Thomas F. Kendziorski, Esq, President  
Sherri Boyd, Executive Director  
April 19, 2024  
TO: Michigan Department of Education, Office of Special Education  
RE: Arc Michigan comments on proposed rule changes, R 340. 1721b, R 340.1723c, and R 340.1733  
The Arc Michigan is a statewide organization of over 10,000 members and 28 local chapter affiliates that advocate  
with, and on behalf of, citizens with developmental disabilities and their families. We appreciate the opportunity to  
comment on the proposed changes to the Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education.  
R 340.1721 Rule 21b. (1) (a) Time lines  
We suggest adding wording that if a parent requests an evaluation verbally to the public agency, the public agency  
must document the verbal request and issue a written statement to the parent acknowledging the date they received the  
request for an evaluation.  
We understand that MDE OSE has explained to public agencies that if a parent makes a verbal request for an  
evaluation that they must document the request to show compliance with the timelines. Parents are reporting that they  
are making verbal requests for evaluations and schools are ignoring the requests. Parents are not receiving written  
notice about whether the school will complete the evaluation or the request for the evaluation is being denied.  
In addition to the statement acknowledging the parent’s request for an evaluation, the parent should be given written  
notice and the timeline for the evaluation process, such as the MDE OSE Guidance Document Initial Evaluation  
R 340.1721 Rule 21b (1) (b) Timelines  
New language states, “The parent shall provide the public agency with written parental consent to provide initial  
special education programs and services within 10 school days of receipt of notice of an initial offer of a free  
appropriate public education”. This suggests that a parent must give their consent to the initial IEP. Federal law states  
that a parent can refuse to give consent for an initial IEP and the school district cannot use mediation or due process  
procedures to obtain a ruling or agreement that the initial IEP services be provided. 34 CFR 300.300(b)  
We suggest adding wording that states the initial IEP cannot be implemented without informed, voluntary parental  
consent. 34 CFR 300.9  
Thank you for considering these comments. Please contact The Arc Michigan if you have any questions.  
Sincerely,  
Sherri Boyd, Executive Director, The Arc Michigan  
Michelle Driscoll, Chair, Education Committee, The Arc Michigan  
2023-76 Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education Online Public Comment  
COMPLETE  
Collector:  
Web Link 1 (Web Link)  
Started:  
Wednesday, March 20, 2024 9:15:26 AM  
Wednesday, March 20, 2024 9:23:17 AM  
00:07:50  
Last Modified:  
Time Spent:  
IP Address:  
206.57.189.66  
Page 2: Demographics  
Q1  
Respondent skipped this question  
Respondent skipped this question  
Individual  
First Name  
Q2  
Last Name  
Q3  
Are you providing comment as an individual or on behalf of  
an organization?  
Q4  
Respondent skipped this question  
Respondent skipped this question  
Teacher  
Email address  
Q5  
County of Residence  
Q6  
What role best describes you in taking this survey?  
Page 3: R 340.1721b Timelines  
Q7  
Support the change as written  
Do you support the proposed amendment to the title of R  
340.1721b?  
Q8  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1721b  
1
2023-76 Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education Online Public Comment  
Page 4: R 340.1721b(1)  
Q9  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R  
340.1721b(1)?  
Q10  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1721b(1)  
Page 5: R 340.1721b(2)  
Q11  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R  
340.1721b(2)?  
Q12  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1721b(2)  
Page 6: R 340.1723c(2)-(6)  
Q13  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R  
340.1723c(2)-(6)?  
Q14  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1723c(2)-(6)  
Page 7: R 340.1733(a)-(c)  
Q15  
Support with minor revisions  
How would you categorize your support of R 340.1733(a)-  
(c) ?  
Q16  
Specific comments about R 340.1733(a)-(c)  
Section A: *heating and cooling conditions  
Page 8: R 340.1733(d)  
2
2023-76 Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education Online Public Comment  
Q17  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R 340.1733(d)?  
Q18  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1733(d)  
Page 9: R 340.1733(e)-(g)  
Q19  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R 340.1733(e)-  
(g)?  
Q20  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1733(e)-(g)  
Page 10: R 340.1733(h)-(j)  
Q21  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R 340.1733(h)-  
(j)?  
