uncombined water.  
(ii) Applicability. This method is applicable for the determination of particulate  
emissions from stationary sources as identified in table 31 of R 336.1331. The method is  
also applicable when specifically provided for in the department’s rules, orders, a permit  
to install, or a permit to operate.  
(iii) Performance test criteria as follows:  
(A) A performance test must meet the requirements under R 336.2003(2).  
(B) For sources that are subject to an emission limitation calculated to 50% excess air,  
the multipoint, integrated sampling procedure of R 336.2004(1)(c) must be used for gas  
analysis. For all other sources that require a determination of the molecular weight of the  
Page 18  
exhaust, an optional sampling procedure of R 336.2004(1)(c) may be used. Alternatives or  
modifications to procedures are subject to the approval of the department.  
(C) The minimum volume per sample must be 30 cubic feet of dry gas corrected to  
standard conditions, 68 degrees Fahrenheit and 29.92 inches mercury. Minimum sample  
time must be 60 minutes, which may be continuous or a combination of shorter sampling  
periods for sources that operate in a cyclic manner. Smaller sampling times or sample  
volumes, if necessitated by process variables or other factors, may be approved by the  
department.  
(D) For a source whose emission control device alters the moisture content of the  
exhaust gas, a moisture determination must be performed in a location upstream from the  
emission control device and in accordance with R 336.2004(1)(d) or an alternative method  
approved by the department.  
(b) The following provisions apply to apparatus:  
(i) Sampling train. A schematic of the sampling train used in this method is shown in  
figure 102 under R 336.2021. Construction details for many, but not all, of the train  
components are given in APTD-0581, adopted by reference in R 336.1902. See subdivision  
(g)(ii) of this rule. For changes from the APTD-0581 document and for allowable  
modifications to figure 102, the user shall consult with the department. The operating and  
maintenance procedures for many, but not all, of the sampling train are described in APTD-  
0576, adopted by reference in R 336.1902. See subdivision (g)(iii) of this rule. Since  
correct usage is important in obtaining valid results, all users shall read APTD-0576 and  
adopt the applicable operating and maintenance procedures outlined in it, unless otherwise  
specified. The sampling train must consist of the following components:  
(A) Probe nozzle. Stainless steel 316 or glass with sharp, tapered leading edge. The  
angle of taper must be less than 30 degrees and the taper must be on the outside to preserve  
a constant internal diameter. The probe nozzle must be of the button-hook design, unless  
otherwise specified by the department. If made of stainless steel, the nozzle must be  
constructed from seamless tubing. Other materials of construction may be used, subject to  
the approval of the department. A range of nozzle sizes suitable for isokinetic sampling  
must be available, for example, 0.32 to 1.27 centimeters, 1/8 to 1/2 inch, or larger if higher  
volume sampling trains are used inside diameter nozzles in increments of 0.16 centimeters,  
1/16 inches. Each nozzle must be calibrated according to the procedures outlined in  
subdivision (e) of this rule.  
(B) Probe liner. Interior surface may be constructed of stainless steel, no specific grade,  
glass, Teflon, or other material that maintains proper flow at the stack conditions  
experienced.  
(C) Pitot tube. Type S, as described in method 2, or other device approved by the  
department. The pitot tube must be attached to the probe, as shown in figure 102 under R  
336.2021, to allow constant monitoring of the stack gas velocity. The impact, high  
pressure, opening plane of the pitot tube must be even with or above the nozzle entry plane,  
see method 2, figure 2-6b, during sampling. The type S pitot tube assembly must have a  
known coefficient, determined as outlined in method 2.  
(D) Differential pressure gauge. Two incline manometer or equivalent devices as  
described in method 2. One manometer must be used for velocity head (p) readings and the  
other must be used for orifice differential pressure readings.  
Page 19  
(E) Filter holders. Two separate filter holders in series or 1 filter holder with separate  
filter supports and seals for 2 filters. One filter holder with 2 filters held in contact with  
each other is not acceptable. Materials of construction may be stainless steel 316, glass,  
Teflon, or other material approved by the department.  
(F) Filter heating system. Auxiliary heating of the filter media is not acceptable. For  
saturated stack gases, the operator may opt to use filters that do not blind when wet and  
that do not require heating, see subdivision (c)(i)(A) of this rule.  
(G) Condenser. The following system must be used to determine the stack gas moisture  
content: Three impingers connected in series with leak-free ground glass fittings or similar  
leak-free noncontaminating fittings. All impingers must be of the Greenburg-Smith design  
and must be modified by replacing the tip with a 1.3 centimeters, 1/2 inch, inside diameter  
glass tube extending to about 1.3 centimeters, 1/2 inch, from the bottom of the flask.  
Modifications, such as using flexible connections between the impingers or using materials  
other than glass, are allowed, subject to the approval of the department. The first impinger  
must contain a known quantity of water, as described in subdivision (d)(i)(C) of this rule.  
The second impinger must be empty, and the third must contain a known weight of silica  
gel or equivalent desiccant. Alternatively, a system that cools the sample gas stream and  
allows measurement of the water condensed and moisture leaving the condenser, each to  
within 1 milliliter or 1 gram, may be used, subject to the approval of the department. In  
any case, the means for measuring the moisture leaving the condenser must be by passing  
the sample gas stream through a tared silica gel, or equivalent desiccant, trap with exit  
gases kept below 20 degrees Centigrade, 68 degrees Fahrenheit, and determining the  
weight gain. If a determination of the particulate matter collected in the impingers is  
required by the department’s rules, a permit to install, or a permit to operate, then the  
impinger system described above must be used without modification. Contact the  
department as to the sample recovery and analysis of the impinger contents.  
(H) Metering system. Vacuum gauge, leak-free pump, thermometers capable of  
measuring temperature to within 3 degrees Centigrade, 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit, dry-gas  
meter capable of measuring volume to within 2%, and related equipment as shown in figure  
102 under R 336.2021. Other metering systems capable of maintaining sampling rates  
within 10% of isokinetic and capable of determining sample volumes to within 2% may be  
used, subject to the approval of the department. When the metering system is used in  
conjunction with a pitot tube, the system must enable checks of isokinetic rates. Sampling  
trains utilizing metering systems designed for higher flow rates than those described in  
APTD-0581 or APTD-0576, both adopted by reference in R 336.1902, may be used if the  
specifications of this method are met.  
(I) Barometer. Mercury, aneroid, or other barometer capable of measuring atmospheric  
pressure to within 2.5 millimeters mercury, 0.1 inch mercury. In many cases, the  
barometric reading may be obtained from a nearby national weather service station. In this  
case, the station value, which is the absolute barometric pressure, must be requested and  
an adjustment for elevation differences between the weather station and sampling point  
must be applied at a rate of minus 2.5 millimeters mercury, 0.1 inch mercury, per 30 meters,  
100 feet, elevation increase or vice versa for elevation decrease.  
(J) Gas density determination equipment. Temperature sensor and pressure gauge, as  
described in method 2, and gas analyzer, if necessary, as described in method 3. The  
temperature sensor must, preferably, be permanently attached to the pitot tube or sampling  
Page 20  
probe in a fixed configuration so that the tip of the sensor extends beyond the leading edge  
of the probe sheath and does not touch any metal. Alternatively, the sensor may be attached  
just before use in the field. If the temperature sensor is attached in the field, then the sensor  
must be placed in an interference-free arrangement with respect to the type S pitot tube  
openings, see method 2, figure 2-6 Velocity Traverse Data. As a second alternative, if a  
difference of not more than 1% in the average velocity measurement is to be introduced,  
then the temperature gauge need not be attached to the probe or pitot tube. This alternative  
is subject to the approval of the department. “Construction Details of Isokinetic Source  
Sampling Equipment,” APTD-0581, April 1971, PB203-060-LL, and “Maintenance,  
Calibration, and Operation of Isokinetic Source Sampling Equipment,” APTD-0576,  
March 1972, PB209-022-LL, are adopted by reference in R 336.1902.  
(ii) Sample recovery. The following items are required:  
(A) Probe-liner and probe-nozzle brushes. Nylon bristle brushes with stainless steel wire  
handles. The probe brush must have extensions, at least as long as the probe, made of  
stainless steel, nylon, Teflon, or similarly inert material. The brushes must be properly  
sized and shaped to brush out the probe liner and nozzle.  
(B) Wash bottles. Two glass wash bottles are recommended. The tester may use  
polyethylene wash bottles, but the acetone should not be stored in polyethylene bottles for  
longer than 1 month.  
(C) Glass sample storage containers. Chemically resistant, borosilicate glass bottles for  
acetone washes. Screw cap liners must either be rubber-backed Teflon or must be  
constructed to be leak-free and resistant to chemical attack by acetone. Narrow-mouth glass  
bottles are less prone to leakage. Alternatively, polyethylene bottles may be used.  
(D) Filter containers. Glass, polyethylene, or aluminum tube containers, unless  
otherwise specified by the department.  
(E) Graduated cylinder or balance. To measure condensed water to within 1 milliliter  
or 1 gram, graduated cylinders must have subdivisions of not more than 2 milliliters. Most  
laboratory balances are capable of weighing to the nearest 0.5 gram or less. Any of these  
balances may be used here and in paragraph (iii)(D) of this subdivision.  
(F) Plastic storage containers. Airtight containers to store silica gel.  
(G) Funnel and rubber policeman. To aid in the transfer of silica gel to container, but  
not necessary if silica gel is weighed in the field.  
(H) Funnel. Glass or polyethylene, to aid in sample recovery.  
(iii) Analysis. The following equipment is required for analysis:  
(A) Glass weighing dishes.  
(B) Desiccator.  
(C) Analytical balance. To measure to within 0.1 milligram.  
(D) Balance. To measure to within 0.5 milligram.  
(E) Beakers. 250 milliliters.  
(F) Hygrometer. To measure the relative humidity of the laboratory environment.  
(G) Temperature gauge. To measure the temperature of the laboratory environment.  
(c) The following provisions must apply to reagents:  
(i) Sampling. The reagents used in sampling are as follows:  
(A) Filters. Two in-stack filters may be any combination of alundum ceramic thimble  
filters, type RA-98, or glass fiber filters, type A without organic binder. The size of the  
filters must allow proper sampling rates to maintain iso-kinetics using the nozzle sizes  
Page 21  
specified in subdivision (b)(i)(A) of this rule. Alternatively, other types of filters may be  
used, subject to the approval of the department.  
(B) Silica gel. Indicating type, 6 to 16 mesh. If previously used, dry at 175 degrees  
Centigrade, 350 degrees Fahrenheit, for 2 hours. New silica gel may be used as received.  
Alternatively, other types of desiccants that are equivalent or better may be used, subject  
to the approval of the department.  
(C) Water. When analysis of the material caught in the impingers is required, distilled  
water must be used. Run blanks before field use to eliminate a high blank of test samples.  
(D) Crushed ice.  
(E) Stopcock grease. Acetone-insoluble, heat-stable silicone grease. This is not  
necessary if screw-on connectors with Teflon sleeves, or equivalent, are used.  
Alternatively, other types of stopcock grease may be used, subject to the approval of the  
department.  
(ii) Sample recovery. Washing solvent. Either acetone or distilled water may be used for  
sample recovery. If acetone is used for washing solvent, then reagent grade, less than  
0.001% residue, in glass bottles is required. Acetone from metal containers generally has  
a high residue blank and must not be used. If suppliers transfer acetone to glass bottles  
from metal containers, then acetone blanks must be run before field use and only acetone  
with low blank values, less than 0.001%, must be used. In no case must a blank value of  
more than 0.001% of the weight of acetone used be subtracted from the sample weight. If  
distilled water is used for washing solvent, use distilled water with less than 0.001%  
residue. Run blanks before field use to eliminate a high blank on test samples.  
(iii) Analysis. Two reagents are required for the analysis:  
(A) Solvent. Same as paragraph (ii) of this subdivision for quantitative transfer.  
(B) Desiccant. Anhydrous calcium sulfate, indicating type. Alternatively, other types of  
desiccants may be used, subject to the approval of the department.  
(d) The following provisions must apply to procedure:  
(i) Sampling. The complexity of this method is such that, in order to obtain reliable  
results, testers shall be trained and experienced with the test procedures. Sampling must  
comply with the following provisions:  
(A) Pretest preparation provisions are as follows:  
(I). All the components must be maintained and calibrated according to the applicable  
procedures described in APTD-0576, adopted by reference in R 336.1902, unless otherwise  
specified in this rule.  
(II) Weigh several 200 to 300 gram portions of silica gel in airtight containers to the  
nearest 0.5 gram. Record the total weight of the silica gel plus container on each container.  
As an alternative, the silica gel need not be preweighed, but may be weighed directly in its  
impinger or sampling holder just before train assembly.  
(III) Check filters visually against light for irregularities, flaws, pinhole leaks, or  
cracks. Label filters of the proper size on the back side using numbering machine ink. As  
an alternative, label the shipping containers, as described under subdivision (b)(ii)(D) of  
this rule, and keep the filters in these containers at all times, except during sampling and  
weighing.  
(IV) Dry the filters in an oven at 105 degrees Centigrade, 220 degrees Fahrenheit, for  
a minimum of 2 hours, cool for at least 1 hour in a desiccator containing anhydrous calcium  
sulfate, and individually weigh and record each weight to the nearest 0.1 milligram. During  
Page 22  
the weighing, the filter must not be exposed to the laboratory atmosphere for a period of  
more than 2 minutes and a relative humidity above 50%.  
(V) Procedures, other than those specified, that account for relative humidity effects  
may be used, subject to the approval of the department.  
(B) Preliminary determinations provisions are as follows:  
(I) Select the sampling site and the minimum number by the department.  
(II) Determine the stack pressure, temperature, and the range of velocity heads using  
method 2. It is recommended that a leak check of the pitot lines, see method 2, be  
performed.  
(III) Determine the moisture content using approximation method 4, or its alternatives,  
for the purpose of making isokinetic sampling rate settings.  
(IV) Determine the stack gas dry molecular weight, as described in method 2, if  
integrated method 3 sampling is used for molecular weight determination, the integrated  
bag sample must be taken simultaneously with, and for the same total length of time as, the  
particulate sample run.  
(V) Select a nozzle size based on the range of velocity heads so that it is not necessary  
to change the nozzle size to maintain isokinetic sampling rates. During the run, do not  
change the nozzle size. Ensure that the proper differential pressure gauge is chosen for the  
range of velocity heads encountered, see method 2.  
(VI) Select a suitable probe liner and probe length so that all traverse points may be  
sampled. For large stacks, sampling from opposite sides of the stack may reduce the length  
of probes.  
(VII) Select a total sampling time greater than or equal to the minimum total sampling  
time specified in the department’s rules so that the sampling time per point is not less than  
5 minutes, unless approved by the department, or some greater time interval as specified  
by the department, and so that the sample volume taken, corrected to standard conditions,  
exceeds the required minimum total gas sample volume. The latter is based on an  
approximate average sampling rate. The number of minutes sampled at each point may be  
an integer or an integer plus 1/2 minute to avoid timekeeping errors. In some  
circumstances, such as in batch cycles, it may be necessary to sample for shorter times at  
the traverse points and to obtain smaller gas sample volumes. In these cases, the  
department’s approval must first be obtained.  
(C) Preparation of collection train provisions are as follows:  
(I) During preparation and assembly of the sampling train, keep all openings where  
contamination can occur covered until just before assembly or until sampling is about to  
begin.  
(II) Place 100 milliliters of water in the first impinger, leave the second impinger  
empty, and transfer approximately 200 to 300 grams of preweighed silica gel from its  
container to the third impinger. More silica gel may be used, but care must be taken to  
ensure that it is not entrained and carried out from the impinger during sampling. Place the  
container in a clean place for later use in the sample recovery. Alternatively, the weight of  
the silica gel plus impinger may be determined to the nearest 0.5 gram and recorded.  
(III) Using tweezers or clean disposable surgical gloves, place a labeled, identified, and  
weighed filter in each filter holder. Be sure that the filter is properly centered and the gasket  
properly placed so as to prevent the sample gas stream from circumventing the filter.  
Page 23  
(IV) Install the selected nozzle using a Viton A 0-ring when stack temperatures are less  
than 260 degrees Centigrade, 500 degrees Fahrenheit, and a heat-resistant fiberglass,  
graphite, or other material string gasket when temperatures are higher. See APTD-0576,  
adopted by reference in R 336.1902, for requirements. Other connecting systems using  
either 310 stainless steel or Teflon ferrules may be used to form a leak-free direct  
mechanical connection.  
(V) Mark the probe with heat-resistant tape or by some other method to denote the  
proper distance into the stack or duct for each sampling point.  
(VI) Set up the train as in figure 102 under R 336.2021.  
(VII) If necessary, use a very light coat of silicone grease on all ground glass joints.  
Grease only the outer portion, see APTD-0576, to avoid the possibility of contamination  
by the silicone grease.  
(VIII) Place crushed ice around the impingers.  
(D) Leak check procedures:  
(I) Pretest leak check. A pretest leak check is strongly recommended, but not required,  
to prevent invalid sampling and wasted time. If the tester opts to conduct the pretest leak  
check, the following procedure must be used: Perform the leak check on the entire system,  
including filter housings and nozzle, by plugging the nozzle and pulling a 380 millimeter  
mercury, 15 inch mercury, vacuum. Alternatively, a lower vacuum may be used if it is not  
exceeded during the test. Leakage rates in excess of 4% of the average sampling rate or  
0.00057 cubic meters per minute, 0.02 cubic feet per minute, whichever is less, are  
unacceptable. The following leak check instructions for the sampling train described in  
APTD-0576 and APTD-0581, adopted by reference in R 336.1902, may be helpful. Start  
the pump with the bypass valve fully open and the coarse adjust valve completely closed.  
Partially open the coarse adjust valve and slowly close the bypass valve until the desired  
vacuum is reached. Do not reverse the direction of the bypass valve, as this will cause water  
to back up into the flexible sample tube and the probe. If the desired vacuum is exceeded,  
either leak-check at this higher vacuum or end the leak check and start over. When the leak  
check is completed, first slowly remove the plug from the inlet to the nozzle and  
immediately turn off the vacuum pump. This prevents the water in the first impinger from  
being forced backward into the sample tube and prevents silica gel from being entrained  
backward into the second impinger.  
(II) Leak checks during sample run. If, during the sampling run, a component, such as  
a filter assembly or impinger, change becomes necessary, a leak check must be conducted  
immediately before the change is made. The leak check must be done according to the  
procedure outlined in paragraph (i)(D)(I) of this subdivision, except that it must be done at  
a vacuum equal to or greater than the maximum value recorded up to that point in the test.  
If the leakage rate is not more than 0.00057 cubic meters per minute, 0.02 cubic feet per  
minute, or 4% of the average sampling rate, whichever is less, then the results are  
acceptable and no correction need be applied to the total volume of dry gas metered. If a  
higher leakage rate is obtained, then the tester shall either record the leakage rate and plan  
to correct the sample volume, as shown in subdivision (f)(iii) of this rule, or void the  
sampling run. Immediately after component changes, leak checks may be performed. If  
leak checks are done, then the procedure outlined in paragraph (i)(D)(I) of this subdivision  
must be used.  
Page 24  
(III) Post-test leak check. A leak check is required at the conclusion of each sampling  
run. The leak check must be performed in accordance with the procedures in paragraph  
(i)(D)(I) of this subdivision, except that it must be conducted at a vacuum equal to or  
greater than the maximum value reached during the sampling run. If the leakage rate is not  
more than 0.00057 cubic meters per minute, 0.02 cubic feet per minute, or 4% of the  
average sampling rate, whichever is less, then the results are acceptable and no correction  
need be applied to the total volume of dry gas metered. If a higher leakage rate is obtained,  
then the tester shall either record the leakage rate and correct the sample volume, as shown  
in subdivision (f)(iii) of this rule, or void the sampling run.  
(E) Particulate train operation. During the sampling run, maintain an isokinetic  
sampling rate that is within 10% of true isokinetic, unless otherwise specified by the  
department. For each run, record the data required on a data sheet such as the data sheet in  
figure 104 under R 336.2021. Record the initial dry-gas meter reading. Record the dry-gas  
meter readings at the beginning and end of each sampling time increment, when changes  
in flow rates are made, before and after each leak check, and when sampling is halted. Take  
other readings required by figure 104 under R 336.2021 at least once at each sample point  
during each time increment, and take additional readings when significant changes, 20%  
variation in velocity head readings, necessitate additional adjustments in flow rate. Level  
and zero the manometer. Because the manometer level and zero may drift due to vibrations  
and temperature changes, make periodic checks during the traverse. Clean the portholes  
before the test run to minimize the chance of sampling deposited material. To begin  
sampling, remove the nozzle cap and verify that the pitot tube and probe are properly  
positioned. Position the nozzle at the first traverse point with the tip pointing directly into  
the gas stream. Immediately start the pump and adjust the flow to isokinetic conditions.  
Nomographs that aid in the rapid adjustment of the isokinetic sampling rate without  
excessive computations are available. These nomographs are designed for use when the  
type S pitot tube coefficient is 0.85 ±0.02 and the stack gas equivalent density, dry  
molecular weight, is equal to 29 ±4. APTD-0576, adopted by reference in R 336.1902,  
details the procedure for using the nomographs. If Cp and Md are outside the above stated  
ranges, do not use the nomographs unless appropriate steps, see subdivision (g)(iv) of this  
rule, are taken to compensate for the deviations. When the stack is under significant  
negative pressure, height of impinger stem, take care to pull low-flow when inserting the  
probe into the stack to prevent water from backing into the sample tubing and to avoid  
pulsation through the filter and possible loss of materials. When the probe is in position,  
block off the openings around the probe and porthole to prevent unrepresentative dilution  
of the gas stream. Traverse the stack cross section, as required by method 1 or as specified  
by the department, being careful not to bump the probe nozzle into the stack walls when  
sampling near the walls or when removing or inserting the probe through the portholes;  
this minimizes the chance of extracting deposited material. During the test run, add more  
ice and, if necessary, salt to maintain a temperature of less than 20 degrees Centigrade, 68  
degrees Fahrenheit, at the condenser/silica gel outlet. Also, periodically check the level and  
zero of the manometer. If the pressure drop across the filter becomes too high and makes  
isokinetic sampling difficult to maintain, the filter may be replaced in the midst of a sample  
run. It is recommended that another complete filter assembly be used rather than attempting  
to change the filter itself. Before a new filter assembly is installed, conduct a leak check,  
as described under paragraph (i)(D)(II) of this subdivision. The total particulate weight  
Page 25  
must include the summation of all filter assembly catches. A single train must be used for  
the entire sample run, except in cases where simultaneous sampling is required in 2 or more  
separate ducts, at 2 or more different locations within the same duct, or where equipment  
failure necessitates a change of trains. In all other situations, the use of 2 or more trains  
must be subject to the approval of the department. When 2 or more trains are used, separate  
analyses of the front-half and, if applicable, impinger catches from each train must be  
performed, unless identical nozzle sizes were used on all trains. If identical nozzle sizes  
were used, the front-half catches from the individual trains may be combined, as may the  
impinger catches, and 1 analysis of front-half catch and 1 analysis of impinger catch may  
be performed. Consult with the department for details concerning the calculation of results  
when 2 or more trains are used. At the end of the sample run, turn off the coarse adjust  
valve, remove the probe and nozzle from the stack, turn off the pump, record the final dry-  
gas meter reading, and conduct a post-test leak check, as outlined in paragraph (i)(D)(III)  
of this subdivision. Leak-check the pitot lines as described in method 2. The lines must  
pass this leak check to validate the velocity head data.  
(F) Calculation of percent isokinetic. Calculate percent isokinetic, see subdivision (f) of  
this rule, to determine if the run was valid or if another test run should be made. If there  
was difficulty in maintaining isokinetic rates due to source conditions, consult with the  
department for possible variance on the isokinetic rates.  
(ii) Sample recovery. Proper cleanup procedure begins as soon as the probe is removed  
from the stack at the end of the sampling period. Allow the probe to cool. When the probe  
can be safely handled, wipe off all external particulate matter near the tip of the probe  
nozzle and place a cap over it to prevent losing or gaining particulate matter. Do not cap  
off the probe tip tightly while the sampling train is cooling down as this creates a vacuum  
in the filter holder and draws water from the impingers into the sample tube. Before moving  
the sampling train to the cleanup site, make sure all condensed water in the probe and  
flexible sample lines are drained into the first impinger. Disconnect all sample lines and  
remove the nozzle-filter set assembly from the probe. Cap all openings to prevent  
contamination or accidental loss of sample. Remove all excess particulate from the exterior  
of the nozzle-filter assembly to prevent contamination during disassembly. Transfer the  
nozzle-filter set assembly and impinger set to the cleanup area. The cleanup area must be  
clean and protected from the wind so that the chances of contaminating or losing the sample  
are minimized. Save a portion of the solvent used for cleanup as a blank. Take 200  
milliliters of this solvent directly from the wash bottle being used and place it in a glass  
sample container labeled "solvent blank". Inspect the train before and during disassembly  
and note any abnormal conditions. Treat the samples in the following manner: Container  
numbers. 1, 1A. Carefully remove the filters from the filter holders and place each filter in  
its identified container. Use a pair of tweezers or clean disposable surgical gloves, or both,  
to handle the filters. Carefully transfer to the container any particulate matter or filter fibers,  
or both, that adhere to the filter holder gasket by using a dry nylon bristle brush or sharp-  
edged blade, or both. Seal the containers. Container number 2. Taking care to see that  
particulate on the outside of the nozzle and filter holders does not get into the sample, the  
tester shall carefully remove the nozzle and clean the inside surface by rinsing with solvent  
from a wash bottle and brushing with a nylon bristle brush. Brush until the solvent rinse  
shows no visible particles and then make a final rinse of the inside surface with solvent.  
