RFR-Page 2
manufacture, importation, possession, transportation, and sale thereof and MCL 436.1215(1)
provides the Commission with general rulemaking authority.
9. Please describe the extent to which the rules conflict with or duplicate similar rules,
compliance requirements, or other standards adopted at the state, regional, or federal level.
The rule fails to formally provide adequate due process in that it summarily suspends a liquor license
when the entity is not in good standing. Due process requires an opportunity to be heard at a
meaningful time and a meaningful place. See Van Slooten v Larsen, 410 Mich 21, 53 (1980). The rule
also sidesteps the Commission's established hearings and appeals administrative rules which require
a violation report to be generated following an investigation. After a violation report is submitted, the
Attorney General's office determines if sufficient evidence exists to support drafting a complaint. The
rule eliminates this process. Further, the rule conflicts with other statutes that allow a business that is
not in good standing to continue to operate such as the Michigan Limited Liability Company Act, MCL
450.4207a(3).
The rule also contains parts that are unnecessary and confusing. First, the rule fails to define any of
its key terms. This creates confusion with regulators and licensees alike. For example, the rule fails to
define what is meant by a "revoked" business. Further, the rules do not specify whether "expired"
refers to the articles of incorporation, certificate of good standing, or some other shortfall by the
business.
The rule confuses what statutes allow. For example, a business entity may renew its existence or
otherwise be reconstituted in a retroactive manner. If a corporation renews its corporate existence,
the corporation's rights are as though the expiration had not happened, and the contracts entered into
during an interval of expiration are valid. MCL 450.1817. Corporations also continue in existence
even after they are in a dissolved state. Under MCL 450.1833, corporations remain in existence even
after dissolution so they can wind down their affairs. Additionally, pursuant to MCL 450.1922, a
corporation has two years and six months to come back into good standing before any dissolution
occurs.
10. Is the subject matter of the rules currently contained in any guideline, handbook, manual,
instructional bulletin, form with instructions, or operational memoranda?
No.
11. Are the rules listed on the department’s annual regulatory plan as rules to be processed for
the current year?
No.
12. Will the proposed rules be promulgated under Section 44 of the administrative procedures act
of 1969, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.244, or under the full rulemaking process?
MCL 24.244 (1)
A. Explain why the rules are being promulgated under 24.244.
R 436.1012 is obsolete and superseded by section 207a(3) of the Michigan limited liability
company act, 1992 PA 23, MCL 450.4207a(3) and sections 817, 833, and 922 of the business
corporation act, 1972 PA 284, MCL 450.1817, MCL 450.1833, and MCL 450.1922, and the
rescission of R 436.1012 is for the solely formal purpose of removing the conflicts with statutes.
Based on the information provided in this RFR, MOAHR concludes that there are sufficient policy and legal
bases for approving the RFR. The RFR satisfies the requirements of the administrative procedures act of
1969, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.201 to 24.328, and Executive Reorganization Order No. 2019-1, MCL 324.99923.
MCL 24.239