Q22  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1733(h)-(j)  
3
2023-76 Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education Online Public Comment  
COMPLETE  
Collector:  
Web Link 1 (Web Link)  
Thursday, March 21, 2024 10:50:37 AM  
Thursday, March 21, 2024 10:58:39 AM  
00:08:01  
Started:  
Last Modified:  
Time Spent:  
IP Address:  
136.228.38.11  
Page 2: Demographics  
Q1  
First Name  
Beth  
Q2  
Last Name  
Longshore  
Q3  
Individual  
Are you providing comment as an individual or on behalf of  
an organization?  
Q4  
Email address  
Q5  
County of Residence  
Eaton  
Q6  
Community member  
What role best describes you in taking this survey?  
Page 3: R 340.1721b Timelines  
4
2023-76 Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education Online Public Comment  
Q7  
Support the change as written  
Do you support the proposed amendment to the title of R  
340.1721b?  
Q8  
Specific comments about R 340.1721b  
Rule 21b. (2) should specific whether it is the public agency in which the private school is located or the public agency in which the  
student is a resident.  
Page 4: R 340.1721b(1)  
Q9  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R  
340.1721b(1)?  
Q10  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1721b(1)  
Page 5: R 340.1721b(2)  
Q11  
Support with minor revisions  
How would you categorize your support of R  
340.1721b(2)?  
Q12  
Specific comments about R 340.1721b(2)  
Rule 21b. (2) - Should specific whether it is the public agency in which the private school is located or the public agency in which the  
student is a resident.  
Page 6: R 340.1723c(2)-(6)  
Q13  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R  
340.1723c(2)-(6)?  
Q14  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1723c(2)-(6)  
5
2023-76 Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education Online Public Comment  
Page 7: R 340.1733(a)-(c)  
Q15  
Support with major revisions  
How would you categorize your support of R 340.1733(a)-  
(c) ?  
Q16  
Specific comments about R 340.1733(a)-(c)  
All classrooms should be aligned with the age ranges of the school in which they are located regardless of program type (with the  
exception of High Schools where students must be able to attend until they age out of special education).  
More importantly, we should NOT have categorically based special education programs. It is profoundly contradictory to the intent and  
letter of the IDEA to have special education programs based on disability category.  
"Disability do not determine placement! So placements cannot be disability specific!"  
Page 8: R 340.1733(d)  
Q17  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R 340.1733(d)?  
Q18  
Specific comments about R 340.1733(d)  
All classrooms should be aligned with the age ranges of the school in which they are located regardless of program type (with the  
exception of High Schools where students must be able to attend until they age out of special education).  
More importantly, we should NOT have categorically based special education programs. It is profoundly contradictory to the intent and  
letter of the IDEA to have special education programs based on disability category.  
"Disability do not determine placement! So placements cannot be disability specific!"  
Page 9: R 340.1733(e)-(g)  
Q19  
Support with minor revisions  
How would you categorize your support of R 340.1733(e)-  
(g)?  
6
2023-76 Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education Online Public Comment  
Q20  
Specific comments about R 340.1733(e)-(g)  
All classrooms should be aligned with the age ranges of the school in which they are located regardless of program type (with the  
exception of High Schools where students must be able to attend until they age out of special education).  
More importantly, we should NOT have categorically based special education programs. It is profoundly contradictory to the intent and  
letter of the IDEA to have special education programs based on disability category.  
"Disability do not determine placement! So placements cannot be disability specific!"  
Page 10: R 340.1733(h)-(j)  
Q21  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R 340.1733(h)-  
(j)?  
Q22  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1733(h)-(j)  
7
2023-76 Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education Online Public Comment  
COMPLETE  
Collector:  
Web Link 1 (Web Link)  
Thursday, March 21, 2024 3:24:05 PM  
Thursday, March 21, 2024 3:25:59 PM  
00:01:54  
Started:  
Last Modified:  
Time Spent:  
IP Address:  
174.210.234.54  
Page 2: Demographics  
Q1  
Respondent skipped this question  
Respondent skipped this question  
Respondent skipped this question  
First Name  
Q2  
Last Name  
Q3  
Are you providing comment as an individual or on behalf of  
an organization?  