After ensuring that all joints have been cleaned of all extraneous material, the tester shall  
Page 26  
quantitatively remove particulate from the filter holders by rubbing the surfaces with a  
nylon bristle brush and rinsing with solvent. Rinse each surface 3 times, or more if needed,  
to remove visible particulate. Make a final rinse of the brush and filter holder set. After all  
solvent washings and particulate matter have been collected in the sample container,  
tighten the lid on the sample container so that solvent will not leak out when it is shipped  
to the laboratory. Mark the height of the fluid level to determine if leakage occurred during  
transport. Label the container to clearly identify its contents. Container number 3. Note the  
color of the indicating silica gel to determine if it has been completely spent and make a  
notation of its condition. Transfer the silica gel from the third impinger to its original  
container and seal. A funnel may make it easier to pour the silica gel without spilling it. A  
rubber policeman may be used as an aid in removing the silica gel from the impinger. It is  
not necessary to remove the small amount of dust particles that adhere to the impinger wall  
and are difficult to remove. Since the gain in weight will be used for moisture calculations,  
do not use any water or other liquids to transfer the silica gel. If a balance is available in  
the field, follow the procedure for container number 3 in paragraph (iii) of this subdivision.  
Impinger water. Treat the impingers in the following manner: Make a notation of any color  
or film in the liquid catch. Measure the liquid that is in the first 2 impingers to within ±1  
milliliter by using a graduated cylinder or by weighing it to within ±1.0 gram by using a  
balance if one is available. Record the volume or weight of liquid present. This information  
is required to calculate the moisture content of the effluent gas. Discard the liquid after  
measuring and recording the volume or weight, unless analysis of the impinger catch is  
required, see subdivision (b)(i)(G) of this rule. If a different type of condenser is used,  
measure the amount of moisture condensed either volumetrically or gravimetrically. If  
possible, containers must be shipped in a manner that keeps them upright at all times.  
(iii) Analysis. Record the data required on a sheet such as the sheet in figure 106 under  
R 336.2021. Handle each sample container in the following manner: Container numbers 1,  
1A. Analyze and report each filter separately. Transfer the filter and any loose particulate  
from the sample container to a tared-glass weighing dish. Dry the filter in an oven at 105  
degrees Centigrade, 220 degrees Fahrenheit, for a minimum of 2 hours, cool for at least 1  
hour in a desiccator containing anhydrous calcium sulfate, and weigh and record its weight  
to the nearest 0.1 milligram. During the weighing the filter must not be exposed to the  
laboratory atmosphere for a period greater than 2 minutes or a relative humidity above  
50%. Procedures, other than those specified, that account for relative humidity effects may  
be used, subject to the approval of the department. The method used for drying and  
weighing of filters must be consistent before and after the test. Container number 2. Note  
the level of liquid in the container and confirm on the analysis sheet if leakage occurred  
during transport. If a noticeable amount of leakage has occurred, then either void the  
sample or use methods, subject to the approval of the department, to correct the final  
results. Measure the liquid in this container either volumetrically to ±1 milliliter or  
gravimetrically to ±1.0 gram. Transfer the contents to a tared 250-milliliter beaker and  
evaporate to dryness either at ambient temperature and pressure for acetone or at 95 degrees  
Centigrade, 203 degrees Fahrenheit, in an oven for distilled water. Then subject the sample  
to 250 degrees Centigrade, 482 degrees Fahrenheit, in an oven for 2 to 3 hours. Desiccate  
24 hours and weigh to a constant weight. Report the results to the nearest 0.1 milligram.  
Container number 3. Weigh the spent silica gel, or silica gel plus impinger, to the nearest  
0.5 gram using a balance. This step may be conducted in the field. "Solvent blank"  
Page 27  
container. Measure solvent in this container either volumetrically or gravimetrically.  
Transfer the contents to a tared 250-milliliters beaker and evaporate to dryness either at  
ambient temperature and pressure for acetone or at 95 degrees Centigrade, 203 degrees  
Fahrenheit, in an oven for distilled water. Then subject the sample to 250 degrees  
Centigrade, 482 degrees Fahrenheit, in an oven for 2 to 3 hours. Desiccate for 24 hours and  
weigh to a constant weight. Report the results to the nearest 0.1 milligram. If acetone is  
used, the contents of Container number 2, as well as the acetone blank container, may be  
evaporated at temperatures higher than ambient. If evaporation is done at an elevated  
temperature, then the temperature must be closely supervised, and the contents of the  
beaker must be swirled occasionally to maintain an even temperature. Use extreme care,  
as acetone is highly flammable and has a low flash point.  
(e) Calibration. Maintain a laboratory log of all calibrations. Calibrations must comply  
with the following provisions:  
(i) Probe nozzle. A probe nozzle must be calibrated before its initial use in the field.  
Using a micrometer, measure the inside diameter of the nozzle to the nearest 0.025  
millimeter, 0.001 inch. Make 3 separate measurements using different diameters each time  
and obtain the average of the measurements. The difference between the high and low  
numbers must not exceed 0.1 millimeter, 0.004 inch. When nozzles become nicked, dented,  
or corroded, the nozzles must be reshaped, sharpened, and recalibrated before use. Each  
nozzle must be permanently and uniquely identified.  
(ii) Pitot tube. The type S pitot tube assembly must be calibrated according to the  
procedures in method 2.  
(iii) Metering system. Before its initial use in the field, the metering system must be  
calibrated according to the procedure in APTD-0576, adopted by reference in R 336.1902.  
Instead of physically adjusting the dry-gas meter dial readings to correspond to the wet-  
test meter readings, calibration factors may be used to mathematically correct the gas meter  
dial readings to the proper values. Before calibrating the metering system, a leak check  
may be conducted. For metering systems having diaphragm or rotary pumps, the normal  
leak check procedure will not detect leakages within the pump. For these cases, the  
following leak check procedure may be used: Make a 10-minute calibration run at 0.00057  
cubic meters per minute, 0.02 cubic feet per minute. At the end of the run, take the  
difference of the measured wet-test meter and dry-gas meter volumes and divide the  
difference by 10 to get the leak rate. The leak rate must not exceed 0.00057 cubic meters  
per minute (0.02 cubic feet per minute). After each field use, the calibration of the metering  
system must be checked by performing 3 calibration runs at a single, intermediate orifice  
setting, based on the previous field test, with the vacuum set at the maximum value reached  
during the test series. To adjust the vacuum, insert a valve between the wet-test meter and  
the inlet of the metering system. Calculate the average value of the calibration factor. If the  
calibration has changed by more than 5%, then recalibrate the meter over the full range of  
orifice settings, as outlined in APTD-0576. Alternatively, a spirometer may be substituted  
for a wet-test meter in the above calibration procedures. Alternative procedures, such as  
using the orifice meter coefficients, may be used, subject to the approval of the department.  
If the dry-gas meter coefficient values obtained before and after a test series differ by more  
than 5%, then the test series must be performed using whichever meter coefficient value,  
before or after, gives the lower value of total sample volume.  
Page 28  
(iv) Temperature gauges. Use the procedure in method 2 to calibrate in-stack  
temperature gauges. Dial thermometers, such as those used for the dry-gas meter and  
condenser outlet, must be calibrated against mercury-in-glass thermometers or other  
thermometers that are calibrated using a National Institute of Standards and Technology  
calibrated reference thermometer.  
(v) Leak check of metering system shown in figure 102 under R 336.2021. That portion  
of the sampling train from the pump to the orifice meter must be leak-checked before initial  
use and after each shipment. Leakage after the pump will result in less volume being  
recorded than is actually sampled. The following procedure is suggested, also see figure  
107 under R 336.2021: Close the main valve on the meter box. Insert a 1-hole rubber  
stopper with rubber tubing attached into the orifice exhaust pipe. Disconnect and vent the  
low side of the orifice manometer. Close off the low side orifice tap. Pressurize the system  
to 13 to 18 centimeters, 5 to 7 inches, water column by blowing into the rubber tubing.  
Pinch off the tubing and observe the manometer for 1 minute. A loss of pressure on the  
manometer indicates a leak in the meter box. Leaks, if present, must be corrected.  
(vi) Barometer. Calibrate against a mercury barometer.  
(f) Calculations. When carrying out calculations, retain at least 1 extra decimal figure  
beyond that of the acquired data. Round off figures after the final calculation. Other forms  
of the equations may be used if the other forms of the equations give equivalent results.  
The following provisions apply to calculations:  
(i) Nomenclature:  
An = Cross-sectional area of nozzle, meters² or the equivalent feet².  
A = Cross-sectional area of stack or flue at the point of sampling, feet².  
B ws = Water vapor in the gas stream, proportion by volume, expressed as a fraction.  
B wi = Percent water vapor in gas entering source particulate control device determined  
by method 4.  
B wo = Percent water vapor in gas exiting source particulate control device.  
Ca = Wash blank residue concentration, milligrams per gram.  
Cs = Concentration of particulate matter in stack gas, pounds per 1,000 pounds of actual  
stack gas.  
C sD = Concentration of particulate matter in stack gas, moisture excluded, pounds per  
1000 pounds of dry stack gas.  
Cs50 = Concentration of particulate matter corrected to 50% excess air, pounds per 1000  
pounds of stack gas.  
Cs50D = Concentration of particulate matter corrected to 50% excess air, excluding any  
water addition from a collector, pounds per 1000 pounds of stack gas.  
E = Mass emission rate of particulate, pounds/hour.  
F50 = Concentration conversion factor to 50% excess air with no moisture alterations  
in exhaust.  
F50D = Concentration conversion factor to 50% excess air, excluding any moisture  
added to exhaust gas by pollution collection system.  
FD = Concentration conversion factor to dry basis, excluding any water in the stack gas.  
I = Percent of isokinetic sampling.  
L a = Maximum acceptable leakage rate for either a pretest leak check or for a leak  
check following a component change; equal to 0.00057 meters³/minute (0.02 cubic feet per  
minute) or 4% of the average sampling rate, whichever is less.  
Page 29  
Li = Individual leakage rate observed during the leak check conducted  
before the "ith" component change (i = 1, 2, 3 . . . . n), meters³/minute (cubic feet per  
minute).  
Lp = Leakage rate observed during the post-test leak check, meters³/minute (cubic feet  
per minute).  
Md = Molecular weight of dry stack gas, gram/gram mole (pound/pound-mole),  
calculated  
by method 3, equation 3-1, using data from integrated method 3.  
mn = Total amount of particulate matter collected, milligram.  
Mw = Molecular weight of water, 18.0 gram/gram-mole (18.0 pound/pound-mole).  
ma = Mass of residue of solvent after evaporation, milligram.  
mg = Total weight of gas samples through nozzle, pound.  
P bar = Barometric pressure at the sampling site, millimeter mercury (inches mercury).  
Ps = Absolute stack gas pressure.  
Pstd = Standard absolute pressure, 760 millimeters mercury (29.92 inches mercury).  
R = Ideal gas constant, 0.06236 millimeters of mercury-cubic meters per kelvin-gram-  
mole, (21.85 inches of mercury-cubic feet per Rankine-pound-mole).  
T m = Absolute average dry-gas meter temperature, see figure 104 under R 336.2021,  
°Kelvin, (°Rankine).  
Ts = Absolute average stack gas temperature, see figure 104 under R 336.2021, °Kelvin,  
(°Rankine).  
Tstd = Standard absolute temperature, 294.I°Kelvin, (530°Rankine).  
V a = Volume of solvent blank, milliliters.  
V aw = Volume of solvent used in wash, milliliters.  
V lc = Total volume of liquid collected in impingers and silica gel (see figure 106 under  
R 336.2021), milliliters.  
Vm = Volume of gas sample as measured by the dry-gas meter, deci-centimeter, (deci-  
cubic-foot).  
V m(std) = Volume of gas sample measured by the dry-gas meter, corrected to standard  
conditions, deci-standard cubic meter, (deci-standard cubic foot).  
V w(std) = Volume of water vapor in the gas sample, corrected to standard conditions,  
standard cubic meter, (standard cubic foot).  
V s = Stack gas velocity, calculated by method 2, using data obtained from method 5,  
meters/second (feet/second).  
Wa = Weight of residue in solvent wash, milligram.  
Y = Dry-gas meter calibration factor.  
ΔH = Average pressure differential across the orifice meter (see figure 104 under R  
336.2021), millimeter water (inches water).  
%02 = Percent oxygen in stack gas by volume (dry basis).  
%N2 = Percent nitrogen in stack gas by volume (dry basis).  
p a = Density of solvent, milligrams/milliliter.  
p s(std) = Density of all sampled gas at standard conditions, pounds/feet.³  
pw = Density of water, 0.9982 grams/milliliter (0.002201 pounds/milliliter).  
θ = Total sample time, minute.  
θ1 = Sample time, interval, from the beginning of a run until the first component  
change, minute.  
Page 30  
θi = Sampling time interval, between 2 successive component changes, beginning with  
the interval between the first and second changes, minute.  
θp = Sampling time interval, from the final (nth) component change until the end of the  
sampling run, minute.  
13.6 = Specific gravity of mercury.  
60 = Seconds/minute.  
100 = Conversion to percent.  
386.9 = Cubic feet per pound-mole of ideal gas at standard conditions.  
453.6 = Conversion of pounds to grams.  
3600 = Conversion of hours to seconds.  
1000 = Conversion of 1000 pound units to pound units.  
(ii) Average the dry-gas meter temperature and average the orifice pressure drop. See  
data sheet, figure 104 under R 336.2021.  
(iii) Dry gas volume. Correct the sample volume measured by the dry-gas meter to  
standard conditions, 21.11 degrees Centigrade, 760 millimeters mercury or 68 degrees  
Fahrenheit, 29.92 inches mercury, by using equation 5-1.  
Equation 5-1:  
Y
(
+ H / 13.6)  
(
+ H / 13.6)  
Pbar  
V m Tstd Pbar  
=
=
Y
K1 V m  
V m(std)  
Tm Pstd  
Tm  
Where:  
K1  
= 0.3869 °K/mm Hg for metric units.  
= 17.71 °R/in. Hg for English units.  
Equation 5-1 may be used as written. However, if the leakage rate observed during any of  
the mandatory leak checks, for example, the post-test leak check or leak checks conducted  
before component changes, exceeds La, equation 5-1 must be modified as follows:  
(A) Case I. No component changes made during sampling run. In this case, replace Vm  
in equation 5-1 with the following expression:  
Vm  
-(L  
p
-L)  
a
(B) Case II. One or more component changes made during the sampling run. In this  
case, replace V in equation 5-1 by the following expression:  
m
n
Vm  
- (L  
1
- L  
a
)  
1
(L  
i
- L  
a
)  
i
(L  
p
- L  
a
)  
p
i=2  
and substitute only for those leakage rates (Li or Lp) that exceed La.  
(iv) Volume of water vapor.  
Equation 5-2  
Page 31  
=
( pw /  
) (R  
/
) =  
Vw(std)  
V1c  
Mw  
Tstd Pstd K2 V1c  
Where:  
K2 = 0.001338 m³/ml for metric units.  
= 0.04733 ft.3/ml for English units.  
(v) Moisture content.  
Equation 5-3  
=
/ (  
Vw(std) Vm(std)  
+
)
vw(std)  
Bws  
In saturated or water droplet-laden gas streams, 2 calculations of the moisture content of  
the stack gas must be made: 1 from the impinger analysis, equation 5-3, and a second from  
the assumption of saturated conditions. The lower of the 2 values of Bws must be considered  
correct. The procedure for determining the moisture content based on the assumption of  
saturated conditions as described in 40 CFR part 60 appendix A method 4. For the purpose  
of this method, the average stack gas temperature from figure 104 under R 336.2021 may  
be used to make the determination, if the accuracy of the in-stack temperature sensor is ±1  
degree Centigrade, 2 degrees Fahrenheit.  
(vi) Solvent blank concentration.  
Equation 5-4  
=
/ ( )  
ma Va Pa  
Ca  
(vii) Solvent wash blank.  
Equation 5-5  
=
Wa  
Ca Vaw Pa  
(viii) Total particulate weight. Determine the total particulate catch from the sum of the  
weights obtained from containers 1, 1A, and 2 less the wash solvent blank, see figure 106  
under R 336.2021. Refer to subdivision (d)(i)(E) of this rule to assist in the calculation of  
results involving 2 or more pairs of filters or 2 or more sampling trains.  
(ix) Sampled gas density. Determine the density of the gas sampled from the stack, at  
standard conditions in pounds per cubic foot, lb/ft.³.  
Equation 5-6  
= (  
(1-  
) +  
) / 386.9  
Mw Bws  
Ps(std)  
Md  
Bws  
(x) Total weight of gas sampled, lbs.  
Page 32  
Equation 5-7  
= (  
+
V w(std)  
) p  
s(std)  
mg  
Vm(std)  
(xi) Particulate concentration, lbs/1000 lbs.  
Equation 5-8  
=
/ (453.6  
)
mg  
Cs  
mn  
(xii) Excess air and moisture correction factors:  
(A) Correction factor to 50% excess air for those sources with or without a particulate  
collector where no increase in moisture content of the exhaust gas occurs after the process  
and before the point of sampling.  
Equation 5-9  
+ 18  
/ (100 -  
)
Md  
- 2.0592 %  
Bwo  
+
Bwo  
+ 18  
=
F50  
0.1826 %  
/ (100 -  
)
Bwo  
N2  
02  
Md  
Bwo  
(B) Correction factor to 50% excess air for those sources with a wet collection device,  
scrubber, that increases the moisture content of the exhaust gas after the process and before  
the point of sampling.  
Equation 5-10  
+ 18  
/ (100 -  
)
Md  
- 2.0592 %  
Bwo  
+
Bwo  
+ 18  
=
F50D  
0.1826 %  
/ (100 -  
)
Bwi  
N2  
02  
Md  
Bwi  
(C) Correction factor to convert the actual concentration, Cs, to dry conditions.  
Equation 5-11  
+ 18  
/ (100 -  
)
Bwo  
Md  
Bwo  
=
FD  
Md  
(xiii) Converted particulate concentrations, where applicable under the department’s  
rules or permit.  
Equation 5-12  
=
Cs50  
Cs F50  
Page 33  
Equation 5-13  
=
Cs50D  
Cs F50D  
Equation 5-14  
=
CsD  
Cs FD  
(xiv) Mass emission rate in pounds per hour, lb/hr.  
Equation 5-15  
3600 A  
Vs Cs Ps Tstd Ps(std)  
E =  
=
A
/
K3 Vs Cs Ps Ps(std) Ts  
1000  
Ts Pstd  
Where:  
K3  
= 63.77 for English units.  
(xv) Isokinetic variation using 1 of the following methods:  
(A) Calculation from raw data.  
Equation 5-16  
100  
(
+ (  
/
)( + H / 13.6))  
Ts K4 V lc  
V m Tm Pbar  
I =  
60  
V s Ps An  
Where:  
K4  
= 0.003458 mm Hg - m³ml - °K for metric units.  
= 0.002672 in. Hg - ft.³/ml - °R for English units.  
(B) Calculation from intermediate values.  
Equation 5-17  
100  
Ts Vm(std) Pstd  
Ts Vm(std)  
(1-  
I =  
=
K5  
60(1-  
)
)
Bws  
Tstd Vs An Ps  
Bws  
Ps Vs An  
Where:  
K5 = 4.307 for metric units.  
= 0.09409 for English units.  
(xvi) Acceptable results. If 90%=I=110%, then the results are acceptable. If the results  
are low in comparison to the standard and I is beyond the acceptable range, or if I is less  
Page 34  
than 90%, then the department may opt to accept the results. Otherwise, reject the results  
and repeat the test.  
(g) Bibliography:  
(i) Federal Register, Volume 42, No. 160, Part 160, Chapter 1, Title 40, Appendix A,  
Method 5, August 18, 1977.  
(ii) Martin, Robert M. Construction Details of Isokinetic Source Sampling Equipment.  
Environmental Protection Agency. Research Triangle Park, N.C. APTD-0581. April, 1971.  
(iii) Rom, Jerome J. Maintenance, Calibration, and Operation of Isokinetic Source  
Sampling Equipment. Environmental Protection Agency. Research Triangle Park, N.C.  
APTD-0576. March, 1972.  
(iv) Shigehara, R. T. "Adjustments in the EPA Nomograph for Different Pitot Tube  
Coefficients and Dry Molecular Weights." Stack Sampling News, 2:4 - 11. October, 1974.  
(v) Guidelines for Source Testing of Particulate. Michigan Department of Natural  
Resources, Air Quality Division. June 1, 1977.  
History: 1985 AACS; 1992 AACS; 2002 AACS; 2005 AACS; 2025 AACS.  
R 336.2012 Reference test method 5C.  
Rule 1012. Reference test method 5C, out-stack filtration method, reads as follows:  
(a) The principle, applicability, and performance test criteria are as follows:  
(i) Principle. Particulate matter is withdrawn iso-kinetically from the source and  
collected on solid filtering media maintained at a temperature in the range of 120 ±14  
degrees Centigrade, 248 ±25 degrees Fahrenheit, or another temperature as specified by  
the department's rules or a permit condition, or as approved by the department for a  
particular application. The particulate mass, which includes any material that condenses at  
or above the filtration temperature, is determined gravimetrically after removal of  
uncombined water.  
(ii) Applicability. This method is applicable for the determination of particulate  
emissions from stationary sources as identified in table 31 of R 336.1331. The method is  
also applicable when specifically provided for in the department’s rules, orders, a permit  
to install, or a permit to operate.  
(iii) Performance test criteria as follows:  
(A) A performance test must meet the requirements under R 336.2003(2).  
(B) For sources that are subject to an emission limitation calculated to 50% excess air,  
the multipoint, integrated sampling procedure of R 336.2004(1)(c) must be used for gas  
analysis. For all other sources that require a determination of the molecular weight of the  
exhaust, an optional sampling procedure of R 336.2004(1)(c) may be used. Alternatives or  
modifications to procedures are subject to the approval of the department.  
(C) The minimum volume per sample must be 30 cubic feet of dry gas corrected to  
standard conditions, 68 degrees Fahrenheit, 29.92 inches mercury. Minimum sample time  
must be 60 minutes, which may be continuous or a combination of shorter sampling periods  
for sources that operate in a cyclic manner. Smaller sampling times or sample volumes,  
when necessitated by process variables or other factors, may be approved by the  
department.  
(D) For a source whose emission control device alters the moisture content of the  
exhaust gas, a moisture determination must be performed in a location upstream from the  
Page 35  
emission control device and in accordance with R 336.2004(1)(d) or an alternative method  
approved by the department.  
(b) The following provisions apply to apparatus:  
(i) Sampling train. A schematic of the sampling train used in this method is shown in  
figure 103 under R 336.2021. Construction details for many, but not all, of the train  
components are given in APTD-0581, subdivision (g)(ii) of this rule. For changes from the  
APTD-0581 document and for allowable modifications to figure 103 under R 336.2021,  
consult with the department. The operating and maintenance procedures for many, but not  
all, of the sampling train are described in APTD-0576, adopted by reference in R 336.1902,  
and referenced under subdivision (g)(iii) of this rule. Since correct usage is important in  
obtaining valid results, all users shall read APTD-0576 and adopt the applicable operating  
and maintenance procedures outlined in it, unless otherwise specified. The sampling train  
consists of the following components:  
(A) Probe nozzle. Stainless steel 316 or glass with sharp, tapered leading edge. The  
angle of taper must be less than 30 degrees and the taper must be on the outside to preserve  
a constant internal diameter. The probe nozzle must be of the buttonhook design, unless  
otherwise specified by the department. If made of stainless steel, the nozzle must be  
constructed from seamless tubing. Other materials of construction may be used, subject to  
the approval of the department. A range of nozzle sizes suitable for isokinetic sampling  
must be available, for example, 0.32 to 1.27 centimeters, 1/8 to 1/2 inch, or larger if higher  
volume sampling trains are used inside diameter nozzles in increments of 0.16 centimeters,  
1/16 inches. Each nozzle must be calibrated according to the procedures outlined in  
subdivision (e) of this rule.  
(B) Probe liner. Borosilicate or quartz glass tubing with a heating system capable of  
maintaining a gas temperature at the exit end during sampling of 120 ±14 degrees  
Centigrade, 248 ±25 degrees Fahrenheit, another temperature as specified by the  
department's rules, or a temperature approved by the department for a particular  
application. The tester may opt to operate the equipment at a temperature lower than that  
specified. Since the actual temperature at the outlet of the probe is not usually monitored  
during sampling, probes constructed according to APTD-0581, adopted by reference in R  
336.1902, which utilize the calibration curves of APTD-0576, or calibrated according to  
the procedure outlined in APTD-0576, adopted by reference in R 336.1902, are acceptable.  
Either borosilicate or quartz glass probe liners may be used for stack temperatures up to  
about 480 degrees Centigrade, 900 degrees Fahrenheit; quartz liners must be used for  
temperatures between 480 and 900 degrees Centigrade, 900 and 1,650 degrees Fahrenheit.  
Both types of liners may be used at higher temperatures than specified for short periods of  
time, subject to the approval of the department. The softening temperature for borosilicate  
is 820 degrees Centigrade, 1,508 degrees Fahrenheit, and for quartz it is 1,500 degrees  
Centigrade, 2,732 degrees Fahrenheit. When practical, every effort must be made to use  
borosilicate or quartz glass probe liners. Alternatively, metal liners, such as 316 stainless  
steel, Incoloy 825, or other corrosion resistant materials made of seamless tubing, may be  
used, subject to the approval of the department.  
(C) Pitot tube. Type S, as described in method 2, or another device approved by the  
department. The pitot tube must be attached to the probe, as shown in figure 103 under R  
336.2021, to allow constant monitoring of the stack gas velocity. The impact, high  
pressure, opening plane of the pitot tube must be even with or above the nozzle entry plane,  
Page 36  
see method 2, figure 2-6 Velocity Traverse Data, during sampling. The type S pitot tube  
assembly must have a known coefficient, determined as outlined in method 2.  
