PUBLIC HEARING COMMENT FOR 2020-03 HS-Foster Family and Group Homes  
NAME AND ORGANIZATION  
Lara Bose, Director  
Forward Michigan  
RULE NUMBER  
Fostering Entire Rule Set  
COMMENT  
DEPARTMENT'S RESPONSE  
No comment needed  
We are in complete agreement  
with the rule set as proposed. We  
would like to see the rules  
expedited and put into place as  
quickly as possible to reduce  
barriers to foster care licensure as  
that is necessary to be able to  
make placement for children and  
match them to homes best to  
provide their services for their  
needs.  
Shannon Chatman, Licensing Supervisor  
Ennis Center  
R 400.9206  
Rule 400.9206, and that's the  
Evaluation of the Family.  
WeB8:C10 just had a concern  
that if we -- can we still ask the  
The licensing worker already accesses finances  
in R 400.9201. If the applicant doesn't have  
sufficient resources, R 400.9201 will cover that  
concern.  
question -- can a private agency Regarding asking the question "why", R  
still ask the question about why 400.12307 already addresses that concern  
the family wants to become a  
during foster parent orientation that is  
foster family?...Just as someone mandated by rule. Based upon these factors, it  
who has been in licensing for  
some time, that's one of the  
questions that I feel like I get a  
will allow a licesning worker to make an  
informed decision of the motives of the  
proposed foster family.  
good response from families and  
it clarifies whether or not they  
would make an acceptable foster  
parent. I mean, if they're  
choosing to become a foster  
parent because they want to  
make money, then we can share  
with them that that's not the  
purpose of foster care and things  
like that.  
The next rule we discussed as an The Family First Prevention Services Act  
agency was Rule 400.9306, and  
that's specifically about the  
Shannon Chatman, Licensing Supervisor  
Ennis Center  
R 400.9306  
(FFPSA) federal national standards require the  
room have enough space for occupants, beds,  
bedroom square footage, which I and storage. DHHS has added these standards  
thought 40 square feet was a  
good, minimum standard. So  
now that's removed and I'm  
to the rule.  
concerned that families may end  
up really stretching the limits and  
putting too many children in a  
room. And without that rule  
minimum square footage, I think  
we're going to have a hard time  
telling families, no, you can't put  
four children in this tiny room.  
Shannon Chatman, Licensing Supervisor  
Ennis Center  
R 400.9306  
And then the other comment we See R 400.9306. Cribs and non-cribs are subject  
had about bedrooms and  
sleeping arrangements is  
removing the restriction  
regarding Pack 'N Plays and  
to federal safety standards which include they  
be safe and in good working condition.  
Further, see R 400.9206 requires the licensee or  
applicant to maintain a safe home and  
property.  
bassinets. I guess this one is a  
question. What happens when  
the agency says no to a family  
that has a bassinet because the  
bassinet is concerning, wobbly?  
mean, I've seen some really, you  
know, marginal bassinets when  
they were allowed back in the  
day. So what happens if the  
agency says no and the family  
says, "But it's not a rule"?  
I
Shannon Chatman, Licensing Supervisor  
Ennis Center  
R 400.9308.  
Back in the day they did not  
require the telephone in the  
The change was a result of the FFPSA national  
licensing standards.  
home, and then it was put in and  
agencies had to adjust and  
families had to adjust. And I  
thought having a home phone in  
the home was important  
because what if we have a 4-year-  
old -- and the rule is -- the new  
rule is written to say "close  
proximity." But if it's a 4-year-  
old, I would say "close proximity,"  
we don't want a 4-year-old  
running outside down to the  
neighbor's house because, you  
know, there's an emergency with  
the foster parent. Even to call  
911, it would be better to have  
the phone in the home.  
Shannon Chatman, Licensing Supervisor  
Ennis Center  
R 400.9401  
And then Rule 400.9401.  
very happy when this rule  
changed and they added that  
children had to have a bed of  
I
was  
This change was a result of the FFPSA federal  
national standards, In addition, the rules  
require the foster parent to make sleeping  
arrangments based on the child's  
their own and now it seems like needs/trauma.  
we're going back to the way it  
was before and allowing two  
children to share a bed. And as  
an agency, our preference has  
always been that each child has  
their own bed. Even if two kids  
choose to share a bed, I think it's  
really important for trauma, kids  
with trauma, to have their own  
space, their own bed. And I think  
taking that out of the rule just  
opens up too much leeway for  
families to use just one bed for  
two kids.  