Q4  
Respondent skipped this question  
Respondent skipped this question  
Community member  
Email address  
Q5  
County of Residence  
Q6  
What role best describes you in taking this survey?  
Page 3: R 340.1721b Timelines  
Q7  
Oppose entirely  
Do you support the proposed amendment to the title of R  
340.1721b?  
Q8  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1721b  
8
2023-76 Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education Online Public Comment  
Page 4: R 340.1721b(1)  
Q9  
Oppose entirely  
How would you categorize your support of R  
340.1721b(1)?  
Q10  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1721b(1)  
Page 5: R 340.1721b(2)  
Q11  
Oppose entirely  
How would you categorize your support of R  
340.1721b(2)?  
Q12  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1721b(2)  
Page 6: R 340.1723c(2)-(6)  
Q13  
Oppose entirely  
How would you categorize your support of R  
340.1723c(2)-(6)?  
Q14  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1723c(2)-(6)  
Page 7: R 340.1733(a)-(c)  
Q15  
Oppose entirely  
How would you categorize your support of R 340.1733(a)-  
(c) ?  
Q16  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1733(a)-(c)  
Page 8: R 340.1733(d)  
9
2023-76 Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education Online Public Comment  
Q17  
Oppose entirely  
How would you categorize your support of R 340.1733(d)?  
Q18  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1733(d)  
Page 9: R 340.1733(e)-(g)  
Q19  
Oppose entirely  
How would you categorize your support of R 340.1733(e)-  
(g)?  
Q20  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1733(e)-(g)  
Page 10: R 340.1733(h)-(j)  
Q21  
Oppose entirely  
How would you categorize your support of R 340.1733(h)-  
(j)?  
Q22  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1733(h)-(j)  
10  
2023-76 Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education Online Public Comment  
COMPLETE  
Collector:  
Web Link 1 (Web Link)  
Friday, March 22, 2024 9:40:21 AM  
Friday, March 22, 2024 9:45:13 AM  
00:04:51  
Started:  
Last Modified:  
Time Spent:  
IP Address:  
23.28.156.149  
Page 2: Demographics  
Q1  
Respondent skipped this question  
Respondent skipped this question  
Respondent skipped this question  
First Name  
Q2  
Last Name  
Q3  
Are you providing comment as an individual or on behalf of  
an organization?  
Q4  
Respondent skipped this question  
Respondent skipped this question  
Prefer not to answer  
Email address  
Q5  
County of Residence  
Q6  
What role best describes you in taking this survey?  
Page 3: R 340.1721b Timelines  
Q7  
Support the change as written  
Do you support the proposed amendment to the title of R  
340.1721b?  
Q8  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1721b  
11  
2023-76 Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education Online Public Comment  
Page 4: R 340.1721b(1)  
Q9  
Support with minor revisions  
How would you categorize your support of R  
340.1721b(1)?  
Q10  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1721b(1)  
Page 5: R 340.1721b(2)  
Q11  
Support with major revisions  
How would you categorize your support of R  
340.1721b(2)?  
Q12  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1721b(2)  
Page 6: R 340.1723c(2)-(6)  
Q13  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R  
340.1723c(2)-(6)?  
Q14  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1723c(2)-(6)  
Page 7: R 340.1733(a)-(c)  
Q15  
Support with minor revisions  
How would you categorize your support of R 340.1733(a)-  
(c) ?  
Q16  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1733(a)-(c)  
Page 8: R 340.1733(d)  
12  
2023-76 Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education Online Public Comment  
Q17  
Respondent skipped this question  
How would you categorize your support of R 340.1733(d)?  
Q18  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1733(d)  
Page 9: R 340.1733(e)-(g)  
Q19  
Respondent skipped this question  
Respondent skipped this question  
How would you categorize your support of R 340.1733(e)-  
(g)?  
Q20  
Specific comments about R 340.1733(e)-(g)  
Page 10: R 340.1733(h)-(j)  
Q21  
Respondent skipped this question  
Respondent skipped this question  
How would you categorize your support of R 340.1733(h)-  
(j)?  
