Michigan Office of Administrative Hearings and Rules  
611 W. Ottawa Street  
Lansing, MI 48909  
Phone: 517-335-8658 Fax: 517-335-9512  
AGENCY REPORT TO THE  
JOINT COMMITEE ON ADMNINISTRATIVE RULES (JCAR)  
1. Agency Information  
Agency name:  
Licensing and Regulatory Affairs  
Division/Bureau/Office:  
Bureau of Professional Licensing  
Name of person completing this form:  
Andria Ditschman  
Phone number of person completing this form:  
517-290-3361  
E-mail of person completing this form:  
Name of Department Regulatory Affairs Officer reviewing this form:  
Elizabeth Arasim  
2. Rule Set Information  
MOAHR assigned rule set number:  
2020-128 LR  
Title of proposed rule set:  
Pharmacy - General Rules  
3. Purpose for the proposed rules and background:  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
Agency Report to JCAR-Page 2  
The purpose of the Pharmacy – General Rules is to encompass all the necessary requirements for  
licensing and regulating the practice for pharmacists, pharmacies, and manufacturers and wholesale  
distributors of drugs and devices. The rules include parts for general provisions, pharmacist licenses,  
pharmacy licenses, manufacturer licenses, wholesale distributor licenses, and the practice of  
pharmacy.  
The purpose of the proposed rules is to: establish any additional licensure requirements for a remote  
pharmacy and provide a procedure to request a waiver from the 10 mile rule for a remote pharmacy,  
pursuant to PA 4 of 2020; modify the requirements in the rules to require mandatory electronic  
transmission of a prescription and add the criteria for a waiver from electronic transmission, pursuant  
to PA 134 of 2020; establish licensure requirements for a wholesale distributor-broker and modify the  
activities allowed by an out-of-state pharmacy that is not licensed as a pharmacy in this state,  
pursuant to PA 142 of 2020; update rules affected by any other modified Public Health Code (Code)  
provisions; review practical experience requirements and limited licensure; review pharmacy  
ownership and licensure requirements; review the need for telehealth regulations; sanitation  
regulations; licensure reciprocity; and update definitions.  
4. Summary of proposed rules:  
The proposed revisions to the rules will: require preceptors to report internship hours; require an  
applicant who has failed the NAPLEX or the MPJE to review the material in a preparation course or  
with an instructor; clarify that an applicant who has completed the FPGEC certification has met the  
English proficiency requirement; allow an applicant for licensure by endorsement to obtain a license  
in this state if he or she either holds a license in another state or holds a license in Canada and meets  
additional requirements; add requirements for relicensure; establish the requirements for a remote  
pharmacy license; provide a waiver process from the 10 mile requirement for remote pharmacies;  
require any pharmacy that will provide sterile compounding in this state to submit an onsite physical  
inspection and report completed no more than 18 months before the application; clarify that a  
pharmacy that starts or resumes sterile compounding must apply to the Department and submit the  
required inspection report; require a pharmacy, manufacturer, wholesale distributor, and wholesale  
distributor-broker that is closing to maintain records; clarify the process for renewal versus  
relicensure; add the requirements for a facility manager for a manufacturer; adopt the federal  
exclusions to the definition of wholesale distribution; add the licensure and record keeping  
requirements for a wholesale distributor-broker; reduce the time from 3 years to 2 years before a  
prescription may be electronically duplicated; provide the requirements for electronic transmission of  
prescriptions; provide the process for a waiver from the mandate to electronically transmit a  
prescription; and clarify that if final product verification is delegated, then both the pharmacist and  
technician must record their initials.  
