Michigan Office of Administrative Hearings and Rules  
AGENCY REPORT TO THE  
JOINT COMMITEE ON ADMNINISTRATIVE RULES (JCAR)  
1. Agency Information  
Agency name:  
Environment, Great Lakes and Energy  
Division/Bureau/Office:  
Air Quality Division  
Name of person completing this form:  
Cari DeBruler  
Phone number of person completing this form:  
517-899-5275  
E-mail of person completing this form:  
Name of Department Regulatory Affairs Officer reviewing this form:  
Dale Shaw  
2. Rule Set Information  
MOAHR assigned rule set number:  
2022-18 EQ  
Title of proposed rule set:  
Part 6. Emission Limitations and Prohibitions – Existing Sources of VOC Emissions  
3. Purpose for the proposed rules and background:  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
Agency Report to JCAR-Page 2  
Part 6 contains rules developed to fulfill the federal Clean Air Act (CAA) 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.,  
requirements referred to as “Reasonably Available Control Technologies” (RACT). They are  
necessary to address moderate nonattainment area provisions for National Ambient Air Quality  
Standards (NAAQS). For past standards, EGLE promulgated RACT rules for existing volatile organic  
compound (VOC) sources in the nonattainment areas established under those standards. With the  
establishment of a new standard, the state must:  
1) Revise existing RACT rules to align with the most recent recommendations contained in the  
United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (USEPA) Control Technique Guidelines (CTGs) as  
required by the CAA Section 182(b)(2).  
2) Evaluate VOC sources in the NAAQS nonattainment areas based on the more recently created  
CTG categories.  
3) Promulgate new rules setting or revising emission standards and operational requirements for  
certain types of existing emission sources applicable to CTGs, beyond those established as rules  
under previous standards, for the nonattainment areas. These nonattainment areas consist of the  
following counties: Allegan (partial), Berrien, Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Muskegon (partial),  
Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw, and Wayne.  
Additionally, the CAA requires Michigan to show reasonable further progress by reducing VOC  
emissions in the nonattainment areas by fifteen percent from the baseline year. To meet this  
requirement, beyond the reductions gained from implementing VOC RACT rules, EGLE has also  
revised and drafted additional rules that address volatile chemical products.  
4. Summary of proposed rules:  
The proposed rule set (2022-18 EQ) will amend the current Part 6 containing rules developed to  
fulfill the federal Clean Air Act (CAA) 42 U.S.C 7401 et seq., requirements referred to as  
“Reasonably Available Control Technologies” (RACT). They are necessary to address moderate  
nonattainment area provisions for National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). For past  
standards, EGLE promulgated RACT rules for existing VOC sources in the nonattainment areas  
established under those standards. With the establishment of a new standard, the state must:  
1)Revise existing RACT rules to align with the most recent recommendations contained in the United  
States Environmental Protection Agency’s (USEPA) Control Technique Guidelines (CTGs) as  
required by the CAA Section 182(b)(2).  
2)Evaluate VOC sources in the NAAQS nonattainment areas based on the more recently recreated  
CTG categories.  
3)Promulgate new rules setting or revising emission standards and operational requirements for  
certain types of existing emission sources applicable to CTGs, beyond those established as rules  
under the previous standards, for the nonattainment areas. These nonattainment areas consist of the  
following counties: Allegan (partial), Berrien, Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Muskegon (partial),  
Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw, and Wayne.  
Additionally, the CAA requires Michigan to show reasonable further progress by reducing VOC  
emissions in the nonattainment areas by fifteen percent from the baseline year. To meet this  
requirement, beyond the reductions gained from implementing VOC RACT rules, EGLE has also  
revised and drafted additional rules that address volatile chemical products.  
