Michigan Office of Administrative Hearings and Rules  
Administrative Rules Division (ARD)  
REQUEST FOR RULEMAKING (RFR)  
1. Department:  
State Police  
2. Bureau:  
Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards (MCOLES)  
3. Promulgation type:  
Full Process  
4. Title of proposed rule set:  
Law Enforcement Standards and Training  
5. Rule numbers or rule set range of numbers:  
R 28.14101 - R 28.14702  
6. Estimated time frame:  
12 months  
Name of person filling out RFR:  
John Gemellaro  
E-mail of person filling out RFR:  
Phone number of person filling out RFR:  
517-242-4548  
Address of person filling out RFR:  
Michigan State Police Headquarters  
7150 Harris Drive  
Dimondale, MI 48221  
7. Describe the general purpose of these rules, including any problems the changes are intended  
to address.  
The general purpose of this proposed amendment to R 28.14210 is to set minimum standards for  
active violence response training.  
8. Please cite the specific promulgation authority for the rules (i.e. department director,  
commission, board, etc.).  
The Commission is required to promulgate this rule under §9e(2) of the Michigan commission on  
law enforcement standards act, as amended, MCL 28.609e(2).  
A. Please list all applicable statutory references (MCLs, Executive Orders, etc.).  
The Commission is required to promulgate this rule under §9e(2) of the Michigan commission on  
law enforcement standards act, as amended, MCL 28.609e(2).  
B. Are the rules mandated by any applicable constitutional or statutory provision? If so, please  
explain.  
The Commission is required promulgate this rule under §9e(2) of the Michigan commission on  
law enforcement standards act, as amended, MCL 28.609e(2), to set the minimum standards for  
the active violence response training.  
9. Please describe the extent to which the rules conflict with or duplicate similar rules,  
compliance requirements, or other standards adopted at the state, regional, or federal level.  
MCL 24.239  
RFR-Page 2  
The rules do not conflict with or duplicate similar rules, compliance requirements, or other  
standards adopted at the state, regional, or federal level.  
10. Is the subject matter of the rules currently contained in any guideline, handbook, manual,  
instructional bulletin, form with instructions, or operational memoranda?  
The subject matter of these rules is not contained in any guideline, handbook, manual,  
instructional bulletin, form with instructions or operational memoranda.  
11. Are the rules listed on the department’s annual regulatory plan as rules to be processed  
for the current year?  
Yes, this rule is on the department’s annual regulatory plan.  
12. Will the proposed rules be promulgated under Section 44 of the Administrative Procedures  
Act, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.244, or under the full rulemaking process?  
Full Process  
13. Please describe the extent to which the rules exceed similar regulations, compliance  
requirements, or other standards adopted at the state, regional, or federal level.  
This rule does not exceed similar regulations, compliance requirements, or other standards  
adopted at the state, regional, or federal level.  
14. Do the rules incorporate the recommendations received from the public regarding any  
complaints or comments regarding the rules? If yes, please explain.  
No recommendations have been received from the public regarding any complaints or comments  
regarding the rules.  
15. If amending an existing rule set, please provide the date of the last evaluation of the rules  
and the degree, if any, to which technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changed  
the regulatory activity covered by the rules since the last evaluation.  
The existing ruleset was last evaluated as part of the department's annual regulatory plan  
submitted on July 1, 2022, and technology, economic conditions, or other factors have not  
changed the regulatory activity covered by the rules since the last evaluation.  
16. Are there any changes or developments since implementation that demonstrate there is no  
continued need for the rules, or any portion of the rules?  
There is a continued need for these rules as they set forth the law enforcement standards and  
training for all persons seeking a license or who are licensed under the Michigan commission on  
law enforcement standards act.  
17. Is there an applicable decision record (as defined in MCL 24.203(6) and required by MCL  
24.239(2))? If so, please attach the decision record.  
No  
MCL 24.239  
;