(D) Differential pressure gauge. Incline manometer or equivalent devices (2), as  
described in method 2. One manometer must be used for velocity head (p) readings, and  
the other must be used for orifice differential pressure readings.  
(E) Filter holders. Two separate filter holders in series or 1 filter holder with separate  
filter supports and seals for 2 filters. One filter holder with 2 filters held in contact with  
each other is not acceptable. Materials of construction may be stainless steel 316, glass,  
Teflon, or another material approved by the department.  
(F) Filter heating system. Any heating system capable of maintaining a temperature  
around the filter holder during sampling of 120 ±14 degrees Centigrade, 248 ±25 degrees  
Fahrenheit, another temperature as specified by the department's rules or a permit  
condition, or a temperature approved by the department for a particular application.  
Alternatively, the tester may opt to operate the equipment at a temperature lower than that  
specified. A temperature gauge capable of measuring temperature to within 3 degrees  
Centigrade, 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit, must be installed so that the temperature around the  
filter holders can be regulated and monitored during sampling. Heating systems other than  
the one shown in APTD-0581 may be used.  
(G) Condenser. The following system must be used to determine the stack gas moisture  
content: Three impingers connected in series with leak-free ground glass fittings or any  
similar leak-free non-contaminating fittings. All impingers must be of the Greenburg-  
Smith design and must be modified by replacing the tip with a 1.3 centimeters, 1/2 inch,  
inside diameter glass tube extending to about 1.3 centimeters, 1/2 inch, from the bottom of  
the flask. Modifications, such as using flexible connections between the impingers or using  
materials other than glass, are allowed subject to the approval of the department’s staff.  
The first impinger must contain a known quantity of water, as described in subdivision  
(d)(i)(C) of this rule, the second must be empty, and the third must contain a known weight  
of silica gel or equivalent desiccant. Alternatively, a system that cools the sample gas  
stream and allows measurement of the water condensed and moisture leaving the  
condenser, to within 1 milliliter or 1 gram, may be used subject to the approval of the  
department. In any case, the means for measuring the moisture leaving the condenser must  
be by passing the sample gas stream through a tared silica gel, or equivalent desiccant, trap  
with exit gases kept below 20 degrees Centigrade, 68 degrees Fahrenheit, and determining  
the weight gain. If a determination of the particulate matter collected in the impingers is  
required by the department's rules, a permit to install, or a permit to operate, the impinger  
system described in this subparagraph must be used, without modification. Contact the  
department as to the sample recovery and analysis of the impinger contents.  
(H) Metering system. Vacuum gauge, leak-free pump, thermometers capable of  
measuring temperature to within 3 degrees Centigrade, 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit, drygas  
meter capable of measuring volume to within 2%, and related equipment as shown in figure  
103 under R 336.2021. Other metering systems capable of maintaining sampling rates  
within 10% of isokinetic and capable of determining sample volumes to within 2% may be  
used, subject to the approval of the department. When the metering system is used in  
conjunction with a pitot tube, the system must enable checks of isokinetic rates. Sampling  
trains utilizing metering systems designed for higher flow rates than those described in  
Page 37  
APTD-0581 or APTD-0576, both adopted by reference in R 336.1902, may be used if the  
specifications of this method are met.  
(I) Barometer. Mercury, aneroid, or other barometer capable of measuring atmospheric  
pressure to within 2.5 millimeters mercury, 0.1 inch mercury. In many cases, the  
barometric reading may be obtained from a nearby national weather service station. When  
obtained from this source, the station value, which is the absolute barometric pressure, must  
be requested and an adjustment for elevation differences between the weather station and  
sampling point must be applied at a rate of minus 2.5 millimeters mercury per 30 meters,  
0.1 inch mercury, per 100 foot, elevation increase or vice versa for elevation decrease.  
(J) Gas density determination equipment. Temperature sensor and pressure gauge, as  
described in method 2, and gas analyzer, if necessary, as described in method 3. The  
temperature sensor must, preferably, be permanently attached to the pitot tube or sampling  
probe in a fixed configuration so that the tip of the sensor extends beyond the leading edge  
of the probe sheath and does not touch any metal. Alternatively, the sensor may be attached  
just before use in the field. Note, however, that if the temperature sensor is attached in the  
field, the sensor must be placed in an interference-free arrangement with respect to the type  
S pitot tube openings, see method 2, figure 2.7. As a second alternative, if a difference of  
not more than 1% in the average velocity measurement is to be introduced, the temperature  
gauge need not be attached to the probe or pitot tube. This alternative is subject to the  
approval of the department.  
(ii) Sample recovery. The following items :  
(A) Probe-liner and probe-nozzle brushes. Nylon bristle brushes with stainless steel wire  
handles. The probe brush must have extensions, at least as long as the probe, made of  
stainless steel, nylon, Teflon, or similarly inert material. The brushes must be properly  
sized and shaped to brush out the probe liner and nozzle.  
(B) Wash bottles - 2. Glass wash bottles are recommended; polyethylene wash bottles  
may be used at the option of the tester. It is recommended that acetone not be stored in  
polyethylene bottles for longer than a month.  
(C) Glass sample storage containers. Chemically resistant, borosilicate glass bottles, for  
acetone washes. Screw cap liners must either be rubber-backed Teflon or must be  
constructed so as to be leak-free and resistant to chemical attack by acetone. Narrow-mouth  
glass bottles have been found to be less prone to leakage. Alternatively, polyethylene  
bottles may be used.  
(D) Filter containers. Glass, polyethylene, or aluminum tube containers, unless  
otherwise specified by the department.  
(E) Graduated cylinder or balance. To measure condensed water to within 1 milliliter  
or 1 gram. Graduated cylinders must have subdivisions of not more than 2 milliliters. Most  
laboratory balances are capable of weighing to the nearest 0.5 gram or less. Any of these  
balances are suitable for use here and in paragraph (iii)(D) of this subdivision.  
(F) Plastic storage containers. Airtight containers to store silica gel.  
(G) Funnel and rubber policeman, to aid in the transfer of silica gel to container; not  
necessary if silica gel is weighed in the field.  
(H) Funnel made from glass or polyethylene, to aid in sample recovery.  
(iii) Analysis must include the following equipment:  
(A) Glass weighing dishes.  
(B) Desiccator.  
Page 38  
(C) Analytical balance, to measure to within 0.1 milligrams.  
(D) Balance, to measure to within 0.5 milligrams.  
(E) Beakers, 250 milliliters.  
(F) Hygrometer, to measure the relative humidity of the laboratory environment.  
(G) Temperature gauge, to measure the temperature of the laboratory environment.  
(c) The following provisions apply to reagents:  
(i) The reagents used in sampling are as follows:  
(A) Filters. Two outstack filters may be any combination of alundum ceramic thimble  
filters, type RA-98 or glass fiber filters, type A without organic binder. The size of the  
filters must allow proper sampling rates to maintain isokinetics using the nozzle sizes  
specified in subdivision (b)(i)(A) of this rule. Alternatively, other types of filters may be  
used, subject to the approval of the department.  
(B) Silica gel. Indicating type, 6 to 16 mesh. If previously used, dry at 175 degrees  
Centigrade, 350 degrees Fahrenheit, for 2 hours. New silica gel may be used as received.  
Alternatively, other types of desiccants, equivalent or better, may be used, subject to the  
approval of the department.  
(C) Water. When analysis of the material caught in the impingers is required, distilled  
water must be used. Run blanks prior to field use to eliminate a high blank on test samples.  
(D) Crushed ice.  
(E) Stopcock grease. Acetone-insoluble, heatstable silicone grease. This is not  
necessary if screw on connectors with Teflon sleeves, or equivalent, are used.  
Alternatively, other types of stopcock grease may be used, subject to the approval of the  
department.  
(ii) Sample recovery, washing solvent. Either acetone or distilled water may be used for  
sample recovery. If acetone is used for washing solvent, then reagent grade, less than  
0.001% residue, in glass bottles is required. Acetone from metal containers generally has  
a high residue blank and must not be used. Suppliers sometimes transfer acetone to glass  
bottles from metal containers, so acetone blanks must be run before field use and only  
acetone with low blank values, less than 0.001%, must be used. A blank value of more than  
0.001% of the weight of acetone used must not be subtracted from the sample weight. If  
distilled water is used for washing solvent, use distilled water with less than 0.001%  
residue. Run blanks before field use to eliminate a high blank on test samples.  
(iii) Two reagents are required for the analysis:  
(A) Solvent. Same as paragraph (ii) of this subdivision for quantitative transfer.  
(B) Desiccant. Anhydrous calcium sulfate, indicating type. Alternatively, other types of  
desiccants may be used, subject to the approval of the department.  
(d) The following provisions apply to procedure:  
(i) Sampling. The complexity of this method is such that, in order to obtain reliable  
results, testers shall be trained and experienced with the test procedures. Sampling must  
comply with the following provisions:  
(A) Pretest preparation. All the components must be maintained and calibrated  
according to the applicable procedures described in APTD-0576, adopted by reference in  
R 336.1902, unless otherwise specified in this rule. Weigh several 200 to 300 gram portions  
of silica gel in airtight containers to the nearest 0.5 gram. Record the total weight of the  
silica gel plus container on each container. As an alternative, the silica gel need not be pre-  
weighed, but may be weighed directly in its impinger or sampling holder just before train  
Page 39  
assembly. Check filters visually against light for irregularities, flaws, pinhole leaks, or  
cracks. Label filters of the proper size on the back side using numbering machine ink. As  
an alternative, label the shipping containers, described in subdivision (b)(ii)(D) of this rule,  
and keep the filters in these containers at all times, except during sampling and weighing.  
Dry the filters in an oven at 105 degrees Centigrade, 220 degrees Fahrenheit, for a  
minimum of 2 hours, cool for at least 1 hour in a desiccator containing anhydrous calcium  
sulfate, and individually weigh and record each weight to the nearest 0.1 milligram. During  
the weighing, the filters must not be exposed to the laboratory atmosphere for a period of  
more than 2 minutes and a relative humidity above 50%. Procedures, other than those  
specified, that account for relative humidity effects may be used, subject to the approval of  
the department.  
(B) Preliminary determinations. Select the sampling site and the minimum number of  
sampling points according to method 1 or as specified by the department. Determine the  
stack pressure, temperature, and the range of velocity heads using method 2. It is  
recommended that a leak check of the pitot lines, see method 2, be performed. Determine  
the moisture content using approximation method 4, or its alternatives, for the purpose of  
making isokinetic sampling rate settings. Determine the stack gas dry molecular weight, as  
described in method 2. If integrated method 3 sampling is used for molecular weight  
determination, the integrated bag sample must be taken simultaneously with, and for the  
same total length of time as, the particulate sample run. Select a nozzle size based on the  
range of velocity heads so that it is not necessary to change the nozzle size in order to  
maintain isokinetic sampling rates. During the run, do not change the nozzle size. Ensure  
that the proper differential pressure gauge is chosen for the range of velocity heads  
encountered, see method 2. Select a suitable probe liner and probe length so that all traverse  
points can be sampled. For large stacks, consider sampling from opposite sides of the stack  
to reduce the length of probes. Select a total sampling time greater than or equal to the  
minimum total sampling time specified in the test procedures for the specific industry so  
that the sampling time per point is not less than 5 minutes, unless approved by the  
department, or some greater time interval as specified by the department, and so that the  
sample volume taken, corrected to standard conditions, exceeds the required minimum total  
gas sample volume. The latter is based on an approximate average sampling rate. It is  
recommended that the number of minutes sampled at each point be an integer or an integer  
plus 1/2 minute to avoid timekeeping errors. In some circumstances, such as in batch  
cycles, it may be necessary to sample for shorter times at the traverse points and to obtain  
smaller gas sample volumes. In these cases, the department's approval must first be  
obtained.  
(C) Preparation of collection train. During preparation and assembly of the sampling  
train, keep all openings where contamination can occur covered until just before assembly  
or until sampling is about to begin. Place 100 milliliters of water in the first impinger, leave  
the second impinger empty, and transfer approximately 200 to 300 grams of pre-weighed  
silica gel from its container to the third impinger. More silica gel may be used, but care  
should be taken to ensure that it is not entrained and carried out from the impinger during  
sampling. Place the container in a clean place for later use in the sample recovery.  
Alternatively, the weight of the silica gel plus impinger may be determined to the nearest  
0.5 gram and recorded. Using tweezers or clean disposable surgical gloves, place a labeled,  
identified, and weighed filter in the filter holder. Be sure that the filter is properly centered  
Page 40  
and the gasket properly placed so as to prevent the sample gas stream from circumventing  
the filter. Check the filter for tears after assembly is completed. When glass liners are used,  
install the selected nozzle using a Viton A O-ring when stack temperatures are less than  
260 degrees Centigrade, 500 degrees Fahrenheit, and a heat-resistant fiberglass, graphite,  
or other material string gasket when temperatures are higher. See APTD-0576, adopted by  
reference in R 336.1902, for details. Other connecting systems using either 310 stainless  
steel or Teflon ferrules may be used. When metal liners are used, install the nozzle in the  
same manner as for glass liners or by a leak-free direct mechanical connection. Mark the  
probe with heat-resistant tape or by some other method to denote the proper distance into  
the stack or duct for each sampling point. Set up the train as in figure 103 under R 336.2021.  
If necessary, use a very light coat of silicone grease on all ground glass joints. Grease only  
the outer portion, see APTD-0576, adopted by reference in R 336.1902, to avoid the  
possibility of contamination by the silicone grease. Place crushed ice around the impingers.  
(D) Leak check procedures as follows:  
(I) Pretest leak check. A pretest leak check is strongly recommended, but not required,  
to prevent invalid sampling and wasted time. If the tester opts to conduct the pretest leak  
check, the following procedure must be used: After the sampling train has been assembled,  
turn it on and set the filter and probe heating systems at the desired operating temperatures.  
Allow time for the temperatures to stabilize. If a Viton A O-ring or other leak-free  
connection is used in assembling the probe nozzle to the probe liner, leak check the train  
at the sampling site by plugging the nozzle and pulling a 380 millimeter mercury, 15 inch  
mercury, vacuum. A lower vacuum may be used, if it is not exceeded during the test. If a  
heat-resistant fiberglass, graphite, or other material string is used, do not connect the probe  
to the train during the leak check. Instead, leak check the train by first plugging the inlet to  
the filter holder, and cyclone, if applicable, and pulling a 380 millimeter mercury, 15 inch  
mercury, vacuum. A lower vacuum may be used if it is not exceeded during the test. Then  
connect the probe to the train and leak check at about a 25 millimeter mercury, 1 inch  
mercury, vacuum. Alternatively, the probe may be leak checked with the rest of the  
sampling train, in 1 step, at a 380 millimeter mercury, 15 inch mercury, vacuum. Leakage  
rates in excess of 4% of the average sampling rate or 0.00057 cubic meters per minute  
(0.02 cubic feet per minute), whichever is less, are unacceptable. The following leak check  
instructions for the sampling train described in APTD-0576 and APTD-0581 may be  
helpful. Start the pump with the bypass valve fully open and the coarse adjust valve  
completely closed. Partially open the coarse adjust valve and slowly close the bypass valve  
until the desired vacuum is reached. Do not reverse the direction of the bypass valve, as  
this will cause water to back up into the filter holder. If the desired vacuum is exceeded,  
either leak check at this higher vacuum or end the leak check and start over. When the leak  
check is completed, first slowly remove the plug from the inlet to the probe, filter holder,  
or cyclone, if applicable, and immediately turn off the vacuum pump. This prevents the  
water in the impingers from being forced backward into the filter holder and prevents silica  
gel from being entrained backward into the third impinger.  
(II) Leak checks during sample run. If, during the sampling run, a component, such as  
a filter assembly or impinger, change becomes necessary, a leak check must be conducted  
immediately before the change is made. The leak check must be done according to the  
procedure outlined in subparagraph (D) (I) of this paragraph, except that it must be done at  
a vacuum equal to or greater than the maximum value recorded up to that point in the test.  
Page 41  
If the leakage rate is found to be not more than 0.00057 cubic meters per minute, 0.02 cubic  
feet per minute, or 4% of the average sampling rate, whichever is less, the results are  
acceptable and no correction need be applied to the total volume of dry gas metered. If,  
however, a higher leakage rate is obtained, the tester shall either record the leakage rate  
and plan to correct the sample volume, as shown in subdivision (f)(iii) of  
R 336.2011, or shall void the sampling run. Immediately after component changes, leak  
checks are optional. If the leak checks are done, the procedure outlined in paragraph  
(i)(D)(I) of this subdivision must be used.  
(III) Post-test leak check. A leak check is mandatory at the conclusion of each sampling  
run. The leak check must be done in accordance with the procedures outlined in paragraph  
(i)(D)(I) of this subdivision, except that it must be conducted at a vacuum equal to or  
greater than the maximum value reached during the sampling run. If the leakage rate is  
found to be not more than 0.00057 cubic meters per minute, 0.02 cubic feet per minute, or  
4% of the average sampling rate, whichever is less, the results are acceptable and no  
correction need be applied to the total volume of dry gas metered. If, however, a higher  
leakage rate is obtained, the tester shall either record the leakage rate and correct the sample  
volume, as shown in subdivision (f)(iii) of R 336.2011, or shall void the sampling run.  
(E) Particulate train operation. During the sampling run, maintain an isokinetic  
sampling rate that is within 10% of true isokinetic, unless otherwise specified by the  
department. For each run, record the data required on a data sheet such as the one shown  
in figure 104 under R 336.2021. Be sure to record the initial dry-gas meter reading. Record  
the dry-gas meter readings at the beginning and end of each sampling time increment, when  
changes in flow rates are made, before and after each leak check, and when sampling is  
halted. Take other readings required by figure 104 under R 336.2021 at least once at each  
sample point during each time increment, and take additional readings when significant  
changes, 20% variation in velocity head readings, necessitate additional adjustments in  
flow rate. Level and zero the manometer. Because the manometer level and zero may drift  
due to vibrations and temperature changes, make periodic checks during the traverse. Clean  
the portholes before the test run to minimize the chance of sampling deposited material. To  
begin sampling, remove the nozzle cap and verify that the pitot tube and probe are properly  
positioned. Position the nozzle at the first traverse point with the tip pointing directly into  
the gas stream. Immediately start the pump and adjust the flow to isokinetic conditions.  
Nomographs that aid in the rapid adjustment of the isokinetic sampling rate without  
excessive computations are available. These nomographs are designed for use when the  
type S pitot tube coefficient is 0.85 ±0.02 and the stack gas equivalent density, dry  
molecular weight, is equal to 29 ±4. APTD-0576, adopted by reference in R 336.1902,  
details the procedure for using the nomographs. If Cp and Md are outside the above stated  
ranges, do not use the nomographs unless appropriate steps, see subdivision (g)(iv) of this  
rule, are taken to compensate for the deviations. When the stack is under significant  
negative pressure, height of impinger stem, take care to pull low flow when inserting the  
probe into the stack to prevent water from backing into the sample tubing and to avoid  
pulsation through the filter and possible loss of materials. When the probe is in position,  
block off the openings around the probe and porthole to prevent unrepresentative dilution  
of the gas stream. Traverse the stack cross section, as required by method 1 or as specified  
by the department, being careful not to bump the probe nozzle into the stack walls when  
sampling near the walls or when removing or inserting the probe through the portholes.  
Page 42  
This minimizes the chance of extracting deposited material. During the test run, add more  
ice and, if necessary, salt to maintain a temperature of less than 20 degrees Centigrade,68  
degrees Fahrenheit, at the condenser/silica gel outlet. Also, periodically check the level and  
zero of the manometer. If the pressure drop across the filter becomes too high and makes  
isokinetic sampling difficult to maintain, the filter may be replaced in the midst of a sample  
run. It is recommended that another complete filter assembly be used rather than attempting  
to change the filter itself. Before a new filter assembly is installed, conduct a leak check,  
see subparagraph (D)(II) of this paragraph . The total particulate weight must include the  
summation of all filter assembly catches. A single train must be used for the entire sample  
run, except in cases where simultaneous sampling is required in 2 or more separate ducts,  
at 2 or more different locations within the same duct, or where equipment failure  
necessitates a change of trains. In all other situations, the use of 2 or more trains must be  
subject to the approval of the department. Note that when 2 or more trains are used, separate  
analyses of the front half catches from the individual trains may be combined, as may the  
impinger catches, and 1 analysis of the front half catch and 1 analysis of impinger catch  
may be performed. Consult with the department for details concerning the calculation of  
results when 2 or more trains are used. At the end of the sample run, turn off the coarse  
adjust valve, remove the probe and nozzle from the stack, turn off the pump, record the  
final dry gas meter reading, and conduct a post-test leak check, as outlined in subparagraph  
(D)(III) of this paragraph. Also, leak check the pitot lines as described in method 2. The  
lines must pass this leak check to validate the velocity head data.  
(F) Calculation of percent isokinetic. Calculate percent isokinetic, see subdivision (f) of  
this rule, to determine whether the run was valid or whether another test run should be  
made. If there was difficulty in maintaining isokinetic rates due to source conditions,  
consult with the department for possible variance on the isokinetic rates.  
(ii) Sample recovery. Proper cleanup procedure begins as soon as the probe is removed  
from the stack at the end of the sampling period. Allow the probe to cool. When the probe  
can be safely handled, wipe off all external particulate matter near the tip of the probe  
nozzle and place a cap over it to prevent losing or gaining particulate matter. Do not cap  
off the probe tip tightly while the sampling train is cooling down as this creates a vacuum  
in the filter holder and draws water from the impingers into the filter holder. Before moving  
the sample train to the cleanup site, remove the probe from the sample train, wipe off the  
silicone grease, and cap the open outlet of the probe. Be careful not to lose any condensate  
that might be present. Wipe off the silicone grease from the filter inlet where the probe was  
fastened and cap it. Remove the umbilical cord from the last impinger and cap the impinger.  
If a flexible line is used between the first impinger or condenser and the filter holder,  
disconnect the line at the filter holder and let any condensed water or liquid drain into the  
impingers or condenser. After wiping off the silicone grease, cap off the filter holder outlet  
and impinger inlet. Ground-glass stoppers, plastic caps, or serum caps may be used to close  
these openings. Transfer the probe and filter-impinger assembly to the cleanup area. This  
area must be clean and protected from the wind so that the chances of contaminating or  
losing the sample are minimized. Save a portion of the solvent used for cleanup as a blank.  
Take 200 milliliters of this solvent directly from the wash bottle being used and place it in  
a glass sample container labeled "solvent blank." Inspect the train prior to and during  
disassembly and note abnormal conditions. Treat the samples as follows:  
Page 43  
(A) Container numbers 1, 1A. Carefully remove the filters from the filter holders and  
place each filter in its identified container. Use a pair of tweezers or clean disposable  
surgical gloves, or both, to handle the filters. Carefully transfer to the container any  
particulate matter or filter fibers, or both, that adhere to the filter holder gasket by using a  
dry nylon bristle brush or sharp-edged blade, or both. Seal the container.  
(B) Container number 2. Taking care to see that dust on the outside of the probe or other  
exterior surfaces does not get into the sample, the tester shall quantitatively recover from  
particulate matter or any condensate from the nozzle, probe fitting, probe liner, and from  
both filter holders by washing these components with solvent and placing the wash in a  
glass container. Perform the solvent rinses as follows: Carefully remove the probe nozzle  
and clean the inside surface by rinsing with solvent from a wash bottle and brushing with  
a nylon bristle brush. Brush until the solvent rinse shows no visible particles and then make  
a final rinse of the inside surface with solvent. Brush and rinse the inside parts of the  
Swagelok fitting with solvent in a similar way until no visible particles remain. Rinse the  
probe liner with solvent by tilting and rotating the probe while squirting solvent into its  
upper end so that all inside surfaces are wetted with acetone. Let the solvent drain from the  
lower end into the sample container. A glass or polyethylene funnel may be used to aid in  
transferring liquid washes to the container. Follow the solvent rinse with a probe brush.  
Hold the probe in an inclined position and squirt solvent into the upper end as the probe  
brush is being pushed with a twisting action through the probe. Hold a sample container  
underneath the lower end of the probe and catch any solvent and particulate matter that is  
brushed from the probe. Run the brush through the probe 3 or more times until no visible  
particulate matter is carried out with the solvent or until none remains in the probe liner on  
visual inspection. With stainless steel or other metal probes, run the brush through, in the  
above prescribed manner, not less than 6 times, since metal probes have small crevices in  
which particulate matter can be entrapped. Rinse the brush with solvent and quantitatively  
collect these washings in the sample container. After the brushing, make a final solvent  
rinse of the probe as described above. It is recommended that 2 people clean the probe to  
minimize sample losses. Between sampling runs, keep brushes clean and protected from  
contamination. After ensuring that all joints have been wiped clean of silicone grease, clean  
the inside of both filter holders by rubbing the surfaces with a nylon bristle brush and  
rinsing with solvent. Rinse each surface 3 times, or more if needed, to remove visible  
particulate. Make a final rinse of the brush and filter holder. After all solvent washings and  
particulate matter have been collected in the sample container, tighten the lid on the sample  
container so that solvent will not leak out when it is shipped to the laboratory. Mark the  
height of the fluid level to determine whether or not leakage occurred during transport.  
Label the container to clearly identify its contents.  
