Michigan Office of Administrative Hearings and Rules  
Administrative Rules Division (ARD)  
611 W. Ottawa Street  
Lansing, MI 48909  
Phone: 517-335-8658 Fax: 517-335-9512  
REQUEST FOR RULEMAKING (RFR)  
1. Department:  
Licensing and Regulatory Affairs  
2. Bureau:  
Michigan Office Of Administrative Hearings and Rules  
3. Promulgation type:  
Full Process  
4. Title of proposed rule set:  
Michigan Office of Administrative Hearings and Rules Administrative Hearing Rules  
5. Rule numbers or rule set range of numbers:  
R 792.10101 – R 792.11027a, R 792.11102, R 792.11201 – R 792.11611, R 792.11901 – R  
792.11903  
6. Estimated time frame:  
12 months  
Name of person filling out RFR:  
Wendy Wisniewski  
E-mail of person filling out RFR:  
Phone number of person filling out RFR:  
517-282-7812  
Address of person filling out RFR:  
611 W. Ottawa, 2nd Floor, Lansing, MI  
7. Describe the general purpose of these rules, including any problems the changes are intended  
to address.  
The 19-part rules set is comprised of general hearing rules in the first part and specific practice  
areas in the 18 parts that follow. The general purpose of the rules set is to govern the practice and  
procedures for all administrative hearings conducted by MOAHR, allowing for different  
procedures in specific types of hearings. The purpose of the proposed changes is to refine certain  
rules to clarify current practices, reflect statutory changes and department reorganizations,  
eliminate duplicative or unnecessary rules, and promote greater efficiency and fairness. Among  
the provisions and rules to be amended or rescinded are as follows:  
Part 1: The proposed changes to the general rules address opportunities for the electronic or e-mail  
filing of documents and service to other parties, and the approved procedure for such filing and  
service. The proposed changes also define and limit the use of portable electronic devices during  
an administrative hearing. The proposed changes also clarify that denial of a motion for summary  
disposition does not need to be in a proposal for decision format to a department director, board,  
or final decisionmaker.  
Part 2: The proposed changes update certain procedures to reflect current law and approved  
practices, such as the electronic payment of filing fees, the exclusion or redaction of personal  
identifying information, appeal by statutorily required petition, transfer of appeals from the small  
claims division to the entire tribunal, extensions and the default process, notice filing  
MCL 24.239  
RFR-Page 2  
requirements, prehearing conferences and mediation.  
Part 3: The proposed changes update the title of the department (reorganized as the Department of  
Environment, Great Lakes and Energy) and add language regarding petitions to the Environmental  
Permit Review Commission created under section 1313 of act 268 of 2018, MCL 324.1313.  
Part 4: The proposed changes reflect new statutory requirements found in 2016 PA 341 and 2016  
PA 342, as well as make minor changes to rules concerning electronic filing and other  
housekeeping matters. The proposed rules also rescind rules concerning motor carriers, because  
jurisdiction over motor carrier regulation has been transferred to the State Police.  
Part 5: The proposed change ensures consistency with the definitions section and eliminates  
reference to MOAHR’s predecessor name, Michigan Administrative Hearing System.  
Part 6: At the agency’s request, Part 6 of the rules set (Rules 601 through 609) will be rescinded  
and deleted to eliminate duplication with the MOAHR general rules and certain statutory changes  
in the subject area.  
Part 8: The proposed changes add Bureaus (Bureau of Professional Licensing and Bureau of  
Constructions Codes) to be included in the Section, update a referenced statute, and provide a  
process for a petition to dissolve a summary suspension order.  
Part 9: The proposed changes update the title of the department (reorganized as the Michigan  
Department of Health and Human Services), rescind a duplicative rule on declaratory rulings, and  
incorporate the formal hearing provision promulgated under the former Dept. of Community  
Health.  
Part 10: The proposed changes update the title of the department and incorporate rules on hearings  
that were promulgated by the former Department of Human Services under its separate statutory  
authority. The proposed changes also include revisions to make the rules consistent with new  
federal regulations and to clarify the process for good cause requests to vacate a dismissal order  
and continue a hearing, and to request a rehearing or reconsideration. The proposed changes also  
address hearing requests related to the over-issuance of benefits, child foster care facility  
licensing, and expunction cases.  
Part 11: The proposed changes update the name and references of the “Department” to Labor and  
Economic Opportunity in the definitions section.  
Part 12: The proposed changes add references to the Paid Medical Leave Act, “notice of violation”  
procedures, and authorized representation at a hearing.  
Part 13: Rescind.  
Part 14. The proposed changes update the name and references to the Unemployment Insurance  
Appeals Commission (formerly the Michigan Compensation Appellate Commission). The  
proposed changes also address subpoena authority, development of the record, and rehearing and  
reopening requests. At the agency’s request, the proposed changes also rescind and delete Rules  
1417 through 1433 to eliminate duplication with the MOAHR.  
Part 15:The proposed change ensures consistency with the definitions section with respect to  
reference to the hearing system.  
Part 16: The proposed change corrects the spelling of "retirement" in Rules 1601(2)(f) and 1609  
(1).  
Part 19: The proposed changes address the notice of hearing and record evidence provisions of the  
hearings and decisions section.  
8. Please cite the specific promulgation authority for the rules (i.e. department director,  
commission, board, etc.).  
By authority conferred on the executive director of the Michigan office of administrative hearings  
and rules.  
A. Please list all applicable statutory references (MCLs, Executive Orders, etc.).  
MCL 24.239  
RFR-Page 3  
Executive Reorganization Order (ERO) Nos. 2005-1, 2011-4, and 2011-6, and the Michigan office  
of administrative hearings and rules by EO No. 2019-6 and EO 2019-13, MCL 445.2021,  
445.2030, 445.2032, 324.99923, 125.998, and section 33 of the administrative procedures act of  
1969, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.233, as well as the following provisions applicable to specific  
practice areas.  
