RIS-Page 7
The proposed rules impose requirements on individual licensees and registrants rather than a small business. Even if
a licensee’s or registrant’s practice qualifies as a small business, the department could not exempt the business
because it would create disparity in the regulation of the profession.
Therefore, there is no cost to the agency for administering or enforcing the rules because exempting or setting lesser
standards of compliance for a small business is not in the best interest of the public.
26. Identify the impact on the public interest of exempting or setting lesser standards of compliance for small
businesses.
The proposed rules have no impact on a small business, so no exemption was considered.
27. Describe whether and how the agency has involved small businesses in the development of the proposed rules.
The department did not involve any small businesses in the development of the proposed amended rules.
A. If small businesses were involved in the development of the rules, please identify the business(es).
No small businesses were involved in the development of the proposed amended rules.
Cost-Benefit Analysis of Rules (independent of statutory impact)
28. Estimate the actual statewide compliance costs of the rule amendments on businesses or groups.
There are no estimated compliance costs with these rule amendments on businesses or groups.
A. Identify the businesses or groups who will be directly affected by, bear the cost of, or directly benefit from the
proposed rules.
No businesses or groups will be directly affected or benefitted by the proposed rules. No additional costs will be
imposed on any businesses or groups.
B. What additional costs will be imposed on businesses and other groups as a result of these proposed rules (i.e.
new equipment, supplies, labor, accounting, or recordkeeping)? Please identify the types and number of businesses
and groups. Be sure to quantify how each entity will be affected.
The estimated cost to complete implicit bias training will vary, depending on the program chosen by the health care
professional. Several Michigan hospitals offer implicit bias training free of charge.
29. Estimate the actual statewide compliance costs of the proposed rules on individuals (regulated individuals or
the public). Include the costs of education, training, application fees, examination fees, license fees, new
equipment, supplies, labor, accounting, or recordkeeping.
A cost is associated with the renewal of a license or registration, but the proposed rules do not address that cost. The
proposed rules only establish license and registration renewal dates. The estimated cost to take implicit bias training
will vary, depending on the program chosen. Several Michigan hospitals offer training free of charge.
A. How many and what category of individuals will be affected by the rules?
All licensees, registrants, and applicants are affected by the proposed rules.
B. What qualitative and quantitative impact do the proposed changes in rules have on these individuals?
The estimated cost to take implicit bias training will vary, depending on the program chosen. Several Michigan
hospitals offer training free of charge.
30. Quantify any cost reductions to businesses, individuals, groups of individuals, or governmental units as a result
of the proposed rules.
There are no cost reductions to businesses, individuals, groups of individuals, or governmental units as a result of the
proposed rules.
31. Estimate the primary and direct benefits and any secondary or indirect benefits of the proposed rules. Please
provide both quantitative and qualitative information, as well as your assumptions.
The benefits of the proposed rules include: 1) Ensuring that licensees and registrants will be aware of renewal
timelines; 2) Ensuring that applicants for licensure, registration, or renewal will become aware of how implicit biases
result in barriers and disparities in access to and the provision of health care services; and 3) Ensuring that the health
care professional will be empowered to take appropriate actions to remedy those inequities.
32. Explain how the proposed rules will impact business growth and job creation (or elimination) in Michigan.
The rules are not expected to have an impact on business growth, job creation, or job elimination in Michigan.
MCL 24.245(3)