(C) Container number 3. Note the color of the indicating silica gel to determine if it has  
been completely spent and make a notation of its condition. Transfer the silica gel from the  
third impinger to its original container and seal. A funnel may make it easier to pour the  
silica gel without spilling it. A rubber policeman may be used as an aid in removing the  
silica gel from the impinger. It is not necessary to remove the small amount of dust particles  
that adhere to the impinger wall and are difficult to remove. Since the gain in weight is to  
be used for moisture calculations, do not use any water or other liquids to transfer the silica  
gel. If a balance is available in the field, follow the procedure for container number 3 in  
paragraph (iii)(C) of this subdivision. Impinger water. Treat the impingers as follows:  
Page 44  
Make a notation of any color or film in the liquid catch. Measure the liquid that is in the  
first 2 impingers to within ±1 milliliter by using a graduated cylinder or by weighing it to  
within ±1.0 gram by using a balance if none is available. Record the volume or weight of  
liquid present. This information is required to calculate the moisture content of the effluent  
gas. Discard the liquid after measuring and recording the volume or weight, unless analysis  
of the impinger catch is required, see subdivision (b)(i)(G) of this rule. If a different type  
of condenser is used, measure the amount of moisture condensed either volumetrically or  
gravimetrically. Whenever possible, containers must be shipped in a manner that keeps  
them upright at all times.  
(iii) Analysis. Record the data required on a sheet such as the one shown in figure 106  
under R 336.2021. Handle each sample container as follows:  
(A) Container numbers 1, 1A. Analyze and report each filter separately. Transfer the  
filter and any loose particulate from the sample container to a tared-glass weighing dish.  
Dry the filter in an oven at 105 degrees Centigrade, 220 degrees Fahrenheit, for a minimum  
of 2 hours, cool for at least 1 hour in a desiccator containing anhydrous calcium sulfate,  
and weigh and record its weight to the nearest 0.1 milligram. During the weighing, the  
filter must not be exposed to the laboratory atmosphere for a period of more than 2 minutes  
or a relative humidity above 50%. Procedures, other than those specified, that account for  
relative humidity effects may be used, subject to the approval of the department. The  
method used for the drying and weighing of filters must be consistent before and after the  
test.  
(B) Container number 2. Note the level of liquid in the container and confirm on the  
analysis sheet whether or not leakage occurred during transport. If a noticeable amount of  
leakage has occurred, either void the sample or use methods, subject to the approval of the  
department, to correct the final results. Measure the liquid in this container either  
volumetrically to ±1 milliliter or gravimetrically to ±1.0 gram. Transfer the contents to a  
tared 250 milliliter beaker and evaporate to dryness either at ambient temperature and  
pressure for acetone or at 95 degrees Centigrade, 203 degrees Fahrenheit, in an oven for  
distilled water. Then subject the sample to 250 degrees Centigrade, 482 degrees Fahrenheit,  
in an oven for 2 to 3 hours. Desiccate for 24 hours and weigh to a constant weight. Report  
the results to the nearest 0.1 milligram.  
(C) Container number 3. Weigh the spent silica gel, or silica gel plus impinger, to the  
nearest 0.5 gram using a balance. This step may be conducted in the field. "Solvent blank"  
container. Measure solvent in this container either volumetrically or gravimetrically.  
Transfer the contents to a tared 250 milliliter beaker and evaporate to dryness either at  
ambient temperature and pressure for acetone or at 95 degrees Centigrade, 203 degrees  
Fahrenheit, in an oven for distilled water. Then subject the sample to 250 degrees  
Centigrade, 482 degrees Fahrenheit, in an oven for 2 to 3 hours. Desiccate for 24-hours  
and weigh to a constant weight. Report the results to the nearest 0.1 milligram. If acetone  
is used, the contents of container number 2, as well as the acetone blank container, may be  
evaporated at temperatures higher than ambient. If evaporation is done at an elevated  
temperature, the temperature must be closely supervised, and the contents of the beaker  
must be swirled occasionally to maintain an even temperature. Use extreme care, as acetone  
is highly flammable and has a low flash point.  
(e) Calibration. Maintain a laboratory log of all calibrations. Calibrations must comply  
with all of the following provisions:  
Page 45  
(i) Probe nozzle. A probe nozzle must be calibrated before its initial use in the field.  
Using a micrometer, measure the inside diameter of the nozzle to the nearest 0.025  
millimeter, 0.001 inch. Make 3 separate measurements using different diameters each time  
and obtain the average of the measurements. The difference between the high and low  
numbers must not exceed 0.1 millimeter, 0.004 inch. When nozzles become nicked, dented,  
or corroded, the nozzles must be reshaped, sharpened, and recalibrated before use. Each  
nozzle must be permanently and uniquely identified.  
(ii) Pitot tube. The type S pitot tube assembly must be calibrated according to the  
procedure outlined in method 2.  
(iii) Metering system. Before its initial use in the field, the metering system must be  
calibrated according to the procedure outlined in APTD -0576, adopted by reference in R  
336.1902. Instead of physically adjusting the dry gas meter dial readings to correspond to  
the wet test meter readings, calibration factors may be used to mathematically correct the  
gas meter dial readings to the proper values. Before calibrating the metering system, it is  
suggested that a leak check be conducted. For metering systems having diaphragm or rotary  
pumps, the normal leak check procedure will not detect leakages within the pump. For  
these cases, the following leak check procedure is suggested: Make a 10-minute calibration  
run at 0.00057 cubic meters per minute, 0.02 cubic feet per minute. At the end of the run,  
take the difference of the measured wet test meter and dry gas meter volumes, and divide  
the difference by 10 to get the leak rate. The leak rate must not exceed 0.00057 cubic meters  
per minute, 0.02 cubic feet per minute. After each field use, the calibration of the metering  
system must be checked by performing 3 calibration runs at a single, intermediate orifice  
setting, based on the previous field test, with the vacuum set at the maximum value reached  
during the test series. To adjust the vacuum, insert a valve between the wet test meter and  
the inlet of the metering system. Calculate the average value of the calibration factor. If the  
calibration has changed by more than 5%, recalibrate the meter over the full range of orifice  
settings, as outlined in APTD-0576. Alternatively, a spirometer may be substituted for a  
wettest meter in the above mentioned calibration procedures. Alternative procedures, such  
as using the orifice meter coefficients, may be used, subject to the approval of the  
department. If the dry gas meter coefficient values obtained before and after a test series  
differ by more than 5%, the test series must be performed using whichever meter  
coefficient value, before or after, gives the lower value of total sample volume.  
(iv) Probe heater calibration. The probe heating system must be calibrated before its  
initial use in the field according to the procedures outlined in APTD-0576, adopted by  
reference in R 336.1902. Probes constructed according to APTD-0581 need not be  
calibrated if the calibration curves in APTD-0576 are used.  
(v) Temperature gauges. Use the procedure in method 2 to calibrate in stack temperature  
gauges. Dial thermometers, such as those used for the dry gas meter and condenser outlet,  
must be calibrated against mercury in glass thermometers or other thermometers that are  
calibrated using a National Institute of Standards and Technology calibrated reference  
thermometer.  
(vi) Leak check of metering system shown in figure 103 under R 336.2021. That portion  
of the sampling train from the pump to the orifice meter must be leak checked before initial  
use and after each shipment. Leakage after the pump results in less volume being recorded  
than is actually sampled. The following procedure is suggested, also see figure 107 under  
R 336.2021: Close the main valve on the meter box. Insert a 1-hole rubber stopper with  
Page 46  
rubber tubing attached into the orifice exhaust pipe. Disconnect and vent the low side of  
the orifice manometer. Close off the low side orifice tap. Pressurize the system to 13 to 18  
centimeters, 5 to 7 inches, water column by blowing into the rubber tubing. Pinch off the  
tubing and observe the manometer for 1 minute. A loss of pressure on the manometer  
indicates a leak in the meter box. Leaks, if present, must be corrected.  
(vii) Barometer. Calibrate against a mercury barometer.  
(f) Calculations. When carrying out calculations, retain at least 1 extra decimal figure  
beyond that of the acquired data. Round off figures after the final calculation. Other forms  
of the equations may be used if the other forms of the equations give equivalent results. All  
of the provisions under R 336.2011 (f) apply to calculations for this rule.  
(g) Bibliography:  
(i) Federal Register, Volume 42, No. 160, Part 60, Chapter 1, Title 40, Appendix A,  
Method 5. August 18, 1977.  
(ii) Martin, Robert M. Construction Details of Isokinetic Source Sampling Equipment.  
Environmental Protection Agency. Research Triangle Park, N.C.APTD-0581. April, 1971.  
(iii) Rom, Jerome J. Maintenance, Calibration, and Operation of Isokinetic Source  
Sampling Equipment. Environmental Protection Agency. Research Triangle Park, N.C.  
APTD-0576. March, 1972.  
(iv) Shigehara, R. T. "Adjustments in the EPA Nomograph for Different Pitot Tube  
Coefficients and Dry Molecular Weights." Stack Sampling News 2:4-11.October, 1974.  
(v) Guidelines for Source Testing of Particulate. Michigan Department of Natural  
Resources, Air Quality Division. June 1, 1977.  
History: 1985 AACS; 1992 AACS; 2002 AACS; 2025 AACS.  
R 336.2013 Reference test method 5D.  
Rule 1013. Reference test method 5D, testing of steel manufacturing sources, reads as  
follows:  
(a) General description. Emission testing procedures shall follow the methodology  
specified in R 336.2004(1)(c) and (d) and R 336.2012, unless otherwise provided in this  
rule.  
(b) Coke battery pushing emission control equipment outlet test procedure for scrubbers.  
Outlet emission tests for any scrubber emission control equipment controlling coke battery  
emissions shall be conducted as follows:  
(i) The pushing emission control system is operated on a batch type process and shall be  
tested as such using the reference test methods specified in subdivision (a) of this rule.  
(ii) Each sampling point shall be sampled for 1 cycle operation, which is defined as  
beginning when the coke guide and snorkels are engaged and continuing until the quench  
car leaves the hood.  
(iii) For a shed, the sampling period shall begin with the first movement of coke and shall  
end when the car enters the quench tower.  
(iv) Integrated gas samples shall be taken over the entire test period. The samples shall be  
analyzed for carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, oxygen, and nitrogen by means of an Orsat  
analyzer. The sampling and sample analysis shall be performed in accordance with R  
336.2004(1)(c). The average values from the 3 samples shall be used in determining the  
Page 47  
dry molecular weight of the exhaust gas. If a complete test is not performed during the day,  
at least 1 sample shall be taken.  
(v) Based on design and previous data, saturated conditions shall be assumed. The  
moisture content shall be calculated as per R 336.2004(1)(d), based on stack conditions  
during the preliminary and sampling traverses.  
(vi) The stack sampling equipment and procedures as described in method 5C shall be  
used in performing a particulate emission test, with the following variations:  
(A) Due to the varying time required for pushing operations, an integer sampling time  
increment shall not be required.  
(B) Because of the shorter sampling periods at each sampling point, a specific gas volume  
cannot be guaranteed. Therefore, an average sampling rate of not less than 0.90 dry  
standard cubic feet per minute shall be used during each sampling run.  
(C) A stainless steel probe liner after the nozzle may be used.  
(D) Glass or glass-lined stainless steel tubing and a glass cyclone between the probe and  
filter holder may be used.  
(E) The probe and filter heating system may be heated at 248 ±25 degrees Fahrenheit.  
(c) Basic oxygen furnace primary emissions control equipment outlet test procedure.  
Outlet emission tests for any emission control equipment controlling only the primary  
emissions from a basic oxygen furnace shall be conducted as follows:  
(i) The testing program shall consist of 3 valid sampling runs. A sampling run is the  
composite of those portions of 4 heats starting with oxygen blowing and ending not more  
than 180 seconds following the last oxygen blow or the beginning of the tap, whichever  
occurs first. Each process cycle shall be used to obtain the sample for 1 quadrant of the  
traverse.  
(ii) When testing a wet scrubber outlet, saturated conditions shall be assumed and  
moisture content shall be calculated based on stack conditions during the preliminary and  
sampling traverses.  
(iii) The particulate emission rate shall be determined as specified in reference test method  
5C, with the following variations:  
(A) A stainless steel probe liner after the nozzle may be used.  
(B) Glass or glass-lined stainless steel tubing and a glass cyclone between the probe and  
filter holder may be used.  
(C) The probe and filter heating system may be heated to 248 ±25 degrees Fahrenheit.  
(d) Basic oxygen furnace secondary emissions control equipment outlet test procedure.  
Outlet emission tests for any emission control equipment controlling only the secondary  
emissions from a basic oxygen furnace shall be conducted as follows:  
(i) The testing program shall consist of 3 valid sampling runs. A sampling run shall be  
defined as the composite of the following portions of 4 heats:  
(A) Charging.  
(B) Tapping.  
(C) Turndown.  
(D) Slagging.  
(E) The first 5 minutes of oxygen blowing for those systems with a separate secondary  
collector.  
Page 48  
(ii) When testing a wet scrubber outlet, saturated conditions shall be assumed and  
moisture content shall be calculated based on stack conditions during the preliminary and  
sampling traverses.  
(iii) The particulate emission rate shall be determined as specified in reference test method  
5C, with the following variations:  
(A) A stainless steel probe liner after the nozzle may be used.  
(B) Glass or glass-lined stainless steel tubing and a glass cyclone between the probe and  
filter holder may be used.  
(C) The probe and filter heating system may be heated to 248 ±25 degrees Fahrenheit.  
(e) Basic oxygen furnace primary and secondary emissions control equip-ment outlet test  
procedures. Outlet emission tests for any emission control equipment controlling both the  
primary and secondary emissions from a basic oxygen furnace shall be conducted as  
follows:  
(i) One vessel:  
(A) For testing of primary control equipment that captures secondary emissions from a  
single vessel, the testing program shall consist of 3 valid sampling runs. A sampling run is  
the composite of the following portions of 8 heats:  
(1) Charging.  
(2) Oxygen blowing.  
(3) Tapping.  
(4) Turndown.  
(5) Slagging.  
Four heats are to be sampled only during oxygen blowing, with each heat used to obtain  
the sample from 1 quadrant. The remaining 4 heats are to be sampled only during the  
portions of the heat other than oxygen blowing, with each heat used to obtain the sample  
from 1 quadrant.  
(B) When testing a wet scrubber outlet, saturated conditions shall be assumed and  
moisture content shall be calculated based on stack conditions during the preliminary and  
sampling traverses.  
(C) The particulate emission rate shall be determined as specified in reference test method  
5C, with the following variations:  
(1) A stainless steel probe liner after the nozzle may be used.  
(2) Glass or glass-lined stainless steel tubing and a glass cyclone between the probe and  
filter holder may be used.  
(3) The probe and filter heating system may be heated to 248 ±25 degrees Fahrenheit.  
(ii) More than one vessel:  
(A) For testing of control equipment that captures both primary and secondary emissions  
from more than 1 vessel, the testing program shall consist of 3 valid sampling runs. A  
sampling run is the composite of the following portions of 4 heats for 1 or more vessels:  
(1) Charging.  
(2) Oxygen blowing.  
(3) Tapping.  
(4) Turndown.  
(5) Slagging.  
At least 1 heat shall be used to obtain the sample from each quadrant of the traverse.  
Page 49  
(B) When testing a wet scrubber outlet, saturated conditions shall be assumed and  
moisture content shall be calculated based on stack conditions during the preliminary and  
sampling traverses.  
(C) The particulate emission rate shall be determined as specified in reference test method  
5C, with the following variations:  
(1) A stainless steel probe liner after the nozzle may be used.  
(2) Glass or glass-lined stainless steel tubing and a glass cyclone between the probe and  
filter holder may be used.  
(3) The probe and filter heating system may be heated to 248 ±25 degrees Fahrenheit.  
(f) Blast furnace casthouse air-cleaning device outlet test procedure. Outlet emission tests  
for any air-cleaning device controlling fugitive emissions from a blast furnace casthouse  
shall be conducted as follows:  
(i) The testing program shall consist of 3 sampling runs. A sampling run shall be  
performed during a 2-hour period, sampling only when casting takes place. If 50 dry  
standard cubic feet are not sampled during this period, the sampling run shall be extended  
so as to fulfill this condition.  
(ii) The particulate emission rate shall be determined as specified in reference test method  
5C, with the following variations:  
(A) A stainless steel probe liner after the nozzle may be used.  
(B) Glass or glass-lined stainless steel tubing and a glass cyclone between the probe and  
filter holder may be used.  
(C) The probe and filter heating system may be heated to 248 ±25 degrees Fahrenheit.  
(g) Coke oven combustion stack test procedures. Emissions from any coke oven  
combustion stack shall be tested as follows:  
(i) The testing program shall consist of 3 valid sampling runs.  
(ii) Saturated conditions shall be assumed for stacks controlled by wet scrubbers. The  
moisture content shall be calculated as per R 336.2004(1)(d) based on stack conditions  
during the preliminary and sampling traverses.  
(iii) The stack sampling equipment and procedures described in method 5C shall be used  
in performing a particulate emission test with the following variations:  
(A) A stainless steel probe liner after the nozzle may be used.  
(B) Heated flexible teflon tubing and a glass cyclone between the probe and filter holder  
may be used.  
(C) The probe and filter heating system may be heated at 248 ±25 degrees Fahrenheit.  
(D) All filters shall be cooled and stored in a dessicator previous to weighing. Exposure  
to the ambient air shall be minimized to the extent that it is practical. This same procedure  
shall be used if any subsequent weighing is necessary.  
(iv) The sampling time shall correspond to a minimum of 5 coke oven pushes per battery.  
(h) Coke oven coal preheater scrubber outlet test procedures. Outlet emission tests for any  
scrubber emission control equipment controlling emissions from a coke oven coal  
preheater shall be conducted as follows:  
(i) The testing program shall consist of 3 valid sampling runs.  
(ii) Based on design and previous data, saturated conditions shall be assumed. The  
moisture content shall be calculated as per R 336.2004(1)(d) based on stack conditions  
during the preliminary and sampling traverses.  
Page 50  
(iii) The stack sampling equipment and procedures described in method 5C shall be used  
in performing a particulate emission test with the following variations:  
(A) A stainless steel probe liner after the nozzle may be used.  
(B) Glass or glass-lined stainless steel tubing and a glass cyclone between the probe and  
filter holder may be used.  
(C) The probe and filter heating system may be heated at 248 ±25 degrees Fahrenheit.  
(i) Electric arc furnace stack test procedures. Emissions from any electric arc furnace  
stack shall be tested as follows:  
(i) The testing program shall consist of 3 valid sampling runs. A sampling run is the time  
beginning when the roof is placed on the furnace, after the first charge, and ending with  
the time when the roof is removed, just prior to tapping.  
(ii) The particulate emission rate shall be determined as specified in reference test method  
5C, with the following exceptions:  
(A) A stainless steel probe liner after the nozzle may be used.  
(B) Glass or glass-lined stainless steel tubing and a glass cyclone between the probe and  
filter holder may be used.  
(C) The probe and filter heating system may be heated to 248 ±25 degrees Fahrenheit.  
(D) The emission rate for any furnace controlled by a positive pressure baghouse, or by a  
baghouse exhausted by more than 5 stacks, shall be determined as specified in R 336.2014.  
(j) Sinter plant gravel bed filter test procedures. Emissions from any gravel bed filter  
emission control equipment controlling emissions from a sinter plant shall be tested as  
follows:  
(i) The testing program shall consist of 3 valid sampling runs.  
(ii) The stack sampling equipment and procedures described in method 5C shall be used  
in performing a particulate emission test with the following variations:  
(A) A stainless steel probe liner after the nozzle may be used.  
(B) Glass or glass-lined stainless steel tubing and a glass cyclone between the probe and  
filter holder may be used.  
(C) The probe and filter heating system may be heated at 248 ±25 degrees Fahrenheit.  
(k) Miscellaneous. During each stack test performed, the owner or operator shall provide  
a representative of the department access to production data and other parameters that are  
necessary for determining compliance.  
(l) Sample volume. The minimum volume per sample shall be 50 cubic feet of dry gas  
corrected to standard conditions, 70 degrees Fahrenheit, 29.92 inches of mercury, unless  
specified otherwise in the provisions of this rule.  
(m) Opacity tests. During each stack test performed, simultaneous visible emission  
evaluations shall be conducted according to the reference test method specified in R  
336.1303 for the process being tested.  
(n) Operating conditions. During each run of a stack test, the facility to be tested shall be  
operated at a batch or other similar production level which is representative of the actual  
level during the preceding 3 months before the first day of the test, unless the department  
approves or specifies alternate acceptable operating conditions.  
(o) Compliance. Compliance with any mass emission standard shall be determined by  
averaging 3 test runs using all test procedures specified for the tested process in this rule.  
History: 1985 AACS; 2002 AACS.  
Page 51  
R 336.2014 Reference test method 5E.  
Rule 1014. Reference method 5E, determination of particulate matter emissions from  
positive pressure fabric filters, reads as follows:  
(a) The principle, applicability, and performance test criteria are as follows:  
(i) Principle. Particulate matter is withdrawn isokinetically from the source and collected  
on a glass fiber filter maintained at a temperature at or above the exhaust gas temperature  
up to a nominal 248 ±25 degrees Fahrenheit. The particulate mass, which includes any  
material that condenses at or above the filtration temperature, is determined gravimetrically  
after the removal of uncombined water.  
(ii) Applicability. This method is applicable for the determination of particulate  
emissions from the stationary sources as identified in table 31 of R 336.1331. The method  
is also applicable when specifically provided for in the department's rules, orders, a permit  
to install, or a permit to operate.  
(iii) Performance test criteria as follows:  
(A) A performance test must meet the requirements under R 336.2003(2).  
(B) For sources that are subject to an emission limitation calculated to 50% excess air,  
the multipoint, integrated sampling procedure of R 336.2004(1)(c) must be used for gas  
analysis. For all other sources that require a determination of the molecular weight of the  
exhaust, an optional sampling procedure of R 336.2004(1)(c) may be used. Alternatives or  
modifications to procedures are subject to the approval of the department.  
(C) The minimum volume per sample must be 30 cubic feet actual gas. Minimum  
sample time must be 60 minutes, which may be continuous or a combination of shorter  
sampling periods for sources that operate in a cyclic manner. Smaller sampling times or  
sample volumes, when necessitated by process variables or other factors, may be approved  
by the department.  
(D) For a source whose emission control device alters the moisture content of the  
exhaust gas, a moisture determination must be performed in a location upstream from the  
emission control device and in accordance with R 336.2004(1)(d) or an alternative method  
approved by the department.  
(b) The following provisions apply to apparatus:  
(i) Sampling train. A schematic of the sampling train used in this method is shown in  
figure 103 under R 336.2021. Construction details for many, but not all, of the train  
components are given in APTD-0581, subdivision (g)(ii) of this rule. For changes from the  
APTD-0581 document and for allowable modifications to figure 103 under  
R 336.2021, consult with the department. The operating and maintenance procedures for  
many, but not all, of the sampling train are described in APTD-0576, adopted by reference  
in R 336.1902 and as referenced under subdivision (g)(iii) of this rule. Since correct usage  
is important in obtaining valid results, all users shall read APTD-0576 and adopt the  
applicable operating and maintenance procedures outlined in it, unless otherwise specified  
in these rules. The sampling train consists of the following components:  
(A) Probe nozzle. Stainless steel 316 or glass with sharp, tapered leading edge. The  
angle of taper must be less than 30 degrees and the taper must be on the outside to preserve  
a constant internal diameter. The probe nozzle must be of the button-hook design, unless  
otherwise specified by the department. If made of stainless steel, the nozzle must be  
constructed from seamless tubing. Other materials of construction may be used, subject to  
Page 52  
the approval of the department. A range of nozzle sizes suitable for isokinetic sampling  
must be available, for example, 0.32 to 1.27 centimeters, 1/8 to 1/2 inch, or larger if higher  
volume sampling trains are used inside diameter nozzles in increments of 0.16 centimeter,  
1/16 inch. Each nozzle must be calibrated according to the procedures outlined in  
subdivision (e) of this rule.  
(B) Probe liner. Borosilicate or quartz glass tubing with a heating system capable of  
maintaining a gas temperature at the exit end during sampling of 120 ±14 degrees  
Centigrade, 248 ±25 degrees Fahrenheit, another temperature as specified by the  
department's rules, or a temperature approved by the department for a particular  
application. The tester may opt to operate the equipment at a temperature lower than that  
specified. Since the actual temperature at the outlet of the probe is not usually monitored  
during sampling, probes constructed according to APTD-0581 that utilize the calibration  
curves of APTD-0576, or calibrated according to the procedure outlined in APTD-0576,  
are acceptable. Either borosilicate or quartz glass probe liners may be used for stack  
temperatures up to about 480 degrees Centigrade, 900 degrees Fahrenheit. Quartz liners  
must be used for temperatures between 480 and 900 degrees Centigrade, 900 and 1,650  
degrees Fahrenheit. Both types of liners may be used at higher temperatures than specified  
for short periods of time, subject to the approval of the department. The softening  
temperature for borosilicate is 820 degrees Centigrade, 1,508 degrees Fahrenheit, and for  
quartz it is 1,500 degrees Centigrade, 2,732 degrees Fahrenheit. When practical, every  
effort must be made to use borosilicate or quartz glass probe liners. Alternatively, metal  
liners, such as 316 stainless steel, Incoloy 825, or other corrosion-resistant materials made  
of seamless tubing, may be used, subject to the approval of the department.  
(C) Pitot tube. Type S, as described in method 2, or other device approved by the  
department. The pitot tube must be attached to the probe, as shown in figure 103 under R  
336.2021, to allow constant monitoring of the stack gas velocity. The impact, high  
pressure, opening plane of the pitot tube must be even with or above the nozzle entry plane,  
see method 2, figure 2-6 Velocity Traverse Data during sampling. The type S pitot tube  
assembly must have a known coefficient, determined as outlined in method 2.  
(D) Differential pressure gauge. Incline manometer or equivalent devices, quantity 2,  
as described in method 2. One manometer must be used for velocity head (p) readings, and  
the other must be used for orifice differential pressure readings.  
