Michigan Office of Administrative Hearings and Rules  
Administrative Rules Division (ARD)  
REQUEST FOR RULEMAKING (RFR)  
1. Department:  
Licensing and Regulatory Affairs  
2. Bureau:  
Bureau of Construction Codes  
3. Promulgation type:  
Full Process  
4. Title of proposed rule set:  
Ski Area Safety – General Rules  
5. Rule numbers or rule set range of numbers:  
R 408.61 – R 408.95  
6. Estimated time frame:  
12 months  
Name of person filling out RFR:  
Daniela Pelachyk  
E-mail of person filling out RFR:  
Phone number of person filling out RFR:  
517-284-7738  
Address of person filling out RFR:  
611 West Ottawa Street, Lansing, MI 48909  
7. Describe the general purpose of these rules, including any problems the changes are intended  
to address.  
R 408.65 is being revised to update the most current addition of the American National Standards  
Institute (ANSI) standard B77.1 on safety requirements for passenger ropeways – aerial tramways,  
aerial lifts, surface lifts, tows, and conveyors, that is adopted by reference in this rule.  
8. Please cite the specific promulgation authority for the rules (i.e. department director,  
commission, board, etc.).  
The Ski Area Safety Board has promulgation authority.  
A. Please list all applicable statutory references (MCLs, Executive Orders, etc.).  
MCL 408.326; and Executive Reorganization Order Nos. 1991-9, 1996-2, 2003-1, 2008-4, and  
2011-4, MCL 338.3501, 445.2001, 445.2011, 445.2025, and 445.2030.  
B. Are the rules mandated by any applicable constitutional or statutory provision? If so, please  
explain.  
These rules are mandated by the Ski Area Safety Act of 1962 PA 199, MCL 408.326.  
9. Please describe the extent to which the rules conflict with or duplicate similar rules,  
compliance requirements, or other standards adopted at the state, regional, or federal level.  
The rules do not conflict with or duplicate similar rules or regulations adopted by the state,  
regional or federal government.  
MCL 24.239  
RFR-Page 2  
10. Is the subject matter of the rules currently contained in any guideline, handbook, manual,  
instructional bulletin, form with instructions, or operational memoranda?  
No, there is no subject matter of the rules currently contained in any guideline, handbook, manual,  
instructional bulletin, form with instructions, or operational memoranda.  
11. Are the rules listed on the department’s annual regulatory plan as rules to be processed  
for the current year?  
Yes, these rules are listed on the department’s annual regulatory plan.  
12. Will the proposed rules be promulgated under Section 44 of the Administrative Procedures  
Act, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.244, or under the full rulemaking process?  
Full Process  
13. Please describe the extent to which the rules exceed similar regulations, compliance  
requirements, or other standards adopted at the state, regional, or federal level.  
There are no similar rules or regulations adopted by state, regional or federal government.  
14. Do the rules incorporate the recommendations received from the public regarding any  
complaints or comments regarding the rules? If yes, please explain.  
No. The rules do not incorporate the recommendations from the public.  
15. If amending an existing rule set, please provide the date of the last evaluation of the rules  
and the degree, if any, to which technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changed  
the regulatory activity covered by the rules since the last evaluation.  
The rules were last updated on December 10, 2020.  
16. Are there any changes or developments since implementation that demonstrate there is no  
continued need for the rules, or any portion of the rules?  
There have been no changes or developments since implementation that indicate the Michigan ski  
rules or any portion of the rules should be discontinued.  
17. Is there an applicable decision record (as defined in MCL 24.203(6) and required by MCL  
24.239(2))? If so, please attach the decision record.  
No  
Based on the information provided in this RFR, MOAHR concludes that there are sufficient  
policy and legal bases for approving the RFR. The RFR satisfies the requirements of the  
Administrative Procedures Act of 1969, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.201 to 24.328, and Executive  
Order No. 2019-6.  
MCL 24.239  
;