(3) A reasonable classification system is a system designed to group individuals or risks with
similar characteristics into rating classifications which are likely to identify significant differences
in mean anticipated losses or expenses, or both, between the groups, as determined by sound
actuarial principles and by actual and credible loss and expense statistics or, in the case of new
coverages or classifications, by reasonably anticipated loss and expense experience.
(4) Sound actuarial principles shall include, but not be limited to, all of the following principles:
(a) That data used in developing classifications and rates are derived from the experience of a
population or sample of risks that is sufficiently similar to the anticipated insured population so
that the statistics thereby obtained can reasonably be expected to produce representative and
reliable estimates of the anticipated loss and expense experience for the insured population and so
that such statistics are calculated in a manner that is suitable to their intended use.
(b) That a reasonable predictive relationship can be demonstrated to exist between a characteristic
used in defining a rating classification and anticipated losses, anticipated expenses, or the
uncertainty of loss for the risks to which the classification applies.
(c) That if rates for individual rating cells are calculated by means of arithmetic combinations of
relativities for the classifications defining those cells, the relativities are combined in a manner
that equitably reflects the anticipated loss and expense experience for those rating cells.
(d) That sampling techniques used in developing classifications and in estimating loss and
expense experience are suitable to their intended application.
(e) That with regard to private passenger automobile insurance and private residential property
insurance, rates for an insurance coverage provided are established in a manner that can reasonably
be anticipated to produce loss ratios which are substantially uniform among the classifications,
kinds, or types of individuals or risks to which the rates apply. Evaluation of loss ratios shall make
appropriate adjustments for differences in deductibles and limits of liability among insureds, for
expense provisions which are not allocated to premiums on a percentage-of-premium basis, and
for differences in contingency factors among classifications and shall give due consideration to the
credibility of experience for groupings of individuals or risks, to trends in past and prospective
loss experience, and to historical patterns between projected and realized loss ratios. For purposes
of this subrule, "substantially uniform" means the absence of significant variations among loss
ratios. This subrule shall not be construed to prohibit the use of appropriate pure premium
relativities to estimate or evaluate rate relativities.
(5) Data of an insurer or rating organization used in calculating actual and credible loss statistics
shall be of sufficient volume, or shall be combined in an appropriate manner with suitable data of
sufficient volume, so that the statistics thereby calculated are reasonably credible and can
reasonably be anticipated to produce reliable estimates of anticipated loss and expense experience.
(6) Data for reasonably anticipated experience used in calculating rates for new coverages and in
establishing new classifications shall, to the extent possible, be based on actual experience for
similar coverages and for groups of risks similar to the proposed classification and shall be of
sufficient volume so that statistics thereby produced can reasonably be anticipated to produce
reliable estimates of loss and expense experience.
(7) Relevant external information, including general economic data and other indicators, may be
given due consideration in evaluating or projecting loss and expense experience.
History: 1980 AACS.
R 500.1208 Expense provisions.
Page 4