RIS-Page 6
The child placing agencies themselves benefit from the rules to secure funding paid by the State to make best interest
placement determination and monitor a child’s progress within the system. The parents of a foster child and the child
benefit as the rules are centered on the best interests of the child in an out of home placement where the child is safe
and secure. Applicants are directly affected by, and benefit from, the amended non-safety requirements to expand the
number of licensed foster homes available in the state.
B. What additional costs will be imposed on businesses and other groups as a result of these proposed rules (i.e.
new equipment, supplies, labor, accounting, or recordkeeping)? Please identify the types and number of businesses
and groups. Be sure to quantify how each entity will be affected.
There are no anticipated additional costs on businesses and other groups as a result of these proposed rules.
29. Estimate the actual statewide compliance costs of the proposed rules on individuals (regulated individuals or
the public). Include the costs of education, training, application fees, examination fees, license fees, new
equipment, supplies, labor, accounting, or recordkeeping.
There are no changes in fees for child placing agencies and/or foster parents. The costs associated with the new
staffing standard have already been factored into the department’s reimbursement rates for those private agencies
under contract. Training will be implemented by the department. It is not anticipated that labor, accounting, or
recordkeeping costs will increase as a result of these proposed rules.
A. How many and what category of individuals will be affected by the rules?
All individual foster parents, child placing agency staff, state licensing staff, monitors of the Dwayne B. lawsuit, and
other outside agencies associated with child welfare services will be affected by the rules.
B. What qualitative and quantitative impact do the proposed changes in rules have on these individuals?
The proposed rules are designed to reduce barriers to foster home licensure and affects all prospective, current foster
parents, and child placing agency staff.
30. Quantify any cost reductions to businesses, individuals, groups of individuals, or governmental units as a result
of the proposed rules.
The proposed rules are generally cost-neutral other than those noted above.
31. Estimate the primary and direct benefits and any secondary or indirect benefits of the proposed rules. Please
provide both quantitative and qualitative information, as well as your assumptions.
•Increase in foster homes.
•Increase in extended opportunities for agencies to establish compliance with rules.
•Increased adherence to safety standards for child welfare agencies as outlined by the National Model Standards.
•Increase in confidence by birth parents with children in foster care placement which allows the parents to address
their issues, such as religion/spirituality and SOGIE, concerning reunification.
•Reduction in the number of placements foster children experience while in foster care due to increase in assessment
in areas related to religion/spirituality and SOGIE training for child welfare staff and foster parents.
32. Explain how the proposed rules will impact business growth and job creation (or elimination) in Michigan.
The rules are not anticipated to have any impact on business growth or job creation.
33. Identify any individuals or businesses who will be disproportionately affected by the rules as a result of their
industrial sector, segment of the public, business size, or geographic location.
The rules do not disproportionately affect any child placing agency or foster home as they apply equally to all
licensed child placing agencies and foster homes.
34. Identify the sources the agency relied upon in compiling the regulatory impact statement, including the
methodology utilized in determining the existence and extent of the impact of the proposed rules and a cost-
benefit analysis of the proposed rules.
Data for this Regulatory Impact Statement came from DHHS and DCWL, information and data provided form the
Rules Advisory Committee and other stakeholders, research on similarly situated states in the Midwest, The National
Model Licensing Standards, the authority of FFPSA, and other federal law.
A. How were estimates made, and what were your assumptions? Include internal and external sources, published
reports, information provided by associations or organizations, etc., that demonstrate a need for the proposed
rules.
All estimates and assumptions came from partnership with the identified stakeholders identified in section 34, which
identified the need for several amendments of the rules, particularly the amendment of the licensing requirements for
more foster homes being made available to children.
MCL 24.245(3)