Michigan Office of Administrative Hearings and Rules  
Administrative Rules Division (ARD)  
REQUEST FOR RULEMAKING (RFR)  
1. Department:  
Health and Human Services  
2. Bureau:  
Public Health Administration  
3. Promulgation type:  
Full Process  
4. Title of proposed rule set:  
Universal Blood Lead Testing  
5. Rule numbers or rule set range of numbers:  
R 330.301 – R 330.319  
6. Estimated time frame:  
6 months  
Name of person filling out RFR:  
Talisa Gauthier  
E-mail of person filling out RFR:  
Phone number of person filling out RFR:  
517-284-4853  
Address of person filling out RFR:  
235 S. Grand Ave, Lansing MI 48933  
7. Describe the general purpose of these rules, including any problems the changes are intended  
to address.  
The purpose of these rules is to follow the mandate of 2023 PA 146, MCL 333.5474d that requires  
the Department to promulgate rules requiring physicians to test, or order a test, for children for  
exposure to lead at select ages and under certain conditions and in certain geographical areas of  
the state. They also require physicians to enter the blood lead test result on the child’s Certificate  
of Immunization.  
8. Please cite the specific promulgation authority for the rules (i.e. department director,  
commission, board, etc.).  
Department Director  
A. Please list all applicable statutory references (MCLs, Executive Orders, etc.).  
By authority conferred on the Director of the Department of Health and Human Services by  
sections 2233, 9227, 20910, and newly added 5474d of the public health code, 1978 PA 368, MCL  
333.2233, 333.9227, 333.20910, and 333.5474d.  
B. Are the rules mandated by any applicable constitutional or statutory provision? If so, please  
explain.  
The rules are mandated under 2023 PA 146, MCL 333.5474d and 1978 PA 368, MCL 333.9227.  
9. Please describe the extent to which the rules conflict with or duplicate similar rules,  
compliance requirements, or other standards adopted at the state, regional, or federal level.  
MCL 24.239  
RFR-Page 2  
The rules do not conflict with or duplicate similar rules, compliance requirements, or other  
standards adopted at the state, regional, or federal level.  
10. Is the subject matter of the rules currently contained in any guideline, handbook, manual,  
instructional bulletin, form with instructions, or operational memoranda?  
Currently, the Department provides guidelines for blood lead testing of children that do not  
include all the mandates specified in MCL 333.5474d. These rules would provide those mandates.  
Additionally, under administrative rules R. 325.9081-325.9086, persons using portable blood lead  
analyzers and laboratories analyzing blood specimens for lead have certain reporting  
responsibilities. These rules will establish more comprehensive requirements for testing and the  
reporting of tests, particularly including a reporting requirement for physicians who order or  
perform blood lead tests.  
11. Are the rules listed on the department’s annual regulatory plan as rules to be processed  
for the current year?  
The rules were not listed on the department’s annual regulatory plan for the current year. These  
rules are being promulgated because of the statutory requirements in MCL 333.5474d.  
12. Will the proposed rules be promulgated under Section 44 of the Administrative Procedures  
Act, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.244, or under the full rulemaking process?  
Full Process  
13. Please describe the extent to which the rules exceed similar regulations, compliance  
requirements, or other standards adopted at the state, regional, or federal level.  
Under Mich Admin Code R 325.9081-325.9086, persons using portable blood lead analyzers and  
laboratories analyzing blood specimens for lead have certain reporting responsibilities. These rules  
will establish more comprehensive requirements for testing and the reporting of tests, particularly  
including a reporting requirement for physicians who order or perform blood lead tests.  
14. Do the rules incorporate the recommendations received from the public regarding any  
complaints or comments regarding the rules? If yes, please explain.  
These rules do not incorporate the recommendations received from the public regarding any  
complaints or comments.  
15. If amending an existing rule set, please provide the date of the last evaluation of the rules  
and the degree, if any, to which technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changed  
the regulatory activity covered by the rules since the last evaluation.  
This is a new rule set.  
16. Are there any changes or developments since implementation that demonstrate there is no  
continued need for the rules, or any portion of the rules?  
This is a new rule set and the rules are mandated by the Legislature under MCL 333.5474d.  
17. Is there an applicable decision record (as defined in MCL 24.203(6) and required by MCL  
24.239(2))? If so, please attach the decision record.  
No  
Based on the information provided in this RFR, MOAHR concludes that there are sufficient  
policy and legal bases for approving the RFR. The RFR satisfies the requirements of the  
Administrative Procedures Act of 1969, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.201 to 24.328, and Executive  
Order No. 2019-6.  
MCL 24.239  
;