DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES CHILDREN'S SERVICES AGENCY, PUBLIC HEARING II
June 10, 2021
1
specific to that. Previously the interpretation had been if
a housing unit had been left vacant -- and I forget the
2
3
exact period of time before it -- and if it was going to be
put back into use, it then would have to comply with new
construction including being sprinkled. And that had been a
previous ruling and we had expended probably $40,000 to make
that happen, and then I served on a subcommittee with Patty
Needman (phonetic) and, you know, the CCI fire safety rules
guru and it was our recommendation that that rule would not,
you know, be placed -- or that it was going to be changed.
You know, and as an example, I mean, we have 24 out of 36
beds being used, but if we needed to re-open that third
house, would I then have to expend, you know, 40,- to
$50,000 to have that house sprinkled again?
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MS. BRENNAN: That is a good question and I am not
going to answer for lack of experience in that. I will send
it to, yes, the fire safety guru, Jerry, and I will have
a -- the response that he provides to me, I will add that to
DHHS's response to public hearing comment and you can review
that. And if you would also like to place it in writing
with your e-mail address, I'd be happy to provide you an
e-mail of what Jerry's response is.
MR. BRIAN PHILSON: That would be great. And
Jerry served on that same subcommittee and, you know, I
just -- you know, the subcommittee fell off the radar for a
Page 49