6A The Mining Journal  
Friday, May 3, 2024  
Good Advice  
Dear Annie  
Daughter seeks support, not judgment, from mother  
ear Annie: My  
mother, who  
is now 62, has  
Dear Struggling for In-  
dependence: It’s clear you  
value both your indepen-  
respect and understanding  
is a two-way street, and it’s glance at her and tell she  
OK to take the space you is ready to jump into the  
else is talking, you can  
the group. Have a private  
conversation with her,  
expressing your apprecia-  
D
always been a domi-  
dence and your relationship need to foster that.  
conversation and say how tion for her kindness and  
nant personality, keen  
on having things go her  
way. I’m 34, an indepen-  
dent graphic designer,  
and I pride myself on  
being self-sufficient  
and creative. But every  
time I share aspects of  
my life with her -- be it  
career choices, romantic  
partners or even smaller  
decisions like adopting a  
pet -- she critiques them,  
often unsolicitedly, mak-  
ing me second-guess my  
with your mother. Express-  
ing your need for support  
rather than criticism is not  
only reasonable but nec-  
essary for a healthy adult  
relationship.  
Dear Annie: My friends  
the same thing happened  
to her or her daughter.  
It’s exhausting.  
Other than that, she is  
a wonderful person. She  
would give you the shirt  
off her back and do any-  
thing for anybody. She is  
funny, kind and loving,  
and because of this, we  
humor, but also share how  
the group feels over-  
and I are a group of four  
women who have known  
each other since elemen-  
tary school. We recon-  
nected at a high school  
reunion and became very  
close. We are all retired  
and travel, have lunch  
dates, and spend the  
whelmed by her domi-  
nance in conversations. A  
friendship that’s endured  
as long as this one has can  
handle tough topics. Just  
remind her that you’re all  
coming from a good place,  
and that, by confronting  
It might be time for a  
gentle but firm conver-  
sation. Let her know that  
while you appreciate her  
desire to help, what you  
need most from her is trust  
in your judgment. Setting  
boundaries is important;  
you might decide to limit  
what personal details you  
share if her responses con-  
tinue to be unsupportive.  
nights together several  
times a year. There is  
one friend in the group  
who will not stop talking.  
She monopolizes every  
conversation and often  
tells the same story over  
and over again. Most of  
have silently endured. We this together head-on, your  
are planning a cruise next friendship will hopefully  
ANNIE LANE  
year and no one wants  
to room with her. We all  
hate confrontation and  
know she will be extreme-  
ly hurt if we say some-  
thing. Please help. What  
do we do? -- Exhausted  
Dear Exhausted: It  
only strengthen and grow.  
dodge the inevitable crit-  
icism. I understand she  
EDITOR’S NOTE: “Ask Me Any-  
thing: A Year of Advice From Dear  
Annie” is out now! Annie Lane’s  
debut book -- featuring favorite  
columns on love, friendship, fam-  
ily and etiquette -- is available as  
a paperback and e-book. Visit  
com for more information. Send  
your questions for Annie Lane to  
decisions. Her disapprov- might be doing this out  
al, which is always veiled  
as concern, is making me  
not want to be around  
her.  
I’m starting to avoid  
sharing any personal  
news with her at all to  
of love, but it feels more  
controlling than caring.  
How can I communicate  
my need for support  
This isn’t to create distance her stories are about her  
but to protect the relation- daughter and grandchil-  
ship you cherish with her.  
without her judgment?  
dren. She does this in per- sounds like your friend  
son and during telephone doesn’t realize how her  
calls. When someone behavior is impacting  
-- Struggling for Indepen- Remember, building a re-  
dence lationship based on mutual  
To Your Good Health  
Red light treatments for neuropathy don’t show much benefit  
EAR DR. ROACH:  
I have neuropathy  
in my left foot. It  
benefit while others do (which I was expecting),  
not. Even the two different all of which were favor-  
showing evidence that  
both electroconvulsive  
therapy and transcranial  
magnetic stimulation  
may work by restoring  
normal levels of cortical  
inhibition in the frontal  
lobes. The induced sei-  
zure activity relating to  
the treatment is respon-  
sible for the benefits seen available for everyone.  
through these therapies.  
It may be possible to  
achieve the same benefits  
with less-invasive treat-  
ments.  
with severe depression,  
having new options for  
therapy would be very  
welcome, as the medi-  
cations we have are not  
remotely 100% effective.  
In addition, psychologi-  
cal therapy, which is also  
very useful but seldom  
a complete cure, is not  
D
reviews came to different  
conclusions. What is clear  
is that there is a strong  
placebo response with this  
treatment. People who  
got a “sham” treatment  
(with a red light device  
that looked like the active  
device but did not provide  
the same type of infrared  
light energy) still noted  
able (which I was not  
expecting). Although  
feels very hot on the  
bottom. My neurologist  
thinks it is from my  
there have been highly  
negative portrayals of  
this treatment in movies  
and books, many people  
who actually underwent  
the treatment, as well as  
their family members  
and caregivers, wrote me  
to say that their experi-  
sugar level, but I got my  
A1C down from 6.2%  
to 5.6% and do not have  
neuropathy in my right  
foot. A friend said that he  
has had some relief with  
red light treatment, but  
he experiences tingling  
in his feet. Does red  
light have an effect with  
burning sensations? Are  
there any other options  
to consider for relief?  
-- M.B.  
EDITOR’S NOTE: Readers may  
email questions to ToYourGood-  
Health@med.cornell.edu or re-  
quest an order form of available  
health newsletters or mail ques-  
tions to P.O. Box 536475, Orlan-  
do, FL 32853-6475.  
improvement in symptoms. ence was “amazing.”  
