Michigan Office of Administrative Hearings and Rules  
Administrative Rules Division (ARD)  
611 W. Ottawa Street  
Lansing, MI 48909  
Phone: 517-335-8658 Fax: 517-335-9512  
REQUEST FOR RULEMAKING (RFR)  
1. Department:  
Insurance and Financial Services  
2. Bureau:  
Insurance  
3. Promulgation type:  
Full Process  
4. Title of proposed rule set:  
Credit for Reinsurance  
5. Rule numbers or rule set range of numbers:  
R 500.1122 through R 500.1133  
6. Estimated time frame:  
6 months  
Name of person filling out RFR:  
Julie Agueros  
E-mail of person filling out RFR:  
Phone number of person filling out RFR:  
517-894-3713  
Address of person filling out RFR:  
530 W. Allegan St., 8th Floor, Lansing, Michigan 48933  
7. Describe the general purpose of these rules, including any problems the changes are intended  
to address.  
MCL 24.239  
RFR-Page 2  
These rules were promulgated in 1996, following the enactment of Chapter 11 of the Insurance  
Code of 1956 (Code), MCL 500.1101 to 500.1127, to regulate reinsurance, which occurs when an  
insurer cedes a portion of its risk to another insurer that assumes the risk. See, generally, 1994 PA  
226. These rules were amended in 2011 and 2019, following changes the National Association of  
Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) made to its model law and regulation and legislative  
amendments to the Code designed to bring Michigan into compliance with the NAIC model law  
and regulation. See 2018 PA 91. Specifically, these rules and Sections 1103, 1105, and 1106 of the  
Code, MCL 500.1103, 500.1105, and 500.1106, establish requirements for insurers to take credit,  
i.e., as an asset or reduction from liability, for reinsurance ceded to an assuming insurer. Section  
1103 allows credit for reinsurance if ceded to an assuming insurer that meets any of subsections  
(2) through (6) of MCL 500.1103. The NAIC has made additional changes to its model law and  
regulation to facilitate the consistency of state law with the “covered agreement” entered by the  
United States on September 22, 2017, authorized under 31 USC 314. The changes to the NAIC  
models necessitate corresponding legislative amendments and amendments to these rules to  
provide for additional categories of assuming insurers that will provide the ceding insurer credit  
for the cession. The legislative amendments are contained within Senate Bill 1015’20 (PA 328 of  
2020), which was signed by Governor Whitmer on December 29, 2020. These proposed rules  
would implement those legislative amendments.  
8. Please cite the specific promulgation authority for the rules (i.e. department director,  
commission, board, etc.).  
Section 1106 of the Code, MCL 500.1106, permits the Director of DIFS to promulgate rules  
regarding certain reinsurance agreements. Existing rules are also authorized under Section 1103  
(6) of the Code, MCL 500.1103, and Section 1103, as amended by Senate Bill 1015, includes  
additional rulemaking authority. Furthermore, the Director is authorized to promulgate rules to  
effectuate and enforce the insurance laws of Michigan under Section 210 of the Code, MCL  
500.210.  
A. Please list all applicable statutory references (MCLs, Executive Orders, etc.).  
MCL 500.210, MCL 500.1103, MCL 500.1106, and Executive Reorganization Order No. 2013-1,  
MCL 550.991.  
B. Are the rules mandated by any applicable constitutional or statutory provision? If so, please  
explain.  
Yes. Certain existing rules are mandated under Section 1103(6) of the Code, MCL 500.1103(6),  
and Senate Bill 1015 requires that the Director promulgate additional rules under Section 1103.  
9. Please describe the extent to which the rules conflict with or duplicate similar rules,  
compliance requirements, or other standards adopted at the state, regional, or federal level.  
These rules do not conflict with or duplicate similar rules, compliance requirements, or other  
standards adopted at the state, regional, or federal level, apart from their implementation of the  
NAIC model law and regulation, as explained above.  
10. Is the subject matter of the rules currently contained in any guideline, handbook, manual,  
instructional bulletin, form with instructions, or operational memoranda?  
No.  
11. Are the rules listed on the department’s annual regulatory plan as rules to be processed  
for the current year?  
Yes.  
12. Will the proposed rules be promulgated under Section 44 of the Administrative Procedures  
Act, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.244, or under the full rulemaking process?  
MCL 24.239  
RFR-Page 3  
Full Process  
13. Please describe the extent to which the rules exceed similar regulations, compliance  
requirements, or other standards adopted at the state, regional, or federal level.  
These rules do not exceed similar regulations, compliance requirements, or other standards  
adopted at the state, regional, or federal level. As explained above, the proposed rules are intended  
to facilitate Michigan’s compliance with the NAIC model law and regulation.  
14. Do the rules incorporate the recommendations received from the public regarding any  
complaints or comments regarding the rules? If yes, please explain.  
No.  
15. If amending an existing rule set, please provide the date of the last evaluation of the rules  
and the degree, if any, to which technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changed  
the regulatory activity covered by the rules since the last evaluation.  
These rules were last evaluated in 2018, which resulted in amendments effective in 2019 (2018-  
056-IF). As explained above, since these rules were last amended, the NAIC has amended its  
model law and regulation upon which these rules are based, and Senate Bill 1015 and these  
proposed rules implement the changes made to the NAIC model law and regulation.  
16. Are there any changes or developments since implementation that demonstrate there is no  
continued need for the rules, or any portion of the rules?  
No.  
17. Is there an applicable decision record (as defined in MCL 24.203(6) and required by MCL  
24.239(2))? If so, please attach the decision record.  
No  
MCL 24.239  
;