5. List names of newspapers in which the notice of public hearing was published and  
publication dates:  
Marquette Mining Journal – August 31, 2021; Flint Journal – August 31, 2021; Grand Rapids Press –  
August 31, 2021  
6. Date of publication of rules and notice of public hearing in Michigan Register:  
9/15/2021  
7. Date, time, and location of public hearing:  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
Agency Report to JCAR-Page 3  
9/21/2021 01:00 PM at G. Mennen Williams Building Auditorium , 525 W. Ottawa Street, Lansing,  
Michigan  
8. Provide the link the agency used to post the regulatory impact statement and cost-benefit  
analysis on its website:  
9. List of the name and title of agency representative(s) attending public hearing:  
Kerry Przybylo, Manager; Andria Ditschman, Senior Policy Analyst; and LeAnn Payne, Board  
Support.  
10. Persons submitting comments of support:  
Deeb D. Eid, PharmD, RPh, Advisor, Pharmacy Regulatory Affairs, CVS Health submitted a  
comment in support.  
11. Persons submitting comments of opposition:  
The following persons sent comments in writing:  
Rose M. Baran, PharmD  
Deeb D. Eid, PharmD, RPh, Advisor, Pharmacy Regulatory Affairs, CVS Health  
Charlie Mollien  
Julie L. Novak, Chief Executive Officer, Michigan State Medical Society (MSMS)  
Jon Pritchett, PharmD., RPh., BCSCP, Pharmacy Program Director, Accreditation Commission for  
Health Care (ACHC)  
Brian Sapita, Director of Government Affairs, Michigan Pharmacists Association (MPA)  
12. Identify any changes made to the proposed rules based on comments received during the  
public comment period:  
Name &  
Comments made at Written  
Agency Rationale Rule number  
Organization public hearing  
Comments  
for change  
& citation  
changed  
1
Mollien  
“Written” is used The Board agrees R 338.501(1)  
throughout the  
rules without a  
with the comment (l)  
that the term  
definition. Add a “written” should  
definition making be added to the  
it clear that  
“written” allows clarification that  
for paper or the term allows for  
definitions with  
electronic forms. paper or electronic  
forms.  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
Agency Report to JCAR-Page 4  
2
Sapita/MPA  
Regarding R  
338.505  
The Board agrees R 338.505(2)  
with the comment  
subsection 2  
that subrules (1)  
which specifies and (2) are  
“prelicensure  
inspection”.  
inconsistent with  
the addition of  
Subsection 1  
references both  
applicants and  
license holders  
“prelicensure” in  
(2) and, therefore,  
“prelicensure”  
should be deleted  
but subsection 2 as in the original  
now excludes  
inspections of  
language, and  
additional  
license holders. language should  
We suggest  
removing this  
language and  
keeping the  
be added to (2),  
“Inspections in  
provision (1) must  
not extend to any  
original language. of the following  
information,  
however, the  
information is  
subject to a  
disciplinary  
investigation.”  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
Agency Report to JCAR-Page 5  
Add “and The Board agrees R 338.531a  
3
Eid/CVS  
Health  
explanation” and with the comment (2)(b)  
“or otherwise not to modify (b) as it  
readily available will ensure the  
to patients” to (b) Department/Board  
to strengthen the has a clearer  
outcome of the  
rule.  
understanding of  
the services that  
will be offered  
rather than just a  
“list”.  
The addition of  
“or otherwise not  
readily available  
to patients” to 2(b)  
ensures the  
application is  
inclusive of  
services that may  
not be readily  
available to  
patients currently.  
The Board agrees R 338.534(3)  
4
Pritchett/ACHC  
Requiring an  
inspection within with the comment  
18 months of  
application  
presents a  
that the rule  
should be  
modified to allow  
problem with the for virtual  
previously  
inspections by  
approved PCAB deleting “onsite”  
process.  
Accreditations  
and “physical”  
from (a) as a  
with ACHC are virtual inspection  
provided on a 36- can cover the same  
month cycle,  
issues as an in-  
which aligns with person inspection  
accreditation  
programs  
with the bulk of  
the inspection  
provided in other being conducted  
areas of the  
healthcare  
by review of  
documents.  
industry as well  
as requirements The Board agrees  
issued by the  
Centers for  
that a pharmacy  
that has been  
Medicare and  
accredited should  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
Agency Report to JCAR-Page 6  
Medicaid  
not have to submit  
Services (CMS). an inspection  
A survey occurs within 18 months  
prior to each new before the date of  
accreditation  
cycle, thus a  
survey roughly  
an application.  