If approved, the rules will be submitted to the USEPA as an amendment to the Michigan State  
Implementation Plan (SIP). The comment period and hearing will fulfill requirements contained in  
the state administrative rules and the CAA.  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
Agency Report to JCAR-Page 3  
5. List names of newspapers in which the notice of public hearing was published and  
publication dates:  
Lansing State Journal, published September 26, 2022  
Oakland Press, published September 26, 2022  
The Mining Journal, published September 26, 2022  
6. Date of publication of rules and notice of public hearing in Michigan Register:  
10/15/2022  
7. Date, time, and location of public hearing:  
10/26/2022 01:00 PM at In Person: Ford Conference Room, 2nd Floor, South Tower, Constitution  
Hall, 525 West Allegan Street, Lansing, MI 48933 , Virtual: https://bit.ly/3cSr0B9 To join by  
phone: 636-651-3142, conference code 374288  
8. Provide the link the agency used to post the regulatory impact statement and cost-benefit  
analysis on its website:  
9. List of the name and title of agency representative(s) attending public hearing:  
Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) staff:  
Trace McDonald – Air Quality Division (AQD)  
Marissa Vaerten – AQD  
Cari DeBruler – AQD  
Thomas Shanley – AQD  
Robert Irvine – AQD (Virtual)  
Mary Ann Dolehanty – AQD  
Annette Switzer – AQD  
Joyce Zhu – AQD (Virtual)  
Lorraine Hickman – AQD (Virtual)  
Erica Shuff – AQD  
Alec Kownacki – AQD  
Jenifer Dixon – Environmental Support Division (ESD)  
Jim Ostrowski – ESD (Virtual)  
Dale Shaw – Information Management Division  
10. Persons submitting comments of support:  
None.  
11. Persons submitting comments of opposition:  
SEMCOG – Kelly Karl  
12. Persons submitting other comments:  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
Agency Report to JCAR-Page 4  
Mixed comments in support and opposition:  
HCPA - Nicholas Georges  
Comments requesting partial revisions:  
National Aerosol Association – Doug Raymond; Fishbeck - Lillian Woolley; Printing United Alliance  
– Gary Jones; American Coatings Association – Rhett Cash; O’Leary Paint – David O’Leary;  
Michigan Oil and Gas Association (MOGA) – Jason Geer; Michigan Manufacturer’s Association  
(MMA) – Caroline Liethen; Consumers Energy – Kathryn Ross; Willert Home Products, Inc. – Troy  
Cummings; RadTech International – Rita Loof; Saint Clair Systems – Michael Bonner  
13. Identify any changes made to the proposed rules based on comments received during the  
public comment period:  
Name &  
Organization public hearing  
Comments made at Written  
Agency Rationale Rule number  
for Rule Change & citation  
and Description changed  
of Change(s)  
Comments  
Made  
1
Kathryn Ross,  
Consumers  
Energy  
Align the  
proposed  
regulatory  
Added additional R 336.1601  
definition to  
(e)  
support phrase  
definitions with (Local  
other existing  
Distribution  
federal program Company custody  
definitions.  
transfer station)  
used in R  
336.1601(g).  
Definition is  
consistent with  
federal standards  
(40 CFR Part 60,  
Subparts OOOO  
and OOOOa) to  
keep Michigan  
rules consistent  
with federal  
standards.  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
Agency Report to JCAR-Page 5  
2
Kathryn Ross,  
Consumers  
Energy  
Align the  
proposed  
regulatory  
Revised existing R 336.1601(f)  
definition to align  
with federal  
definitions with standard  
other existing  
definition. This  
federal program will help provide  
definitions.  
consistency for  
these applicable  
sources between  
our rules and  
federal regulations  
(40 CFR Part 98,  
Subpart W). The  
federal standard  
definition aligns  
with the  
description of  
“natural gas  
distribution”  
outlined in the  
CTG document  
(EPA-453/B-16-  
001 2016/10).  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
Agency Report to JCAR-Page 6  
3
Kathryn Ross,  
Consumers  
Energy  
Align the  
proposed  
regulatory  
Revised existing R 336.1601(i)  
definition to align  
with federal  
definitions with standard  
other existing  
definition. This  
federal program will help provide  
definitions.  
consistency for  
these applicable  
sources between  
our rules and  
federal regulations  
(40 CFR Part 60,  
Subparts OOOO  
and OOOOa). The  
federal standard  
definition aligns  
with the  
description of  
“natural gas  
transmission and  
storage” outlined  
in the CTG  
document (EPA-  
453/B-16-001  
2016/10).  