(E) Filter holders. Two separate filter holders in series or 1 filter holder with separate  
filter supports and seals for 2 filters. One filter holder with 2 filters held in contact with  
each other is not acceptable. Materials of construction may be stainless steel 316, glass,  
Teflon, or other material approved by the department.  
(F) Filter heating system. Any heating system capable of maintaining a temperature  
around the filter holder during sampling of 120 ±14 degrees Centigrade, 248 ±25 degrees  
Fahrenheit, another temperature as specified by the department's rules or a permit  
condition, or a temperature approved by the department for a particular application.  
Alternatively, the tester may opt to operate the equipment at a temperature lower than that  
specified. A temperature gauge capable of measuring temperature to within 3 degrees  
Centigrade, 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit, must be installed so that the temperature around the  
filter holders can be regulated and monitored during sampling. Heating systems other than  
the one shown in APTD-0581 may be used.  
Page 53  
(G) Condenser. The following system must be used to determine the stack gas moisture  
content: Three impingers connected in series with leak-free ground glass fittings or any  
similar leak-free noncontaminating fittings. All impingers must be of the Greenburg-Smith  
design and must be modified by replacing the tip with a 1.3 centimeters, 1/2 inch, inside  
diameter glass tube extending to about 1.3 centimeters, 1/2 inch, from the bottom of the  
flask. Modifications, such as using flexible connections between the impingers or using  
materials other than glass, are allowed subject to the approval of the department. The first  
impinger must contain a known quantity of water, as described in subdivision (d)(i)(C) of  
this rule, the second must be empty, and the third must contain a known weight of silica  
gel or equivalent desiccant. Alternatively, any system that cools the sample gas stream and  
allows measurement of the water condensed and moisture leaving the condenser, each to  
within 1 milliliter or 1 gram, may be used subject to the approval of the department. In any  
case, the means for measuring the moisture leaving the condenser must be by passing the  
sample gas stream through a tared silica gel, or equivalent desiccant, trap with exit gases  
kept below 20 degrees Centigrade, 68 degrees Fahrenheit, and determining the weight gain.  
If a determination of the particulate matter collected in the impingers is required by the  
department's rules, a permit to install, or a permit to operate, the impinger system described  
in this subdivision must be used, without modification. Contact the department as to the  
sample recovery and analysis of the impinger contents.  
(H) Metering system. Vacuum gauge, leak-free pump, thermometers capable of  
measuring temperature to within 3 degrees Centigrade, 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit, dry-gas  
meter capable of measuring volume to within 2%, and related equipment as shown in figure  
103 under R 336.2021. Other metering systems capable of maintaining sampling rates  
within 10% of isokinetic and capable of determining sample volumes to within 2% may be  
used, subject to the approval of the department. When the metering system is used in  
conjunction with a pitot tube, the system must enable checks of isokinetic rates. Sampling  
trains utilizing metering systems designed for higher flow rates than those described in  
APTD-0581 or APTD-0576, adopted by reference in R 336.1902, may be used if the  
specifications of this rule are met.  
(I) Barometer. Mercury, aneroid, or other barometer capable of measuring atmospheric  
pressure to within 2.5 millimeters mercury, 0.1-inch mercury. In many cases, the  
barometric reading may be obtained from a nearby national weather service station. When  
obtained from this source, the station value, which is the absolute barometric pressure, must  
be requested and an adjustment for elevation differences between the weather station and  
sampling point must be applied at a rate of minus 2.5 millimeters mercury, 0.1-inch  
mercury, per 30 meters, 100 foot, elevation increase or vice versa for elevation decrease.  
(J) Gas density determination equipment. Temperature sensor and pressure gauge, as  
described in method 2, and gas analyzer, if necessary, as described in method 3. The  
temperature sensor must, preferably, be permanently attached to the pitot tube or sampling  
probe in a fixed configuration so that the tip of the sensor extends beyond the leading edge  
of the probe sheath and does not touch metal. Alternatively, the sensor may be attached  
just before use in the field. Note, however, that if the temperature sensor is attached in the  
field, the sensor must be placed in an interference-free arrangement with respect to the type  
S pitot tube openings, see method 2, figure 2.6 Velocity Traverse Data. As a second  
alternative, if a difference of not more than 1% in the average velocity measurement is to  
Page 54  
be introduced, the temperature gauge need not be attached to the probe or pitot tube. This  
alternative is subject to the approval of the department.  
(ii) Sample recovery. The following items are needed:  
(A) Probe-liner and probe-nozzle brushes. Nylon bristle brushes with stainless steel wire  
handles. The probe brush must have extensions, at least as long as the probe, made of  
stainless steel, nylon, Teflon, or similarly inert material. The brushes must be properly  
sized and shaped to brush out the probe liner and nozzle.  
(B) Wash bottles - 2. Glass wash bottles are recommended. Polyethylene wash bottles  
may be used at the option of the tester. It is recommended that acetone not be stored in  
polyethylene bottles for longer than a month.  
(C) Glass sample storage containers. Chemically resistant, borosilicate glass bottles, for  
acetone washes, 500 milliliters or 1000 milliliters. Screw cap liners must either be rubber-  
backed Teflon or must be constructed so as to be leak-free and resistant to chemical attack  
by acetone. Narrow-mouth glass bottles have been found to be less prone to leakage.  
Alternatively, polyethylene bottles may be used.  
(D) Filter containers. Glass, polyethylene, or aluminum tube containers, unless  
otherwise specified by the department.  
(E) Graduated cylinder or balance. To measure condensed water to within 1 milliliter  
or 1 gram. Graduated cylinders must have subdivisions of not more than 2 milliliters. Most  
laboratory balances are capable of weighing to the nearest 0.5 gram or less. Any of these  
balances are suitable for use here and in paragraph (iii)(D) of this subdivision.  
(F) Plastic storage containers. Airtight containers to store silica gel.  
(G) Funnel and rubber policeman, to aid in the transfer of silica gel to container, but not  
necessary if silica gel is weighed in the field.  
(H) Funnel. Glass or polyethylene, to aid in sample recovery.  
(iii) Analysis. The following equipment is needed for analysis:  
(A) Glass weighing dishes.  
(B) Desiccator.  
(C) Analytical balance. To measure to within 0.1 milligrams.  
(D) Balance. To measure to within 0.5 milligrams.  
(E) Beakers. 250 milliliters.  
(F) Hygrometer, to measure the relative humidity of the laboratory environment.  
(G) Temperature gauge, to measure the temperature of the laboratory environment.  
(c) The following provisions apply to reagents:  
(i) Sampling. The reagents used in sampling are as follows:  
(A) Filters. Two outstack filters may be any combination of alundum ceramic thimble  
filters, type RA-98 or glass fiber filters, type A without organic binder. The size of such  
filters must allow proper sampling rates to maintain isokinetics using the nozzle sizes  
specified in subdivision (b)(i)(A) of this rule. Alternatively, other types of filters may be  
used, subject to the approval of the department.  
(B) Silica gel. Indicating type, 6 to 16 mesh. If previously used, dry at 175 degrees  
Centigrade, 350 degrees Fahrenheit, for 2 hours. New silica gel may be used as received.  
Alternatively, other types of desiccants, the equivalent or better of silica gel, may be used,  
subject to the approval of the department.  
(C) Water. When analysis of the material caught in the impingers is required, distilled  
water must be used. Run blanks before field use to eliminate a high blank on test samples.  
Page 55  
(D) Crushed ice.  
(E) Stopcock grease. Acetone-insoluble, heat-stable silicone grease. This is not  
necessary if screw-on connectors with Teflon sleeves, or equivalent, are used.  
Alternatively, other types of stopcock grease may be used, subject to the approval of the  
department.  
(ii) Sample recovery. Washing solvent. Either acetone or distilled water may be used for  
sample recovery. If acetone is used for washing solvent, then reagent grade, less than  
0.001% residue, in glass bottles is required. Acetone from metal containers generally has  
a high residue blank and must not be used. Suppliers sometimes transfer acetone to glass  
bottles from metal containers. Thus, acetone blanks must be run before field use, and only  
acetone with low blank values, less than 0.001%, must be used. In no case must a blank  
value of more than 0.001% of the weight of acetone used be subtracted from the sample  
weight. If distilled water is used for washing solvent, use distilled water with less than  
0.001% residue. Run blanks before field use to eliminate a high blank on test samples.  
(iii) Analysis. Two reagents are required for the analysis:  
(A) Solvent. Same as paragraph (ii) of this subdivision for quantitative transfer.  
(B) Desiccant. Anhydrous calcium sulfate, indicating type. Alternatively, other types of  
desiccants may be used, subject to the approval of the department.  
(d) The following provisions apply to procedures:  
(i) Determination of single measurement sites. The measurement site for a positive  
pressure fabric filter with an exhaust stack meeting method 1 criteria must be in accordance  
with method 1. The measurement site for positive pressure fabric filters with short stacks  
or physical configuration not amenable to the requirements of method 1 must be  
determined from the following alternatives, or as approved by the department:  
(A) Short stacks not meeting method 1 criteria: Short stacks may be extended in  
accordance with the procedures set forth in method 1 or by the use of flow straightening  
vanes. The flow straightening vanes must be of the egg crate design, see figure 109 under  
R 336.2021. The measurement site, when using straightening vanes, must be at a distance  
not less than 2 times the average equivalent diameter of the vane opening and not less than  
half of the overall stack diameter upstream of the stack outlet.  
(B) Roof monitor or monovent exhaust outlets: For positive pressure fabric filters  
equipped with peaked roof monitors, ridge vents, or other types of monovents, use a  
measurement site at the base of the monovent. Examples of the locations are shown in  
figure 108 under R 336.2021. The measurement site must be upstream of any exhaust point.  
(C) Measurement site in fabric filter compartment housing. Sample immediately  
downstream of the filter bags directly as shown in the examples in figure 108 under R  
336.2021. Depending on the housing design, use sampling ports in the housing walls or  
locate the sampling equipment within the compartment housing.  
(ii) Determination of number and location of traverse points. The number and location  
of traverse points for single exhaust stacks on positive pressure fabric filters meeting  
method 1 criteria must be in accordance with method 1. The number of traverse points for  
other single measurement sites not meeting method 1 criteria must not be less than 24. For  
example, a rectangular measurement site, such as a monovent, would require the use of a  
balanced 5-by-5 traverse point matrix. All traverse points must be sampled for each test  
run.  
Page 56  
(iii) Multiple measurement sites. Sampling from 2 or more stacks or measurement sites  
may be combined for a test run, if all of the following requirements are met:  
(A) All measurement sites up to 12 must be sampled. For more than 12 measurement  
sites, conduct sampling on not less than 12 sites or 50% of the sites, whichever is greater.  
The measurement sites sampled must be evenly, or nearly evenly, distributed among the  
available sites, if not all of the sites are to be sampled.  
(B) The same number of measurement sites must be sampled for each test run.  
(C) The minimum number of traverse points per test run is 24. An exception to the 24-  
point minimum would be a test combining the sampling from 2 stacks meeting method 1  
criteria for acceptable stack length, and method 1 specifies fewer than 12 points per site.  
(D) As long as the 24 traverse points per test run criterion is met, the number of traverse  
points per measurement site may be reduced to 8. Alternatively, conduct a test run for each  
measurement site individually using the criteria in this paragraph and paragraph (ii) of this  
subdivision for the number of traverse points. Each test must count toward the total of 3  
required for a performance test. If more than 3 measurement sites are sampled, the number  
of traverse points per measurement site may be reduced to 8 if not less than 72 traverse  
points are sampled for all 3 tests.  
(iv) Sampling. The complexity of this method is such that, in order to obtain reliable  
results, testers must be trained and experienced with the test procedures. Sampling must  
comply with the following provisions:  
(A) Pretest preparation. All the components must be maintained and calibrated  
according to the applicable procedures described in APTD-0576, adopted by reference in  
R 336.1902, unless otherwise specified in this rule. Weigh several 200 to 300 gram portions  
of silica gel in airtight containers to the nearest 0.5 gram. Record the total weight of the  
silica gel plus container on each container. As an alternative, the silica gel need not be  
preweighed, but may be weighed directly in its impinger or sampling holder just before  
train assembly. Check filters visually against light for irregularities, flaws, pinhole leaks,  
or cracks. Label filters of the proper size on the back side using numbering machine ink.  
As an alternative, label the shipping containers, subdivision (b)(ii)(D) of this rule, and keep  
the filters in these containers at all times, except during sampling and weighing. Dry the  
filters in an oven at 105 degrees Centigrade, 220 degrees Fahrenheit, for a minimum of 2  
hours, cool for at least 1 hour in a desiccator containing anhydrous calciumsulfate, and  
individually weigh and record each weight to the nearest 0.1 milligram. During the  
weighing, the filters must not be exposed to the laboratory atmosphere for a period of more  
than 2 minutes and a relative humidity above 50%. Procedures, other than those specified,  
that account for relative humidity effects may be used, subject to the approval of the  
department.  
(B) Preliminary determinations. Select the sampling site and the minimum number of  
sampling points according to method 1 or as specified by the department. Determine the  
stack pressure, temperature, and the range of velocity heads using method 2. It is  
recommended that a leak check of the pitot lines, see method 2, be performed. Determine  
the moisture content using approximation method 4, or its alternatives, for the purpose of  
making isokinetic sampling rate settings. Determine the stack gas dry molecular weight, as  
described in method 2. If integrated method 3 sampling is used for molecular weight  
determination, the integrated bag sample must be taken simultaneously with, and for the  
same total length of time as, the particulate sample run. Select a nozzle size based on the  
Page 57  
range of velocity heads so that it is not necessary to change the nozzle size in order to  
maintain isokinetic sampling rates. During the run, do not change the nozzle size. Ensure  
that the proper differential pressure gauge is chosen for the range of velocity heads  
encountered, see method 2. Select a suitable probe liner and probe length so that all traverse  
points can be sampled. For large stacks, consider sampling from opposite sides of the stack  
to reduce the length of probes. Select a total sampling time greater than or equal to the  
minimum total sampling time specified in the test procedures for the specific industry so  
that the sampling time per point is not less than 5 minutes, unless approved by the  
department, or some greater time interval as specified by the department, and so that the  
sample volume taken, corrected to standard conditions, exceeds the required minimum total  
gas sample volume. The latter is based on an approximate average sampling rate. It is  
recommended that the number of minutes sampled at each point be an integer or an integer  
plus 1/2 minute to avoid timekeeping errors. In some circumstances, such as in batch  
cycles, it may be necessary to sample for shorter times at the traverse points and to obtain  
smaller gas sample volumes. In these cases, the department's approval must first be  
obtained.  
(C) Preparation of collection train. During preparation and assembly of the sampling  
train, keep all openings where contamination can occur covered until just before assembly  
or until sampling is about to begin. Place 100 milliliters of water in the first impinger, leave  
the second impinger empty, and transfer approximately 200 to 300 grams of preweighed  
silica gel from its container to the third impinger. More silica gel may be used, but care  
should be taken to ensure that it is not entrained and carried out from the impinger during  
sampling. Place the container in a clean place for later use in the sample recovery.  
Alternatively, the weight of the silica gel plus impinger may be determined to the nearest  
0.5 gram and recorded. Using tweezers or clean disposable surgical gloves, place a labeled,  
identified, and weighed filter in the filter holder. Be sure that the filter is properly centered  
and the gasket properly placed so as to prevent the sample gas stream from circumventing  
the filter. Check the filter for tears after assembly is completed. When glass liners are used,  
install the selected nozzle using a Viton A O-ring when stack temperatures are less than  
260 degrees Centigrade, 500 degrees Fahrenheit, and a heat-resistant fiberglass, graphite,  
or other material string gasket when temperatures are higher. See APTD-0576, adopted by  
reference in R 336.1902, for details. Other connecting systems using either 310 stainless  
steel or Teflon ferrules may be used. When metal liners are used, install the nozzle in the  
same manner as for glass liners or by a leak-free direct mechanical connection. Mark the  
probe with heat-resistant tape or by some other method to denote the proper distance into  
the stack or duct for each sampling point. Set up the train as in figure 103 under R 336.2021.  
If necessary, use a very light coat of silicone grease on all ground glass joints. Grease only  
the outer portion, see APTD-0576, to avoid the possibility of contamination by the silicone  
grease. Place crushed ice around the impingers.  
(D) Leak check procedures:  
(I) Pretest leak check. A pretest leak check is strongly recommended, but not required,  
to prevent invalid sampling and wasted time. If the tester opts to conduct the pretest leak  
check, the following procedure must be used: After the sampling train has been assembled,  
turn it on and set the filter and probe heating systems at the desired operating temperatures.  
Allow time for the temperatures to stabilize. If a Viton A O-ring or other leak-free  
connection is used in assembling the probe nozzle to the probe liner, leak check the train  
Page 58  
at the sampling site by plugging the nozzle and pulling a 380 millimeter mercury, 15 inch  
mercury, vacuum. A lower vacuum may be used if it is not exceeded during the test. If a  
heat-resistant fiberglass, graphite, or other material string is used, do not connect the probe  
to the train during the leak check. Instead, leak check the train by first plugging the inlet to  
the filter holder, cyclone, if applicable, and pulling a 380 millimeter mercury, 15 inch  
mercury, vacuum. A lower vacuum may be used if it is not exceeded during the test. Then  
connect the probe to the train and leak check at about a 25 millimeter mercury, 1 inch  
mercury, vacuum. Alternatively, the probe may be leak checked with the rest of the  
sampling train, in 1 step, at a 380 millimeter mercury, 15 inch mercury, vacuum. Leakage  
rates in excess of 4% of the average sampling rate or 0.00057 cubic meters per minute,  
0.02 cubic feet per minute,, whichever is less, are unacceptable. The following leak check  
instructions for the sampling train described in APTD-0576 and APTD-058 may be helpful.  
Start the pump with the bypass valve fully open and the coarse adjust valve completely  
closed. Partially open the coarse adjust valve and slowly close the bypass valve until the  
desired vacuum is reached. Do not reverse the direction of the bypass valve, as this will  
cause water to back up into the filter holder. If the desired vacuum is exceeded, either leak  
check at this higher vacuum or end the leak check and start over. When the leak check is  
completed, first slowly remove the plug from the inlet to the probe, filter holder, or cyclone,  
if applicable, and immediately turn off the vacuum pump. This prevents the water in the  
impingers from being forced backward into the filter holder and prevents silica gel from  
being entrained backward into the third impinger.  
(II) Leak checks during sample run. If, during the sampling run, a component, such as  
a filter assembly or impinger, change becomes necessary, a leak check must be conducted  
immediately before the change is made. The leak check must be done according to the  
procedure outlined in paragraph (iv)(D)(I) of this subdivision, except that it must be done  
at a vacuum equal to or greater than the maximum value recorded up to that point in the  
test. If the leakage rate is found to be not more than 0.00057 cubic meters per minute, 0.02  
cubic feet per minute, or 4% of the average sampling rate, whichever is less, the results are  
acceptable and no correction need be applied to the total volume of dry gas metered. If,  
however, a higher leakage rate is obtained, the tester shall either record the leakage rate  
and plan to correct the sample volume, as shown in subdivision (f)(iii) of R 336.2011, or  
shall void the sampling run. Immediately after component changes, leak checks are  
optional. If the leak checks are done, the procedure outlined in paragraph (iv)(D)(I) of this  
subdivision must be used.  
(III) Post-test leak check. A leak check is mandatory at the conclusion of each sampling  
run. The leak check must be done in accordance with the procedures outlined in paragraph  
(iv)(D)(I) of this subdivision, except that it must be conducted at a vacuum equal to or  
greater than the maximum value reached during the sampling run. If the leakage rate is  
found to be not more than 0.00057 cubic meters per minute, 0.02 cubic feet per minute, or  
4% of the average sampling rate, whichever is less, the results are acceptable and no  
correction need be applied to the total volume of dry gas metered. If, however, a higher  
leakage rate is obtained, the tester shall either record the leakage rate and correct the sample  
volume, as shown in subdivision (f)(iii) of R 336.2011, or shall void the sampling run.  
(E) Particulate train operation. During the sampling run, maintain an isokinetic  
sampling rate that is within 10% of true isokinetic, unless otherwise specified by the  
department. For each run, record the data required on a data sheet such as the one shown  
Page 59  
in figure 104 under R 336.2021. Be sure to record the initial dry-gas meter reading. Record  
the dry-gas meter readings at the beginning and end of each sampling time increment, when  
changes in flow rates are made, before and after each leak check, and when sampling is  
halted. Take other readings required by figure 104 under R 336.2021 at least once at each  
sample point during each time increment, and take additional readings when significant  
changes, 20% variation in velocity head readings, necessitate additional adjustments in  
flow rate. Level and zero the manometer. Because the manometer level and zero may drift  
due to vibrations and temperature changes, make periodic checks during the traverse. Clean  
the portholes before the test run to minimize the chance of sampling deposited material. To  
begin sampling, remove the nozzle cap and verify that the pitot tube and probe are properly  
positioned. Position the nozzle at the first traverse point with the tip pointing directly into  
the gas stream. Immediately start the pump and adjust the flow to isokinetic conditions.  
Nomographs that aid in the rapid adjustment of the isokinetic sampling rate without  
excessive computations are available. These nomographs are designed for use when the  
type S pitot tube coefficient is 0.85 ±0.02 and the stack gas equivalent density, dry  
molecular weight, is equal to 29 ±4. APTD-0576, adopted by reference in R 336.1902,  
details the procedure for using the nomographs. If Cp and Md are outside the above stated  
ranges, do not use the nomographs unless appropriate steps, see subdivision (g)(iv) of this  
rule, are taken to compensate for the deviations. When the stack is under significant  
negative pressure, height of impinger stem, take care to pull low flow when inserting the  
probe into the stack to prevent water from backing into the sample tubing and to avoid  
pulsation through the filter and possible loss of materials. When the probe is in position,  
block off the openings around the probe and porthole to prevent unrepresentative dilution  
of the gas stream. Traverse the stack cross section, as required by method 1 or as specified  
by the department, being careful not to bump the probe nozzle into the stack walls when  
sampling near the walls or when removing or inserting the probe through the portholes.  
This minimizes the chance of extracting deposited material. During the test run, add more  
ice and, if necessary, salt to maintain a temperature of less than 20 degrees Centigrade, 68  
degrees Fahrenheit, at the condenser/silica gel outlet. Also, periodically check the level and  
zero of the manometer. If the pressure drop across the filter becomes too high and makes  
isokinetic sampling difficult to maintain, the filter may be replaced in the midst of a sample  
run. It is recommended that another complete filter assembly be used rather than attempting  
to change the filter itself. Before a new filter assembly is installed, conduct a leak check,  
see paragraph (iv)(D)(II) of this subdivision. The total particulate weight must include the  
summation of all filter assembly catches. A single train must be used for the entire sample  
run, except in cases where simultaneous sampling is required in 2 or more separate ducts,  
at 2 or more different locations within the same duct, or where equipment failure  
necessitates a change of trains. In all other situations, the use of 2 or more trains must be  
subject to the approval of the department. Note that when 2 or more trains are used, separate  
analyses of the front-half catches from the individual trains may be combined, as may the  
impinger catches, and 1 analysis of the front-half catch and 1 analysis of impinger catch  
may be performed. Consult with the department for details concerning the calculation of  
results when 2 or more trains are used. At the end of the sample run, turn off the coarse  
adjust valve, remove the probe and nozzle from the stack, turn off the pump, record the  
final dry-gas meter reading, and conduct a post-test leak check, as outlined in paragraph  
Page 60  
(iv)(D)(III) of this subdivision. Also, leak-check the pitot lines as described in method 2  
The lines must pass this leak check to validate the velocity head data.  
(F) Calculation of percent isokinetic. Calculate percent isokinetic, see subdivision (f) of  
this rule, to determine whether the run was valid or whether another test run should be  
made. If there was difficulty in maintaining isokinetic rates due to source conditions,  
consult with the department for possible variance on the isokinetic rates.  
(v) Sample recovery. Proper cleanup procedure begins as soon as the probe is removed  
from the stack at the end of the sampling period. Allow the probe to cool. When the probe  
can be safely handled, wipe off all external particulate matter near the tip of the probe  
nozzle and place a cap over it to prevent losing or gaining particulate matter. Do not cap  
off the probe tip tightly while the sampling train is cooling down as this creates a vacuum  
in the filter holder and draws water from the impingers into the filter holder. Before moving  
the sample train to the cleanup site, remove the probe from the sample train, wipe off the  
silicone grease, and cap the open outlet of the probe. Be careful not to lose any condensate  
that might be present. Wipe off the silicone grease from the filter inlet where the probe was  
fastened and cap it. Remove the umbilical cord from the last impinger and cap the impinger.  
If a flexible line is used between the first impinger or condenser and the filter holder,  
disconnect the line at the filter holder and let any condensed water or liquid drain into the  
impingers or condenser. After wiping off the silicone grease, cap off the filter holder outlet  
and impinger inlet. Ground-glass stoppers, plastic caps, or serum caps may be used to close  
these openings. Transfer the probe and filter-impinger assembly to the cleanup area. This  
area must be clean and protected from the wind so that the chances of contaminating or  
losing the sample are minimized. Save a portion of the solvent used for cleanup as a blank.  