Shannon Chatman, Licensing Supervisor  
Ennis Center  
R 400.9502  
Rule 400.9502. It seems that  
there's no longer the  
requirement for the family to  
The licensing worker must do an annual  
assessmen of income for the foster family. This  
assesssment should be sufficient. There are  
report a change in employment. rules to allow for a special evaluation in the  
That was crossed off from the  
rules. And I just think that is  
something that should be  
event the foster family is having financial  
difficulties.  
reported and should be required  
to report. So if the agency -- this  
is another one of those if the  
agency has that as a rule for  
families is that violating the CPA  
rules that says we can't have  
stricter requirements? So that  
would be a concern. We want  
foster families to have to report  
a change in employment.  
Lara Bose, Director  
Forward Michigan  
Fostering R 400.9306  
In regards to Rule 400.9306,  
Bedrooms, we are concerned  
DHHS agrees there is a conflict between the  
two subrules. The original language requiring  
about an inconsistency between floor to ceiling walls is reinstated. The issue of  
subrule (c) and (d). Subrule ©  
made changes to the  
requirements regarding walls,  
ceilings, and floors. Subrule (d)  
latchable doors was brought up during a  
meeting with LARA Fire Regulations Division  
who indicated this is the proper language to  
ensure ingress and egress are safe for the foster  
did not indicate a change to the child and family.  
latchable door requirement. We  
are under the impression that  
this is because of fire and possible  
carbon monoxide safety issues,  
that these two things seem  
inconsistent and might pose a  
barrier to foster homes knowing  
how to be in compliance with this  
entire rule set for bedrooms. And  
we would like the Department to  
do further research and  
determine whether latchable  
doors are still necessary. We like  
the removal of the added  
requirements in subrule (c).  
Erin Matuz, Licesning Worker, DHHS  
Several Rules  
See Comments  
Ms. Matuz's comments were not considered.  
After given the ability to respond to the rule  
changes internally, and after consultation with  
ARD, her written comments constitute a  
conflict of interest, i.e. DHHS is the agency  
changing the rules and DHHS staff are not the  
"public". MCL 24.203 defines “agency” as the  
department or bureau promulgating the rule.  
MCL 24.205 defines “person” as essentially  
anyone other than the agency.  
From:  
To:  
Cc:  
Subject:  
Date:  
Comments re: CPA and FH rules 2020-2 and 2020-3 HS  
Thursday, October 7, 2021 11:55:50 AM  
image001.png  
Attachments:  
Good morning. My name is Erin and I am a foster home licensor with the State of Michigan. I have  
had the opportunity to review the proposed changes to the CWL-Pub 11 (pink book) titled “Licensing  
Rules for Child Placing Agencies” (2020-2 HS) and CWL-Pub 10 (green book) titled “Licensing Rules  
for Foster Family Homes and Foster Family Group Homes for Children” (2020-3 HS).  
I understand that public hearings are to be completed and comments may be submitted to this  
email address. Thank you for your consideration of the notes below.  
RE: Proposed Changes to CWL-Pub 11 (pink book) titled “Licensing Rules for Child Placing  
Agencies” (2020-2 HS) à  
R12303(1) and (2) – (Agencies having written policy & procedures) Why are agencies required  
to have their own written policies and procedures [see 12303] when R12403(3) indicates  
agencies may not be more restrictive than Department policies or Administrative rules? With  
the exception of local contact persons or procedures, what would the agency policies include  
that the pink/green books do not?  
R12312 – (b) The 6 hours of training annually after licensure – How does the initial “Original”  
(6-month) license play into this? All reporting periods are 1 year except for that initial 6-  
month license. The revised rule should acknowledge 6 hours is due annually after the first 6-  
month renewal.  
R12313 – With the elimination of the “reasonable restraint” exception to behavior support,  
does that mean children who need “bear hugs” when out of control cannot get it, or is that  
considered allowed physical intervention (per green book R404(2))?  
R12313(b) – Seclusion in a room forbidden – Does this mean children can’t be sent to their  
rooms for a time out? Please make rule more clear about meaning/intentions.  
R12313(f) – Re: Denial of communication with family forbidden – It is not reasonable to  
expect that foster children should have 24/7 ability to communicate with their family. Please  
add a caveat that reasonable restrictions about the timing and manner of communication are  
appropriate.  
R12316 – (Personal Possessions) Saying a child has a right to his or her possessions; we  
sometimes have youth not allowed to have their cell phones or other electronic devices,  
depending on their use, the foster family expectations, behavior support plans, etc. Please  
add a caveat for these sorts of situations.  