Q22  
Specific comments about R 340.1733(h)-(j)  
13  
2023-76 Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education Online Public Comment  
COMPLETE  
Collector:  
Web Link 1 (Web Link)  
Monday, April 01, 2024 9:01:58 AM  
Monday, April 01, 2024 9:42:35 AM  
00:40:36  
Started:  
Last Modified:  
Time Spent:  
IP Address:  
216.11.96.171  
Page 2: Demographics  
Q1  
First Name  
Shelley  
Q2  
Last Name  
Dickerson  
Q3  
Individual  
Are you providing comment as an individual or on behalf of  
an organization?  
Q4  
Email address  
Q5  
County of Residence  
Macomb  
Q6  
Other (please specify):  
ISD Compliance Monitor  
What role best describes you in taking this survey?  
Page 3: R 340.1721b Timelines  
14  
2023-76 Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education Online Public Comment  
Q7  
Support the change as written  
Do you support the proposed amendment to the title of R  
340.1721b?  
Q8  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1721b  
Page 4: R 340.1721b(1)  
Q9  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R  
340.1721b(1)?  
Q10  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1721b(1)  
Page 5: R 340.1721b(2)  
Q11  
Support with major revisions  
How would you categorize your support of R  
340.1721b(2)?  
Q12  
Specific comments about R 340.1721b(2)  
The separation of private and public school students is appreciated, particularly the removal of obligation to offer FAPE and to simply  
provide Prior Written Notice of a child's IDEA eligibility or ineligibility - in cases where the district of location is not the district of  
residence.  
It would be helpful if there was delineation between the obligation of the district of residence and district of location and their differing  
obligations. If this is not achieved through the MARSE rule, then perhaps statewide procedures can be developed and shared.  
MARSE should include a section for reevaluation requirements.  
MARSE should should include a section on Nonpublic Services Plan development.  
Page 6: R 340.1723c(2)-(6)  
Q13  
Support with major revisions  
How would you categorize your support of R  
340.1723c(2)-(6)?  
15  
2023-76 Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education Online Public Comment  
Q14  
Specific comments about R 340.1723c(2)-(6)  
Much like a request for a school based evaluation, districts should respond to verbal requests by notifying parent to put request in  
writing. If needed, districts can support parents with developing a written request. It would be very difficult for anyone to measure the  
timeline of a verbal request that is not in writing. Proposal to keep the "written" language in the rule.  
It is also requested that the seven calendar day timeline be changed to a 10 school day timeline; again, consistent with the  
requirements of a school based evaluation request.  
Page 7: R 340.1733(a)-(c)  
Q15  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R 340.1733(a)-  
(c) ?  
Q16  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1733(a)-(c)  
Page 8: R 340.1733(d)  
Q17  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R 340.1733(d)?  
Q18  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1733(d)  
Page 9: R 340.1733(e)-(g)  
Q19  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R 340.1733(e)-  
(g)?  
Q20  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1733(e)-(g)  
Page 10: R 340.1733(h)-(j)  
16  
2023-76 Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education Online Public Comment  
Q21  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R 340.1733(h)-  
(j)?  
Q22  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1733(h)-(j)  
17  
2023-76 Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education Online Public Comment  
COMPLETE  
Collector:  
Web Link 1 (Web Link)  
Started:  
Wednesday, April 03, 2024 11:54:29 AM  
Wednesday, April 03, 2024 11:57:27 AM  
00:02:58  
Last Modified:  
Time Spent:  
IP Address:  
66.219.112.2  
Page 2: Demographics  
Q1  
First Name  
Matthew  
Q2  
Last Name  
Smith  
Q3  
Individual  
Are you providing comment as an individual or on behalf of  
an organization?  
Q4  
Email address  
Q5  
County of Residence  
Clare  
Q6  
Community member  
What role best describes you in taking this survey?  
Page 3: R 340.1721b Timelines  
18  
2023-76 Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education Online Public Comment  
Q7  
Support the change as written  
Do you support the proposed amendment to the title of R  
340.1721b?  
Q8  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1721b  
Page 4: R 340.1721b(1)  
Q9  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R  
340.1721b(1)?  
