RFR-Page 2
B. Are the rules mandated by any applicable constitutional or statutory provision? If so, please
explain.
The rules are not mandated by constitutional or statutory provisions. MCL 333.6234 states that,
“The department may promulgate rules under the administrative procedures act of 1969 for the
administration of this part and the licensing of substance use disorder services programs under this
part. Rules promulgated under former section 6231 relating to the licensing of substance use
disorder services programs remain effective and applicable on and after the effective date of this
section until rules are promulgated by the department under this section.”
9. Please describe the extent to which the rules conflict with or duplicate similar rules,
compliance requirements, or other standards adopted at the state, regional, or federal level.
The proposed rules will not conflict with or duplicate similar rules, compliance requirements or
other standards adopted at the state, regional, or federal level.
10. Is the subject matter of the rules currently contained in any guideline, handbook, manual,
instructional bulletin, form with instructions, or operational memoranda?
The subject matter is not currently contained in any guidance, handbook, manual, instructional
bulletin, form with instructions, or operational memorandum.
11. Are the rules listed on the department’s annual regulatory plan as rules to be processed
for the current year?
Promulgation of these rules are included in the LARA Annual Regulatory Plan.
12. Will the proposed rules be promulgated under Section 44 of the Administrative Procedures
Act, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.244, or under the full rulemaking process?
Full Process
13. Please describe the extent to which the rules exceed similar regulations, compliance
requirements, or other standards adopted at the state, regional, or federal level.
The proposed rules will not exceed similar regulations, compliance requirements, or other
standards adopted at the state, regional, or federal level.
14. Do the rules incorporate the recommendations received from the public regarding any
complaints or comments regarding the rules? If yes, please explain.
The proposed changes are the result of input from licensed providers and various associations to
eliminate the need to regulate outpatient counseling services as these providers are already
licensed by the state under the Public Health Code, Article 15, or certified by the state’s only
recognized certification organization, Michigan Certification Board for Addiction Professionals
(MCBAP). This proposed change eliminates what some consider a duplicate and unnecessary
license. The other primary change was provided by the Michigan Bleeding Disorders Coalition.
15. If amending an existing rule set, please provide the date of the last evaluation of the rules
and the degree, if any, to which technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changed
the regulatory activity covered by the rules since the last evaluation.
Rules were last revised June 26, 2023. Technology, economic conditions, or other factors have not
changed the regulatory activity covered by the rules since the last evaluation.
16. Are there any changes or developments since implementation that demonstrate there is no
continued need for the rules, or any portion of the rules?
There are no changes or developments that demonstrate there is no continued need for the rules.
17. Is there an applicable decision record (as defined in MCL 24.203(6) and required by MCL
24.239(2))? If so, please attach the decision record.
MCL 24.239