Take 200 milliliters of this solvent directly from the wash bottle being used and place it in  
a glass sample container labeled "solvent blank." Inspect the train before and during  
disassembly and note any abnormal conditions. Treat the samples as follows: Container  
numbers 1, 1A. Carefully remove the filters from the filter holders and place each filter in  
its identified container. Use a pair of tweezers or clean disposable surgical gloves, or both,  
to handle the filters. Carefully transfer to the container any particulate matter or filter fibers,  
or both, that adhere to the filter holder gasket by using a dry nylon bristle brush or sharp-  
edged blade, or both. Seal the container. Container number 2. Taking care to see that dust  
on the outside of the probe or other exterior surfaces does not get into the sample, the tester  
shall quantitatively recover from particulate matter or condensate from the nozzle, probe  
fitting, probe liner, and from both filter holders by washing these components with solvent  
and placing the wash in a glass container. Perform the solvent rinses as follows: Carefully  
remove the probe nozzle and clean the inside surface by rinsing with solvent from a wash  
bottle and brushing with a nylon bristle brush. Brush until the solvent rinse shows no visible  
particles and then make a final rinse of the inside surface with solvent. Brush and rinse the  
inside parts of the Swagelok fitting with solvent in a similar way until no visible particles  
remain. Rinse the probe liner with solvent by tilting and rotating the probe while squirting  
solvent into its upper end so that all inside surfaces are wetted with acetone. Let the solvent  
drain from the lower end into the sample container. A glass or polyethylene funnel may be  
used to aid in transferring liquid washes to the container. Follow the solvent rinse with a  
probe brush. Hold the probe in an inclined position and squirt solvent into the upper end as  
the probe brush is being pushed with a twisting action through the probe. Hold a sample  
container underneath the lower end of the probe and catch any solvent and particulate  
Page 61  
matter that is brushed from the probe. Run the brush through the probe 3 or more times  
until no visible particulate matter is carried out with the solvent or until none remains in  
the probe liner on visual inspection. With stainless steel or other metal probes, run the brush  
through, in the manner set forth in this paragraph, not less than 6 times, since metal probes  
have small crevices in which particulate matter can be entrapped. Rinse the brush with  
solvent and quantitatively collect these washings in the sample container. After the  
brushing, make a final solvent rinse of the probe as described above. It is recommended  
that 2 people be used to clean the probe to minimize sample losses. Between sampling runs,  
keep brushes clean and protected from contamination. After ensuring that all joints have  
been wiped clean of silicone grease, clean the inside of both filter holders by rubbing the  
surfaces with a nylon bristle brush and rinsing with solvent. Rinse each surface 3 times, or  
more if needed, to remove visible particulate. Make a final rinse of the brush and filter  
holder. After all solvent washings and particulate matter have been collected in the sample  
container, tighten the lid on the sample container so that solvent will not leak out when it  
is shipped to the laboratory. Mark the height of the fluid level to determine whether or not  
leakage occurred during transport. Label the container to clearly identify its contents.  
Container number 3. Note the color of the indicating silica gel to determine if it has been  
completely spent and make a notation of its condition. Transfer the silica gel from the third  
impinger to its original container and seal. A funnel may make it easier to pour the silica  
gel without spilling it. A rubber policeman may be used as an aid in removing the silica gel  
from the impinger. It is not necessary to remove the small amount of dust particles that  
adhere to the impinger wall and are difficult to remove. Since the gain in weight is to be  
used for moisture calculations, do not use any water or other liquids to transfer the silica  
gel. If a balance is available in the field, follow the procedure for container number 3 in  
paragraph (vi) of this subdivision. Impinger water. Treat the impingers as follows: Make a  
notation of any color or film in the liquid catch. Measure the liquid that is in the first 2  
impingers to within ±1 milliliter by using a graduated cylinder or by weighing it to within  
±1.0 gram by using a balance if none is available. Record the volume or weight of liquid  
present. This information is required to calculate the moisture content of the effluent gas.  
Discard the liquid after measuring and recording the volume or weight, unless analysis of  
the impinger catch is required, see subdivision (b)(i)(G) of this rule. If a different type of  
condenser is used, measure the amount of moisture condensed either volumetrically or  
gravimetrically. When possible, containers must be shipped in a manner that keeps them  
upright at all times.  
(vi) Analysis. Record the data required on a sheet such as the one shown in figure 106  
under R 336.2021. Handle each sample container as follows: Container numbers 1, 1A.  
Analyze and report each filter separately. Transfer the filter and any loose particulate from  
the sample container to a tared-glass weighing dish. Dry the filter in an oven at 105 degrees  
Centigrade, 220 degrees Fahrenheit, for a minimum of 2 hours, cool for at least 1 hour in  
a desiccator containing anhydrous calcium sulfate, and weigh and record its weight to the  
nearest 0.1 milligram. During the weighing, the filter must not be exposed to the laboratory  
atmosphere for a period of more than 2 minutes or a relative humidity above 50%.  
Procedures, other than those specified, that account for relative humidity effects may be  
used, subject to the approval of the department. The method used for the drying and  
weighing of filters must be consistent before and after the test. Container number 2. Note  
the level of liquid in the container and confirm on the analysis sheet whether or not leakage  
Page 62  
occurred during transport. If a noticeable amount of leakage has occurred, either void the  
sample or use methods, subject to the approval of the department, to correct the final  
results. Measure the liquid in this container either volumetrically to ±1 milliliters or  
gravimetrically to ±1.0 grams. Transfer the contents to a tared 250 milliliter beaker and  
evaporate to dryness either at ambient temperature and pressure for acetone or at 95 degrees  
Centigrade, 203 degrees Fahrenheit, in an oven for distilled water. Then subject the sample  
to 250 degrees Centigrade, 482 degrees Fahrenheit, in an oven for 2 to 3 hours. Desiccate  
for 24 hours and weigh to a constant weight. Report the results to the nearest 0.1 milligram.  
Container number 3. Weigh the spent silica gel, or silica gel plus impinger, to the nearest  
0.5 gram using a balance. This step may be conducted in the field. "Solvent blank"  
container. Measure solvent in this container either volumetrically or gravimetrically.  
Transfer the contents to a tared 250 milliliter beaker and evaporate to dryness either at  
ambient temperature and pressure for acetone or at 95 degrees Centigrade, 203 degrees  
Fahrenheit, in an oven for distilled water. Then subject the sample to 250 degrees  
Centigrade, 482 degrees Fahrenheit, in an oven for 2 to 3 hours. Desiccate for 24 hours and  
weigh to a constant weight. Report the results to the nearest 0.1 milligram. If acetone is  
used, the contents of container number 2, as well as the acetone blank container, may be  
evaporated at temperatures higher than ambient. If evaporation is done at an elevated  
temperature, the temperature must be closely supervised, and the contents of the beaker  
must be swirled occasionally to maintain an even temperature. Use extreme care, as acetone  
is highly flammable and has a low flash point.  
(e) Calibration. Maintain a laboratory log of all calibrations. The following provisions  
apply to calibrations:  
(i) Probe nozzle. A probe nozzle must be calibrated before its initial use in the field.  
Using a micrometer, measure the inside diameter of the nozzle to the nearest 0.025  
millimeter, 0.001 inch. Make 3 separate measurements using different diameters each time  
and obtain the average of the measurements. The difference between the high and low  
numbers must not exceed 0.1 millimeter, 0.004 inch. When nozzles become nicked, dented,  
or corroded, the nozzles must be reshaped, sharpened, and recalibrated before use. Each  
nozzle must be permanently and uniquely identified.  
(ii) Pitot tube. The type S pitot tube assembly must be calibrated according to the  
procedure outlined in method 2.  
(iii) Metering system. Before its initial use in the field, the metering system must be  
calibrated according to the procedure outlined in APTD-0576, adopted by reference in R  
336.1902. Instead of physically adjusting the dry-gas meter dial readings to correspond to  
the wet-test meter readings, calibration factors may be used to mathematically correct the  
gas meter dial readings to the proper values. Before calibrating the metering system, it is  
suggested that a leak check be conducted. For metering systems having diaphragm or rotary  
pumps, the normal leak check procedure will not detect leakages within the pump. For  
these cases, the following leak check procedure is suggested: Make a 10-minute calibration  
run at 0.00057 cubic meters per minute, 0.02 cubic feet per minute, at the end of the run,  
take the difference of the measured wet-test meter and dry-gas meter volumes, and divide  
the difference by 10 to get the leak rate. The leak rate must not exceed 0.00057 cubic meters  
per minute, 0.02 cubic feet per minute. After each field use, the calibration of the metering  
system must be checked by performing 3 calibration runs at a single, intermediate orifice  
setting, based on the previous field test, with the vacuum set at the maximum value reached  
Page 63  
during the test series. To adjust the vacuum, insert a valve between the wet-test meter and  
the inlet of the metering system. Calculate the average value of the calibration factor. If the  
calibration has changed by more than 5%, recalibrate the meter over the full range of orifice  
settings, as outlined in APTD-0576. Alternatively, a spirometer may be substituted for a  
wet-test meter in the above mentioned calibration procedures. Alternative procedures, such  
as using the orifice meter coefficients, may be used, subject to the approval of the  
department. If the dry-gas meter coefficient values obtained before and after a test series  
differ by more than 5%, the test series must be performed using whichever meter  
coefficient value, before or after, gives the lower value of total sample volume.  
(iv) Probe heater calibration. The probe heating system must be calibrated before its  
initial use in the field according to the procedures outlined in APTD-0576, adopted by  
reference in R 336.1902. Probes constructed according to APTD-0581 need not be  
calibrated if the calibration curves in APTD-0576 are used.  
(v) Temperature gauges. Use the procedure in method 2 to calibrate instack temperature  
gauges. Dial thermometers, such as those used for the dry-gas meter and condenser outlet,  
must be calibrated against mercury-in-glass thermometers or other thermometers that are  
calibrated using a National Institute of Standards and Technology calibrated reference  
thermometer.  
(vi) Leak check of metering system shown in figure 103 under R 336.2021. That portion  
of the sampling train from the pump to the orifice meter must be leak checked before initial  
use and after each shipment. Leakage after the pump will result in less volume being  
recorded than is actually sampled. The following procedure is suggested, also see figure  
107 under R 336.2021: Close the main valve on the meter box. Insert a 1-hole rubber  
stopper with rubber tubing attached into the orifice exhaust pipe. Disconnect and vent the  
low side of the orifice manometer. Close off the low side orifice tap. Pressurize the system  
to 13 to 18 centimeters, 5 to 7 inches, water column by blowing into the rubber tubing.  
Pinch off the tubing and observe the manometer for 1 minute. A loss of pressure on the  
manometer indicates a leak in the meter box. Leaks, if present, must be corrected.  
(vii) Barometer. Calibrate against a mercury barometer.  
(f) Calculations. When carrying out calculations, retain at least 1 extra decimal figure  
beyond that of the acquired data. Round off figures after the final calculation. Other forms  
of the equations may be used if the other forms of the equations give equivalent results. All  
of the provisions under R 336.2011(f) apply to calculations for this rule.  
(g) Bibliography:  
(i) Federal Register, Volume 42, No. 160, Part 60, Chapter 1, Title 40, Appendix A  
Method 5, August 18, 1977.  
(ii) Martin, Robert M. Construction Details of Isokinetic Source Sampling Equipment.  
Environmental Protection Agency. Research Triangle Park, N.C.APTD-0581. April, 1971.  
(iii) Rom, Jerome J. Maintenance, Calibration, and Operation of Isokinetic Source  
Sampling Equipment. Environmental Protection Agency.Research Triangle Park, N.C.  
APTD-0576. March, 1972.  
(iv) Shigehara, R. T. "Adjustments in the EPA Nomograph for Different Pitot Tube  
Coefficients and Dry Molecular Weights." Stack Sampling News 2:4-11.October, 1974.  
(v) Guidelines for Source Testing of Particulate. Michigan Department of Natural  
Resources, Air Quality Division. June 1, 1977.  
History: 1985 AACS; 2002 AACS; 2025 AACS.  
Page 64  
R 336.2021 Figures.  
Rule 1021. Figures 102 to 104 and 106 to 109 read as follows:  
Page 65  
Page 66  
Page 67  
Page 68  
Page 69  
Page 70  
History: 1985 AACS; 2002 AACS.  
R 336.2030 Reference test method 9A.  
Rule 1030. Reference test method 9A, opacity measurement for scarfer operations at steel  
manufacturing facilities, reads as follows: Visible emission evaluations for scarfer  
operations at steel manufacturing facilities shall be conducted as specified in reference test  
method 9, with the exception that the data reduction provisions of section 2.5 of method 9  
shall be based on an average of 6 consecutive readings, recorded at 15-second intervals.  
History: 1985 AACS.  
R 336.2031 Reference test method 9B.  
Rule 1031. Reference test method 9B, coke oven inspection procedures for visible  
emissions, reads as follows:  
(a) Charging. For the purposes of determining compliance with the coke oven standards  
for charging, the following inspection procedure shall be utilized:  
(i) Observations for the purpose of determining compliance with the coke oven standards  
for charging emissions shall be made from any point or points on the topside of a coke  
oven battery from which an observer can obtain an unobstructed view of the charging  
operation. The observer shall determine and record the total number of seconds that  
charging emissions are visible during the charging of coal to the coke oven. The observer  
Page 71  
shall time the visible charging emissions with a stopwatch while observing the charging  
period. The observer shall stop the watch when visible emissions stop or are obscured from  
view and shall restart the stopwatch only when visible emissions are observed again.  
Simultaneous emissions from more than 1 emission point shall be timed and recorded as 1  
emission and shall not be added individually to the total time.  
(ii) Charging emissions shall not include any emissions observed after all the charging  
port covers have been firmly seated following the removal of the larry car, such as  
emissions occurring when a cover is temporarily removed to permit the sweep-in of spilled  
coal.  
(iii) The total number of seconds of visible emissions observed, clock time for the  
initiation and completion of the charging period, battery identification, and oven number  
of each charge shall be recorded by the observer. If observations of emissions from a charge  
are interrupted due to events beyond the control of the observer, the data from that charge  
shall be invalidated unless a violation has already been noted. The reason for invalidating  
the data shall be noted on the observer's observation sheet. The observer shall then resume  
observation of the next consecutive charge or charges, and continue until a set of  
consecutive charges has been obtained for comparison with the emission standard. The  
charge immediately preceding the interrupted charge and the charge immediately following  
the interrupted charge shall constitute consecutive charges. Compliance shall be  
determined by summing the seconds of charging emissions observed during any set of 4  
consecutive charges on the same battery. Observations can be terminated once a violation  
has been identified, even though 4 complete charges have not been observed. Any 1 charge  
may be included in only 1 set of consecutive charges.  
(b) Doors. Compliance with the percent door leakage standard shall be determined as  
follows:  
(i) The area to which the door leakage standard applies is the door and any location on  
the perimeter of a coke oven door, including the door jamb, or, with respect to chuck doors,  
the door and any location on the perimeter of a chuck door, but not when emissions are  
seen to come from the area between a buck stay and adjacent jamb.  
(ii) Observations of door emissions shall be made from a minimum distance of 25 feet  
from each door. Each door shall be observed in sequence for only that period necessary to  
determine whether or not, at the time, there are visible emissions from any point on the  
door while the observer walks along the side of the battery. If the observer's view of a door  
is more than momentarily obstructed, as, for example, by door machinery, pushing  
machinery, coke guide, luter truck, or opaque steam plumes, the observer shall record the  
door obstructed and the nature of the obstruction and continue the observations with the  
next door in sequence which is not obstructed. The observer shall continue this procedure  
along the entire length of the battery for both sides and shall record the battery  
identification, battery side, and oven door identification number of each door exhibiting  
visible emissions. Before completing the traverse, or immediately thereafter, the observer  
shall attempt to again observe the obstructed doors. A row of 2 or more continuous batteries  
may be inspected by observing all of the doors on one side of the row of batteries and then  
all of the doors on the other side.  
(iii) Compliance with this section shall be calculated by applying the following formula  
separately for coke side doors, pusher side doors, and chuck doors:  
Page 72  
(number of doors with visible emissions  
on operating ovens in the battery) x 100  
actual percentage of doors  
with visible emissions  
=
[(number of doors on total ovens in the battery) -  
(number of doors obstructed from view on operating ovens)]  
(c) Ports. Compliance with the limits on visible emissions from charging ports shall be  
determined as follows:  
(i) Observations of any visible emissions shall be made and recorded during the time an  
observer walks the topside of a battery from one end to the other. Each oven shall be  
observed in sequence.  
(ii) The observer shall record the battery identification, the points of emissions from each  
oven, and the oven number.  
(iii) The observer shall not record the following:  
(A) Visible emissions from charging ports on ovens that are opened during a  
decarbonization period, if not more than 3 ovens are undergoing decarbonization.  
(B) Visible emissions caused by maintenance work in progress at an oven.  
(C) Steam emissions, including steam caused by the vaporization of wet luting materials.  
(iv) Compliance shall be determined by applying the following formula:  
(number of charging ports with visible  
actual  
percentage  
of  
emissions on operating ovens in the battery) x 100  
(number of charging ports on operating ovens in the battery)  
=
charging ports with visible  
emissions  
(d) Standpipe assembly emission points. Compliance with the limits on visible emissions  
from standpipe assembly emission points shall be determined as follows:  
(i) Observations of any visible emissions from the standpipe assembly shall be made by  
traversing the topside of the battery. During the traverse, the observer shall walk as near to  
the center of the battery as safety considerations permit, but may walk as close as necessary  
to the offtake piping to determine whether an observed emission is emanating from the  
standpipe assembly. If the battery has 2 collector mains, the observer may take 2 traverses  
to observe emissions from standpipe assembly emission points.  
(ii) Each oven shall be observed in sequence.  
(iii) The observer shall record the battery identification; the number of the standpipe  
assembly emission points with visible emissions, which shall not exceed the number of  
emission points on the oven; and the oven number.  
(iv) The observer shall not record the following:  
(A) Visible emissions from standpipe assemblies on ovens that are opened during the  
decarbonization period, if not more than 3 ovens are undergoing decarbonization.  
(B) Visible emissions caused by maintenance work in progress at an oven.  
(C) Steam emissions, including steam caused by the vaporization of wet luting material.  
(v) Compliance shall be determined by applying the following formula:  
(number of standpipe assembly emission points with =  
visible emissions on operating ovens) x 100  
(number of standpipe assembly emission points on  
the operating ovens of the coke battery)  
actual percentage of  
emission points with  
visible emissions  
Page 73  
(e) Pushing. Compliance with the visible emission standards during pushing operations  
shall be determined in accordance with the following inspection technique:  
(i) Visible emission observers shall be certified in accordance with the procedures  
specified in reference test method 9.  
(ii) Visible emissions from any pushing emission control device outlet shall be  
determined in accordance with the provisions of reference test method 9, except as follows:  
(A) The observer shall be positioned in accordance with the provisions of section 2.1 of  
method 9 to the extent practicable.  
(B) The data reduction provisions of section 2.5 of method 9 shall be based on an average  
of 6 consecutive readings taken at 15-second intervals.  
(C) The readings shall commence when the coke begins to fall into the coke receiving car  
and shall end with the sixth reading.  
(iii) In viewing fugitive push and travel emissions, the observer shall stand on the coke  
side of the battery where a clear view of the push can be obtained. This generally should  
be a location on the ground in the coke side yard outside the hot car tracks. The observer  
shall not be restricted to the ground level, but may make the observation from some  
elevated level. The observer's line of sight should be approximately perpendicular to the  
line of travel of the quench car. If observations of emissions from a pushing operation are  
interrupted due to events beyond the control of the observer, the data from that pushing  
operation shall be invalidated unless a violation has already been noted.  
(iv) During the pushing operation, the reader shall observe all the pushing emissions,  
including, but not limited to, fugitive emissions from the pushing emission control device  
and from open quench cars during travel. All fugitive push emissions shall be read above  
the battery top. Fugitive emissions during travel may be read against any contrasting  
background.  
(v) Fugitive visible emissions during the pushing of coke into the coke receiving car shall  
be determined in accordance with the provisions of reference test method 9, except as  
follows:  
(A) The data reduction provisions of section 2.5 of method 9 shall be based on an average  
of 6 consecutive readings taken at 15-second intervals.  
(B) The readings shall commence when coke begins to fall into the coke receiving car and  
shall end with the sixth reading.  
(vi) Fugitive visible emissions during transit of the coke receiving car to the quench tower  
shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of reference test method 9, except  
as follows:  
(A) The data reduction provisions of section 2.5 of method 9 shall be based on an average  
of as many consecutive readings as are possible during transit of the coke receiving car.  
(B) The readings used to determine compliance shall be those readings taken after the car  
leaves the hood and until the car enters the quench tower.  
(f) Definition of "operating ovens." For the purposes of subrules (2)(c), (3)(d), and (4)(e)  
of this rule, an "operating oven" means an oven which is not out of service for a rebuild or  
for maintenance that is extensive enough to require the oven to be left out of the charging  
sequence.  
History: 1985 AACS.  
Page 74  
R 336.2032 Reference test method 9C.  
Rule 1032. Reference test method 9C, opacity measurement for basic oxygen furnace  
operations and hot metal transfer and desulfurization operations at steel manufacturing  
facilities, reads as follows:  
Fugitive and nonfugitive visible emission evaluation for basic oxygen furnace operations,  
hot metal desulfurization, and hot metal transfer operations shall be conducted as specified  
in reference test method 9, with the exception that the data reduction provisions of section  
2.5 of method 9 shall be based on an average of 12 consecutive readings recorded at 15-  
second intervals.  
History: 1985 AACS.  
R 336.2033 Test methods for coke oven quench towers.  
Rule 1033. (1) Test methods as applicable to coke oven quench towers. The publication  
entitled "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater," 23rd edition,  
must apply to the measurement of total dissolved solids in coke oven quench tower water.  
(2) In addition to the provisions in “Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and  
Wastewater” under subrule (1), all of the following provisions must apply to the  
measurement of total dissolved solids in coke oven quench tower water:  
(a) The quench tower makeup water must be sampled at locations downstream of any  
makeup water additions.  
(b) The quench tower water must be sampled between the quench tower sump and the  
quench tower spray nozzles.  
(c) One sample of quench tower water for all operating quench towers must be collected  
once per day, 5 days per week.  
(d) Compliance with the applicable quench tower limits must be determined on a weekly  
basis.  
(e) For purposes of determining compliance, either individual analysis of the collected  
samples may be averaged or a weekly composite analysis may be performed.  
History: 1985 AACS; 2025 AACS.  
R 336.2040 Method for determination of volatile organic compound emissions from  
coating lines and graphic arts lines.  
Rule 1040. (1) The methods described in this rule must be used for the determination of  
volatile organic compound emissions from coating lines and graphic arts lines for the  
purpose of determining compliance, during the specified averaging period, with an  
emission limit. For emission limits expressed as pounds of volatile organic compounds per  
gallon of coating, minus water, as applied. Concentrations of volatile organic compounds  
in coatings and inks must be determined by excluding water and compounds that are used  
as organic solvents and are excluded from the definition of volatile organic compound from  
both the volume of volatiles in the coatings and inks and the volume of the coatings and  
inks as applied. The emission limits can be contained in any of the following:  
(a) These rules.  
Page 75  
(b) A permit to install.  
(c) A permit to operate.  
(d) A voluntary agreement.  
(e) A performance contract.  
(f) A stipulation.  
(g) An order of the department.  
(2) Unless otherwise specified in these rules or in a legally enforceable permit, order, or  
contract as described in subrule (1) of this rule, for a particular coating line or graphic arts  
line, the applicable method for the determination of volatile organic emissions from coating  
lines and graphic arts lines is based on the form of the specified emission limit as follows:  
(a) For coating lines that do not have an add-on emissions control device for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
coating, minus water, as applied, use the method described in subrule (12)(a) of this rule.  
(b) For coating lines that have 1 or more add-on emissions control devices for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
coating, minus water, as applied, use the method described in subrule (12)(b) of this rule.  
(c) For coating lines that do not have an add-on emissions control device for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
coating solids, as applied, use the method described in subrule (12)(c) of this rule.  
(d) For coating lines with 1 or more add-on emissions control devices for which emission  
limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of coating solids,  
as applied, use the method described in subrule (12)(d) of this rule.  
(e) For coating lines that do not have an add-on emissions control device for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
applied coating solids, use the method described in subrule (12)(e) of this rule.  
(f) For coating lines that have 1 or more add-on emissions control devices for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
applied coating solids, use the method described in subrule (12)(f) of this rule.  
(g) For graphic arts lines that do not have an add-on emissions control device for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per pound of solids,  
as applied, use the method described in subrule (12)(g) of this rule.  
(h) For graphic arts lines that have 1 or more add-on emissions control devices for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per pound of solids,  
as applied, use the method described in subrule (12)(h) of this rule.  
(i) For flatwood paneling coating lines that do not have an add-on emissions control  
device for which emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds  
per 1,000 square feet of coated finished product, use the method described in subrule (12)(i)  
of this rule.  
(j) For flatwood paneling coating lines that have 1 or more add-on emissions control  
devices for which emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds  
per 1,000 square feet of coated finished product, use the method described in subrule (12)(j)  
of this rule.  
(3) The following nomenclature applies to the equations described in this rule:  
(a) a = An individual duct through which gases containing volatile organic compounds  
are ducted to an add-on emissions control device.  
Page 76  
(b) B = Modified emission limit, converted from pounds of volatile organic compounds  
per gallon of coating, minus water, as applied, to pounds of volatile organic compounds  
per gallon of coating solids as applied.  
(c) Cim = Concentration of volatile organic compounds, as measured by the applicable  
method, in the effluent gas flowing through stack "m" leaving the add-on emissions control  
device, parts per million by volume.  
(d) Cza = Concentration of volatile organic compounds, as measured by the applicable  
method, in the influent gas flowing through duct "a" entering the add-on emissions control  
device, parts per million by volume.  
(e) Dci = Density of each ink or coating "i" as received from the ink or coating supplier,  
pounds per gallon of ink or coating.  
(f) Dsj = Density of each volatile organic compound dilution solvent "j" added to the  
coating, pounds per gallon of solvent, minus water.  
(g) DE = Volatile organic compound destruction efficiency of the add-on emissions  
control device.  
