RFR-Page 2
The Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 requires that the Michigan
Occupational Safety and Health Act promulgate standards that are “at least as effective as” those
promulgated under Section 6 of the Act. By authority conferred on the director of the department
of labor and economic opportunity by sections 14, 14r, 16, and 21 of Act No. 154 of 1974, as
amended, being MCL, 408.1014, 408.1014r, MCL 408.1016 an MCL 408.1021.
A. Please list all applicable statutory references (MCLs, Executive Orders, etc.).
Executive Reorganization Order Nos. 1996-2, 2003-1, 2008-4, 2011-4, and 2019-3, MCL
445.2001, 445.2011, 445.2025, 445.2030, 125.1998, 408.1014, 408.1014r, 408.1016, and
408.1021.
B. Are the rules mandated by any applicable constitutional or statutory provision? If so, please
explain.
Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1974 PA 154 sections MCL 408.1014, 408.1014r,
408.1021.
9. Please describe the extent to which the rules conflict with or duplicate similar rules,
compliance requirements, or other standards adopted at the state, regional, or federal level.
There are rules in this ruleset that duplicate rules at the federal level. In addition, there are rules in
this ruleset specific to PFAS that are not in the federal level rules.
10. Is the subject matter of the rules currently contained in any guideline, handbook, manual,
instructional bulletin, form with instructions, or operational memoranda?
None that MIOSHA is aware of.
11. Are the rules listed on the department’s annual regulatory plan as rules to be processed
for the current year?
Yes
12. Will the proposed rules be promulgated under Section 44 of the Administrative Procedures
Act, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.244, or under the full rulemaking process?
Full Process
13. Please describe the extent to which the rules exceed similar regulations, compliance
requirements, or other standards adopted at the state, regional, or federal level.
These proposed rules are more restrictive than Federal OSHA in that Federal OSHA does not
address the proper use, handling, storage, and containment of firefighting foam containing PFAS.
Therefore, these rules are being promulgated under the full rulemaking process as specified in the
Administrative Procedures Act and a public hearing is required.
14. Do the rules incorporate the recommendations received from the public regarding any
complaints or comments regarding the rules? If yes, please explain.
No comments have been received from the public regarding these rules; however, MIOSHA will
be convening an advisory committee to receive input from the industry.
15. If amending an existing rule set, please provide the date of the last evaluation of the rules
and the degree, if any, to which technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changed
the regulatory activity covered by the rules since the last evaluation.
The rules were last updated on May 28, 2015.
16. Are there any changes or developments since implementation that demonstrate there is no
continued need for the rules, or any portion of the rules?
MIOSHA is not aware of any changes.
MCL 24.239