Michigan Office of Administrative Hearings and Rules  
Administrative Rules Division (ARD)  
AGENCY REPORT TO THE  
JOINT COMMITTEE ON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES (JCAR)  
AGENCY INFORMATION:  
Agency name:  
Licensing and Regulatory Affairs  
Division/Bureau/Office:  
Bureau of Professional Licensing  
Name of person completing this form:  
Jennifer Shaltry  
Phone number of person completing this form:  
517-241-3085  
Email of person completing this form:  
Name of Department Regulatory Affairs Officer reviewing this form:  
Elizabeth Arasim  
RULE SET INFORMATION:  
MOAHR assigned rule set number:  
2025-28 LR  
Title of the proposed rule set:  
Pharmacy - General Rules  
1. Purpose of the proposed rules and background:  
The Pharmacy – General Rules provide the licensing requirements and regulate the practice of pharmacists,  
pharmacies, manufacturers, wholesale distributors, and wholesale distributor-brokers.  
The rules will be amended to implement Sections 17724, 17724a, and 17744g of the Public Health Code, MCL  
333.17724, MCL 333.17724a, and MCL 333.17744g, concerning pharmacists ordering and administering qualified  
immunizing agents, ordering qualified laboratory tests and dispensing medications based on the results, and  
prescribing hormonal contraceptives. Further, all rules will be reviewed, updated, and revised for clarity as needed.  
2. Summary of the proposed rules:  
The proposed revisions include updates to improve ease of reading and comply with current drafting standards, new  
definitions, the removal of outdated language concerning training required to renew a controlled substance license,  
establishing a process for the board to approve entities to inspect pharmacies that compound under good  
manufacturing practice for finished pharmaceuticals, updates to the adopted United States Pharmacopeia Convention  
standards, and clarification of inspection requirements for pharmacies that engage in compounding. New rules are  
proposed concerning telehealth services; a pharmacist ordering and administering qualified immunizations; a  
pharmacist ordering and administering qualified laboratory tests and dispensing, without a prescription, an antiviral  
drug based on the test result; and a pharmacist prescribing a hormonal contraceptive patch, a self-administered  
hormonal contraceptive, an emergency contraceptive, or a vaginal ring hormonal contraceptive.  
3. List names of newspapers in which the notice of public hearing was published and publication  
dates:  
The Escanaba Daily Press, August 28, 2025  
The Flint Journal, August 28, 2025  
The Grand Rapids Press, August 28, 2025  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
Agency Report to JCAR -Page 2  
4. Date of publication of the proposed rules and notice of public hearing in the Michigan Register:  
9/1/2025  
5. Date, time, and location of the public hearing:  
9/10/2025 09:00 AM at G. Mennen Williams Building Auditorium, 525 W. Ottawa Street, Lansing, MI  
6. Provide the link the agency used to post the regulatory impact statement and cost-benefit analysis  
on its website:  
7. List of the name and title of agency representative(s) who attended the public hearing:  
Jennifer Shaltry, Departmental Specialist, Bureau of Professional Licensing  
Kerry Przybylo, Manager, Bureau of Professional Licensing  
8. Persons submitting comments of support:  
Eric Roath, Leang Mey Tao  
9. Persons submitting comments of opposition:  
Joseph Paul Pacis Javier, Obioma Opara, Arian Shaska, Micaiah Whitaker, Maria Young  
10. Persons submitting other comments:  
Kennyle Johnson, Eric Roath, Krupa, Chris Munden, Michelle Kelly, Susan Davis, Brittany Stewart, Lynette Moser,  
Sally Rafie, Hsin Wang, Leang Mey Tao  
11. Identify any changes made to the proposed rules based on comments received during the public  
comment period:  
Name &  
Comments Made at Written Comments  
Agency Rationale for Rule Rule Number &  
Organization Public Hearing  
Change & Description of  
Change(s) Made  
Citation  
Changed  
1
Eric Roath,  
Michigan  
Pharmacists  
Association  
An agent of a licensed The Board agrees with the  
R 338.507(1) and  
health professional,  
rather than the health staff working with licensees  
professional to obtain consent and keep  
proposal to permit unlicensed (2).  
themselves, may obtain proof of consent in the  
consent and document patient’s medical record.  
consent according to  
proposed subrules (1) to keep “health professional”  
and (2) – (i.e. a and add “or delegate of the  
pharmacy technician or health professional.” The  
However, the Board prefers  
an unlicensed  
Department agrees.  
pharmacy clerk). The  
commenter proposed  
changing “health  
professional” in R  
338.507(1) and (2) to  
“pharmacist, pharmacy  
technician, or agent of  
the pharmacist.”  