4
Jason Geer,  
MOGA  
Request to define Well site was not R 336.1601  
“Well Site” previously defined (m)  
within the rules. within the  
Michigan Air  
Pollution Control  
Rules. Agency  
incorporated a  
well site definition  
based on the  
definition in the  
USEPA issued  
Control  
Techniques  
Guidelines for the  
Oil and Natural  
Gas Industry, 2016  
(EPA-453/B-16-  
001  
2016/10).  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
Agency Report to JCAR-Page 7  
Commentor Agency recognizes R 336.1602  
5
Caroline  
Liethen, MMA  
requested that the need for flexibility (2)(a)(iv)  
VOC testing in rule to allow for  
requirements in various  
Rule 610a(4)(e) alternatives to be  
(vii) allow for  
alternate test  
methods to be  
pursued.  
Alternative was  
added to this rule  
used, especially to allow for the  
previously  
approved  
alternate  
compliance  
methods option  
added to R610a(4)  
(e)(vii).  
alternate test  
methods, if a  
different or  
modified method  
would more  
accurately  
represent  
equipment  
operating  
conditions.  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
Agency Report to JCAR-Page 8  
6
Caroline  
The compliance Agency agreed  
R 336.1602  
Liethen, MMA  
and Kathryn  
Ross,  
schedule for the with commentors (4)  
various stages of rationale for  
the RACT  
extending  
Consumers  
Energy  
analysis required timeframes under  
under R 336.1602 this rule and  
(4) should be  
lengthened.  
allowing for a  
small de minimis  
threshold to  
remove  
A de minimis  
threshold should insignificant  
be incorporated analysis and  
into R 336.1602 burden on  
(4) in order to  
avoid  
industry.  
insignificant  
Revised language  
analysis for low to extend  
emitting sources compliance  
that will have no periods and also  
technical or  
allow for  
economic feasible department  
control options. approval of  
additional time, if  
needed.  
Created new  
subrule to allow  
sources less than  
2.7 tons per year  
volatile organic  
compound  
emissions at an  
applicable facility  
be exempt from  
conducting a  
RACT analysis.  
However, if  
combined  
emissions from  
those sources  
equal 25 tons per  
year or more they  
must complete the  
analysis.  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
Agency Report to JCAR-Page 9  
Commentor Agency recognizes R 336.1610a  
7
Caroline  
Liethen, MMA  
requested that the need for flexibility (4)(e)(vii)  
VOC testing in rule to allow for  
requirements in various  
Rule 610a(4)(e) alternatives to be  
(vii) allow for  
alternate test  
methods to be  
pursued. Language  
was added to this  
rule to allow for  
used, especially alternate test  
previously  
approved  
alternate test  
methods, if a  
different or  
methods as  
approved through  
the process  
detailed in R  
336.1602(2) per  
modified method USEPA policy.  
would more  
accurately  
represent  
equipment  
operating  
conditions.  
8
Gary Jones,  
Printing United  
Alliance  
Suggestion to add Agreed  
R 336.1624a  
clarifying  
clarification was (8)(f)  
language to the  
recordkeeping  
needed. Made  
revisions to clarify  
requirements for the 12-month  
exempt sources. rolling average  
basis  
recordkeeping  
requirement for  
exempt sources.  
9
Gary Jones,  
Printing United  
Alliance  
Removal of  
additional space. formatting.  
Removed  
Error in  
R 336.1634  
(5)(c)  
additional spacing  
from sentence.  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
Agency Report to JCAR-Page 10  
Suggestion to  
10  
Gary Jones,  
Printing United  
Alliance  
The “offset  
R 336.1635  
(1)  
revise language lithographic”  
to replace the phrase was used  
incorrect phrases by mistake and  
used by mistake. was updated to the  
Also provided  
additional  
correct term  
“letterpress”.  
clarifying  
language to add Additional  
to various language  
definitions in this suggested was  
rule.  
incorporated as the  
Agency agreed it  
provided  
additional clarity  
to the definitions  
under this rule.  
