9
R 38.174a Physical and mental examination.
Rule 44a. (1) If the appellant places the appellant’s mental or physical condition in
controversy, the administrative law judge, on motion for good cause with notice to the
appellant and all parties, may order the appellant to submit to a physical or mental
examination by a physician or other appropriate professional. The order must specify the
time, place, manner, conditions, and scope of the examination and the name of the examiner
or examiners.
(2) On request of the appellant or the appellant’s attorney, the party who requested the
examination under subrule (1) of this rule shall deliver to the appellant or the appellant’s
attorney a copy of a detailed written report of the examiner or examiners setting out the
findings, including all test results, diagnoses, and conclusions, and all reports on earlier
examinations pertaining to the same condition, and make available for inspection all
diagnostic aids.
(3) After delivery of the report specified in subrule (2) of this rule, the party who requested
the examination shall, on request, receive from the appellant a similar report of any
examination previously or subsequently made pertaining to the same condition and shall
be allowed a similar inspection of all diagnostic aids.
(4) If an appellant refuses to deliver a report requested under subrule (3) of this rule, the
administrative law judge, on motion and notice, may enter an order requiring delivery on
just terms. If an examiner refuses or fails to provide a report required under this rule, the
administrative law judge may order the examiner to appear for a discovery deposition.
(5) By requesting and obtaining a report on an examination ordered under this rule or by
taking the deposition of the examiner, the appellant waives any privilege the appellant may
have in the action or another action involving the same controversy regarding the testimony
of every other person that has examined or may examine the person as to the same mental
or physical condition.
(6) Subrule (2) of this rule applies to an examination made by agreement of the parties,
unless the agreement expressly provides otherwise.
(7) Subrule (2) of this rule does not preclude discovery of a report of an examiner or the
taking of a deposition of the examiner under any statute or other rule.
R 38.176 Exceptions, cross-exceptions, and statement in support.
Rule 46. (1) Within the time allowed by the act, a party shall file with the commission a
statement of exceptions, statement of cross-exceptions, or statement in support of the
preliminary decision and order, and supporting brief.
(2) Except by order of the commission, briefs must not exceed 50 double-spaced pages
using margins of at least 1 inch and type of at least 12-points, exclusive of tables, indexes,
appendices, and title page. Single spacing of quotations and footnotes is permissible.
(3) A brief under this rule must contain, in the following order, all of the following:
(a) A table of contents listing the exceptions or cross-exceptions in the order of
presentation, with the page number where the argument related to each exception or cross-
exception begins in the brief.
(b) An index of authorities listing in alphabetical order all authorities cited, with the page
numbers where they appear in the brief.