RIS-Page 7
There are no expected costs for legal, consulting, or accounting services that a small business would incur in
complying with the proposed rules.
24. Estimate the ability of small businesses to absorb the costs without suffering economic harm and without
adversely affecting competition in the marketplace.
There are no expected costs to a small business that will cause economic harm to a small business or the marketplace
as a result of the proposed rules.
25. Estimate the cost, if any, to the agency of administering or enforcing a rule that exempts or sets lesser
standards for compliance by small businesses.
The proposed rules impose requirements on individual licensees rather than a small business. Even if a licensee’s
practice qualifies as a small business, the department could not exempt his or her business because it would create
disparity in the regulation of the profession.
Therefore, there is no cost to the agency for administering or enforcing the rules because exempting or setting lesser
standards of compliance for a small business is not in the best interest of the public.
26. Identify the impact on the public interest of exempting or setting lesser standards of compliance for small
businesses.
The proposed rules impose requirements on individual licensees rather than a small business. Even if a licensee’s
work qualifies as a small business, the department could not exempt his or her business because it would create a
disparity in the regulation of the profession. Therefore, exempting or setting lesser standards of compliance for a
small business is not in the best interest of the public.
27. Describe whether and how the agency has involved small businesses in the development of the proposed rules.
The department worked with the Michigan Board of Podiatric Medicine and Surgery in the development of the
proposed rules. The Board is composed of professional and public members.
A. If small businesses were involved in the development of the rules, please identify the business(es).
No small businesses were involved in the development of the rules.
Cost-Benefit Analysis of Rules (independent of statutory impact)
28. Estimate the actual statewide compliance costs of the rule amendments on businesses or groups.
There are no estimated compliance costs with these rule amendments on businesses or groups.
A. Identify the businesses or groups who will be directly affected by, bear the cost of, or directly benefit from the
proposed rules.
No businesses or groups will be directly affected or benefitted by the proposed rules. No additional costs will be
imposed on any businesses or groups.
B. What additional costs will be imposed on businesses and other groups as a result of these proposed rules (i.e.
new equipment, supplies, labor, accounting, or recordkeeping)? Please identify the types and number of businesses
and groups. Be sure to quantify how each entity will be affected.
No additional costs will be imposed on any businesses or groups.
29. Estimate the actual statewide compliance costs of the proposed rules on individuals (regulated individuals or
the public). Include the costs of education, training, application fees, examination fees, license fees, new
equipment, supplies, labor, accounting, or recordkeeping.
It is estimated that there will be no new compliance costs imposed on individuals as a result of the proposed rules.
A. How many and what category of individuals will be affected by the rules?
All licensees and applicants are affected by the proposed rules.
B. What qualitative and quantitative impact do the proposed changes in rules have on these individuals?
There is no qualitative or quantitative impact on individuals as a result of the proposed rules.
30. Quantify any cost reductions to businesses, individuals, groups of individuals, or governmental units as a result
of the proposed rules.
There are no cost reductions to businesses, individuals, groups of individuals, or governmental units as a result of the
proposed rules.
MCL 24.245(3)