R12317 – (Allowance) Is this saying a specified cash allowance will be required to be given to  
youth? Is there a prescribed way for agencies to monitor allowance? Please make rule more  
clear about meaning/intention.  
R12320 - (Supervision) There are some applicants, relatives especially, who have difficulty  
identifying sub care providers. To require them to have someone willing to take children for  
extended overnight periods may be prohibitive. Please also provide clarification on what  
“extended overnight periods” means and if it matters if that care is provided in the licensed  
home or in the substitute care provider’s home? Also, isn’t there a time limit to how long a  
foster parent can legally leave a foster child with an unlicensed person?  
R12322 – Involvement with law enforcement pursuant to criminal investigation – Locally, our  
agency requires notification of contact with law enforcement for things like domestic  
disturbances (which is not necessarily a criminal investigation). But R12403(3) seems to take  
away our local ability to require more than the pink & green books prescribe. Is that  
accurate?  
R12323(1)(d) – Emergency policy required for epidemics – This is not similarly reflected in the  
foster home rules (green book) R411. Does that mean individual agencies must have a plan  
for how to do business in an epidemic, but not necessarily related to licensing of foster  
homes? Clarification is needed.  
R12326(2) – (After-hours borrowed beds) What documentation, if any, will need to be  
maintained by the agency to prove compliance with the verbal after-hours summary?  
RE: Proposed Changes to CWL-Pub 10 (green book) titled “Licensing Rules for Foster Family  
Homes and Foster Family Group Homes for Children” 2020-3 HS à  
R301(4)(d) – Barriers around swimming pools with safety device – will funding be allocated to  
help current foster parents comply? Will there be a grace period/deadline for compliance to  
be achieved?  
R304(2) – Portable heating devices will not be allowed in bedrooms, but will they be allowed  
overnight in other areas of the home? This needs clarification.  
R401(6) – (Bedrooms) This is eliminated; does that mean there is no age limit on a child  
sharing a room with a (foster) parent? This needs clarification.  
R401(7) – (Bedrooms) This is eliminated; does that mean there is no prohibition on opposite  
genders sharing a bedroom? (Or even a bed, given the revised 401(6). This needs clarification.  
R404(b) is inconsistent with the proposed wording in 2020-2 HS (pink book) R400.12313(b).  
404(b) forbids confinement in a closet or locked room; 12313(b) says confinement or  
seclusion in a locked room is not allowed. Not only is the wording inconsistent, agencies have  
had differing interpretations of seclusion, with some forbidding children from being put in a  
time-out in their own rooms by themselves, saying it equates to seclusion. Please add  
clarification.  
R408(a) – (Personal Possessions) Saying a child has a right to his or her possessions; we  
sometimes have youth not allowed to have their cell phones or other electronic devices,  
depending on their use, the foster family expectations, behavior support plans, etc. Please  
add a caveat for these sorts of situations.  
R409(a) and (b) – (Allowance) Is this saying a specified cash allowance will be required to be  
given to youth? This needs clarification.  
R412(3) – Medications being accessible as appropriate for the age & functioning level of the  
children in the home is vague. This needs clarification. (Currently, DCWL enforces a lock &  
key expectation for all prescription and OTC medication. How will DCWL be  
interpreting/enforcing this with agencies?)  
R413 – (Supervision) There are some applicants, relatives especially, who have difficulty  
identifying sub care providers. To require them to have someone willing to take children for  
extended overnight periods may be prohibitive. Please also provide clarification on what  
“extended overnight periods” means and if it matters if that care is provided in the licensed  
home or in the substitute care provider’s home? Also, isn’t there a time limit to how long a  
foster parent can legally leave a foster child with an unlicensed person?  
Comments relevant to both books’ proposed rule changes:  
Currently, the DCWL licensing TA manual indicates if a family does not immunize their own  
children, they shall not be licensed to foster children under 7 years of age. I did not notice  
that in the proposed CPA or FH rules. Will that still be enforced?  
Thank you for the opportunity to submit my comments for consideration.  
~ Erin  
Erin Matuz, Foster Home Licensing  
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES - MUSKEGON COUNTY  
P.O. Box 4290 / 2700 Baker Street, Muskegon Hts. MI 49444  
(Phone/text) 231.327.6804  
(Fax) 231-733-3704  
*Due to staff working remotely, electronic document submission is preferred. Documents submitted  
via fax or mail will experience a delay in processing.  
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution of any confidential and/or privileged  
information contained in this e-mail is expressly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,  
please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy any and all copies of the original message.  
;