Agency Report to JCAR -Page 13
Election
information.’” And also information” is explained in
Specialist,
Charter
Township of
Brownstown
says “Provide
examples and
scenarios.”
detail in Rule 2. Edited Rule
2(1) to make it more clear
that reliable information is
information about voter
residency by adding the
phrase “that a voter has
moved” to subrule (1).
4
Erica
“It should be clarified in Agree with comment that
subsection (d) that the adding permanently clarifies
individual who lives at the meaning of this
R 168.252(2)(d)
Peresman,
Senior Advisor,
Promote the
Vote
the voter’s registration subsection, so added the
address must have
personal knowledge
that the voter has
removed their ꢀ
word “permanently” before
the word “moved.” Also
clarified this subsection by
adding that the individual who
residence permanently the clerk talks to must inform
from that address and the clerk that the voter has
that the voter no longer permanently moved by
intends to be
adding “informs the clerk” in
considered a resident place of “has personal
of the jurisdiction for
knowledge.”
voting purposes.” ꢀ
5
Alison
“(h) What does it mean Comment was asking for
R 168.252(2)(f)
Fitzgerald,
Election
Specialist,
Charter
Township of
Brownstown
to “independently find” clarification in subrule (2)(h) and R
if the challenged voter but in light of this comment
has moved? ꢀDefine and another comment
independently find ꢀ (discussed in the following
Provide examples and row) we decided subrule
168.252(2)(h)
scenarios on how to
properly manage ꢀ
(2)(h) added more confusion
than clarity to the rules. We
information/documentat struck subrule (2)(h) and
ion received ꢀDetail added additional clarification
what qualifies as
sufficient proof” ꢀ
to subrule (2)(f) about the
information that is received
and the required “proof” as
the comment put it to be
reliable information that a
voter has moved. Subrule
(2)(h) described situations
where an individual claims a
voter is registered at an
address where they do not
live but was very vague and
non-specific in a way that
was clearly confusing,
subrule (2)(f) discussed utility
bills as information that can
show a voter doesn’t live at a
certain residence but was not
explained, so we added
additional clarity to that rule
and struck (2)(h).
6
Erica
“Subsection (h) should Agree that this subsection
be removed. The term may be more confusing than
“supporting evidence” helpful as an example and
R 168.252(2)(h)
Peresman,
Senior Advisor,
Promote the
Vote
is vague, and ꢀ
deleted subsection (h).
situations where an
Subsection (h) used to read:
MCL 24.242 and 24.245