(a) Beginning April 16, 2015, Lansing board of water and light, eckert power station,
units 1, 2, and 3 shall comply with the VLME unit provisions under R 336.2503(3) and
units 4, 5, and 6 shall each receive a mercury emission limit of 19 pounds (304 ounces) per
12-month rolling time period as determined at the end of each calendar month.
(b) Beginning April 16, 2015, the total mercury emission limit for Lansing board of water
and light, eckert power station, affected existing EGUs shall be 84 pounds (1,344 ounces)
per 12-month rolling time period as determined at the end of each calendar month.
(c) Beginning April 16, 2018, the total mercury emission limit for Lansing board of water
and light, eckert power station, affected existing EGUs shall be 57 pounds (912 ounces)
per 12-month rolling time period as determined at the end of each calendar month.
(d) Compliance with the mercury emission limits may be demonstrated using stationary
source-wide pooling.
(e) Not later than January 16 of the applicable compliance year, Lansing Board of water
and light eckert power station shall provide verification and certification of their proposed
compliance demonstration notification extension using written documentation under R
336.2509.
(f) If the owner or operator for Lansing board of water and light, eckert power station,
units 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 has obtained an extension of compliance for the federal MATS
pursuant to 40 C.F.R. 63.6(i), adopted by reference in R 336.1902, then the requirements
in subdivisions (a), (b), and (c) of this subrule are suspended for the duration of the
extension of compliance regardless of whether the federal MATS is an applicable
requirement.
(3) As an alternative to R 336.2503(1) or (3), the city of Marquette, shiras unit 3, and
Michigan south central power agency, endicott unit 1, may request on a case-by-case basis,
an alternative mercury standard as follows:
(a) The owner or operator of the existing EGU shall submit a demonstration of best
available control technology for mercury at an existing EGU not later than the end of
December before the applicable compliance year. The demonstration shall include, at a
minimum, a description of the mercury emission controls, mercury emissions data, and
mercury emissions reductions.
(b) The demonstration shall be subject to the review and approval of the department. The
department approval of an alternative mercury emission standard shall be based on the
information submitted. If the department determines the alternative mercury emission
standard does not demonstrate best available control technology for mercury at an existing
EGU, then the department may disapprove the plan in writing, stating its reasons for
disapproval, and require the existing EGU to comply with R 336.2503(1) or (3).
(c) If the owner or operator for the city of Marquette, shiras unit 3, or the owner or operator
for Michigan south central power agency, endicott unit 1, has obtained an extension of
compliance for the federal MATS pursuant to 40 C.F.R. 63.6(i), adopted by reference in R
336.1902, then the requirements in subdivision (a) and (b) of this subrule are suspended
for the duration of the extension of compliance regardless of whether the federal MATS is
an applicable requirement.
History: 2009 AACS; 2013 AACS.
R 336.2505 Baseline and coal analysis for input mercury levels.
Page 8
Courtesy of Michigan Administrative Rules