2
Eric Roath,  
Michigan  
Pharmacists  
Association  
Entities that provide CE The Board and Department R 338.581  
or certificate programs agree with the comment.  
accredited by ACPE  
are not, themselves,  
“accredited.” Rather,  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
Agency Report to JCAR -Page 3  
they are organizations  
that provide courses  
which are accredited by  
ACPE. This distinction  
is important for  
ensuring that common  
certificate programs  
utilized by practicing  
professionals are  
recognized (e.g. the  
APhA Immunization  
Certification  
Program). The  
commenter  
recommended adding  
“or course” after  
“entity”.  
3
Eric Roath,  
Michigan  
Entities that provide  
training, CE, or  
The Board and Department R 338.581b  
agree with the comment.  
Pharmacists  
Association  
certificate programs  
accredited by ACPE  
are not, themselves,  
“accredited.” Rather,  
they are organizations  
that provide courses  
which are accredited by  
ACPE. This distinction  
is important for  
ensuring that common  
certificate programs  
utilized by practicing  
professionals are  
recognized. The  
commenter  
recommended adding  
“or course” after  
“entity”.  
4
Susan Davis,  
Brittany  
Stewart and  
Lynette Moser,  
Wayne State  
University  
Excessive referral  
requirements: Rule 81c patient for a physical  
mandating referral for a examination cannot be  
physical exam if one  
hasn’t occurred in 12  
months is not  
The requirement to refer the R 338.581c(b)(iii)  
completely eliminated  
because MCL 333.17744g  
mandates referrals under  
certain circumstances.  
consistent with CDC  
guidance, which does However, the Board agreed  
not require a physical that the proposed rule  
before safely initiating contained too many referral  
most hormonal  
contraceptives.  
requirements. The Board  
decided to remove R  
According to the CDC, 338.581c(b)(iii) from the  
the goals of the proposed rule because  
recommendations are referrals for patients who do  
to remove unnecessary not receive a prescription are  
medical barriers to  
accessing and using  
contraception and to  
support providing  
person-centered  
not mandatory under MCL  
333.17744g. The Department  
agrees.  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
Agency Report to JCAR -Page 4  
contraceptive  
counseling and  
services in a  
noncoercive manner. ꢀ  
Recommendation:  
eliminate the  
mandatory physical  
exam requirement.  
Suggested alternative  
can be based on that  
used in Oregon: “The  
Pharmacist is  
responsible for  
recognizing limits of  
knowledge and  
experience for  
resolving situations  
beyond their expertise  
by consulting with or  
referring patients to  
another health care  
provider.”  
5
Eric Roath,  
Michigan  
The commenter  
proposed modifications 338.581(c)(iii) was stricken,  
Because the former R  
R 338.581c(b)(iv)  
Pharmacists  
Association  
including adding  
second sentence  
stating that a  
this paragraph was  
renumbered as R  
338.581c(b)(iii). The Board  
prescription receipt or and Department agree that  
note in an electronic  
health record or  
the written record may  
include electronic records.  
pharmacy management The commenter’s sentence  
system shall be  
sufficient to comply  
was rewritten to use simpler  
language and to include all  
with this subrule. The types of electronic records.  
commenter wrote this  
change would  
accomplish the goals of  
the proposed language  
while recognizing the  
realities of current  
workflow and health  
communication  
practices.  
6
Eric Roath,  
Michigan  
Pharmacists  
Association  
The commenter  
proposed simpler  
language.  
The Board and Department R 338.581c(b)(v)  
agree with the comment.  
12. Date report completed:  
5/7/2026  
MCL 24.242 and 24.245  
;