Bagby, Tammy (LARA)
From:
Sent:
To:
Dr. Amelia Kenyon <drkenyon@professional-education-services.com>
Tuesday, March 22, 2022 8:11 AM
LARA-BCHS-Training; Horvath, Larry (LARA); nschoenmaker@professional-education-
services.com
Subject:
Public Comment on Proposed Rule changes to NATP
CAUTION: This is an External email. Please send suspicious emails to abuse@michigan.gov
Greetings,
This email is being sent in regard to requests for public comment on the proposed rule changes for Nurse Aide Training
Programs in the state of Michigan.
We are Professional Education Services, LLC, and as the owners of a Nurse Aide Training Program, we have a few
comments we would like added to the official record, if you please.
1
1.) While these rules do further clarify what is expected of NATPs, there is little to no clarification on the role that the
state will play except to state that there will be required responses within 30 days. (I can absolutely guarantee you that
this is not currently happening and has not happened since our school was opened in early 2021.) Our question is: who
is going to monitor this? As it currently stands, the responsiveness from the state and the woman currently overseeing
these programs, Moneah James, is less than mediocre at best. Her responsiveness (and lack thereof) is all over the place.
For instance, we had two new employees added to our roster in January. We received a response stating one was
added, and absolutely NOTHING about the other one. This type of communication is par for the course with Moneah
James. Who will be monitoring her going forward to ensure the job is in fact done, and she is, in fact, communicating in
the manner that is spelled out in these rules? Another example: one of our trainers submitted her Train the Trainer
application in December. It wasn’t until she had to call the State, that she was told by Moneah James that her
application was “thrown out” because she had mistakenly forgot to include her check. She was never notified of this,
and had she not called, she would have never known. So again, we ask, who is going to monitor communications and
ensure that this is being done? How will a NATP have recourse if the state is not following through on the rules that they
have set in place and are attempting to implement? (If interested, I have pages and pages of documentation of the State
of Michigan not following through and being completely unprofessional towards our NATP staff while further not
following through on the role that is expected.)
2
2.)We would like to see the role of the state supervisor of the NATPs be a Registered Nurse. If a CNA cannot supervise
nurses, we do not feel that a state employee with no medical background or training should be able to supervise nurse
aide training programs. How can one effectively do this without the knowledge, understanding, and training of the role
of a registered nurse? We would like to see an addendum to these rules added that says that any state employee
supervising nurse aide training programs be a registered nurse hired through the state of Michigan, and that they must
also have long term care experience training and a background. This is only fair that you have this requirement for
whomever is overseeing the training programs as well. They MUST be a registered nurse to supervise NATPs. We do not
feel that this is too much to ask.
3. 3.) As you may or may not be aware, it is very, very difficult to find qualified trainers to teach in a CNA training program.
Most RNs do not go to work in long term care facilities. Finding staff is a challenge. We receive calls nearly every day
from other programs looking to “borrow” our Train the Trainers, because they have difficulty finding nurse aide trainers,
and desperately need help. Please keep this simplified as to who can teach, including supplemental instructors. Do not
1