RIS-Page 6
11. Describe whether or not an agency appropriation has been made or a funding source provided for any
expenditures associated with the proposed rules.
There has been no agency appropriation for the proposed rules because there are no expected agency expenditures
associated with the proposed rules.
12. Describe how the proposed rules are necessary and suitable to accomplish their purpose, in relationship to the
burden(s) the rules place on individuals. Burdens may include fiscal or administrative burdens, or duplicative
acts.
The proposed rules supply a mechanism for the licensing and regulation of individuals in this state, as mandated by
statute. Applicants and licensees will continue to have a cost related burden associated with licensing, renewal, or
relicensure. The cost of renewal for a Limited Licensed Speech-Language Pathologist is $159.10. The cost of
relicensure for a Limited Licensed Speech-Language Pathologist is $118.25. The cost of licensure for a Licensed
Speech-Language Pathologist by examination or endorsement is $100.75. The cost of renewal for a Licensed Speech
-Language Pathologist is $159.10. The cost of relicensure for a Licensed Speech-Language Pathologist is $120.75.
A. Despite the identified burden(s), identify how the requirements in the rules are still needed and reasonable
compared to the burdens.
The rules are necessary to supply a mechanism for licensing and regulation of the profession. The rules are not more
restrictive than allowed by statute. Despite the cost related burden of licensing, the rules and regulations are
necessary to supply a framework of standards for educational and licensure requirements.
13. Estimate any increase or decrease in revenues to other state or local governmental units (i.e. cities, counties,
school districts) as a result of the rule. Estimate the cost increases or reductions for other state or local
governmental units (i.e. cities, counties, school districts) as a result of the rule. Include the cost of equipment,
supplies, labor, and increased administrative costs in both the initial imposition of the rule and any ongoing
monitoring.
There is no expected increase or decrease in revenues to other state or local government units, nor are there cost
increases or reductions on other state or local government units expected because of the proposed rules. There is no
expected increase or decrease in revenues to other state or local government units, nor are there cost increases or
reductions on other state or local government units expected because of the proposed rules.
14. Discuss any program, service, duty, or responsibility imposed upon any city, county, town, village, or school
district by the rules.
The proposed rules do not impose any program, service, duty, or responsibility upon any city, county, town, village,
or school district.
A. Describe any actions that governmental units must take to be in compliance with the rules. This section should
include items such as record keeping and reporting requirements or changing operational practices.
No action is necessary for governmental units to follow the rule(s).
15. Describe whether or not an appropriation to state or local governmental units has been made or a funding
source provided for any additional expenditures associated with the proposed rules.
State and local government units will incur no added expenditures because of implementing the proposed rules.
Therefore, no appropriation or funding source is necessary.
16. In general, what impact will the rules have on rural areas?
There is no expected disparate impact on rural areas because of the proposed rules.
A. Describe the types of public or private interests in rural areas that will be affected by the rules.
There is no expected disparate impact of public or private interests on rural areas because of the proposed rules.
17. Do the proposed rules have any impact on the environment? If yes, please explain.
No, the proposed rules will have no impact on the environment.
18. Describe whether and how the agency considered exempting small businesses from the proposed rules.
The public health code authorizes the board and the department to regulate individuals with speech-language
pathologist licenses, not small businesses. Even if a licensee’s practice qualified as a small business, the department
could not exempt his or her small business because it would create disparity in the regulation of the profession.
19. If small businesses are not exempt, describe (a) the manner in which the agency reduced the economic impact
of the proposed rules on small businesses, including a detailed recitation of the efforts of the agency to comply
with the mandate to reduce the disproportionate impact of the rules upon small businesses as described below (in
accordance with MCL 24.240(1)(a-d)), or (b) the reasons such a reduction was not lawful or feasible.
MCL 24.245(3)