Q10  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1721b(1)  
Page 5: R 340.1721b(2)  
Q11  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R  
340.1721b(2)?  
Q12  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1721b(2)  
Page 6: R 340.1723c(2)-(6)  
Q13  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R  
340.1723c(2)-(6)?  
Q14  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1723c(2)-(6)  
Page 7: R 340.1733(a)-(c)  
19  
2023-76 Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education Online Public Comment  
Q15  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R 340.1733(a)-  
(c) ?  
Q16  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1733(a)-(c)  
Page 8: R 340.1733(d)  
Q17  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R 340.1733(d)?  
Q18  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1733(d)  
Page 9: R 340.1733(e)-(g)  
Q19  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R 340.1733(e)-  
(g)?  
Q20  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1733(e)-(g)  
Page 10: R 340.1733(h)-(j)  
Q21  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R 340.1733(h)-  
(j)?  
Q22  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1733(h)-(j)  
20  
2023-76 Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education Online Public Comment  
COMPLETE  
Collector:  
Web Link 1 (Web Link)  
Tuesday, April 09, 2024 8:55:44 AM  
Tuesday, April 09, 2024 9:02:21 AM  
00:06:37  
Started:  
Last Modified:  
Time Spent:  
IP Address:  
207.179.104.195  
Page 2: Demographics  
Q1  
First Name  
Julie  
Q2  
Last Name  
Gordon  
Q3  
Organization, including non-profits, advocacy groups, Local  
Education Agencies, or Intermediate School Districts  
(Please provide name of organization below.):  
Northwest Education Services  
Are you providing comment as an individual or on behalf of  
an organization?  
Q4  
Email address  
Q5  
County of Residence  
29  
Q6  
School administrator and support  
What role best describes you in taking this survey?  
Page 3: R 340.1721b Timelines  
21  
2023-76 Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education Online Public Comment  
Q7  
Support with minor revisions  
Do you support the proposed amendment to the title of R  
340.1721b?  
Q8  
Specific comments about R 340.1721b  
In 347 21 b.(2) (e)(a) at the bottom of page 2 of the strikethrough copy, it discussed an evalaution "when appropriate." Could "when  
appropriate" be more specific?- maybe 'if the REED team detemines there is a need for an evaluation'.  
Also, it was unclear what the difference was between 'shall' vs. 'must'. Was there a grammar rule where 'shall' was kept vs. when it  
was replaced by 'must'?  
Page 4: R 340.1721b(1)  
Q9  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R  
340.1721b(1)?  
Q10  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1721b(1)  
Page 5: R 340.1721b(2)  
Q11  
Support with minor revisions  
How would you categorize your support of R  
340.1721b(2)?  
Q12  
Specific comments about R 340.1721b(2)  
In 347 21 b.(2) (e)(a) at the bottom of page 2 of the strikethrough copy, it discussed an evalaution "when appropriate." Could "when  
appropriate" be more specific?- maybe 'if the REED team detemines there is a need for an evaluation'.  
Also, it was unclear what the difference was between 'shall' vs. 'must'. Was there a grammar rule where 'shall' was kept vs. when it  
was replaced by 'must'?  
Page 6: R 340.1723c(2)-(6)  
22  
2023-76 Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education Online Public Comment  
Q13  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R  
340.1723c(2)-(6)?  
Q14  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1723c(2)-(6)  
Page 7: R 340.1733(a)-(c)  
Q15  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R 340.1733(a)-  
(c) ?  
Q16  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1733(a)-(c)  
Page 8: R 340.1733(d)  
Q17  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R 340.1733(d)?  
Q18  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1733(d)  
Page 9: R 340.1733(e)-(g)  
Q19  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R 340.1733(e)-  
(g)?  
Q20  
Respondent skipped this question  
Specific comments about R 340.1733(e)-(g)  
Page 10: R 340.1733(h)-(j)  
Q21  
Support the change as written  
How would you categorize your support of R 340.1733(h)-  
(j)?  
23  
2023-76 Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education Online Public Comment  
Q22  
Specific comments about R 340.1733(h)-(j)  
Respondent skipped this question  
24  
;