The Board will  
add the following  
every 36 months. language to (3)  
This creates a  
misalignment  
with the  
“unless accredited  
by a national  
accrediting  
Michigan  
organization,  
licensure  
schedule of  
recognized by the  
board, an … .  
renewal every 2  
years; some  
pharmacies,  
depending on  
where they are in  
their accreditation  
cycle, will not be  
scheduled for a  
survey within the  
18 months  
preceding  
renewal of their  
licensure. ACHC  
requests that the  
rule be returned  
to requiring either  
evidence on a  
current  
accreditation or a  
physical  
inspection and  
corresponding  
report completed  
within 18 months  
of application.  
We would also  
like to see  
clarification  
about acceptance  
of the use of  
virtual surveys  
during a public  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
Agency Report to JCAR-Page 7  
health emergency,  
as the issues  
surrounding  
COVID-19  
appear to be  
ongoing.  
5
Mollien  
Clarify if the  
FDA certification comment to delete (h)  
requirement is  
In response to the R 338.563(2)  
(h), add “if  
necessary and if it required by the  
is necessary  
FDA” to the rule.  
whether it should  
only apply to  
distributions of  
blood and blood  
products.  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
Agency Report to JCAR-Page 8  
6
Mollien  
Add “board” to To address the  
(6). safety concern in and (8)  
These rules create the comment, the  
a significant Board adds the  
public health and proposed language  
R 338.569(6)  
safety gap that  
allows  
introduction of  
counterfeit  
to (6) and as (8)  
requires additional  
record  
requirements, (8)  
medications into must be referenced  
the closed  
in (6).  
distribution  
supply chain. To  
close this gap,  
clarify in this rule  
that any  
purchasing  
pharmacy using a  
wholesale  
distributor-broker  
to facilitate a  
transaction from  
a pharmacy not  
licensed in  
Michigan shall  
request the  
transaction  
history,  
transaction  
statement, or  
transaction  
information for  
the drugs  
supplied.  
7
Mollien  
The rules are  
missing the  
The Board agrees R 338.583a  
with the comment  
record retention that for  
requirements  
applicable to  
pharmacies  
consistency with  
the controlled  
substances rules, a  
rule regarding  
related to non-  
control drug and pharmacy  
device acquisition acquisition and  
and distribution distribution  
records.  
ADD  
records should be  
added.  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
Agency Report to JCAR-Page 9  
Pharmacy  
Acquisition and  
Distribution  
Records  
(1) A pharmacy  
must keep and  
make available  
for inspection all  
acquisition and  
distribution  
records for  
prescription and  
non-prescription  
drugs and  
devices, such as  
invoices, packing  
slips or receipts,  
for 5 years. All  
records, which  
may be  
electronic, must  
be readily  
retrievable within  
48 hours.  
(2) Acquisition  
and distribution  
records must  
include the  
following  
information:  
(a) The source of  
the prescription  
drugs or devices,  
including the  
name and  
principal address  
of the seller or  
transferor and the  
address from  
which the  
prescription drugs  
or devices were  
shipped.  
(b) The identity  
and quantity of  
the prescription  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
Agency Report to JCAR-Page 10  
drugs or devices  
received, if  
applicable, and  
distributed or  
disposed of.  
(c) The dates of  
receipt, if  
applicable, and  
distribution of the  
prescription drugs  
or devices.  
8
Baran  
Change 338.584 The Board will  
R 338.584(1)  
(g)  
(1)(g) to “Issue  
date of the  
replace  
“dispensed” with  
“issued.”  
Novak/MSMS  
prescription.”  