(h) E = Emission limit expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
coating, minus water, as applied.  
(i) GT = Total volume of all coatings "z" used during the averaging period, gallons of  
coating, minus water, as applied.  
(j) i = An individual coating used during the averaging period that belongs to the coating  
category for which a compliance determination is being made pursuant to the provisions  
of this rule. For a graphic arts line, "i" is an individual ink or coating used during the  
averaging period.  
(k) j = An individual dilution solvent used during the averaging period that is used in  
conjunction with a coating "i".  
(l) k = An individual method of application of coating solids.  
(m) Lci = Volume of each coating "i" used during the averaging period, gallons of coating,  
minus water, as applied.  
(n) Ldi = Volume of each ink or coating "i" as received from the ink or coating supplier  
and used during the averaging period, gallons of ink or coating.  
(o) Lik = Volume of each coating "i" used by each application method "k" during the  
averaging period, gallons of coating, minus water, as applied.  
(p) Lsj = Volume of each volatile organic compound dilution solvent "j" added to the  
coating during the averaging period, gallons of solvent, minus water.  
(q) M = Total weight of volatile organic compounds in all coatings "z" used during the  
averaging period for a coating line or a graphic arts line, pounds.  
(r) m = An individual stack through which gases containing volatile organic compounds  
are ducted to the ambient air from an add-on emissions control device.  
(s) Mr = Total weight of volatile organic compounds recovered from a recovery-type add-  
on emissions control device during the averaging period, pounds.  
(t) N = Fraction, by weight, of the total volatile organic compounds emitted from an  
operation which is captured and enters the add-on emissions control device, pound per  
pound.  
(u) NTr = Fraction, by weight, of the total volatile organic compounds in all coatings "z"  
used during the averaging period for a coating line or a graphic arts line which is controlled  
by an add-on emissions control device "r," pound per pound.  
Page 77  
(v) P = For an individual coating "i," pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon  
of coating, minus water, as applied.  
(w) Ps = For an individual coating "i," pounds of volatile organic compounds, minus  
water, as received from the ink or coating supplier.  
(x) Pa = As used in subrule (12)(a) of this rule for coating lines that do not have an add-  
on emissions control device, volume-weighted average pounds of volatile organic  
compounds per gallon of coating, minus water, as applied, for a single coating category  
during the averaging period.  
(y) Pb = As used in subrule (12)(b) of this rule for coating lines that have 1 or more add-  
on emissions control devices, volume-weighted average pounds of volatile organic  
compounds per gallon of coating, minus water, as applied, for a single coating category  
during the averaging period.  
(z) Pc = As used in subrule (12)(c) of this rule for coating lines that do not have an add-  
on emissions control device, volume-weighted average pounds of volatile organic  
compounds per gallon of coating solids, as applied, for a single coating category during the  
averaging period.  
(aa) Pd = As used in subrule (12)(d) of this rule for coating lines that have 1 or more add-  
on emissions control devices, volume-weighted average pounds of volatile organic  
compounds per gallon of coating solids, as applied, for a single coating category during the  
averaging period.  
(bb) Pe = As used in subrule (12)(e) of this rule for coating lines that do not have an add-  
on emissions control device, volume- weighted average pounds of volatile organic  
compounds per gallon of applied coating solids for a single coating category during the  
averaging period.  
(cc) Pf = As used in subrule (12)(f) of this rule for coating lines that have 1 or more add-  
on emissions control devices, volume-weighted average pounds of volatile organic  
compounds per gallon of applied coating solids for a single coating category during the  
averaging period.  
(dd) Pg = As used in subrule (12)(g) of this rule for graphic arts lines that do not have an  
add-on emissions control device, average pounds of volatile organic compounds per pound  
of solids, as applied, for all inks and coatings used during the averaging period.  
(ee) Ph = As used in subrule (12)(h) of this rule for graphic arts lines that have 1 or more  
add-on emissions control devices, average pounds of volatile organic compounds per  
pound of solids, as applied, for all inks and coatings used during the averaging period.  
(ff) Pi = As used in subrule (12)(i) of this rule for flatwood paneling coating lines that do  
not have an add-on emissions control devices, volume-weighted average pounds of volatile  
organic compounds per 1,000 square feet of coated finished product for a single-coating  
category during the averaging period.  
(gg) Pj = As used in subrule (12)(j) of this rule for flatwood paneling coating lines that  
have 1 or more add-on emissions control devices, volume-weighted average pounds of  
volatile organic compounds per 1,000 square feet of coated finished product for a single-  
coating category during the averaging period.  
(hh) Qim = Volumetric flow rate of the effluent gas flowing through stack "m" leaving  
the add-on emissions control device, dry standard cubic feet per hour.  
(ii) Qza = Volumetric flow rate of the influent gas flowing through duct "a" entering the  
add-on emissions control device, dry standard cubic feet per hour.  
Page 78  
(jj) Q3n = Volumetric flow rate of the effluent gas leaving an uncontrolled stack "n," dry  
standard cubic feet per hour.  
(kk) r = An individual add-on emissions control device.  
(ll) Rr = Reduction efficiency of a single add-on emissions control device.  
(mm) Rt = Overall reduction efficiency of all add-on emissions control devices used for  
a coating line or a graphic arts line.  
(nn) s =The total number of different add-on control devices "r" on a coating line or  
graphic arts line.  
(oo) sq = The total surface area of coated finished product for a single-coating category  
for a flatwood paneling coating line during the averaging period, square feet.  
(pp) T = Overall transfer efficiency for all coatings "i" for a single-coating category on a  
coating line for the averaging period.  
(qq) t = The total number of stacks "m" leaving an add-on emissions control device "r".  
(rr) Ti = Transfer efficiency for application of coating "i," %.  
(ss) u = Total number of ducts "a" entering an add-on emissions control device "r".  
(tt) Uci = For representative colors and parts that are tested for transfer efficiency, "Uci"  
is the volume of each representative color of coating that is applied to each representative  
part on a coating line during the averaging period.  
(uu) V = For a coating line, the volume of solids in all coatings used "zc" during the  
averaging period, gallons.  
(vv) Vci = Proportion of solids by volume in each coating "i," gallon of solids per gallon  
of coating, minus water, as applied.  
(ww) W = For a graphic arts line, the weight of solids in all inks and coatings used "zg"  
during the averaging period, pounds.  
(xx) Wci = Proportion of volatiles, volatile organic compounds, water, and exempt  
compounds, by weight in each ink or coating "i" as received from the ink or coating  
supplier, pound of volatiles per pound of coating.  
(yy) x = The total number of different application methods "k."  
(zz) y = The total number of different dilution solvents "j."  
(aaa) z = The total number of different coatings "i" used on a coating line or different  
number of inks and coatings "i" used on a graphic arts line during the averaging period. "z"  
is used generically in the equations specified in this rule for "zc" when the calculation is  
made for a coating line and for "zg" when the calculation is made for a graphic arts line.  
(bbb) zc = The total number of different coatings "i" in the same coating category used  
during the averaging period.  
(ccc) zg = The total number of different inks and coatings "i" used during the averaging  
period.  
(4) The following provisions apply to the calculations for a coating line or graphic arts  
line made pursuant to the methods described in this rule:  
(a) When carrying out calculations, carry not less than 5 significant digits in intermediate  
calculations. Round off figures after the final calculation, rounding off calculated emission  
numbers to not less than 2, but not more than 3, significant figures.  
(b) The calculations for a coating line must include all of the coatings which are in the  
same coating category and which are used during the averaging period as specified in the  
applicable emission limit.  
Page 79  
(c) Except as specified in R 336.1624(5)(d), the calculations for a graphic arts line must  
include all of the inks and coatings that are used during the averaging period as specified  
in the applicable emission limit.  
(5) The volatile organic compound content of an ink or coating, minus water, as applied,  
"P," must be determined using any of the following methods:  
(a) The volatile organic compound content of an ink or coating, minus water, as applied,  
"P," must be determined according to all of the following provisions:  
(i) The volatile organic compound content, minus water, as applied, must be determined  
as follows:  
(A) For a coating used on a coating line or a coating used on a graphic arts line, the  
volatile organic compound content, minus water, as applied, must be determined using  
federal reference method 24 or federal reference method 24A, as applicable to the coating,  
as described in R 336.2004, or an alternate method approved by the department.  
(B) For an ink that is used on a graphic arts line, the volatile organic compound content,  
minus water, as applied, must be determined using federal reference method 24 or federal  
reference method 24A, as applicable, as described in R 336.2004.  
(ii) The ink or coating sample must be taken at a point where the sample will be  
representative of the ink or coating material as applied.  
(iii) The sample must be stored in an enclosed container that is not less than 1 pint in  
volume.  
(iv) By using a procedure that is acceptable to the department, the amount of any  
compound in the sample that is excluded from the definition of volatile organic compound  
may be quantified and subtracted from the total amount of volatiles in the sample as  
determined by federal reference method 24, federal reference method 24A, or an alternate  
method that is approved by the department. In this case, the volume of any excluded  
compound in the sample must also be subtracted from the volume of the ink or coating  
sample.  
(b) Upon written approval by the department, the volatile organic compound content of  
an ink or coating may be determined from formulation data, which includes batch  
composition information from the ink or coating manufacturer and the amount of volatile  
organic compound dilution solvent added to the ink or coating before application. In this  
case, "P" must be calculated using the following equation:  
Ps+  
Ldi  
Lsj Dsj  
P=  
+
Ldi Lsj  
(c) If a coating or ink is tested by a federal reference method 24 or 24A analysis or by an  
alternate method approved by the department and the results are different than calculated  
through formulation data review, then the test method results must be used for determining  
compliance with the emission limit.  
(6) The weight of volatile organic compounds that are used during the averaging period  
must be calculated using the following equation, where "z" is the total number of coatings  
used:  
z
M =  
P
Lci  
i=1  
(7) The total volume of coating solids that are used during the averaging period must be  
calculated using the following equation, where "z" is the total number of coatings used:  
Page 80  
z
V =  
Lci V ci  
i=1  
(8) The total weight of ink and coating solids that are used during the averaging period  
must be calculated using the following equation, where "zg" is the total number of inks and  
coatings used during the averaging period:  
zg  
W =  
(1- )  
Ldi Dci W ci  
i=1  
(9) The transfer efficiency must be determined by the following method, if approved by  
the department, or by an alternate method approved by the department:  
(a) A person that is responsible for the transfer efficiency test shall identify all of the  
following in a coating operation transfer efficiency test proposal and submit the proposal  
to the department for approval not less than 30 days before the transfer efficiency test:  
(i) All processing sequences. A processing sequence is the combination and order of  
paint booths, flash-off areas, ovens, and application equipment necessary to apply a  
coating.  
(ii) The coating categories used on each processing sequence.  
(iii) The representative coating color in each coating category. A representative color  
must be determined based on the volume of coating used in relation to the total volume of  
coating category coatings used and any other parameters acceptable to the department. If  
it is believed by the department that the transfer efficiency of the various coatings within  
the same coating category would be different as a result of different coating technologies,  
such as for metallic topcoat coatings and nonmetallic topcoat coatings, 2 or more  
representative coating colors may be required by the department to be tested.  
(iv) At a minimum, 2 different representative parts coated in each processing sequence.  
A representative part must be determined based on the numbers of the part coated in  
relation to the total number of parts coated, the configuration of the part, and any other  
parameters acceptable to the department.  
(b) For the initial transfer efficiency tests, a person shall test, at a minimum, the  
representative color or colors in each coating category used on each representative part in  
each processing sequence. To more closely represent actual process conditions, coatings  
applied wet-on-wet, such as basecoat and clearcoat, may be tested together. Also, identical  
colors or clear coats on identical parts in identical processing sequences need not be tested.  
(c) A person that is responsible for the transfer efficiency test shall review the operating  
conditions annually after the initial transfer efficiency tests and demonstrate, to the  
satisfaction of the department, that significant changes have not occurred in coating  
technology, the parts coated, or the processing sequence. The most recent test results  
remain valid for 5 years if the person demonstrates that significant change has not occurred.  
Significant product, processing, material, or application equipment changes necessitate  
retesting of the transfer efficiency of the operations that have been modified. The retesting  
must be done as soon as practicable, but not more than 180 days after the start-up and  
stabilization of the new product, process, material, or application equipment. New transfer  
efficiency values determined by the retest must be used retroactively to the start-up of the  
new product, process, material, or application equipment.  
(d) Retests on a coating line may be limited to a representative coating on not less than 2  
representative parts in a representative processing sequence, as approved by the  
Page 81  
department. A representative processing sequence must be determined based on coating  
usage, application equipment, and any other parameters acceptable to the department.  
(e) The area in the facility to be used for part weighing must be selected so as to provide  
for an area that has relatively constant temperature and minimal air movement.  
(f) Except as allowed pursuant to the provisions of subdivision (b) of this subrule, the  
coating being tested must be the only coating applied during the transfer efficiency test. If  
the part is weighed, weight loss from all other materials must be accounted for in the initial  
test weight.  
(g) A minimum of 10 parts per transfer efficiency test must be weighed to determine the  
weight of the solids applied. The average weight gain for the 10 parts tested must be used  
as the part weight gain for that transfer efficiency test. All transfer efficiency tests for a  
processing sequence must be completed within a 36-hour period.  
(h) Each part to be painted must be identified and preweighed to the nearest 0.05 pound.  
(i) The selected paint material at each paint system or paint pot dedicated for the transfer  
efficiency test must be isolated.  
(j) The amount of material used during the transfer efficiency test must be determined by  
either of the following measurement procedures:  
(i) The weight measurement procedure as follows:  
(A) Weigh the tank of reduced paint, to the nearest 0.01 pound, after all supply and  
return lines have been filled.  
(B) Connect the paint tank to the system and paint the test parts.  
(C) Reweigh the tank to the nearest 0.01 pound.  
(D) Determine the weight of paint material used by subtracting the final weight of the  
tank from the initial weight of the tank.  
(E) Obtain paint samples for weight solids determination.  
(F) Do both the initial and final weighings of the paint tank with the tank pressurized or  
with the tank not pressurized.  
(ii) A volume measurement procedure that is acceptable to the department.  
(k) Each painted test part must be reweighed to the nearest 0.01 pound after paint has  
cured and cooled.  
(l) The weight of the solids in the paint samples must be determined using ASTM-D2369,  
adopted by reference in R 336.1902.  
(m) The coating density in pounds per gallon must be determined using ASTM-D1475,  
adopted by reference in R 336.1902.  
(n) The following equation must be used to calculate the transfer efficiency for the  
application of coating "i":  
푇표푡푎푙 푤푒ꢀ푔ℎ푡 푔푎ꢀ푛 표푓 푝푎푟푡푠 푡푒푠푡푒푑  
Ti = (  
)
푡표푡푎푙 푤푒ꢀ푔ℎ푡 표푓 푐표푎푡ꢀ푛푔 푢푠푒푑 푝푒푟 푡푒푠푡 푥 (푤푒ꢀ푔ℎ푡 푓푟푎푐푡ꢀ표푛 푠표푙ꢀ푑푠)  
(o) Where more than 1 part type or coating are tested on a coating line for a single coating  
category, the overall transfer efficiency "T" for the coating category must be determined  
by averaging the individual transfer efficiency values based on a volume-weighted average  
of coatings applied during the averaging period for each different color and part type tested.  
This overall transfer efficiency must be calculated by using the following equation, where  
"aa" is the number of coatings tested and "bb" is the number of part types tested:  
Page 82  
aa bb  
T ci U ci  
  
i=1 c=1  
T =  
aa bb  
U ci  
  
i-1 c=1  
(p) Baseline operating parameters of the paint application equipment and the paint booths  
must be established for each transfer efficiency test and must serve as a basis for  
determining compliance. These parameters must be included in a transfer efficiency test  
report and must include all of the following information:  
(i) Type of spray equipment.  
(ii) Electrostatic voltage.  
(iii) Size and geometry of the part coated.  
(iv) Gun-to-target distance, nonmanual.  
(v) Number of parts per conveyor hook.  
(vi) Air velocity in spray booth, linear feet per minute.  
(vii) Fluid flow settings, by color.  
(viii) Bell revolutions per minute for minibells.  
(ix) Atomizing air pressure.  
(10) The capture efficiency "N" must be determined as follows:  
(a) The capture efficiency "N" must be determined by using the methods specified in 40  
CFR 52.741(a)(4)(iii) entitled "Capture system efficiency test protocols" and in appendix  
B entitled "VOM Measurement Techniques for Capture Efficiency," with the following  
modifications:  
(i) The general modifications are as follows:  
(A) Replace the requirements under 40 CFR 52.741(a)(4)(iii)(A) (2) with the following  
requirements: If a source owner or operator uses a control device designed to collect and  
recover volatile organic compounds, for example, carbon adsorber, an explicit  
measurement of capture efficiency is not necessary if the conditions described in 40 CFR  
52.741(a)(4)(iii) are met. The overall emission reduction efficiency of the control system  
must be determined each day by directly comparing the input liquid volatile organic  
compounds to the recovered liquidvolatile organic compounds. The procedure for use in  
this situation is given in 40 CFR 60.433, with the modification to 40 CFR  
52.741(a)(4)(iii)(A)(2)(i) under paragraph (B) of this rule.  
(B) Replace the requirements under 40 CFR 52.741(a)(4)(iii)(A)(2)(i) with the  
following requirements: The source owner or operator shall obtain data each day for the  
solvent usage and solvent recovery and determine the solvent recovery efficiency of the  
system each day using a 7-day rolling period. The recovery efficiency for each day is  
computed as the ratio of the total recovered solvent for that day and the prior 6 consecutive  
operating days to the total solvent usage for the same 7-day period weighted average as  
given in 40 CFR §60.433. This ratio must be expressed as a percentage. The ratio must be  
computed within 72 hours after each 24-hour period. With the approval of the  
administrator, a source that believes that the 7-day rolling period is not appropriate may  
use an alternative multi-day rolling period of not more than 30 days.  
(C) Requirements in 40 CFR 52.741 appendix Bfor procedures G.1, G.2, F.2, F.1, and  
L, sections titled “1.4 Sampling requirements” must be replaced with the following: A  
capture efficiency test must consist of not less than 3 sampling runs. Each run must cover  
at least 1 complete production cycle, but must be not less than 3 hours long. The sampling  
Page 83  
time for each run need not be more than 8 hours, even if the production cycle has not been  
completed. Alternative sampling times may be used if approved by the administrator.  
(ii) Owners or operators of coating lines that have multiple stacks may choose to apply  
1 of the 4 protocols under 40 CFR 52.741(a)(4)(iii)(B) or the protocol described under  
subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, in addition to the modifications listed in paragraph (i)  
of this subdivision except for the modification to 1.4 listed in paragraph (i)(C)(1) of this  
subdivision, which is replaced with the following language as described under  
subparagraph (B) of this paragraph:  
(A) Liquid/gas method measuring the captured emission, Gw, and liquid input, L. This  
procedure may only be used when the capture efficiency for a coating line is expected to  
be less than 50%. The capture efficiency equation to be used for this protocol is:  
CE = Gw/L  
Where:  
CE = Coating line capture efficiency, decimal fraction.  
Gw = Mass of vom captured and delivered to a control device.  
L = Mass of liquid vom input to coating line.  
Procedure G.1 contained in appendix B of this section is used to obtain Gw. Procedure L  
contained in appendix B or the alternate method in R 336.2007 must be used to determine  
L.  
(B) Requirements in 40 CFR 52.741 appendix B for procedures G.1, G.2, F.2, F.1, and  
L, under the procedure section titled “1.4 Sampling requirements” must be replaced with  
the following requirements: A capture efficiency test must consist of not less than 3  
sampling runs. Each run must cover at least 1 complete production or processing cycle or  
must be at least 1 hour in duration. For automotive surface coating operations, the sampling  
time per test must be based on coating a minimum of 3 representative vehicles.  
(b) The test protocols and 40 CFR 52.741(a)(4)(iii) appendix B are adopted by reference  
under R 336.1902.  
(c) Where multiple capture systems are used on a coating line or a graphic arts line, the  
appropriate capture efficiency for each application method must be determined and the  
overall capture efficiency for the coating line must be based on a mass-weighted average  
of all volatile organic compounds used on the coating line or the graphic arts line during  
the averaging period.  
(11) The overall reduction efficiency of add-on emissions control devices must be  
determined using 1 or more of the following methods, as applicable:  
(a) When a destructive-type add-on emissions control device is used, the reduction  
efficiency for the add-on emissions control device must be determined by using the  
following method:  
(i) The destruction efficiency of the add-on emissions control device is calculated by  
using the following equation, where "u" is the total number of ducts entering the control  
device and "t" is the total number of stacks leaving the control device:  
Page 84  
u
t
-
Q
Q
im Cim  
za Cza  
a=1  
m=1  
DE =  
u
Q
za Cza  
a=1  
(ii) Using the destruction efficiency as determined in paragraph (i) of this subdivision,  
the reduction efficiency of the add-on emissions control device is calculated by using the  
following equation:  
=(DE) N  
Rr  
(iii) If there is only 1 add-on emissions control device used on a coating line or graphic  
arts line, use the value calculated for "Rr" pursuant to paragraph (ii) of this subdivision as  
the value for RT in subsequent calculations.  
(iv) The concentration of volatile organic compound emissions entering and exiting the  
add-on emissions control device must be determined by using federal reference methods  
25 or 25A, federal reference method 18 if approved by the department, the alternate version  
of federal reference method 25 incorporating the Byron analysis, as described in R  
336.2004, or an alternate method that is acceptable to the department. federal reference  
methods as described in R 336.2004, must be used as applicable for the determination of  
the volumetric flow rate in the effluent gas.  
(b) When an add-on emissions control device is used that recovers volatile organic  
compounds, the reduction efficiency of the device must be determined by using 1 of the  
following methods:  
(i) A mass balance of the products used and the products recovered, using the following  
equation:  
M r  
M
=
Rr  
(ii) An alternate method that is acceptable to the department.  
(iii) If there is only 1 add-on emissions control device used on a coating line or a graphic  
arts line, use the value calculated for "R " pursuant to paragraph (i) or (ii) of this  
r
subdivision as the value for R in subsequent calculations.  
T
(c) If there is more than 1 add-on emissions control device used on a coating line or a  
graphic arts line, calculate the overall reduction efficiency by using the following equation:  
s
=
(
)
RT  
Rr NT r  
r=1  
(12) Compliance with the specified emission limit must be determined using 1 of the  
following methods, as applicable, based on the form of the emission limit:  
(a) For coating lines that do not have an add-on emissions control device for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
coating, minus water, as applied, use either of the following methods:  
(i) If only 1 coating is used on the coating line during the averaging time, use the  
following method:  
(A) Determine the volatile organic compound content of the coating, minus water, as  
applied, "P," by using the method described in subrule (5) of this rule.  
(B) If "P" is less than or equal to the specified emission limit, the coating line meets the  
emission limit.  
Page 85  
(ii) If more than 1 coating of the same coating category is used on the coating line during  
the averaging period, use the following method:  
(A) Determine the volatile organic compound content of each coating, minus water, as  
applied, that belongs to the same coating category "P" used during the averaging period by  
using the method described in subrule (5) of this rule.  
(B) Determine the weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging  
period "M" by using the method described in subrule (6) of this rule.  
(C) Determine the total volume of coatings used on the coating line during the averaging  
period "GT" using the following equation:  
z
=
GT  
Lci  
i=1  
(D) Determine the volume-weighted average weight of volatile organic compounds per  
gallon, minus water, as applied, by using the following equation:  
M
=
Pa  
GT  
(E) If "Pa" is less than or equal to the specified emission limit, the coating line meets  
the emission limit.  
(b) For coating lines that have 1 or more add-on emissions control devices for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
coating, minus water, as applied, use the following method:  
(i) Convert the specified emission limit to a modified emission limit "B" expressed in  
pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of coating solids, as applied, by using the  
following equation:  
E
B=  
E
1-  
7.36  
(ii) Determine the volatile organic compound content of each coating, minus water, as  
applied, that belongs to the same coating category "P" used during the averaging period by  
using the method described in subrule (5) of this rule.  
(iii) Determine the weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging  
period "M" by using the method described in subrule (6) of this rule.  
(iv) Determine the total volume of coating solids used during the averaging period "V"  
by using the method described in subrule (7) of this rule.  
(v) Determine the overall capture efficiency "N" by using the method described in  
subrule (10) of this rule.  
(vi) Determine the overall reduction efficiency "RT" by using the method described in  
subrule (11) of this rule.  
(vii) Determine the volume-weighted average weight of volatile organic compounds per  
gallon of coating solids, as applied, "Pb," by using the following equation:  
M
=
(1-  
)
RT  
Pb  
V
(viii) If "Pb" is less than or equal to the modified limit "B," the coating line meets the  
emission limit.  
Page 86  
(c) For coating lines that do not have an add-on emissions control device for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
coating solids, as applied, use the following method:  
(i) Determine the volatile organic compound content of each coating, minus water, as  
applied, that belongs to the same coating category "P" used during the averaging period by  
using the method described in subrule (5) of this rule.  
(ii) Determine the weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging  
period "M" by using the method described in subrule (6) of this rule.  
(iii) Determine the total volume of coating solids used during the averaging period "V"  
by using the method described in subrule (7) of this rule.  
(iv) Determine the volume-weighted average weight of volatile organic compounds per  
gallon of coating solids, as applied, "Pc," by using the following equation:  
M
=
Pc  
V
(v) If "Pc" is less than or equal to the specified limit, the coating line meets the emission  
limit.  
(d) For coating lines that have 1 or more add-on emissions control devices for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
coating solids, as applied, use the following method:  
(i) Determine the volatile organic compound content of each coating, minus water, as  
applied, that belongs to the same coating category "P" used during the averaging period by  
using the method described in subrule (5) of this rule.  
