executive secretary shall provide prompt written notice of the termination to all persons of
whom inquiry was made. The board may issue a report of its actions.
(5) If the board determines that the matter cannot be resolved under subrule (3) or (4),
then the board may schedule a hearing.
History: 1979 AC; 2006 AACS.
R 15.8 Hearings.
Rule 8. (1) The board may hold a hearing to further review the merits of a complaint, a
request for an advisory opinion, or upon conclusion of an investigation.
(2) Not fewer than 28 calendar days before the date of the hearing, the executive secretary
shall notify any interested party and shall post the notice on the board's website. The
notice shall state the time, place, date, case name, and questions to be heard at the hearing
as determined by the board.
(3) Hearings may be held before the entire board, before one or more designated voting
members of the board, or before a hearing officer designated to conduct the hearing. If the
hearing is conducted before the board or designated members, then the chairperson of the
board shall preside over the hearings, or in the chairperson's absence, members of the board
shall appoint a board member as presiding officer. A member of the board, a hearing
officer, agent or employee of the board shall not have direct or indirect ex-parte
communication with any person in connection with any issue involved in a scheduled
hearing except with the members of the board or its agents or employees.
(4) The presiding board member or hearing officer shall do any of the following:
(a) Administer oaths as deemed appropriate by the board.
(b) Request the attendance of any witnesses whose testimony, in the judgment of the
board, will aid in the conduct of its investigations.
(c) Request the production of books, papers, and other documentary evidence to aid the
board in its investigation.
(d) Fix the time and form for the submission of evidence or argument.
(e) Adjourn a hearing for good cause to such time, date, and place as the presiding board
member or hearing officer determines to be appropriate. The rules of evidence applicable
in the courts of the state need not be applied strictly in any hearing.
(5) The standard of review shall be the preponderance of the evidence. The complainant
shall have the burden of introducing the requisite evidence to prove the alleged unethical
conduct. The person requesting an advisory opinion or an investigation or the attorney
general shall have the burden of presenting facts or issues to the board for its consideration.
The person whose conduct is being questioned has all of the following rights:
(a) Be present.
(b) Be represented by counsel.
(c) Testify.
(d) Produce and examine witnesses.
(e) Cross-examine adverse witnesses.
(f) Introduce other evidence as may be material and relevant to the issues.
(6) At the conclusion of the hearing, the presiding board member or hearing officer may
request additional evidence or written argument concerning the subject matter to be
submitted within such time and in the form as the presiding board member or hearing
Page 6
Courtesy of Michigan Administrative Rules