In the best-done studies,  
the difference between the  
sugar levels does not make actual red-light device and  
One of my readers  
DR. KEITH ROACH, MD  
also alerted me to new  
research at University  
of California San Diego,  
As a clinician who  
treats many patients  
the condition go away,  
although it does help slow  
progression.  
Medication for diabetic  
neuropathy is pretty effec-  
the red light bulb wasn’t  
significant.  
Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs  
Bureau of Professional Licensing  
Being a conservative  
doctor, I won’t recom-  
mend this therapy unless  
ANSWER: The most  
classic neuropathy in  
people with diabetes is  
a symmetrical polyneu-  
ropathy, which usually  
affects both feet and may  
later affect both hands.  
(It’s possible you have  
this, and it just started on  
one side for some reason.)  
tive at treating the pain and there is clear evidence of  
burning, but not as good benefit from future studies.  
for numbness and tingling. I will note that multiple  
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING  
June 4, 2024  
9:00 a.m.  
Red light treatment, also  
called monochromatic in-  
frared energy, is provided  
burns have been reported,  
and government bodies  
have determined that red  
Location: 611 W. Ottawa Street, UL-5  
Lansing, Michigan  
by LEDs rather than lasers. light treatment is not a  
In theory, the light can  
reasonable and necessary  
treatment for diabetic or  
nondiabetic neuropathy.  
DR. ROACH WRITES:  
The hearing is held to receive public comments on the following administrative rules:  
There are many other types stimulate blood flow and  
Architects – General Rules  
(MOAHR #2023-047 LR)  
of neuropathies, nearly  
all of which are more  
common in people with  
diabetes. Unfortunately,  
once diabetic neuropathy  
has started, controlling  
reduce inflammation.  
There have been many  
studies and two meta-anal- A recent column on  
yses of published studies, electroconvulsive thera-  
and the results are mixed, py for severe depression  
with some studies showing generated many letters  
Authority: MCL 339.308, 339.205, and 339.2009, and Executive Reorganization  
Nos. 1991-9,1996-2, 2003-1 and 2011-4, MCL 338.3501, 445.2001, 445.2011, and 445.2030.  
Overview: The proposed rules include revisions to follow current drafting standards and  
adoption of the latest version of the model rules of conduct.  
Osteopathic Medicine and Surgery – General Rules  
(MOAHR #2023-036 LR)  
Authority: MCL 333.16145, 333.16148, 333.16174, 333.16201, 333.16204, 333.16215,  
333.16287, 333.17531, 333.17533, and 333.17548, and Executive Reorganization Nos. 1991-9,  
1996-2, 2003-1 and 2011-4, MCL 338.3501, 445.2001, 445.2011, and 445.2030.  
Overview: The proposed rules include: revisions to follow current drafting standards; removal of  
the prohibition on delegation of a drug or device individually, in combination, or in succession, for  
a woman known to be pregnant with the intention of causing either a miscarriage or fetal death;  
updates to accreditation standards; edits to decrease the number of allowed attempts to pass any  
level of the COMLEX-USA from six attempts to four attempts; removal of the requirement that an  
applicant shall successfully pass all steps of the COMLEX-USA within seven years after the date  
the applicant first passed a step of the COMLEX-USA; clarification of the period in which a licens-  
ee must request a waiver of continuing education; clarification that a licensee who completes  
implicit bias training under R 338.7004 may also use that training toward fulfillment of continuing  
education requirements; and allowance of non-Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Ed-  
ucation (ACCME) accredited providers engaging in joint providership with ACCME accredited  
providers to qualify as acceptable providers of continuing education.  
Professional Surveyors – General Rules  
(MOAHR #2023-049 LR)  
Authority: MCL 339.308, 339.205, and 339.2009, and Executive Reorganization Nos. 1991-9,  
1996-2, 2003-1 and 2011-4, MCL 338.3501, 445.2001, 445.2011, and 445.2030.  
Overview: The proposed rules include revisions to follow current drafting standards; edits to the  
continuing education requirements for relicensure so it will be the same as the requirements for  
renewal to ensure licensees are completing the same continuing education requirements under  
either set of circumstances, and elimination of R 339.17403 (3) as it is redundant.  
The rules will take effect immediately upon filing with the Secretary of State, unless specified  
otherwise in the rules. Comments on the proposed rules may be presented in person at the public  
hearing. Written comments will also be accepted from date of publication until  
5:00 p.m. on June 4, 2024, at the following address or e-mail address:  
Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs  
Bureau of Professional Licensing– Boards and Committees Section  
P.O. Box 30670  
Lansing, MI 48909-8170  
Attention: Departmental Specialist Email: BPL-BoardSupport@michigan.gov  
A copy of the proposed rules may be obtained by contacting Board Support at (517) 241-7500 or  
the email address noted above. Electronic copies also may be obtained at the following link:  
Architects – General Rules  
Osteopathic Medicine and Surgery – General Rules  
Professional Surveyors – General Rules  
To allow for broad public attendance and participation, including for persons with disabilities,  
members of the public may access this meeting by both web and phone and provide either oral or  
written comments. Closed captioning will be provided, when available. Members of the public who  
are speech or hearing impaired may also attend and participate in this meeting by dialing 7-1-1  
and using the Michigan Relay service. More information about this service may be found at https://  
People with disabilities requiring additional accommodations (such as materials in alternative for-  
mat) to participate in the meeting, or those that have questions should contact the department at  
BPLBoardSupport@ michigan.gov.  
Please call (517) 241-7500 or email BPL-BoardSupport@michigan.gov with any questions  
related to the hearing.  
;