The prescriber  
will not know the  
date the  
prescription was  
dispensed when  
issuing a  
prescription.  
Align the  
Pharmacy  
9
Mollien  
CMS waiver is  
automatic state  
R 338.584a  
(4)(a)  
General rule with waiver/Section (4)  
the CS rule  
regarding  
electronic  
transmission of  
prescriptions.  
(a):  
The Code requires  
that if a CMS  
waiver is granted  
then the  
Department shall  
also grant a  
waiver. Subrule  
(4) will be  
modified to allow  
for a waiver  
without meeting  
other requirements  
if the CMS waiver  
has been granted.  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
Agency Report to JCAR-Page 11  
10  
Novak/MSMS  
Amend to  
recognize the  
The rule will  
recognize the  
R 338.584a  
(3)  
exceptions to the exceptions to  
mandate by electronic  
adding, “unless transmissions  
an exception  
under section  
17754 of the  
Code, MCL  
333.17754a,  
applies, …”  
permitted by MCL  
333.17754a.  
11  
Novak/MSMS  
Recommends the The Public Health R 338.584a  
effective dates Code mandates (1) and (3)  
between the rules electronic  
sets and the Code transmission of  
be consistent.  
prescriptions as of  
October 1, 2021  
but requires that  
the Department  
delay the  
implementation  
date of the  
mandate to the  
date established by  
the Federal  
Centers for  
Medicare and  
Medicaid Services  
for electronic  
transmission of  
prescription for  
controlled  
substances.  
Therefore, the  
effective/enforced  
date will be the  
date the mandate  
is enforced by the  
Federal Centers  
for Medicare and  
Medicaid  
Services.  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
Agency Report to JCAR-Page 12  
12  
Novak/MSMS  
Identify examples Exceptional  
of qualifying  
“exceptional  
R 338.584a  
circumstances will (4)(b)(iii)  
be further clarified  
circumstances” as by adding  
follows:  
circumstances  
(iii) The  
suggested in (B)  
and (C). However,  
(A) will not be  
added as this basis  
is really a claim  
for economic  
prescriber  
demonstrates  
attests to  
exceptional  
circumstances  
including, but not hardship, which is  
limited to, the  
following:  
already in the rule.  
A. Prescribing  
fewer than “X”  
The rule will read  
prescriptions per “The prescriber  
year.  
demonstrates by  
attesting to  
exceptional  
circumstances  
including, but not  
limited to, the  
B. Intention to  
cease practice  
within the next  
twelve months.  
C. Limited  
practice due to an following: …”  
illness or other  
unforeseen event.  
Clarify that the  
prescriber may  
declare or  
formally certify  
in writing such as  
with an  
attestation as to  
the exceptional  
circumstances,  
instead of using  
the word  
“demonstrate.”  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
Agency Report to JCAR-Page 13  
We believe the  
13  
Sapita/MPA  
“On site” will be R 338.587(4)  
(e)  
use of “on site” is deleted in (e).  
confusing since  
after 2 years the  
prescription  
information can  
be kept  
electronically. We  
suggest that “on  
site” be removed  
from this  
subsection  
entirely.  
14  
Eid/CVS  
Health  
Add in clarifying The comment will R 338.588(3)  
language to allow be added as it  
for use of  
automated  
clarifies that a  
pharmacy may use  
devices as patient an automated  
pick-up options device within the  
within the  
premises of a  
licensed  
pharmacy. The  
following changes  
also need to be  
pharmacy. Add made: delete “and  
this language: A if a pharmacy is  
secured, lockable, closed;” add  
and privacy  
enabled  
“only” and “non-  
controlled;” and  
automated device modify “used” to  
located on the  
premise of the  
licensed  
“under control.”  
pharmacy may be  
utilized as a  
means for  
patient’s or an  
agent of the  
patient to pick up  
prescription  
medications when  
and if a pharmacy  
is closed.  
13.Date report completed:  
10/7/2021  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
;