Part 1: ERO 2005-1, MCL 445.2021.  
Part 2: sections 32 and 49 of 1973 PA 186, MCL 205.732 and 205.749.  
Part 3: sections 2233, and 13322 of 1978 PA 368, MCL 333.2233 and 333.13322; ERO Nos.  
1997-2 and 1998-2, MCL 29.451 and 29.461; parts 31, 33, 41, 55, 63, 111, 115, and 201 of 1994  
PA 451, MCL 324.101 to 324.90106; and ERO No. 1995-16, MCL 324.99903.  
Part 4: section 7 of 1909 PA 106, MCL 460.557; section 2 of 1909 PA 300, MCL 462.2; section 5  
of 1919 PA 419, MCL 460.55; article 5, sections 6 and 6a of 1939 PA 3, MCL 460.6 and MCL  
460.6a, article 5, section 6 of 1933 PA 254, MCL 479.6; and ERO No. 2015-3, MCL 460.21.  
Part 5: section 675, 1949 PA 300, MCL 257.675; section 5 of 1969 PA 200, MCL 247.325, and  
section 23 of 1972 PA 106, MCL 252.323.  
Part 6: section 210 of 1956 PA 218, MCL 500.210.  
Part 8: section 308 of 1980 PA 299, MCL 339.308, and ERO Nos. 1996-1 and 2003-1, MCL  
330.3101 and 445.2011.  
Part 9: sections 6 and 9 of 1939 PA 280, MCL 400.6 and 400.9; and sections 2226 and 2233 of  
1978 PA 368, MCL 333.2226, and 333.2233.  
Part 10: section 6 of 1939 PA 280, MCL 400.6; and ERO Nos. 2005-1, 2011-4, 2015-1, and 2018-  
6, MCL 445.2021, 445.2030, 400.227, and 722.110.  
Part 11: section 46 of 1974 PA 154, MCL 408.1046.  
Part 12: section 12 of 1978 PA 390, MCL 408.482, and section 7(3) of 2018 PA 338, MCL  
408.967.  
Part 13: section 213 of 1969 PA 317, MCL 418.213, and ERO Nos. 1996-2, 2002-1, and 2003-1,  
MCL 445.2001, 445.2004, and 445.2011.  
Part 14: section 34 of 1936 PA 1, MCL 421.34, and ERO Nos. 1996-2, 2003-1, 2011-4, 2011-6,  
MCL 445.2001, 445.2011, 445.2030, and 445.2032.  
Part 15: sections 7, 9a and 27 of 1939 PA 176, MCL 423.7, 423.9a, 423.27, sections 12 and 14 of  
1947 PA 336, MCL 423.212 and 432.214; and ERO Nos. 1996-2, 2011-4, and 2011-5, MCL  
445.2001, 445.2030, and 445.2031.  
Part 16: section 2 of 1943 PA 240, MCL 38.2.  
Part 19: section 6 of 1953 PA 232, MCL 791.206  
MCL 24.239  
RFR-Page 4  
B. Are the rules mandated by any applicable constitutional or statutory provision? If so, please  
explain.  
The following MCLs mandate rule promulgation: MCL 205.749, 333.13322, 324.3131, 324.5504,  
324.5505, 324.5506, 324.5507, 324.5509, 324.5512, 324.11114, 324.11127, 324.11508,  
324.11538, 324.11547, 324.20139, 460.6a, 479.6, 247.325, 500.210, 339.308, 408.1046, 423.7,  
432.214.  
9. Please describe the extent to which the rules conflict with or duplicate similar rules,  
compliance requirements, or other standards adopted at the state, regional, or federal level.  
The proposed rules set will not conflict, duplicate or exceed similar regulations, compliance  
requirements or standards, but will instead comply with all current statutory requirements for  
hearings conducted by MOAHR.  
10. Is the subject matter of the rules currently contained in any guideline, handbook, manual,  
instructional bulletin, form with instructions, or operational memoranda?  
No.  
11. Are the rules listed on the department’s annual regulatory plan as rules to be processed  
for the current year?  
Yes.  
12. Will the proposed rules be promulgated under Section 44 of the Administrative Procedures  
Act, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.244, or under the full rulemaking process?  
Full Process  
13. Please describe the extent to which the rules exceed similar regulations, compliance  
requirements, or other standards adopted at the state, regional, or federal level.  
The proposed rules set will not conflict, duplicate or exceed similar regulations, compliance  
requirements or standards, but will instead comply with all current statutory requirements for  
hearings conducted by MOAHR.  
14. Do the rules incorporate the recommendations received from the public regarding any  
complaints or comments regarding the rules? If yes, please explain.  
No.  
15. If amending an existing rule set, please provide the date of the last evaluation of the rules  
and the degree, if any, to which technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changed  
the regulatory activity covered by the rules since the last evaluation.  
This rules set was last reviewed in 2018. The administrative hearings process (the regulatory  
activity covered by this rules set) has improved from a technological standpoint with electronic  
filing and remote video and telephone hearing capabilities but otherwise remains unchanged. The  
process has also changed due to the transfer of certain aspects of the process from MOAHR to  
other agencies by executive reorganization order(s).  
16. Are there any changes or developments since implementation that demonstrate there is no  
continued need for the rules, or any portion of the rules?  
No.  
17. Is there an applicable decision record (as defined in MCL 24.203(6) and required by MCL  
24.239(2))? If so, please attach the decision record.  
No  
MCL 24.239  
;