RFR-Page 2
9. Please describe the extent to which the rules conflict with or duplicate similar rules,
compliance requirements, or other standards adopted at the state, regional, or federal level.
The proposed rules duplicate the requirements in the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1306,
entitled Prescriptions, Title 21 CFR 1306.15, regarding the prescription information between retail
pharmacies and central fill pharmacies for prescriptions of schedule II controlled substances, and
Title 21 CFR 1306.27, regarding the prescription information between retail pharmacies and
central fill pharmacies for initial and refill prescriptions of schedule III, IV, or V controlled
substances.
10. Is the subject matter of the rules currently contained in any guideline, handbook, manual,
instructional bulletin, form with instructions, or operational memoranda?
Yes, the subject matter of these rules is contained in the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1306,
entitled Prescriptions, Title 21 CFR 1306.15, and Title 21 CFR 1306.27.
11. Are the rules listed on the department’s annual regulatory plan as rules to be processed
for the current year?
Yes.
12. Will the proposed rules be promulgated under Section 44 of the Administrative Procedures
Act, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.244, or under the full rulemaking process?
Full Process
13. Please describe the extent to which the rules exceed similar regulations, compliance
requirements, or other standards adopted at the state, regional, or federal level.
Although there are other similar provisions at the federal level, the proposed rules do not exceed
similar regulations, compliance requirements, or other standards adopted at the state, regional, or
federal level.
14. Do the rules incorporate the recommendations received from the public regarding any
complaints or comments regarding the rules? If yes, please explain.
The Department will work with associations, related businesses, and lobbyists in preparing the
proposed rules.
15. If amending an existing rule set, please provide the date of the last evaluation of the rules
and the degree, if any, to which technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changed
the regulatory activity covered by the rules since the last evaluation.
The rules were promulgated in 2008. There have been no technological factors, economic
conditions, or other factors that would necessitate amendment of the rules.
16. Are there any changes or developments since implementation that demonstrate there is no
continued need for the rules, or any portion of the rules?
No, there are no changes or developments since implementation of the rules that demonstrate there
is no continued need for the rules, or any portion of the rules.
17. Is there an applicable decision record (as defined in MCL 24.203(6) and required by MCL
24.239(2))? If so, please attach the decision record.
Yes
MCL 24.239