RFR-Page 2
8. Please cite the specific promulgation authority for the rules (i.e. department director,
commission, board, etc.).
Under Executive Reorganization Order No. 2009-31, MCL 324.99919, the powers and duties of
the Office of Racing Commissioner were transferred to the Executive Director of the Michigan
Gaming Control Board, including regulating pari-mutuel wagering, licensing, issuing final agency
decisions on all contested case hearings, and the promulgation of agency rules.
A. Please list all applicable statutory references (MCLs, Executive Orders, etc.).
The Executive Director is given discretionary authority under §7(1) of the Horse Racing Law of
1995, as amended, MCL 431.307(1), to promulgate rules in accordance with the Administrative
Procedures Act.
B. Are the rules mandated by any applicable constitutional or statutory provision? If so, please
explain.
The rules are not mandated by any applicable constitutional or statutory provision.
9. Please describe the extent to which the rules conflict with or duplicate similar rules,
compliance requirements, or other standards adopted at the state, regional, or federal level.
There are no national or regional compliance requirements for horse racing. While there are
national standards and model rules these documents are suggestions and not binding on the state
of Michigan. Thus, these rules do not conflict with or duplicate similar rules or regulations.
10. Is the subject matter of the rules currently contained in any guideline, handbook, manual,
instructional bulletin, form with instructions, or operational memoranda?
The subject matter of these rules is not contained in any guideline, handbook, manual,
instructional bulletin, or operational memoranda. A number of forms with instructions are used in
the licensing process including applications for track licenses, race meeting licenses, third-party
facilitators and occupational licenses.
11. Are the rules listed on the department’s annual regulatory plan as rules to be processed
for the current year?
Yes. These are rules listed on the agency’s annual regulatory plan.
12. Will the proposed rules be promulgated under Section 44 of the Administrative Procedures
Act, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.244, or under the full rulemaking process?
Full Process
13. Please describe the extent to which the rules exceed similar regulations, compliance
requirements, or other standards adopted at the state, regional, or federal level.
These rules do not exceed similar regulations, compliance requirements, or other standards.
Approximately 32 states allow pari-mutuel wagering on horse racing. Each state establishes its
own requirements for licensing and regulating horse racing. These rules provide a regulatory
framework for the licensing and operation of race tracks, race meet licensees, third-party
facilitators, and occupational licensees to ensure the public’s interest in fair and honest gaming.
14. Do the rules incorporate the recommendations received from the public regarding any
complaints or comments regarding the rules? If yes, please explain.
Track licensees, race meeting licensees, potential third-party facilitators and occupational
licensees provided input and were met with more than once to discuss proposed changes to the
administrative rules. The agency weighed the input with its duty to strictly regulate the horse
racing industry and incorporated changes to the proposed rules when it could.
MCL 24.239