(ii) Determine the weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging  
period "M" by using the method described in subrule (6) of this rule.  
(iii) Determine the total volume of coating solids used during the averaging period "V"  
by using the method described in subrule (7) of this rule.  
(iv) Determine the overall capture efficiency "N" by using the method described in  
subrule (10) of this rule.  
(v) Determine the overall reduction efficiency "RT" by using the method described in  
subrule (11) of this rule.  
(vi) Determine the volume-weighted average weight of volatile organic compounds per  
gallon of coating solids, as applied, "Pd," by using the following equation:  
M
=
(1-  
)
RT  
Pd  
V
(vii) If "Pd" is less than or equal to the specified limit, the coating line meets the emission  
limit.  
(e) For coating lines that do not have an add-on emissions control device for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
applied coating solids, use the following method:  
(i) Determine the volatile organic compound content of each coating, minus water, as  
applied, that belongs to the same coating category "P" used during the averaging period by  
using the method described in subrule (5) of this rule.  
(ii) Determine the weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging  
period "M" by using the method described in subrule (6) of this rule.  
(iii) Determine the total volume of coating solids used during the averaging period "V"  
by using the method described in subrule (7) of this rule.  
Page 87  
(iv) Determine the overall transfer efficiency "T" by using the method described in  
subrule (9) of this rule.  
(v) Determine the volume-weighted average weight of volatile organic compounds per  
gallon of applied coating solids "Pe" by using the following equation:  
M
(T)  
=
Pe  
V
100  
(vi) If "Pe" is less than or equal to the specified limit, the coating line meets the emission  
limit.  
(f) For coating lines that have 1 or more add-on emissions control devices for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
applied coating solids, use the following method:  
(i) Determine the volatile organic compound content of each coating, minus water, as  
applied, that belongs to the same coating category "P" used during the averaging period by  
using the method described in subrule (5) of this rule.  
(ii) Determine the weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging  
period "M" by using the method described in subrule (6) of this rule.  
(iii) Determine the total volume of coating solids used during the averaging period "V"  
by using the method described in subrule (7) of this rule.  
(iv) Determine the overall transfer efficiency "T" by using the method described in  
subrule (9) of this rule.  
(v) Determine the overall capture efficiency "N" by using the method described in  
subrule (10) of this rule.  
(vi) Determine the overall reduction efficiency "RT" by using the method described in  
subrule (11) of this rule.  
(vii) Determine the volume-weighted average weight of volatile organic compounds per  
gallon of applied coating solids "Pf" by using the following equation:  
M
=
(1-  
)
RT  
P f  
(T)  
V
100  
(viii) If "Pf" is less than or equal to the specified limit, the coating line meets the emission  
limit.  
(g) For graphic arts lines that do not have an add-on emissions control device for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per pound of solids,  
as applied, use the following method:  
(i) Determine the volatile organic compound content of each ink and coating, minus  
water, as applied, "P," used during the averaging period by using the method described in  
subrule (5) of this rule.  
(ii) Determine the weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging  
period "M" by using the method described in subrule (6) of this rule.  
(iii) Determine the weight of ink and coating solids used during the averaging period  
"W" by using the method described in subrule (8) of this rule.  
(iv) Determine the average pounds of volatile organic compound per pound of solids, as  
applied, "Pg," by using the following equation:  
Page 88  
M
W
=
Pg  
(v) If "Pg" is less than or equal to the specified limit, the graphic arts line meets the  
emission limit.  
(h) For graphic arts lines that have 1 or more add-on emissions control devices for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per pound of solids,  
as applied, use the following method:  
(i) Determine the volatile organic compound content of each ink and coating, minus  
water, as applied, "P," used during the averaging period by using the method described in  
subrule (5) of this rule.  
(ii) Determine the weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging  
period "M" by using the method described in subrule (6) of this rule.  
(iii) Determine the weight of ink and coating solids used during the averaging period  
"W" by using the method described in subrule (8) of this rule.  
(iv) Determine the overall capture efficiency "N" by using the method described in  
subrule (10) of this rule.  
(v) Determine the overall reduction efficiency "Rt" by using the method described in  
subrule (11) of this rule.  
(vi) Determine the average pounds of volatile organic compound per pound of solids, as  
applied, "Ph," by using the following equation:  
M
=
(1-  
)
RT  
Ph  
W
(vii) If "Ph" is less than or equal to the specified limit, the graphic arts line meets the  
emission limit.  
(i) For flatwood paneling coating lines that do not have an add-on emissions control  
device for which emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compound per  
1,000 square feet of coated finished product, use the following method:  
(i) Determine the volatile organic compound content of each coating, minus water, as  
applied that belongs to the same coating category "P" used during the averaging period by  
using the method described in subrule (5) of this rule.  
(ii) Determine the weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging  
period "M" by using the method described in subrule (6) of this rule.  
(iii) Determine the total surface area of coated finished product for the coating category  
during the averaging period "sq".  
(iv) Determine the volume-weighted average pounds of volatile organic compounds per  
1,000 square feet of coated finished product "Pi" by using the following equation:  
M
sq  
=
Pi  
1,000  
Where the units for the term 1,000 are square feet.  
(v) If "Pi" is less than or equal to the specified limit, the coating line meets the emission  
limit.  
(j) For flatwood paneling coating lines that have 1 or more add-on emissions control  
devices for which emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds  
per 1,000 square feet of coated finished product, use the following method:  
Page 89  
(i) Determine the volatile organic compound content of each coating, minus water, as  
applied, that belongs to the same coating category "P" used during the averaging period by  
using the method described in subrule (5) of this rule.  
(ii) Determine the weight of volatile organic compounds used during the specified  
averaging period "M" by using the method described in subrule (6) of this rule.  
(iii) Determine the total surface area of coated finished product for the coating category  
during the averaging period "sq".  
(iv) Determine the overall capture efficiency "N" by using the method described in  
subrule (10) of this rule.  
(v) Determine the overall reduction efficiency "RT" by using the method described in  
subrule (11) of this rule.  
(vi) Determine the volume-weighted average pounds of volatile organic compounds per  
1,000 square feet of coated finished product "Pj" by using the following equation:  
M
sq  
1,000  
=
(1-  
)
RT  
P j  
Where the units for the term 1,000 are square feet.  
(vii) If "Pj" is less than or equal to the specified limit, the coating line meets the emission  
limit.  
History: 1993 AACS; 2002 AACS; 2025 AACS.  
R 336.2041 Recordkeeping requirements for coating lines and graphic arts lines.  
Rule 1041. (1) Unless otherwise specified in any of the following, the recordkeeping  
requirements specified in this rule must apply to coating lines and graphic arts lines subject  
to emission limits contained in any of the following:  
(a) These rules.  
(b) A permit to install.  
(c) A permit to operate.  
(d) A voluntary agreement.  
(e) A performance contract.  
(f) A stipulation.  
(g) An order of the department.  
(h) A renewable operating permit.  
(2) If a coating line does not have an add-on emissions control device for which emission  
limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of coating, minus  
water, as applied, and if only 1 coating is used on the coating line during the averaging  
time, then a person shall keep records of the name, identification number, volume "Lci,"  
and volatile organic compound content of the coating, minus water, as applied, "P," used  
during the averaging period, as described in R 336.2040(5). If this single coating used  
during an averaging period is in compliance with all of the emission limits specified in  
subrule (1) of this rule, then the volume "Lci" for the averaging period may be calculated,  
based on coating usage records during a time period of not more than 1 month, with the  
Page 90  
coating usage prorated to the specified averaging period using a method approved by the  
department for that coating line.  
(3) If a coating line does not have an add-on emissions control device for which emission  
limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of coating, minus  
water, as applied, and if more than 1 coating of the same coating category is used on the  
coating line during the averaging period, then a person shall keep all of the following  
records:  
(a) The name, identification number, volume "Lci," and volatile organic compound  
content of each coating, minus water, as applied, that belongs to the same coating category  
"P" used during the averaging period, as described in R 336.2040(5). If all coatings used  
on the coating line during an averaging period are in compliance with all of the emission  
limits specified in subrule (1) of this rule, then the volume "Lci" for the averaging period  
may be calculated, based upon coating usage records during a time period of not more than  
1 month, with the coating usage prorated to the specified averaging period using a method  
approved by the department for that coating line.  
(b) The weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging period "M," as  
described in R 336.2040(6).  
(c) The total volume of coatings used on the coating line during the averaging period  
"GT," as described in R 336.2040(12).  
(d) The volume-weighted average weight of volatile organic compounds per gallon,  
minus water, as applied, "Pa," as described in R 336.2040(12).  
(4) If a coating line has 1 or more add-on emissions control devices for which emission  
limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of coating, minus  
water, as applied, then a person shall keep all of the following records:  
(a) The name, identification number, volume "Lci," and volatile organic compound  
content of each coating, minus water, as applied, that belongs to the same coating category  
"P" used during the averaging period, as described in R 336.2040(5).  
(b) The weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging period "M," as  
described in R 336.2040(6).  
(c) The total volume of coating solids and volume of ink or coating "Ldi" used during the  
averaging period "V," as described in R 336.2040(7).  
(d) The overall capture efficiency "N," as described in R 336.2040(10).  
(e) The overall reduction efficiency "Rt, " as described in R 336.2040(11), including the  
parameters "Qza," "Cza," "Qim," "Cim," and "Mr."  
(f) The volume-weighted average weight of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
coating solids, as applied, "Pb," as described in R 336.2040(12).  
(5) If a coating line does not have an add-on emissions control device for which emission  
limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of coating solids,  
as applied, then a person shall keep all of the following records:  
(a) The name, identification number, volume "Lci," and volatile organic compound  
content of each coating, minus water, as applied, that belongs to the same coating category  
"P" used during the averaging period, as described in R 336.2040(5).  
(b) The weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging period "M," as  
described in R 336.2040(6).  
(c) The total volume of coating solids and volume of ink or coating "Ldi" used during the  
averaging period "V," as described in R 336.2040(7).  
Page 91  
(d) The volume-weighted average weight of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
coating solids, as applied, "Pc," as described in R 336.2040(12).  
(6) If a coating line has 1 or more add-on emissions control devices for which emission  
limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of coating solids,  
as applied, then a person shall keep all of the following records:  
(a) The name, identification number, volume "Lci," and volatile organic compound  
content of each coating, minus water, as applied, that belongs to the same coating category  
"P" used during the averaging period, as described in R 336.2040(5).  
(b) The weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging period "M," as  
described in R 336.2040(6).  
(c) The total volume of coating solids and volume of ink or coating "Ldi" used during the  
averaging period "V," as described in R 336.2040(7).  
(d) The overall capture efficiency "N," as described in R 336.2040(10).  
(e) The overall reduction efficiency "Rt," as described in R 336.2040(11), including the  
parameters "Qza," "Cza," "Qim," "Cim," and "Mr."  
(f) The volume-weighted average weight of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
coating solids, as applied, "Pd," as described in R 336.2040(12).  
(7) If a coating line does not have an add-on emissions control device for which emission  
limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of applied coating  
solids, then a person shall keep all of the following records:  
(a) The name, identification number, volume "Lci," and volatile organic compound  
content of each coating, minus water, as applied, that belongs to the same coating category  
"P" used during the averaging period, as described in R 336.2040(5).  
(b) The weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging period "M," as  
described in R 336.2040(6).  
(c) The total volume of coating solids and volume of ink or coating "Ldi" used during the  
averaging period "V," as described in R 336.2040(7).  
(d) The overall transfer efficiency "T," as described in R 336.2040(9), including "Ti" and  
"Uci".  
(e) The volume-weighted average weight of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
applied coating solids "Pe," as described in R 336.2040(12).  
(8) If a coating line has 1 or more add-on emissions control devices for which emission  
limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per gallon of applied coating  
solids, then a person shall keep all of the following records:  
(a) The name, identification number, volume "Lci," and volatile organic compound  
content of each coating, minus water, as applied, that belongs to the same coating category  
"P" used during the averaging period, as described in R 336.2040(5).  
(b) The weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging period "M," as  
described in R 336.2040(6).  
(c) The total volume of coating solids and volume of ink or coating "Ldi" used during the  
averaging period "V," as described in R 336.2040(7).  
(d) The overall transfer efficiency "T," as described in R 336.2040(9), including "Ti" and  
"Uci".  
(e) The overall capture efficiency "N," as described in R 336.2040(10).  
(f) The overall reduction efficiency "Rt," as described in R 336.2040(11), including the  
parameters "Qza," "Cza," "Qim," "Vim," and "Mr."  
Page 92  
(g) The volume-weighted average weight of volatile organic compounds per gallon of  
applied coating solids "Pf," as described in R 336.2040(12).  
(9) If a graphic arts line does not have an add-on emissions control device for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per pound of solids,  
then a person shall keep all of the following records:  
(a) The name, identification number, volume "Lci," and volatile organic compound  
content of each ink and coating, minus water, as applied, "P," used during the averaging  
period, as described in R 336.2040(5).  
(b) The weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging period "M," as  
described in R 336.2040(6).  
(c) The weight of ink and coating solids used during the averaging period "W," as  
described in R 336.2040(8), including "Wci" and "Ldi."  
(d) The average pounds of volatile organic compound per pound of solids, as applied,  
"Pg," as described in R 336.2040(12).  
(10) If a graphic arts line has 1 or more add-on emissions control devices for which  
emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per pound of solids,  
as applied, then a person shall keep all of the following records:  
(a) The name, identification number, volume "Lci," and volatile organic compound  
content of each ink and coating, minus water, as applied, "P," used during the averaging  
period, as described in R 336.2040(5).  
(b) The weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging period "M," as  
described in R 336.2040(6).  
(c) The weight of ink and coating solids used during the averaging period "W," as  
described in R 336.2040(8), including "Wci" and "Ldi."  
(d) The overall capture efficiency "N," as described in R 336.2040(10).  
(e) The overall reduction efficiency "Rt," as described in R 336.2040(11), including the  
parameters "Qza," "Cza," "Qim," "Cim," and "Mr."  
(f) The average pounds of volatile organic compound per pound of solids, as applied,  
"Ph," as described in R 336.2040(12).  
(11) If a flatwood paneling coating line does not have an add-on emissions control device  
for which emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compound per 1,000  
square feet of coated finished product, then a person shall keep all of the following records:  
(a) The name, identification number, volume "Lci," and volatile organic compound  
content of each coating, minus water, as applied, "P," used during the averaging period, as  
described in R 336.2040(5).  
(b) The weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging period "M," as  
described in R 336.2040(6).  
(c) The total surface area of coated finished product for the coating category during the  
averaging period "sq," as described in R 336.2040(3).  
(d) The volume-weighted average pounds of volatile organic compounds per 1,000  
square feet of coated finished product "Pi," as described in R 336.2040(12).  
(12) If a flatwood paneling coating line has 1 or more add-on emissions control devices  
for which emission limits are expressed in pounds of volatile organic compounds per 1,000  
square feet of coated finished product, then a person shall keep all of the following records:  
Page 93  
(a) The name, identification number, volume "Lci," and volatile organic compound  
content of each coating, minus water, as applied, "P," used during the averaging period, as  
described in R 336.2040(5).  
(b) The weight of volatile organic compounds used during the averaging period "M," as  
described in R 336.2040(6).  
(c) The total surface area of coated finished product for the coating category during the  
averaging period "sq," as described in R 336.2040(3).  
(d) The overall capture efficiency "N," as described in R 336.2040(10).  
(e) The overall reduction efficiency "Rt," as described in R 336.2040(11), including the  
parameters "Qza," "Cza," "Qim," "Cim," and "Mr."  
(f) The volume-weighted average pounds of volatile organic compounds per 1,000 square  
feet of coated finished product "Pj," as described in R 336.2040(12).  
(13) An owner or operator of primer surfacer or topcoat operations subject to emission  
limits in R 336.1610(11), table 62 or R 336.1610a(4), table 64-a, shall keep records as  
required in the publication entitled "Protocol for Determining the Daily Volatile Organic  
Compound Emission Rate of Automobile and Light-duty Truck Topcoat Operations,"  
EPA-453/R-08/002adopted by reference in R 336.1902.  
(14) The records that are required in this rule must be retained for a period of not less than  
2 complete years after the date of collection and, on request by the department, must be  
submitted to the department in an acceptable format.  
History: 1993 AACS; 1998-2000 AACS; 2002 AACS; 2025 AACS.  
R 336.2060 Procedures for determination of compliance with R 336.1631.  
Rule 1060. The following procedures shall be used for the determination of compliance  
with R 336.1631:  
(a) The following procedure shall be used for the determination of compliance with  
R 336.1631 emission limitations expressed as pounds of volatile organic compound per  
1,000 pounds of polystyrene resin, dry organic resin, or completed organic resin produced:  
(i) Principle. Compliance with R 336.1631 is determined after determining all of the  
following:  
(A) The concentration of volatile organic compounds in the effluent gas vented to the  
atmosphere.  
(B) The flow rate of effluent gas vented to the atmosphere.  
(C) The pounds of polystyrene resin, completed organic resin, or dry organic resin  
produced over a period of time or per batch.  
(D) The length of time for each stage of the resin manufacturing operation.  
(ii) Applicability. This procedure is applicable for the determination of compliance with  
R 336.1631 emission limits expressed as pounds of volatile organic compound per 1,000  
pounds of polystyrene, completed organic, or dry organic resin produced.  
(iii) All of the following provisions apply to procedure:  
(A) The concentration of volatile organic compounds in the effluent gas vented to the  
atmosphere shall be determined using federal reference method 25, as described in  
R 336.2004, or an equivalent method approved by the department. A sample shall be taken  
from each vent emitting volatile organic compounds on all material recovery equipment  
and on all reactors, thinning tanks, and blending tanks. The samples shall be taken at a  
Page 94  
point between the last piece of control equipment on the vent and the vent opening to the  
atmosphere. Two samples shall be taken during each time period or stage in the  
manufacturing process represented by a process change. The results of the 2 samples shall  
be averaged.  
(B) The flow rate of effluent gas vented to the atmosphere shall be determined using  
federal reference methods 1 and 2, as described in R 336.2004, or an equivalent method  
approved by the department. The flow rate shall be measured in conjunction with the  
sampling as required in subparagraph (A) of this paragraph. The flow chart shall be  
measured at a point between the last piece of control equipment on the vent and the vent  
opening to the atmosphere. The flow rates shall be measured on each vent stack of each  
piece of equipment affected by the emission limits referred to in this subdivision. Flow  
rates shall be measured on each piece of equipment from which the samples referred to in  
subparagraph (A) of this paragraph are taken.  
(C) The pounds of polystyrene resin, completed organic resin, or dry organic resin  
produced shall be determined from plant production data.  
(D) The length of time for each stage of a resin manufacturing operation shall be  
determined from plant records.  
(iv) All of the following provisions apply to carrying out calculations:  
(A) Nomenclature.  
Csv = Concentration of volatile organic compound in the effluent gas flowing through  
stack v during stage s before venting to the atmosphere (pounds per cubic feet).  
M = Total mass of volatile organic compound emitted through all stacks for every stage  
of the resin manufacturing operation per batch, or per calendar day for continuous  
processes (pounds of volatile organic compound).  
K = Total mass of polystyrene resin, completed organic resin, or dry organic resin  
produced per batch or per calendar day for continuous processes (pounds of resin).  
Qsv = Volumetric flow rate of the effluent gas flowing through stack v during stage s  
(cubic feet per minute).  
R = Actual emission rate from a resin manufacturing process (pounds of volatile organic  
compound per 1,000 pounds of polystyrene resin, completed organic resin, or dry organic  
resin produced).  
Ts = Time period for each stage of the resin manufacturing process (minutes).  
(B) The following equations shall be used:  
(1) Calculate the total mass of volatile organic compound emitted from affected stacks  
for every stage of the resin manufacturing process using the following equation, where "a"  
is the total number of stages of the resin manufacturing process and "b" is the total number  
of stacks emitting volatile organic compound and involved in the manufacture of a resin  
affected by R 336.1631:  
Page 95  
a
b
M =  
QSV  
CSV  
TS  
   
s=1 v=1  
(2) Calculate the actual emission rate from material recovery equipment used in the  
manufacture of polystyrene resin, and from reactors, thinning tanks, and blending tanks  
used in the manufacture of completed organic resin and dry organic resin, using the  
following equation:  
(1000) M  
R =  
K
If "R" is less than or equal to the required emission limit expressed as pounds of volatile  
organic compound per 1,000 pounds of polystyrene resin, completed organic resin, or dry  
organic resin produced for the affected resin operation, the resin operation meets the  
emission limit.  
(b) The following procedure shall be used for the determination of compliance with the  
R 336.1631 emission limit requiring control equipment to reduce the total volatile organic  
compound emissions from reactors, thinning tanks, and blending tanks by 95 weight  
percent:  
(i) Principle. Compliance with R 336.1631 is determined after determining all of the  
following:  
(A) The concentration of volatile organic compounds in the effluent gas vented to the  
atmosphere.  
(B) The concentration of volatile organic compounds in the effluent gas vented to the first  
piece of control equipment following the reactors, thinning tanks, or blending tanks.  
(C) The flow rate of the effluent gas vented to the atmosphere and vented to the first piece  
of control equipment following the reactors, thinning tanks, or blending tanks.  
(ii) Applicability. This procedure is applicable for the determination of compliance with  
the R 336.1631 emission limit requiring control equipment to reduce the total volatile  
organic compound emissions from reactors, thinning tanks, and blending tanks by 95  
weight percent.  
(iii) All of the following provisions apply to procedure:  
(A) The concentration of volatile organic compounds in the effluent gas vented to the  
atmosphere shall be determined using federal reference method 25, as described in  
R 336.2004, or an equivalent method approved by the department. A sample shall be taken  
from each vent emitting volatile organic compounds on all reactors, thinning tanks, and  
blending tanks. The samples shall be taken at a point between the last piece of control  
equipment on the vent and the vent opening to the atmosphere. Two samples shall be taken  
during each time period or stage in the manufacturing process represented by a process  
change. The results of the 2 samples shall be averaged.  
(B) The concentration of volatile organic compounds in the effluent gas vented from  
reactors, thinning tanks, and blending tanks shall be determined using federal reference  
method 25, as described in R 336.2004, or an equivalent method approved by the  
department. A sample shall be taken from each vent containing volatile organic compounds  
on all reactors, thinning tanks, and blending tanks. The samples shall be taken at a point on  
the vent immediately before entering the first piece of control equipment from the reactor,  
thinning tank, or blending tank. Two samples shall be taken at each time period or stage in  
the manufacturing process represented by a process change. The results of the 2 samples  
shall be averaged.  
Page 96  
(C) The flow rate of the effluent gas vented to the atmosphere and vented from reactors,  
thinning tanks, and blending tanks shall be determined using federal reference methods 1  
and 2, as described in R 336.2004, or an equivalent method approved by the department.  
The flow rate shall be measured in conjunction with the sampling as required in  
subparagraphs (A) and (B) of this paragraph. The flow rate shall be measured at a point  
between the last piece of control equipment on the vent and the vent opening to the  
atmosphere and also at a point between the reactor, thinning tank, or blending tank and the  
piece of control equipment nearest the reactor, thinning tank, or blending tank. The flow  
rates shall be measured on each piece of equipment from which the samples referred to in  
subparagraphs (A) and (B) of this paragraph are taken.  
(iv) All of the following provisions apply to carrying out calculations:  
(A) Nomenclature.  
Csv = Concentration of volatile organic compound in the effluent gas flowing through  
stack v during stage s before venting to the atmosphere (pounds per cubic feet).  
C1 = Concentration of volatile organic compound in the effluent gas leaving the reactor,  
sv  
thinning tank, or blending tank and flowing through stack v during stage s (pounds per  
cubic feet).  
M = Total mass of volatile organic compound emitted to the atmosphere through the  
stacks of all reactors, thinning tanks, and blending tanks for every stage of the resin  
manufacturing operation (pounds of volatile organic compounds per minute).  
M1 = Total mass of volatile organic compound leaving all the reactors, thinning tanks,  
and blending tanks through the stacks for every stage of the resin manufacturing process  
(pounds of volatile organic compound per minute).  
P = Actual weight percent of volatile organic compound emissions reduced by control  
equipment from all reactors, thinning tanks, and blending tanks (percent).  
Qsv = Volumetric flow rate of the effluent gas flowing through stack v during stage s  
(cubic feet per minute).  
Q1 = Volumetric flow rate of the effluent gas leaving the reactor, thinning tank, and  
sv  
blending tank and flowing through stack v during stage s (cubic feet per minute).  
(B) The following equations shall be used:  
(1) Calculate the total mass of volatile organic compound emitted from affected stacks  
for every stage of the resin manufacturing process using the following equation, where "a"  
is the total number of stages of the resin manufacturing process and "b" is the total number  
of stacks emitting volatile organic compound and involved in the manufacture of a resin  
affected by R 336.1631:  
a
b
M =  
QSV  
CSV  
   
s=1 v=1  
Page 97  
(2) Calculate the total mass of volatile organic compound leaving reactors, thinning tanks,  
and blending tanks through affected stacks for every stage of the resin manufacturing  
process using the following equation, where "a" is the total number of stages of the resin  
manufacturing process and "b" is the total number of stacks emitting volatile organic  
compound and involved in the manufacture of a resin affected by R 336.1631:  
Aa  
b
M1 =  
Q1SV C1SV  
   
s=1 v=1  
(3) Calculate the actual weight percent of volatile organic compound emissions reduced  
by control equipment from all reactors, thinning tanks, and blending tanks using the  
following equation:  
M
M1  
P = 1 -  
100  
If "P" is equal to or greater than 95, the resin operation meets the emission limit.  
History: 1989 AACS; 2002 AACS.  
Page 98  
;