RFR-Page 2
The rules do not conflict with or duplicate similar rules, compliance requirements, or other
standards adopted at the state, regional, or federal level.
10. Is the subject matter of the rules currently contained in any guideline, handbook, manual,
instructional bulletin, form with instructions, or operational memoranda?
Currently, the Department provides guidelines for blood lead testing of children that do not
include all the mandates specified in MCL 333.5474d. These rules would provide those mandates.
Additionally, under administrative rules R. 325.9081-325.9086, persons using portable blood lead
analyzers and laboratories analyzing blood specimens for lead have certain reporting
responsibilities. These rules will establish more comprehensive requirements for testing and the
reporting of tests, particularly including a reporting requirement for physicians who order or
perform blood lead tests.
11. Are the rules listed on the department’s annual regulatory plan as rules to be processed
for the current year?
The rules were not listed on the department’s annual regulatory plan for the current year. These
rules are being promulgated because of the statutory requirements in MCL 333.5474d.
12. Will the proposed rules be promulgated under Section 44 of the Administrative Procedures
Act, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.244, or under the full rulemaking process?
Full Process
13. Please describe the extent to which the rules exceed similar regulations, compliance
requirements, or other standards adopted at the state, regional, or federal level.
Under Mich Admin Code R 325.9081-325.9086, persons using portable blood lead analyzers and
laboratories analyzing blood specimens for lead have certain reporting responsibilities. These rules
will establish more comprehensive requirements for testing and the reporting of tests, particularly
including a reporting requirement for physicians who order or perform blood lead tests.
14. Do the rules incorporate the recommendations received from the public regarding any
complaints or comments regarding the rules? If yes, please explain.
These rules do not incorporate the recommendations received from the public regarding any
complaints or comments.
15. If amending an existing rule set, please provide the date of the last evaluation of the rules
and the degree, if any, to which technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changed
the regulatory activity covered by the rules since the last evaluation.
This is a new rule set.
16. Are there any changes or developments since implementation that demonstrate there is no
continued need for the rules, or any portion of the rules?
This is a new rule set and the rules are mandated by the Legislature under MCL 333.5474d.
17. Is there an applicable decision record (as defined in MCL 24.203(6) and required by MCL
24.239(2))? If so, please attach the decision record.
No
Based on the information provided in this RFR, MOAHR concludes that there are sufficient
policy and legal bases for approving the RFR. The RFR satisfies the requirements of the
Administrative Procedures Act of 1969, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.201 to 24.328, and Executive
Order No. 2019-6.
MCL 24.239