11  
Gary Jones,  
Printing United  
Alliance  
Addition of “or Reviewed the  
R 336.1635  
heatset  
CTG and it does (3)(f)(iii)  
allow for  
letterpress” as  
exempt from the exemption of heat  
add-on control  
requirements.  
presses, which is  
interpreted to  
include both offset  
lithographic as  
well as letterpress.  
Revised the rule  
language to add in  
the heat set  
letterpress  
exemption.  
12  
Gary Jones,  
Printing United  
Alliance  
Clarifying  
language  
suggested to  
Agreed this added R 336.1635  
more clarity and (4)(a)  
added in the  
denote “heatset” additional term  
classification. “heatset”.  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
Agency Report to JCAR-Page 11  
13  
Gary Jones,  
Printing United  
Alliance  
Suggested  
revisions to  
Agreed the  
language further (6)(c) &  
R 336.1635  
clarify language. clarified the rule, R 336.1635  
made suggested  
revisions which  
consisted of  
(6)(d)  
deletion of “their”  
and replacement  
of “meet” with  
“demonstrate the  
emissions are  
below”.  
14  
15  
Gary Jones,  
Printing United  
Alliance  
Suggestion to add Added language to R 336.1635  
language to clarify acceptable (6)(e)  
define retention retention factors to  
factors and  
capture  
efficiencies.  
assist regulated  
community while  
leaving flexibility.  
Jason Geer,  
MOGA  
Allowance of an Agency agreed  
R 336.1642  
(3)(a)(i) &  
approved  
this was a  
engineer in  
accordance with and has been  
reasonable option R 336.1642  
(3)(a)(ii)  
40 CFR  
60.5393a.  
allowed at the  
federal level.  
Agency revised  
the rule to  
incorporate an  
allowance for  
certification from  
an approved  
engineer as  
defined under 40  
CFR 60.5393a.  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
Agency Report to JCAR-Page 12  
16  
Jason Geer,  
MOGA  
Allowance of a  
engineering  
Evidence provided R 336.1642  
(5)(b)  
testing a  
calibrated bag or showed that  
calculations to be pneumatic device  
used for through calibrated  
pneumatic device bag and  
testing.  
calculations was a  
reasonable and  
cost-effective  
method. Agency  
revised the rule to  
include options for  
alternative  
performance  
testing as  
approved by the  
department.  
17  
Jason Geer,  
MOGA  
Commentor  
suggested  
removing the  
Evidence provided R 336.1643  
that rod packing is (5)(a) &  
inspected regularly R 336.1643  
requirement for during every  
(5)(b)  
rod packing  
replacement  
inspection, oil  
change, and  
every 36 months service so there is  
due to high cost ample monitoring  
of replacement. occurring. Agency  
Recommended to revised the  
revise the rule to requirement to  
allow for either allow for either  
rod packing  
replacement  
rod packing  
replacement every  
every 36 months 36 months or route  
or route rod  
packing  
emissions to a  
process.  
rod packing  
emissions to a  
process.  
18  
Troy  
Suggestion to  
The date proposed R 336.1660  
Cummings,  
Warner  
change a date in was an error and (1)(b)  
the rule to  
was corrected.  
Norcross and  
Judd  
eliminate an  
undefined/illogic  
al gap in  
applicability.  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
Agency Report to JCAR-Page 13  
19  
20  
Troy  
Cummings,  
Warner  
Norcross and  
Judd  
The proposed  
rule exempted  
some activities  
but neglected to and completely in  
exempt those  
activities  
elsewhere in the  
model rule.  
Commentor  
claims small  
manufacturers  
Added language to R 336.1660  
exempt the  
(2)(f)  
activity clearly  
the rule.  
David O’Leary,  
O’Leary Paints  
Due to the nature R 336.1662  
of these small  
manufacturers  
(1)(a)-(c)  
lack resources to making up a very  
make coatings  
compliant in  
timeframes  
proposed.  
small portion of  
emissions, the  
agency added  
language (Rule  
662(1)(c)) to delay  
compliance  
deadlines for small  
manufacturers  
with total  
production under 1  
million gallons per  
calendar year.  
Additional minor  
edits were made to  
R662(1)(a) and (b)  
to accommodate  
these changes.  
14.Date report completed:  
12/22/2022  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
;