RFR-Page 2
Yes. Section 202(2) of the Code requires that the department establish the expiration date of a
license or registration via rule.
Section 205 of the Code grants the department the authority to promulgate rules to implement
articles 1 to 6.
9. Please describe the extent to which the rules conflict with or duplicate similar rules,
compliance requirements, or other standards adopted at the state, regional, or federal level.
The rules do not conflict with or duplicate similar rules, compliance requirements, or other
standards adopted at the state, regional, or federal level.
10. Is the subject matter of the rules currently contained in any guideline, handbook, manual,
instructional bulletin, form with instructions, or operational memoranda?
No.
11. Are the rules listed on the department’s annual regulatory plan as rules to be processed
for the current year?
No.
12. Will the proposed rules be promulgated under Section 44 of the Administrative Procedures
Act, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.244, or under the full rulemaking process?
MCL 24.244 (1)
A. Explain why the rules are being promulgated under 24.244.
The rules must be promulgated under Section 44 of the APA because recent statutory changes to
the occupational code adding a new license and a new registration to CSCL's regulatory scheme
require the department to set a renewal date. Section 202(2) of the Code requires that this be done
via rule. Seeing as this would be a statutorily-required ministerial change, as opposed to a
substantive one, CSCL believes that this justifies the rationale to promulgate a change to R
339.1003 under MCL 24.244(1).
Based on the information provided in this RFR, MOAHR concludes that there are sufficient
policy and legal bases for approving the RFR. The RFR satisfies the requirements of the
Administrative Procedures Act of 1969, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.201 to 24.328, and Executive
Order No. 2019-6.
MCL 24.239